11.07.2015 Views

The California Report on Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

The California Report on Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

The California Report on Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE CALIFORNIA CABG MORTALITY REPORTING PROGRAMKey Findings Regarding the Risk Model• Although some of the risk model variables are not statistically significant (as determined by ap-value of 40.0) were also at increased risk of death (OR 1.52) but not to the extentthat the very underweight were. A very low BMI may be a proxy for frailty or indicate awasting comorbid c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> not captured by other risk model variables.• Even after c<strong>on</strong>trolling for all other variables, Gender had a statistically significant effect, withmales having about <strong>on</strong>e-third lower mortality. This gender effect has weakened whencompared to the 1997-1999 model, perhaps because of the inclusi<strong>on</strong> of BMI in the currentmodel. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> literature suggests that gender may be a proxy for body size and/or cor<strong>on</strong>aryartery size (diameter) and smaller cor<strong>on</strong>ary arteries in women may be more pr<strong>on</strong>e tothrombosis or restenosis.• Of the acute comorbidities collected, Cardiogenic Shock had the largest effect (OR 2.49).Of the chr<strong>on</strong>ic comorbid c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, severe Chr<strong>on</strong>ic Lung Disease has the str<strong>on</strong>gestassociati<strong>on</strong> with inpatient mortality (OR 2.52).• Patients with Left Main Disease > 50% did not appear to be at increased risk (OR 1.09, notsignificant) of inpatient death. However, when Left Main Stenosis was collected as ac<strong>on</strong>tinuous measure (see 1997-1999 model), patients with Stenoses > 70% were about 50%more likely to die.• When compared to the 1997-1999 risk model, six variables in the prior model were nol<strong>on</strong>ger significant, and two variables not significant in the prior model were significant in thecurrent model. Of most c<strong>on</strong>cern from a clinical perspective, there was no increased risk ofmortality from PTCA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!