2042 CANCER June 1, 2001 / Volume 91 / Number 11TABLE 2Distribution <strong>of</strong> Toxicity Events by Type <strong>and</strong> GradeToxicityGrade1 2 3 4Neuropathy 2 1 0 0Musculoskeletal 1 0 0 0Alopecia 3 2 0 0Neutropenia 0 0 1 0Phlebitis a 0 4 0 0Edema 0 0 1 0Thrombosis/embolism 0 0 0 1Nausea 3 3 1 0Emesis 2 0 0 0Diarrhea 0 0 1 0a Phlebitis refers to induration <strong>and</strong> erythema at the site <strong>of</strong> intravenous infusion.mg/m 2 with estramustine 900 mg/m 2 . One patient waslost to follow-up after 5 weeks <strong>of</strong> treatment. Two patientscompleted two cycles. For Cohort <strong>II</strong>I, six patientswere enrolled to receive <strong>paclitaxel</strong> 75 mg/m 2with estramustine 900 mg/m 2 . The cohort was exp<strong>and</strong>ed,because one patient developed Grade 3 nausea<strong>and</strong> diarrhea, requiring treatment interruption.Five patients completed two cycles. In Cohort IV, sixpatients were enrolled to receive <strong>paclitaxel</strong> 90 mg/m 2with estramustine 900 mg/m 2 . The cohort also wasexp<strong>and</strong>ed, because 1 patient developed Grade 3edema with pulmonary embolism during the secondweek <strong>of</strong> the first cycle <strong>and</strong> was removed from protocol.One patient discontinued therapy after 4 weeks, <strong>and</strong>one patient developed Grade 3 neutropenia. Four patientscompleted two cycles.According to the MTD criteria, no further escalationswere made after Cohort IV. In summary, 14patients completed two cycles <strong>of</strong> therapy, <strong>and</strong> 4 patientsdid not complete the first cycle.Toxicity AssessmentToxicity could be evaluated in all patients enrolled inthe <strong>study</strong>, because the discontinuation <strong>of</strong> treatment infour patients occurred after they had started treatment.Overall, there were no therapy-related deaths. Adetailed account <strong>of</strong> the spectrum <strong>of</strong> toxicity <strong>and</strong> thenumber <strong>of</strong> patients for each grade <strong>of</strong> toxicity are listedin Table 2. Grade 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 paresthesias were observedin three patients, <strong>and</strong> Grade 1 musculoskeletal symptomswere documented in another patient. Partial loss<strong>of</strong> hair was seen in five patients. There was only onepatient with Grade 3 neutropenia without febrile complications.At the time <strong>of</strong> enrollment, 17 patients hadGrade 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 anemia secondary to prolonged <strong>and</strong>rogenablation <strong>and</strong> chronic disease. There were no newTABLE 3Distribution <strong>of</strong> Grade 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 Toxicity Events among Cohorts<strong>II</strong>I <strong>and</strong> IVToxicity Cohort <strong>II</strong>I Cohort IVNeutropenia 0 1Edema 0 1Thrombosis/embolism 0 1Nausea 1 0Emesis 0 0Diarrhea 1 0patients with Grade 1 or 2 anemia or progression <strong>of</strong>anemia during therapy. Four patients had superficialphlebitis with erythema at the site <strong>of</strong> intravenous injectionwithout evidence <strong>of</strong> deep vein thrombosis,which resolved with local therapy. One patient hadGrade 3 lower extremity edema <strong>and</strong> subsequently developeda pulmonary embolism with pleuritic chestpain <strong>and</strong> shortness <strong>of</strong> breath without hemodynamiccomplications. Symptoms improved rapidly with st<strong>and</strong>ardanticoagulation treatment with heparin <strong>and</strong> warfarin,<strong>and</strong> the patient was removed from <strong>study</strong>. Nauseawas the most common gastrointestinal symptom<strong>and</strong> was experienced by six <strong>of</strong> seven patients as Grade1–2 <strong>and</strong> by one patient as Grade 3. Grade 2 emesis wasseen in two patients, <strong>and</strong> Grade 3 diarrhea was experiencedby one patient.Overall, there were four events <strong>of</strong> Grade 3 toxicity<strong>and</strong> one event <strong>of</strong> Grade 4 toxicity. Table 3 summarizedthe number <strong>of</strong> Grade 3– 4 toxicity events by cohort.There was one patient with Grade 3 nausea <strong>and</strong> diarrheain Cohort <strong>II</strong>I, <strong>and</strong> one patient with Grade 3 neutropenia<strong>and</strong> one patient with edema <strong>and</strong> pulmonaryembolism in Cohort IV.PSA ResponseTable 4 summarizes the clinical responses for eachcohort according to PSA criteria <strong>and</strong> intent-to-treatanalysis results. Cohort I had one patient with stablePSA levels <strong>and</strong> two patients with PSA progression.Cohort <strong>II</strong> had one patient who was lost to follow upafter 5 weeks <strong>of</strong> treatment, one patient had PSA progression,<strong>and</strong> one had PSA decline 75%. In Cohort<strong>II</strong>I, one patient was removed early, one patient hadstable PSA, one patient had PSA decline 50%, <strong>and</strong>three patients had PSA decline 75%. In Cohort IV,two patients were removed early, one patient had PSAdecline 50%, <strong>and</strong> three patients had PSA decline 75%.The PSA response rate estimated on the basis <strong>of</strong>the intent-to-treat analysis showed that 9 <strong>of</strong> 18 patients(50%) enrolled in the <strong>study</strong> had a PSA decline
Weekly Paclitaxel/Estramustine in HRPC/Ferrari et al. 2043TABLE 4Prostate Specific Antigen Response by CohortCohort Paclitaxel Estramustine No.Treatmentdiscontinued Progressed StablePSA decline> 50%Intent to treatresponse (%)I 40 600 3 0 3 0 0 0 <strong>of</strong> 3<strong>II</strong> 60 900 3 1 1 0 1 1 <strong>of</strong> 3<strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong> 75 900 6 1 0 1 4 4 <strong>of</strong> 6IV 90 900 6 2 0 0 4 4 <strong>of</strong> 6Total — — 18 4 4 1 9 9 <strong>of</strong> 18 (50)PSA: prostate specific antigen. 50%. Because the group <strong>of</strong> patients in Cohorts <strong>II</strong>–IVreceived a <strong>dose</strong> <strong>of</strong> estramustine 1.5 times greater thanCohort I, <strong>and</strong> this alone may have affected the PSAresponse irrespective <strong>of</strong> the <strong>dose</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>paclitaxel</strong>, we alsoanalyzed them as a group. The intent-to-treat analysisshowed that 9 <strong>of</strong> 15 patients (60%) had a PSA decline 50%; in 7 patients, the decline was 75%. Themedian duration <strong>of</strong> response (n 9 patients) was 16.7weeks, with a range from 3 weeks to 48.6 weeks.Fifteen <strong>of</strong> 18 patients (83%) had metastatic diseaselimited to bone, including 12 patients in Cohorts <strong>II</strong>–IV.Seven <strong>of</strong> these patients (58%) experienced PSA decline 50% from baseline. Stabilization with mild improvementwas reported in two patients. Three patients hadmeasurable disease to lymph nodes, one patient had ameasurable response with a PSA decline 75%, anotherpatient had no response with a PSA decline 50%, <strong>and</strong> one patient did not complete therapy.Bone scan abnormalities persisted in all patients.DISCUSSIONIn this report, we present the toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>and</strong> response<strong>of</strong> patients with hormone-refractory prostatecarcinoma to a new schedule <strong>and</strong> <strong>dose</strong> range <strong>of</strong> <strong>paclitaxel</strong><strong>and</strong> <strong>oral</strong> estramustine. This regimen was basedon previous experience with other tumors suggestingthat more frequent 24,25 <strong>and</strong> lower <strong>dose</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>paclitaxel</strong>, 17,26as well as intermittent but <strong>high</strong>er <strong>dose</strong>s <strong>of</strong> estramustine,19 could improve the toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> each drugwithout compromising their synergistic activity.Therefore, <strong>weekly</strong> 1-hour infusions <strong>of</strong> <strong>paclitaxel</strong> weregiven in escalating <strong>dose</strong>s <strong>of</strong> 40 mg/m 2 , 60 mg/m 2 ,75mg/m 2 , <strong>and</strong> 90 mg/m 2 combined with 3 <strong>days</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>oral</strong>estramustine. The <strong>dose</strong> <strong>of</strong> estramustine, which wasestablished at 600 mg/m 2 in the original design <strong>and</strong>was received by patients in Cohort I along with 40mg/m 2 <strong>of</strong> <strong>paclitaxel</strong>, was increased subsequently to900 mg/m 2 <strong>and</strong> fixed at that level for all subsequent<strong>paclitaxel</strong> <strong>dose</strong> levels.The results <strong>of</strong> this trial indicate that the grade <strong>and</strong>spectrum <strong>of</strong> toxicity associated with taxanes in previousstudies <strong>of</strong> this combination 7,15 can be improvedmarkedly. Compared with the 20% <strong>and</strong> 53% incidencerates <strong>of</strong> Grade 3– 4 granulocytopenia, there was onlyone patient without febrile complications in our series.Similarly, there were no new incidents <strong>of</strong> anemiaor worsening <strong>of</strong> preexisting anemia compared with the18% <strong>and</strong> 59% incidence rates reported in the previousstudies, <strong>and</strong> there were no incidents <strong>of</strong> thrombocytopenia.Neurologic <strong>and</strong> musculoskeletal symptoms alsowere infrequent <strong>and</strong> predominantly were Grade 1.Hypersensitivity reactions, arrhythmia, or hypotensionwere not reported during the infusions. The incidence<strong>of</strong> peripheral edema also was reduced markedly.Gastrointestinal complications commonly associatedwith <strong>oral</strong> estramustine 27 were ameliorated butnot eliminated with the brief <strong>and</strong> intermittent schedulethat was used. Despite the <strong>high</strong> <strong>dose</strong> <strong>of</strong> estramustine,the frequency <strong>and</strong> severity <strong>of</strong> nausea, emesis, <strong>and</strong>diarrhea was low 7,28 <strong>and</strong> was limited to the <strong>days</strong> <strong>of</strong>treatment. This may explain why, compared withother regimens using lower <strong>dose</strong>s <strong>of</strong> estramustine forprolonged periods <strong>of</strong> time, 28 anorexia <strong>and</strong> weight losswere rare.This treatment schedule did not appear to preventthe development <strong>of</strong> thromboembolic events previouslyreported with regimens containing estramustine,27 as illustrated by the patient who developed apulmonary embolism in the second week <strong>of</strong> therapy.Given the proximity <strong>of</strong> the episode to the initiation <strong>of</strong>therapy, the possibility cannot be excluded that it mayhave been related to the advanced stage <strong>of</strong> the diseaserather than the treatment. Also, because we did notobserve other patients with deep vein thrombosis, <strong>and</strong>recent studies quote 8 –10% thromboembolic eventswith lower 28 <strong>and</strong> intermittent 7 dosing <strong>of</strong> estramustine,we do not have evidence that the <strong>high</strong>er <strong>dose</strong> used inthis trial played a role. In recognizing this risk, prophylaxis<strong>of</strong> thrombosis using low <strong>dose</strong>s <strong>of</strong> warfarin<strong>and</strong> aspirin currently are included in the treatmentplan <strong>of</strong> new trials containing estramustine. Based on