EPA Region 10 Mercury Strategy Framework - Environmental ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EPA Region 102. Assess Factors ControllingMercury MethylationMercury is usually released into the environment in aninorganic form, which is generally considered to have lowtoxicity if ingested. Approximately ninety percent of themercury found in fish tissue is methyl mercury, which istoxic when ingested. For mercury to be assimilated into thefood chain, it must first be converted into the organic methylform, generally through the action of sulfate reducingbacteria (SRB).USGS is the leader in research on methylation in the EasternUnited States (US), where it was noted that some waters haddisproportionately high fish tissue mercury relative to theirproximity to known mercury sources. After 15 years ofintensive study, factors responsible for these highconcentrations are well enough understood in the East thatthey can be predicted from data on the pH, sulfate levelsand dissolved organic carbon characteristic of thewaterbody.Conditions in the West differ substantially enough from theEast that research done to date on mercury methylation cannot be reliably applied to predict methylmercury abundanceand distributions in Region 10.For example:Mercury Strategy Framework• There are a considerable number of reservoirs in theWest – drying and rewetting of sediment has beendemonstrated to increase methylation rates, resulting inmethylmercury concentration spikes in water, sedimentand food webs.• Sulfate levels are a major factor influencing mercurymethylation. Low sulfate abundance in the East cansometimes limit methylation, and in general there aregreater amounts of sulfate in soils of the West. Howeverthe role sulfate plays in methylation in Region 10 isunclear and more data is needed in order to informresource managers.• Waters in the West generally have higher pH than Easternwaters and low pH tends to accelerate methylation• Selenium has a complex, multi-modal affect on mercury.At the right levels, selenium can effectively “tie up”mercury and render it unavailable for methylation. Onthe other hand, selenium itself is toxic at elevated levelsso attributing toxicological effects to a single co-factorcan be difficult where both selenium and mercury vary inspace. In general, low levels of native selenium in theEast have not stimulated much research in the past.However, the generally much higher levels in the Westwarrant more attention.• Conditions in Alaska may be substantially different thanin the rest of the Region and the U.S., given the abundantwetlands and extreme northern latitudes. In addition,some parts of Alaska contain many metal deposits,including mercury mines, therefore geologic sources mayplay an important role in the occurrence and distributionof mercury in local ecosystems.Understanding methylation factors that are important in theRegion will provide more information on alternative meansto reduce fish tissue levels in waters where the primarysources of mercury input are not immediately controllable,such as global mercury deposition or historic mining.Region 10 efforts to evaluate methylation will need to becoordinated closely with activities by other agencies. USGSis beginning to conduct research in the West under theirown initiative, although their limited budget has slowed thepace of this work. In addition, as mentioned above underthe Monitoring Support activity, several Federal agenciesare proceeding to develop a national monitoring planhoping that funds will be available in the future.Mercury Strategy Framework - Page 5
EPA Region 10Mercury Strategy FrameworkEPA role:To continue to communicate and collaborate onmethylation issues by supporting, leveraging andbuilding upon existing USGS efforts.Examples of the power of maintaining a frameworkfor communication with USGS and other agenciesdoing methyl mercury research include:• Participation in EPA’s Columbia River ToxicsWorkgroup helped USGS gain support within theiragency to win funding for a major sampling projectin the Columbia River.• USGS collaborated with EPA’s National Lakes FishTissue Study (http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/fish/study/) last year, analyzing fish tissue formercury. However, they could only participate intwo states due to time constraints.Additional activities could include:• Investigate adding methylmercury analysis to theRegion 10 Laboratory to allow more local study ofmethylation potential.• Work collaboratively with USGS to develop a“Methylation Evaluation Guide” that could be usedby states, tribes, and other federal agencies andentities to assist in characterizing methylationpotential of waterbodies throughout the West.• Assist Region 10 states and tribes in designing andconducting watershed-specific methylation studies,and/or work collaboratively with USGS and otherEPA Regions on larger scale methylation pilotstudies in the West (e.g. multi-region RAREproposals; link to national monitoring work, etc.)Mercury Strategy Framework - Page 6
Page 1 and 2: EPA 910-R-08-003 | December 2008EPA
Page 3 and 4: EPA Region 10Mercury Strategy Frame
Page 5: EPA Region 10Mercury Strategy Frame
Page 9 and 10: EPA Region 104. Identify / Inventor
Page 11 and 12: EPA Region 106. Address Unregulated
Page 13 and 14: EPA Region 107. Implement a Tribal

EPA Region 10 Mercury Strategy Framework - Environmental ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?