11.07.2015 Views

Guide-for-Nonprofit-Organizations-Bankruptcy-Issues-FINAL-with-ads

Guide-for-Nonprofit-Organizations-Bankruptcy-Issues-FINAL-with-ads

Guide-for-Nonprofit-Organizations-Bankruptcy-Issues-FINAL-with-ads

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

applicable non-bankruptcy law. The nonprofit business and its legal counsel should reviewstate and federal privacy laws to determine whether any restrictions on the transfer ofin<strong>for</strong>mation in the client and donor databases applies.If the privacy policy does not permit the transfer of PII, the transfer may still occur, but onlyafter the Court orders the U.S. Trustee to appoint a consumer privacy ombudsman, and afternotice and hearing, the Court must approve the sale. The consumer privacy ombudsmanprovides the court <strong>with</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation to assist the court in its consideration of the facts,circumstances, and conditions of the proposed sale of PII. Such in<strong>for</strong>mation may include: (i) theprivacy policy; (ii) the potential losses or gains of privacy to consumers if the sale is approved;(iii) the potential costs or benefits to consumers if such sale is approved; and (iv) the potentialalternatives that would mitigate potential privacy losses or costs to consumers.Consumer privacy ombudsmen appointed by <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> Courts have supported the sale ofPII, provided that certain conditions were met, such as: (i) the purchaser must be in materiallythe same line of business as the seller; (ii) the purchaser must use the PII <strong>for</strong> the same purposesas are specified in the applicable privacy policy; (iii) the purchaser must agree to comply <strong>with</strong>the applicable privacy policy; (iv) the purchaser offers consumers the opportunity to "opt out"of any "material changes" it plans to make to the applicable privacy policy; (v) the purchasermust agree to employ appropriate in<strong>for</strong>mation controls and procedures (technical, operationaland managerial) to protect the PII; and (vi) the purchaser must agree to abide by any applicablestate privacy and data breach laws. For more in<strong>for</strong>mation on this topic, refer to SellingCustomer Data in <strong>Bankruptcy</strong> Raises Privacy Concerns, Journal of Corporate Renewal (March2012) by Lauren Nachinson.Special Rules <strong>for</strong> Educational InstitutionsThe Code contains specific provisions <strong>for</strong> Debtors whose businesses function as accreditededucational institutions. First are those relating to the automatic stay. These provisions can befound in Section 362(b)(14) to (16). Specifically, these subsections provide that filing abankruptcy petition does not operate as a stay: (i) of any action by an accrediting agencyregarding the accreditation status of the Debtor as an educational institution; (ii) of any actionby a State licensing body regarding the licensure of the Debtor as an educational institution; or(iii) of any action by a guaranty agency, as defined in section 435(j) of the Higher Education Actof 1965 or the Secretary of Education regarding the eligibility of the accredited educationalinstitution.Debtor to participate in programs authorized under such ActPursuant to these sections, certain government agencies are permitted to continue monitoringeducational institutions that have filed <strong>for</strong> bankruptcy. The government agencies may<strong>with</strong>draw an educational institution's accreditation and/or licenses <strong>with</strong>out violating theautomatic stay. Moreover, if the Debtor is an educational institution that is participating incertain student loan guarantee programs <strong>with</strong> the government, the agency guaranteeing loansmade by the Debtor can <strong>with</strong>draw its participation in the guarantee program <strong>with</strong>out violatingthe stay. In re Betty Owen Schools, Inc., 195 B.R. 23, 28 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1996) (position takenby U.S. Department of Education in litigation <strong>with</strong> Debtor related to eligibility of Debtor toparticipate in programs under the HEA was exempted from the automatic stay under section362(b)(16)).57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!