11.07.2015 Views

Full Programme Pages 8 & 9 Register online at www.correx.org

Full Programme Pages 8 & 9 Register online at www.correx.org

Full Programme Pages 8 & 9 Register online at www.correx.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CorrosionManagement | September/October 2009TECHNICALARTICLEvari<strong>at</strong>ion between different areas of thesandbox. It is also possible th<strong>at</strong> the form<strong>at</strong>ionof the passive film on the steel section, thedesired consequence of applying CP, doesnot occur evenly leading to some variability.Despite these errors the boundary elementmethod provides sufficiently accur<strong>at</strong>e resultsto produce potential and current distributionmaps for the surface of buried steel elementsand identify areas of excessive or inadequ<strong>at</strong>epolaris<strong>at</strong>ion, as shown in Figure 7.5. Stray current effectsFigure 6: Comparison of experimental andmodelled potential line scan for steel beamin sand.Figure 7: Potential distribution on the surface of a steel beam subject to c<strong>at</strong>hodic protection,as modelled by the boundary element method.Figure 8: Sand box test to assess stray current effects.Steel-framed masonry buildings contain avariety of metallic elements. In addition tothe frame itself, metal window frames, drainpipes and fixings such as wall ties and clampsare commonly encountered. Generallyelectrical continuity between structuralmembers is rarely a problem [9] since thestructural connections are typically boltedor riveted. However, other elements aremore likely to be electrically discontinuousand this must be taken into account whendesigning a CP systems. Failure to ensure theelectrical continuity of all metallic elementscould result in stray current interactionsbetween the various elements of thestructure, resulting in acceler<strong>at</strong>ed corrosionof the discontinuous items.By employing the boundary elementmethod, it has been possible to modelthe effect of discontinuous steel on straycurrent corrosion and the results have beencompared with weight loss measurementsfrom sand box tests, as shown in Figure 8. Themodel predicts the steel between the anodeand the steel section will pick up currenton the face nearest the anode and releasecurrent on the face nearest the steel section,the l<strong>at</strong>ter resulting in a loss of metal. For theother bar, while there is some pick up, thereis rel<strong>at</strong>ively little loss and consequently littleor no corrosion [10]. Estim<strong>at</strong>ed weight lossesbased on the modelled currents comparedwell with actual weight loss measurementsobtained from the bars, demonstr<strong>at</strong>ing thevalidity of the boundary element methodfor assessing the effects of stray current ondiscontinuous metallic items.6. Design implic<strong>at</strong>ionsHaving demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed the adequacy of themodel, it has subsequently been employedto assist in the detailed design of c<strong>at</strong>hodicprotection systems for historically significantsteel framed structures. The model can assistin the optimis<strong>at</strong>ion of anode loc<strong>at</strong>ions intwo ways. Firstly, it can help identify the bestloc<strong>at</strong>ions for anodes so as to achieve fullprotection from the least number of anodes,12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!