11.07.2015 Views

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2011 (2) (33) _ Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series Vol. (33) No. (2) 2011* (2011 / 4 / 10 .2011 / 1 / 18 )∇ ∇ (26) 2011/1/82010/9/9 : (6) • (12) • (8) • (13) (13) . : - (6) - / / •/ / •/ / •. ( %61.5 ) . •. •. •. •: , , : . – – – – - *9


2011 (2) (33) _ Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series Vol. (33) No. (2) 2011<strong>Laparoscopic</strong> <strong>Hysterectomy</strong>Dr . Ahmad Abdul Rahman *(Received 18 / 1 / 2011. Accepted 10 / 4 / 2011)∇ ABSTRACT ∇Our study includes 26 patients of the accepted patients at ELSHATBY UniversityHospital, Alexandria University, Egyptian Arab Republic over the period spanning from9/9/2010 to 8/1/2011; where they had <strong>Laparoscopic</strong> <strong>Hysterectomy</strong> Operations as follows:• 6 cases of <strong>Laparoscopic</strong> sub – total hysterectomy• 12 cases of Vaginal assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy• 8 cases of <strong>Laparoscopic</strong> total hysterectomyWe have performed half of the operations (13 cases) using Bipolar Coagulation, andthe other half (13 cases) using Ultracision Harmonic Scalpel. To cut the uterus body fromthe cervices in laparoscopic sub–total hysterectomy cases, which are (6 cases), we used:• (two cases) the Loop• Bipolar Coagulation (two cases)• Ultracision Harmonic Scalpel (two cases)The common cause of hysterectomy was myoma (61.5%)Conclusions:• Using cervical loop decreased the time of cutting the uterus body from the cervicesand reduced bleeding.• Using Ultracision Harmonic Scalpel decreased the time of operation• Vaginal assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy was the easiest way• Complications were little and insignificant -Keywords: Laparoscopy, Total <strong>Hysterectomy</strong>, Sub-Total <strong>Hysterectomy</strong>* Professor; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Tishreen University,Lattakia, Syria.10


Tishreen University Journal. Health Sciences Series 2011 (2) (33) : %75 .[1] 1989 Reich %25 [2] , [3] [5] .[4] [7,6] .[9,4] . [8] : . . , : • ٕ , (Bipolar Coagulation) • • . ••.( Ultracision Harmonic Scalpel ) 52-37 /26/ 2010/9/9 2011/1/8 / 12/ . : -: - Storz SCB Unidrive Gyn 20 7111 2011


- Storz Electronic Endoflator 26 4305 20- Storz Electronic Laparoflator 26 3400 20- Storz Xenon Nova 175 20 1315 20- Storz Karl Storz – Endoskope SCB Tricam SL II 20 2230 20- Sporo 230 Xenon 300w- Sporo 167 1cc D- KLS Martin MEMB1- Ultracision Harmonic ScalpelGenerator 300Ethicon endo-surgeryGEN 04 ٕ Veress Needle ڥ: , ( 10 )( 5 )( 5 )( 5 ) •••• 10 5 •. morcellator. 30 Cefotaxim 1 . 52 – 37 ( 3.2 ± 44.7) (1) : : %23%46.2%30.8%100612826 (%46.2) (1) . %19.2%3.8 (2) 51 12


Tishreen University Journal. Health Sciences Series 2011 (2) (33) %19.2(2) . . : )Cervical Loop Monopolar ( 1.5 . ( 100-30) . Bipolar . Ultracision Harmonic Scalpel (3) ( ) 0.23 ±2.3(Cervical Loop) 1.7 ± 20.7 + Bipolar 1.2 ± 14.7Ultracision Harmonic Scalpel . (3) (4) %15.14%3.8%26.9417 II I %26.9(4) . %26.9%3.8. (5) 71 %26.9(5) . (6) %61.5%11.5%27%100163726 II I 13


.(%61.5) (6) . (7) Ultracision HarmonicBipolar Scalpel %11.5 3%11.5 3 %33.1 6%33.1 6 %15.4 4%15.4 4 %50 13%50 13 Bipolar (%50) (7) .Ultracision Harmonic Scalpel (8) Ultracision HarmonicBipolar Scalpel19.4 ±132.210.2 ±98.318.6 ±127.7Ultracision Harmonic Scalpel20.8 ± 139.712.3 ± 118.416.7 ± 138.6 Bipolar (8) . %11.5%15.4%11.5%7.7 (9) 3432. (Morcellator ) ڥ . (9) / 4/ . 3.3 ± 18.7 2.3 ± 28.7 . 2.7 ± 24 14


Tishreen University Journal. Health Sciences Series 2011 (2) (33) : -. %23 , . (Loop) %46.2 . ( Cervical Loop ) ( 100-30 ) Monopolar Bipolar . Bipolar Ultracision Harmonic Scalpel . Ultracision Harmonic Scalpel . Bipolar . : :. •. (Loop) •. •. •. •(Ultracision Harmonic Scalpel. Loop): ••. . •15


:1- HULKA, J.F.; LEVY, B.S.; PARKER, W.H .; et.al. <strong>Laparoscopic</strong> – Assistedvaginal hysterectomy : American Assosiation of Gynecologyic laparoscopists , 1995Membership survey . J A m Assoc Gynecol Laparoscop 4, 1997,167-171.2- DANIELL, J. F . Endometrial ablation . In AZZIZ R, MURPHY AA(eds): PracticalManual of operative laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy ,ed2. New York, Springer , 1997, 3053- DE MEEUS, J.B. ; MAGNIN, G . Indications for indications hysterectomy . Eurobstet Gynecol reprod boil 74, 1997,49 - 52.4- EINARSSON, J. I.; SUZUKI, Y. Total <strong>Laparoscopic</strong> <strong>Hysterectomy</strong>,10 Steps Towarda Successful Journal List, Rev Obstet .Gynecol. Winter 2,1, 2009,57 –645- BOLGER, B.S .; DE BASSOR LOPES A ,LAVIE OD ,et la : comparison oflaparoscopic – assisted raolical vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of earlystage cervical carcinoma {abstract}. Gynecol oncol 68, 1998 ,95 .6- WILLIS, S. F.; BARTON, D. ; THOMAS, EJ Ind . <strong>Laparoscopic</strong> <strong>Hysterectomy</strong> withor without Pelvic Lymphadenectomy or Sampling in a high – risk series of patientswith endometrial cancer International seminars in surgical oncology, Vol. 3,2006.7- SPIRTOS, N .M .; BALLON, S.C .; PEREZ, G.M .et la : <strong>Laparoscopic</strong> Radical<strong>Hysterectomy</strong> (Type III ) with aortic and pelvic . Lymphadenectomy : surgical .morlidity and short – term follow up {abstract}. Gynecol oncol 68 , 1998,106.8- WALID,M.SAMI ; HEATON , RICHARD, L . Total <strong>Laparoscopic</strong> <strong>Hysterectomy</strong> foruteri over one kilogram, Journal of the Society of <strong>Laparoscopic</strong> Surgeons , Volume14 , Number 2 , April – June 2010 , 178 – 182 (5)9- SIREN, P.H.; KURTEI , T. A Nationnide Analysis of <strong>Laparoscopic</strong> Complications.Obstet . Gynecol 98, 1997 ,108 .16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!