Agenda for Research and Development in Patient Safety

More documents

Recommendations

Info

NPSF Research AgendaE. What methodologies are appropriate for research in patient safety?F. By what processes should the research strategy and agenda of the NPSFbe developed, maintained, and updated so that it is consistent withcontemporaneous needs of the patient safety movement and the NPSF?G. By what measures will we know if our goals are being achieved?A.What is PatientSafety?BackgroundThe term “patient safety” is becoming widely used. As does the term“safety” alone, it means different things to different people. Those whoformed the National Patient Safety Foundation had in mind some concept,individually and collectively, of what is patient safety. Yet, until now, no onehas articulated what constitutes the spectrum of issues to which the NPSFshould give its attention. Where does safety end and quality begin? Whatproblems are better addressed in a context of medical complications orpublic health? What should be the boundaries of patient safety in whichthe NPSF operates its research and other programs?Defining Characteristics of Patient SafetyBased on these materials, patient safety can be defined as incorporatingthe following points:1. Patient safety has to do primarily with the avoidance, prevention, andamelioration of adverse outcomes or injuries stemming from the processesof health care itself. It should address events that span the continuumfrom what may be called “errors” and “deviations” to “accidents”(See model below).2. Safety emerges from the interaction of the components of the system. It ismore than the absence of adverse outcomes and it is more than avoidanceof identifiable “preventable” errors or occurrences. Safety does not resideAccidentsNear MissesDangerous SituationsErrors andDeviaionsBattles JB, Kaplan HS, van der Schaaf TW, Shea CE. The attributes of medicalevent-reporting systems. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998;122:231-238.2
NPSF Research Agendain a person, device or department. Improving safety depends on learninghow safety emerges from the interactions of the components.3. Patient safety is related to “quality of care”, but the two concepts are notsynonymous. Safety is an important subset of quality. To date, activitiesto manage quality, such as quality assurance, continuous qualityimprovement, total quality management, etc, have not focusedsufficiently on patient safety issues.Using several information-gathering processes conducted by the NPSF,coupled with historical materials about safety in other domains, the outlinesof patient safety can be defined. These processes are:1. The request for Letters of Intent (LOI) to apply for grant fundingfrom the NPSF.2. The criteria resulting from the NPSF Research Program’s deliberations onwhich LOIs to invite to submit full proposals.3. The survey of Program members regarding possible topics to beconsidered as relevant and important to patient safety.4. The topics addressed in abstracts submitted to the 1998 conferenceon patient safety.5. The presentations at the 1997 Workshop on Assembling the ScientificBasis for Progress on Patient Safety and position papers statements byexperts participating in that conference.Note: The NPSF published a 1998 monograph on the results of this workshop entitled A Tale of Two Stories:Constrasting Views of Patient Safety. This document is available on its web site at www.npsf.org.Continuum of Patient SafetyPatient safety research efforts span a continuum from understanding theroots of system and individual failure, through developing interventions tomitigate those failures, to assessing the effect of implementation of errorreduction processes.Examples on the continuum are:Epidemiology Error Mechanisms Developing Implementation ofof Error Interventions Error Reduction ProcessesObservational Analysis of Creation and trial Effectiveness testingstudies of error technical work of experimental of broadscaleincidence reporting system reporting systemDescriptive studies Analysis of error Creation and Effectiveness testingof error typology processes trial of error of simulation forreduction process improving performanceEfforts to improve safety are needed at all points along this continuum.Furthermore, improvement requires an understanding of technical work,of organizational factors that influence the safe conduct of that work and,especially, of new vulnerabilities that are introduced whenever an3
Page 4 and 5: NPSF Research Agendaintervention is
Page 6 and 7: NPSF Research AgendaB.What are the
Page 8 and 9: NPSF Research Agenda3. Other Avenue
Page 10 and 11: NPSF Research AgendaF. How to Devel
Page 12: NPSF Research AgendaG. How Will the

Agenda for Research and Development in Patient Safety

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?