introduction

51˚22’56.10”N 0˚09’30.05”WBeddington zeroAmy fasnacht Greg nakata Katie olinEnergy developmentasustainablesite+building Case studyThursday 15 April 2010 + architecture 464By implementing a large bioswale to improve storm watermitigation, and wildlife habitat implementation, redesign livingmachine to be more efficient in treating storm/grey/blackwater for potable water, increase efficiency of chp energy,implement wind turbines on site, and raising taxes on thoseusing petrol only vehicles, the new checklist score rates thebuilding as being much greener.+ 1375!results51˚22’56.10”N 0˚09’30.05”W+1375!Beddington zeroAmy fasnacht Greg nakata Katie olinEnergy developmentsustainableasite+building Case studyThursday 15 April 2010 + architecture 464This facility was designed to be carbon neutral and extremelyenergy efficient, however carbon neutral status relies heavilyupon lifestyle factors and user choices – not merely efficientbuildings alone. With our redesign principles, educating theresidents, and public in general, about the benefits BedZedhas to offer would greatly improve the carbon neutrality ofthis facility.conclusion