Team Presentation Rubric - Richland College

ubricteampresent● Coverage:thorough andbalanced intreatment of topic● veryincomplete,significantgaps, or biasedtreatment oftopic● eitherthorough butbiased, orincomplete andbalanced● generallythorough andbalanced butawkward,needs moreevidence, orbettersequencing● thoroughcoverage oftopic perassignment withbalancedtreatment ofperspectivesRationale:explainsreasoning andprovides evidence● little or noreasoning,explanation, orevidenceprovided● reasoning andevidencepresented but notwell organized orpoor sources● good logicalreasoning andevidence, butnot integrated● logicalreasoningintegrated withauthoritativereferences onkey pointsGraphics:attractive &balanced layout,legible font● no graphics(may beappropriate insome cases)● graphicspresent but poorquality (illegible,inconsistent, ,etc.)● well donegraphics buttoo much ortoo little, andnot on keypoints● welldesignedandattractivegraphics thatsimplify orsummarize keyideas; originalgraphics● Team Roles:team membershave equivalentroles● unclearteam roles● clear teamroles but unequalcontribution● clear roles,equalcontribution● clear roles,balancedcontribution,good transitionbetweenpresenters,cross referenceeach other● Discussion:team is preparedto facilitatediscussion and isreceptive tofeedback● little or nodiscussion● discussion butwithout clearorganization orpurpose● prepareddiscussionquestions● preparedquestions onkey areas, andresponsive toand elicitparticipantreaction andquestionshttp://faculty.css.edu/dswenson/web/Gradingrubrics/rubricteampresent.html (2 of 3)2/23/2008 2:21:59 PM