100-75-50-25 YEARS AGOthe economic slump not to foreigncompetition, but to "a serious and widespreaddecline in consuming power"which was caused by "taxation...andimprovident methods of finance inmany countries."Foreshadowing what was accomplishedwhen Margaret Thatcherbecame Prime Minister over half a centurylater, <strong>Churchill</strong>'s article "ShouldStrategists Veto the Tunnel?" appearedin The Weekly Dispatch on 27 July. WSCwas highly critical of a recent decisionby the Committee of Imperial Defence,dismissing a proposal for a Channeltunnel which had been supported byover 400 members of Parliament.<strong>Churchill</strong> ridiculed the secrecy surroundingthe decision and the fact thatit was reached after a limited discussion:"They must be quite short argumentsbecause we know there were onlyforty minutes available for their presentation,for their discussion and for theconclusion to be recorded. Twenty minuteswould, therefore, perhaps suffice torepeat them. One column of an ordinarynewspaper would readily containthem. Why should we not have them?Why should this matter be wrapt inmystery? The public have a right toknow what were grounds in which agreat decision like this was taken."<strong>Churchill</strong> then set forth in considerabledetail why British security wouldnot be endangered by a Channel tunnel:"Fancy trying to invade this islandby a tiny tube when the whole air isopen to a stronger assailant. Comparethe risks of London being destroyed byincendiary bombs or poisoned by chemicalbombs from the air, with the risks ofour not being capable of flooding thetunnel in time and safeguarding ourown end of it. The risks from the air arenow a hundredfold greater....The dangerof invasion following on treachery is thesole ground on which a government isjustified in vetoing the scheme. And ifthat ground is shown to be illusory, dieway will be cleared for the fair examinationof an enterprise which might wellbecome a notable symbol in the advanceof human civilisation."In a letter to Clementine on 19August 1924, <strong>Churchill</strong> gave her anupdate on how repairs were progressingat Chartwell: "Everyone is working franticallyat your room. The whitewashes,the oak stainers, the carpenters and theplasterers are hard at work from morntill night. I hope that all will be to yourliking when you return. They are allowingnothing to stand in the way ofthis....My Beloved, it will be jolly havingyou back on Monday. The house seemsvy empty without you. With tenderlove, your devoted W"On 11 September, <strong>Churchill</strong>accepted an offer from the ConservativeParty's Constituency Committee inEpping to stand for Parliament in thenext General Election as a "Constitutionalist"with Conservative Party support.At Epping, and one of its successorconstituencies called Woodford, hewould find at last the "Seat for Life" he'dlost in Dundee.Fifty years ago:Summer 1949 • Age 74En garde, frangais!<strong>Churchill</strong> continued working onthe third volume of his war memoirs,spending much time in Italy on holidaywith Clementine and his entourage,described on this occasion by WalterGraebner. No matter how far he went,whether by rail or air, <strong>Churchill</strong> tookwith him all the equipment for anoffice, other than tables and chairs.Nothing was left to chance: he wantedan office functioning within an hour ortwo after his arrival. Crates and blackdespatch boxes were filled with typewriters,paper clips, pencils, ink, paper,paste, scissors, pins, envelopes, sealingwax,seals and string.The management of this vital partof the holiday operation was entrustedto two secretaries from the London staff,one of whom was available whenever<strong>Churchill</strong> called between 8AM and2PM.There were always about a dozenpeople in the <strong>Churchill</strong> entourage. Twowere Scotland Yard detectives, whoworked twelve-hour shifts each so that<strong>Churchill</strong> was never left unguarded.Since they were the same team assignedto him in England they felt quite at easein the party, and on painting and picnicexcursions they pitched in and helpedlike everyone else. Also present was avalet, who not only dressed <strong>Churchill</strong>and looked after his other needs in thebedroom, but squeezed the tube whenhis master wanted more paint, saw thata fresh cigar was never more than a fewfeet away, and did hundreds of other littlethings which added to his comfort.Immediately prior to departing onholiday, <strong>Churchill</strong> addressed a Conservativerally in Wolverhampton in whichhe harkened back to his 1924 theme ofexcessive taxation:"...our Socialist spendthrifts andmuddlers have dissipated every overseaasset they could lay their hands on, andin addition have exacted and extractedfrom our people a higher rate of taxationthan was required in the veryheight of the war, from which we victoriouslyemerged. It will be incredible tothose who come afterwards that somuch should have been cast away in soshort a time, so many sacrifices demanded,so many restrictions and regulationsimposed and obeyed, and that atthe end we should be where we arenow."<strong>Churchill</strong> concluded this passageby borrowing and adapting to presentcircumstances one of his most famouslines: "Never before in the history ofhuman government has such greathavoc been wrought by such smallmen." He also repeated the attacks onSocialism he had made twenty-five yearsearlier, promising that the Conservativeswould "...return to a system which pro-FlNESTHOUR103/l6
vides incentives for effort, enterprise,self-denial, initiative, and good housekeeping.We cannot uphold die principlethat die rewards of society must beequal for those who try and for thosewho shirk, for those who succeed andfor those who fail...."Within a year—perhaps muchsooner—the British nation will havehad to make one of the most momentouschoices in its history. The choice isbetween two ways of life: between individualliberty and State domination;between concentration of ownership indie hands of the State and the extensionof ownership over the widest number ofindividuals; between the dead hand ofmonopoly and the stimulus of competition;between a policy of increasingrestraint and a policy of liberating energyand ingenuity; between a policy oflevelling down and a policy of opportunityfor all to rise upwards from a basicstandard."In August, <strong>Churchill</strong> attended thefirst meeting of the Council of Europein Strasbourg, where he delivered aspeech in French and, according toHarold Macmillan, "with a better accentthan usual." Robert Rhodes Jamesreported diat <strong>Churchill</strong>'s opening words,"Take heed! I am going to speak inFrench," were received by the crowd"with thunderous cheers and applause."In the speech, <strong>Churchill</strong> attempted toharmonize European nationalism withan overriding European unity:"We are reunited here, in this newAssembly, not as representatives of ourseveral countries or various political parties,but as Europeans forging ahead,hand in hand, and if necessary elbow toelbow, to restore the former glories ofEurope and to permit this illustriouscontinent to take its place once more, ina world organization, as an independentmember sufficient unto itself."That primary and sacred loyaltythat one owes to one's own country isnot difficult to reconcile with this largerfeeling of European fellowship. On thecontrary, we will establish that all legitimateinterests are in harmony and thateach one of us will best serve the realinterests and security of his country ifwe enlarge at the same time both oursentiment of citizenship and of commonsovereignty—if we include in thissentiment the entire continent of Statesand of nations who have the same wayof life."After Strasbourg, <strong>Churchill</strong> continuedhis holiday, staying with LordBeaverbrook at his villa near MonteCarlo. While there, he suffered a slightstroke which was not reported publiclyat the time. (See "<strong>Churchill</strong>'s Dagger,"FH 87.) By the end of August,<strong>Churchill</strong> had recovered sufficiendy toreturn to England, where he attendedthe races at Epsom to see his new racehorse,Colonist II.Fifty years ago:Summer 1974Take Heed!While the controversial GrahamSutherland portrait of Sir <strong>Winston</strong>,presented to him by Parliament in1954, remained unavailable for viewinga previously unknown sketch for theportrait was discovered on the back ofanother Sutherland canvas, "Paraphraseof Figure with Key in Rembrandt'sNight Watch," painted in 1953. It wasdiscovered when the owner of the Rembrandtstudy sent it to be cleaned. Thislaunched a fresh round of speculation asto the fate of the original which, as wenow know, Lady <strong>Churchill</strong> had determinedwould never see the light of day.CSC had no comment.Winning her approval, by contrast,were two excellent small statues ofSir <strong>Winston</strong>. One, revealed by LordMountbatten in September, was a 20-inch-high replica of the Ivor Roberts-Jones memorial statue in ParliamentSquare, offered in limited edition at£594 each to commemorate the<strong>Churchill</strong> Centenary.A second,by German-bornsculptress Karin<strong>Churchill</strong> (norelation), depictedWSCaged 80 in hisGarter Robesand sold for£250. The generousMrs.<strong>Churchill</strong>, alongtime memberof ICS, presentedone ofher bronze statuesto Blenheim Palace, another to theCentenary Exhibition at SomersetHouse, and a third to Lady <strong>Churchill</strong>,who was delighted with it. Unlike manymodern effigies, Karin <strong>Churchill</strong>'s workwas very lifelike. "The trend nowadaysis to be almost abstract," she told theOxford Journal. "The person becomesunrecognisable, and I think people whoreally like <strong>Churchill</strong> would like somethingreally like him."&FINEST HOUR 103/17