11.07.2015 Views

A Phase I/II study of weekly paclitaxel and 3 days of high dose oral ...

A Phase I/II study of weekly paclitaxel and 3 days of high dose oral ...

A Phase I/II study of weekly paclitaxel and 3 days of high dose oral ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2042 CANCER June 1, 2001 / Volume 91 / Number 11TABLE 2Distribution <strong>of</strong> Toxicity Events by Type <strong>and</strong> GradeToxicityGrade1 2 3 4Neuropathy 2 1 0 0Musculoskeletal 1 0 0 0Alopecia 3 2 0 0Neutropenia 0 0 1 0Phlebitis a 0 4 0 0Edema 0 0 1 0Thrombosis/embolism 0 0 0 1Nausea 3 3 1 0Emesis 2 0 0 0Diarrhea 0 0 1 0a Phlebitis refers to induration <strong>and</strong> erythema at the site <strong>of</strong> intravenous infusion.mg/m 2 with estramustine 900 mg/m 2 . One patient waslost to follow-up after 5 weeks <strong>of</strong> treatment. Two patientscompleted two cycles. For Cohort <strong>II</strong>I, six patientswere enrolled to receive <strong>paclitaxel</strong> 75 mg/m 2with estramustine 900 mg/m 2 . The cohort was exp<strong>and</strong>ed,because one patient developed Grade 3 nausea<strong>and</strong> diarrhea, requiring treatment interruption.Five patients completed two cycles. In Cohort IV, sixpatients were enrolled to receive <strong>paclitaxel</strong> 90 mg/m 2with estramustine 900 mg/m 2 . The cohort also wasexp<strong>and</strong>ed, because 1 patient developed Grade 3edema with pulmonary embolism during the secondweek <strong>of</strong> the first cycle <strong>and</strong> was removed from protocol.One patient discontinued therapy after 4 weeks, <strong>and</strong>one patient developed Grade 3 neutropenia. Four patientscompleted two cycles.According to the MTD criteria, no further escalationswere made after Cohort IV. In summary, 14patients completed two cycles <strong>of</strong> therapy, <strong>and</strong> 4 patientsdid not complete the first cycle.Toxicity AssessmentToxicity could be evaluated in all patients enrolled inthe <strong>study</strong>, because the discontinuation <strong>of</strong> treatment infour patients occurred after they had started treatment.Overall, there were no therapy-related deaths. Adetailed account <strong>of</strong> the spectrum <strong>of</strong> toxicity <strong>and</strong> thenumber <strong>of</strong> patients for each grade <strong>of</strong> toxicity are listedin Table 2. Grade 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 paresthesias were observedin three patients, <strong>and</strong> Grade 1 musculoskeletal symptomswere documented in another patient. Partial loss<strong>of</strong> hair was seen in five patients. There was only onepatient with Grade 3 neutropenia without febrile complications.At the time <strong>of</strong> enrollment, 17 patients hadGrade 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 anemia secondary to prolonged <strong>and</strong>rogenablation <strong>and</strong> chronic disease. There were no newTABLE 3Distribution <strong>of</strong> Grade 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 Toxicity Events among Cohorts<strong>II</strong>I <strong>and</strong> IVToxicity Cohort <strong>II</strong>I Cohort IVNeutropenia 0 1Edema 0 1Thrombosis/embolism 0 1Nausea 1 0Emesis 0 0Diarrhea 1 0patients with Grade 1 or 2 anemia or progression <strong>of</strong>anemia during therapy. Four patients had superficialphlebitis with erythema at the site <strong>of</strong> intravenous injectionwithout evidence <strong>of</strong> deep vein thrombosis,which resolved with local therapy. One patient hadGrade 3 lower extremity edema <strong>and</strong> subsequently developeda pulmonary embolism with pleuritic chestpain <strong>and</strong> shortness <strong>of</strong> breath without hemodynamiccomplications. Symptoms improved rapidly with st<strong>and</strong>ardanticoagulation treatment with heparin <strong>and</strong> warfarin,<strong>and</strong> the patient was removed from <strong>study</strong>. Nauseawas the most common gastrointestinal symptom<strong>and</strong> was experienced by six <strong>of</strong> seven patients as Grade1–2 <strong>and</strong> by one patient as Grade 3. Grade 2 emesis wasseen in two patients, <strong>and</strong> Grade 3 diarrhea was experiencedby one patient.Overall, there were four events <strong>of</strong> Grade 3 toxicity<strong>and</strong> one event <strong>of</strong> Grade 4 toxicity. Table 3 summarizedthe number <strong>of</strong> Grade 3– 4 toxicity events by cohort.There was one patient with Grade 3 nausea <strong>and</strong> diarrheain Cohort <strong>II</strong>I, <strong>and</strong> one patient with Grade 3 neutropenia<strong>and</strong> one patient with edema <strong>and</strong> pulmonaryembolism in Cohort IV.PSA ResponseTable 4 summarizes the clinical responses for eachcohort according to PSA criteria <strong>and</strong> intent-to-treatanalysis results. Cohort I had one patient with stablePSA levels <strong>and</strong> two patients with PSA progression.Cohort <strong>II</strong> had one patient who was lost to follow upafter 5 weeks <strong>of</strong> treatment, one patient had PSA progression,<strong>and</strong> one had PSA decline 75%. In Cohort<strong>II</strong>I, one patient was removed early, one patient hadstable PSA, one patient had PSA decline 50%, <strong>and</strong>three patients had PSA decline 75%. In Cohort IV,two patients were removed early, one patient had PSAdecline 50%, <strong>and</strong> three patients had PSA decline 75%.The PSA response rate estimated on the basis <strong>of</strong>the intent-to-treat analysis showed that 9 <strong>of</strong> 18 patients(50%) enrolled in the <strong>study</strong> had a PSA decline

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!