pdf book format here - Bethel (The House Of God)

The basis of your defense is: 1. Hideous lies; 2. Invention of new heresies; 3. Gross perversion of simplescriptures; 4. Denial of Dr. Vayle‘s teachings on the three major heresies injected into the C.A.B. 5.Employment of the love gospel of Satan.MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE - C.A.B. – page 104 –Error NUMBER ONE:On your defense you further confirmed that you believe these heresies that say:A- That a woman is no longer married to her husband if she commits adultery.B- Romans 7:3 do not mean what it says.C- A divorced woman can be remarried; Deuteronomy 24:1-4 does not mean what it says.It is very obvious that on this subject, you did not replace Dr. Vayle‘s name with Brother Branham‘s, as Istated in my discourse. You did that for a special reason. Something is troubling your conscience. You don‘t want toattach Brother Branham‘s name to these heresies. You are afraid. It goes to show that you know better than whatyour lips are saying. You know that Dr. Vayle is wrong on his teaching on this subject, and you are hypocriticallytrying to defend them.Heretical Article No. 706: Language is stinging; without love.Pastor Kocourek: I must say your language is quite stinging, and very strong and accusatorial for onewho says that he wishes to communicate with Christian love and respect. You might want to study up on what loveand respect are before you commit to doing this discourse with love and respect. (Page 4, Spoken Word no 42, Q &A 44 Discourse on CAB marriage and Divorce).E.O.D.H. Answer: It‘s alarming that you don‘t know that such is scriptural. Jesus‘ language was stinging(Matthew 23); read it all. John the Baptist‘s language was strong. How readest thou? I guess the Pharisees wanted togive him a lesson on divine love. Do you reckon that he would have accepted it and Jesus likewise? ―You stiffneckedand uncircumcised in heart and ears; ye do always resist the Holy Ghost; as your fathers did, so do ye.‖ Didthat fit your love gospel heresy? Did it sound like the good old priest? That was the message preacher-Stephen themartyr, who died for Christ‘s love gospel. Does it compare with yours?Heretical Article No. 707: Denial of Adam’s sin.Pastor Kocourek: You assume this says that the sin of Adam was committing adultery with his own wife,but that is not what was said at all. (Page 5, Spoken Word no 42, Q & A 44 Discourse on CAB marriage andDivorce).E.O.D.H. Answer: You have perverted the scriptures, you have told lies, and now you are changing themeaning of what Dr. Vayle indicated. That is very dishonest of you. If he did not, why did he go through all thepains to indicate the law of Deuteronomy 24? Then tell me what is the sin of Adam that Dr. Vayle indicated? Godnever commanded him to leave his wife. You cannot prove that in the scriptures. Dr. Vayle was unable to do so, thushe applied the Law of Moses, which was not yet written. Now you are denying it.Heretical Article No. 708: Adam’s sin - disobedience to God.