What’s Next for News?MIT professor Sherry Turkle finds the prevalence of PowerPoint in grade school classrooms “distressing,” yet PowerPoint is ubiquitous. Ithas gained adherents in the federal Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff who use it to brief military commanders.unnecessarily long and boring, andthe stuff that’s great you could fitin a couple of hands, and that’s thestuff they should really commit toand memorize and study. The rest ofit is better short and quick and to thepoint. Look at haiku. It’s much harderto do something quickly than it is todo something for hours. And who’s tosay that it’s better to take your timeand not be distracted?Turkle: The ability to trace complicatedthemes through a literary work,through a poem, through a play—thesepleasures will be lost to us because theybecome pleasures through acquiredskills. You need to learn how to listento a poem, read a [Fyodor] Dostoevskynovel, read a Jane Austen novel. Theseare pleasures of reading that demandattention to things that are long andwoven and complicated. And this issomething that human beings havecherished and that have broughttremendous riches. And to just say,“Well, we’re of a generation that nowlikes it short and sweet and haiku.Why? Just because the technologymakes it easy for us to have thingsthat are short and sweet and haiku.”In other words, it’s an argument aboutsensibility and aesthetics that’s drivenby what technology wants.I don’t really care what technologywants. It’s up to people to developtechnologies, see what affordancesthe technology has. Very often theseaffordances tap into our vulnerabilities.I would feel bereft if, because technologywants us to read short, simplestories, we bequeath to our childrena world of short, simple stories. Whattechnology makes easy is not alwayswhat nurtures the human spirit.I’ve been an MIT professor for 30years; I’ve seen the losses. There’s noone who’s been teaching for 25 yearsand doesn’t think that our studentsaren’t different now than they werethen. They need to be stimulatedin ways that they didn’t need to bestimulated before. No, that’s notgood. You want them to think abouthard things. You want them to thinkabout complicated things. When youhave the ability to easily do showy,fabulous things, you want to believethey’re valuable because that would begreat. I think that we always have to22 <strong>Nieman</strong> Reports | Summer 2010
Digital Youthask ourselves, when technology makessomething easy, when its affordancesallow us to do certain things, isthis valuable? What are the humanpurposes being served? And in theclassroom, what are the educationalpurposes being served?One of the most distressing thingsto me in looking at K-12 is the use ofPowerPoint in the schools. I believethat PowerPoint is one of the mostfrequently used pieces of software inclassrooms. Students are taught how tomake an argument—to make it in bullets,to add great photos, to draw fromthe popular culture, and show snippetsof movies and snippets of things that[he or she] can grab from the Web,and funny cartoons and to kind ofmake a mélange, a pastiche of croppedcultural images and animations andto make a beautiful PowerPoint. Andthat’s their presentation.PowerPoints are aboutsimple, communicableideas illustrated by powerfulimages, and there’s aplace for that. But thatisn’t the same as criticalthinking. Great books arenot fancied-up Power-Point presentations. Greatbooks take you through anargument, show how theargument is weak, meetobjections, and show adifferent point of view. Bythe time you’re throughwith all that, you’re waybeyond the simplicities ofPowerPoint.Computers are seductive; computersare appealing. There’s no harm inusing the seductive and appealing todraw people in, to get them in theirseats, and to begin a conversation. Thequestion is, what happens after that?Frontline: What about multitasking?Turkle: Because technology makes iteasy, we’ve all wanted to think it isgood for us, a new kind of thinking, anexpansion of our ability to reason andcycle through complicated things—domore and be more efficient. Unfortunately,the new research is comingin that says when you multitask,everything gets done a little worse;there’s a degradation of all functions.Did we need to really go through 10years of drinking the Kool-Aid on theeducational wonders of multitaskingand forgetting about everything weknew about what it takes to reallyaccomplish something hard?At MIT, I teach the most brilliantstudents in the world. But they havedone themselves a disservice by drinkingthe Kool-Aid and believing thata multitasking learning environmentwill serve their best purposes becausethey need to be taught how to make asustained, complicated argument on ahard, cultural, historical, psychologicalpoint. Many of them were trained thata good presentation is a PowerPointpresentation—you know, bam-bambam—it’svery hard for them to haveSherry Turkle spoke on Frontline’s “Digital Nation” about how adolescentsand adults interact with technology. Photo courtesy of Frontline.a kind of quietness, a stillness in theirthinking where one thing can actuallylead to another and build and build andbuild and build. There are just somethings that are not amenable to beingthought about in conjunction with 15other things. And there are some kindsof arguments you cannot make unlessyou’re willing to take something frombeginning to end.We’re becoming quite intolerant ofletting each other think complicatedthings. I don’t think this serves ourhuman needs because the problemswe’re facing are quite complicated. Tohear someone else out, you need tobe able to be still for a while and payattention to something other than yourimmediate needs. So if we’re living ina moment when you can be in sevendifferent places at once, and you canhave seven different conversations atonce on a back channel here, on aphone here, on a laptop, how do wesave stillness? How threatened is it?How do we regain it?Erik Erikson is a psychologist whowrote a great deal about adolescenceand identity, and he talks about theneed for stillness in order to fullydevelop and to discover your identityand become who you need to becomeand think what you need to think. AndI think stillness is one of the greatthings in jeopardy.[Henry David] Thoreau, in writingabout Walden Pond, lists the threethings that he feels the experience isteaching him to developfully as the man he wantsto become. He wants tolive deliberately; he wantsto live in his life; and hewants to live with no senseof resignation. But on allof those dimensions, I feelthat we’re taking awayfrom ourselves the thingsthat Thoreau thought wereso essential to discoveringan identity.We’re not deliberate;we’re bombarded. Wehave no stillness; we haveresignation.Kids say: “Well, it hasto be this way; we have noother way to live. We’re not living fullyin our lives. We’re living a little in ourlives and a little bit in our Facebooklives.” You know, you put up a differentlife, you put up a different person. Soit’s not to be romantic about Thoreau,but I think he did write, as Eriksonwrote, about the need for stillness; tobe deliberate; to live in your life andto never feel that you’re just resignedto how things need to be.When we’re texting, on the phone,doing e-mail, getting information, theexperience is of being filled up. Thatfeels good. And we assume that it isnourishing in the sense of taking us to<strong>Nieman</strong> Reports | Summer 2010 23