E.O.D.H. Answer: This is foolishness. I can see a drowning man grabbing to a straw again, trying to bringup an accusation against a man who stands for righteousness. All my preaching and publications bear witnessagainst your lies. You ran short of carnal weapons of war, thus you invented this dirty bomb; which is exploding inyour face. Your mind is so set on winning a debate until it is only on carnal things, indicating that I take one act ofadultery as a light thing. Shame on you! Repent Brother and Pastor Kocourek. All liars shall have their part in thelake of fire!Pastor Kocourek: <strong>The</strong> sin that Adam fell was not taking back his wife, it was doing what he wascommanded not to do. (Page 12, Spoken Word no 42, Q & A 44 Discourse on CAB marriage and Divorce).E.O.D.H. Answer: This is proof that you have a different doctrine than Dr. Vayle. He plainly stated thatwas the sin of Adam, with indications that he committed adultery when he took back the adulteress. Your <strong>here</strong>sy isbased upon that <strong>here</strong>sy.Quote Dr. Lee Vayle C.A.B 104-1 ...people ask me, "If Eve fell that way, what did Adam do, for <strong>God</strong> laysthe blame on Adam?"... Now the Word teaches us that if a woman leaves her husband and goes with another manshe is an adultress and is no longer married and the husband is not to take her back. That Word was true in Edenas it was true when Moses wrote it in the law. <strong>The</strong> Word can't change. Adam took her back. He knew exactly whathe was doing, but he did it any way. (Ephesian Church Age - C.A.B. Cpt.3).Heretical Article No. 716: Uncleanness means she was not a virgin.Pastor Kocourek: Deuteronomy 24:1-4 When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come topass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her… first of all we must ask ourselves what is this uncleanness, that bothers this man enough to put his wifeaway… This Scripture speaks of a man who marries a woman and then finds after they are married that she is not avirgin, he has a right to put her away, and it says then she is free to marry another. (Page 13, Spoken Word no 42,Q & A 44 Discourse on CAB marriage and Divorce).E.O.D.H. Answer: You have no proof of your assumption. You have perverted the scripture to justify Dr.Vayle‘s <strong>here</strong>sy. You are such a perverter that you even perverted Dr. Vayle’s <strong>here</strong>sy.Heretical Article No. 717: Divorced woman is free to remarry.Pastor Kocourek: … this first man found out his wife was not a virgin so that nullifies the marriagealtogether as brother Branham explains… So if they were not married to begin with then she would be free to marryfor the first time legitimately, but not as a virgin. (Page 14, Spoken Word no 42, Q & A 44 Discourse on CABmarriage and Divorce).E.O.D.H. Answer: By this <strong>here</strong>sy, you are propagating remarriage for a divorced woman. That‘scontrary to the prophet‘s teaching and the Word of <strong>God</strong>; Romans 7, which you have denied and perverted.Deuteronomy 24 has no connection with what the prophet taught on that particular subject. Give me one quotation.He indicated that scripture to show that a man cannot take back his wife if she goes out and marries another. Hisinterpretation is right and you are wrong.Heretical Article No. 718: Defiled woman’s second marriage is legitimate.Pastor Kocourek: Deuteronomy 24 say it is ok for the first man to put her away and a second man couldmarry her and that is not adultery?... this first man found out his wife was not a virgin …as brother Branhamexplains… So if they were not married to begin with then she would be free to marry for the first time legitimately,but not as a virgin. (Page 14, Spoken Word no 42, Q & A 44 Discourse on CAB marriage and Divorce).
E.O.D.H. Answer: This is a <strong>here</strong>sy plus a <strong>here</strong>sy. You have no scripture or quotation to support it. Youperverted Deuteronomy 24: 1-4 to make it say so. You perverted W.M.B.‘s quotation to make him say so. Now<strong>here</strong>in the prophet‘s message can you show w<strong>here</strong> he said that the woman is not married and can be remarried underthose circumstances. I challenge you to give me a single quotation.Heretical Article No. 719: Deuteronomy 24:1-4 doesn’t mean what it say.Pastor Kocourek: Foreign Pastor Statement: “<strong>The</strong> Bible is specifically making reference to a woman thatwas divorced and became the wife of another man by marriage.‖ End of Foreign Pastor Statement:It doesn’t say that she became the wife a second time, as you are reading this. (Page 14, Spoken Word no42, Q & A 44 Discourse on CAB marriage and Divorce).E.O.D.H. Answer: How readest thou, Rev. Kocourek? Are you telling me that the Bible does not meanwhat it says? She was put away and given a bill of divorcement. She did become the wife of another man. Should Ibelieve you or <strong>God</strong>? I believe <strong>God</strong> and believe that you are telling a lie. Your statement expresses gross infidelity,total denial of <strong>God</strong>‘s own words: <strong>God</strong> said ―She may go and be another man‘s wife.‖ He spoke about her latterhusband and former husband, Deuteronomy 24: 3-4. If you have the nerve to pervert the very law of <strong>God</strong>, writtenin plain language, t<strong>here</strong> is no wonder about you perverting the words of the prophet and even Dr. Vayle‘s.<strong>The</strong> prophet said she was married again, called her the first wife and she was the property of another man.Quote: 678-Q-159 159. Brother Branham, I was married to a woman that had been married before.We divorced, and she has been married twice since. <strong>The</strong> Bible states that if we desire to marry... to turnto... first wife. Now, could I turn to her who has been married before or could I be free?Well now, my brother, <strong>here</strong>'s the only way that you could do it... Jesus said in Matthew 5, ―...whosoevermarries her that is put away liveth in adultery." So don't do that. No, you cannot go back to your first wife if she'sbeen married again....No, sir. Get over in the Levitical laws. You go back to that woman, she's somebody else's property.You've defiled and made yourself worse off than ever. No, you should not take a wife back who's been married tosomebody else...you don't go back again. No, sir. She's married to somebody else; stay away from her...Don't you goback and take that woman when she's been married two or three times since she married you. That's wrong.(Questions And Answers COD 61-1015M).Away with your Greek and Hebrew translations to pervert the Word. <strong>God</strong>‘s prophet has spoken by theWord. Let your words be a lie and <strong>God</strong>‘s be true.Heretical Article No. 720: Exposing C.A.B. errors is an attack on W.M.B.Pastor Kocourek: …your attack was not even against brother Vayle, but you are guilty of attackingbrother Branham… My brother it is one thing to preach against sin, but when you cross the line by trying to destroyindividuals, you are going to find yourself fighting against <strong>God</strong>. (Page 14, 15, Spoken Word no 42, Q & A 44Discourse on CAB marriage and Divorce).E.O.D.H. Answer: You know better than that. I have already proved you to be a liar right in the answers toyour website response.Pastor Kocourek: Leviticus 20: 10… So if the adulterer and adulteress are to be stoned, then how is itpossible for her to come back to him. (Page 14, Spoken Word no 42, Q & A 44 Discourse on CAB marriage andDivorce).E.O.D.H. Answer: You are living under the Old Testament law Sir. Joseph was a man of love and graceunder the law and did not make his wife a public example, and others did likewise. You are saying by your <strong>here</strong>sy aman cannot take back his wife. <strong>God</strong> told Joseph to take back his wife. Was he wrong? <strong>The</strong> Grace Covenant
- Page 1 and 2: INTRODUCTIONThis book entitled “7
- Page 3 and 4: After I closed my discourse on the
- Page 5 and 6: automatically engage themselves in
- Page 7 and 8: Heretical Article No. 713: Jesus di
- Page 9 and 10: y the rapture sermon....………
- Page 11 and 12: Heretical Article No. 790: God was
- Page 13 and 14: injected into the grammarized versi
- Page 15 and 16: telephone call to one of our Editor
- Page 17 and 18: publishing his errors injected into
- Page 19 and 20: I Corinthians 7:39 Dr. Vayle or Bro
- Page 21 and 22: DIVORCED, REMARRIED WOMAN - DON’T
- Page 23 and 24: Heretical Article No. 695: “E.O.D
- Page 25 and 26: E.O.D.H. Answer: In essence, you ar
- Page 27 and 28: So now, these same spirits that you
- Page 29 and 30: I make myself absolutely clear that
- Page 31 and 32: Pastor Kocourek: Adam wilfully diso
- Page 33: E.O.D.H. Answer: What foolishness!
- Page 37 and 38: Now, without further delay, I am go
- Page 39 and 40: seed. I am declaring that Pentecost
- Page 41 and 42: And Jesus answered and said unto hi
- Page 43 and 44: Quote W.M.B.: 37 ... people talks t
- Page 45 and 46: You become a believer, are borned a
- Page 47 and 48: will hear the Word for your age, as
- Page 49 and 50: You believe unto Eternal Life, and
- Page 51 and 52: aptism of the Spirit until the day
- Page 53 and 54: Heretical Article No. 736: Two bapt
- Page 55 and 56: And he had in his hand a little boo
- Page 57 and 58: attention to the way that I answere
- Page 59 and 60: Brother Kocourek: So there is a dif
- Page 61 and 62: Quote W.M.B.: 76-2 {54} …this Boo
- Page 63 and 64: you just got any Light in you.Notic
- Page 65 and 66: E.O.D.H. Answer: All the seals are
- Page 67 and 68: Pastor Kocourek 18: Now i fyou say,
- Page 69 and 70: is how it stands. Now other men, li
- Page 71 and 72: 2. unscriptural and3. erroneous. Th
- Page 73 and 74: E.O.D.H. Answer: Who made you a car
- Page 75 and 76: not embarrassed. I thought, being a
- Page 77 and 78: scriptural or message support. It i
- Page 79 and 80: Quote W.M.B.: 51-5 You‘re sealed.
- Page 81 and 82: …Now this messenger of Malachi 4
- Page 83 and 84: Heretical Article No. 759: The seve
- Page 85 and 86:
disagree with you. It is now, and I
- Page 87 and 88:
He claims to be praying for me afte
- Page 89 and 90:
The rapture has started.The resurre
- Page 91 and 92:
E.O.D.H. Answer: That is very nice
- Page 93 and 94:
sinful and will be dealt with and w
- Page 95 and 96:
… In the year 2000 I felt the lea
- Page 97 and 98:
Even theologians know and establish
- Page 99 and 100:
Quote Pastor Kocourek: Some even sa
- Page 101 and 102:
RAPTURE, RESURRECTION STARTED - PAR
- Page 103 and 104:
some.>II Timothy 2: 16-18
- Page 105 and 106:
Quote: 128-2 {75} And then there's
- Page 107 and 108:
Quote Dr. Lee Vayle: But, let me te
- Page 109 and 110:
epeated in this book, but formerly
- Page 111 and 112:
“…the Logos was with God;"…an
- Page 113 and 114:
GENESIS 53-0729 010 he said, "Out o
- Page 115 and 116:
Later, after that beginning and the
- Page 117 and 118:
E.O.D.H. Answer: Pastor Kocourek ha
- Page 119 and 120:
The son of God; Jesus, was non-exis
- Page 121 and 122:
Quote Dr. Lee Vayle: Now, Bro. Bran
- Page 123 and 124:
Quote Dr. Lee Vayle: The space of a
- Page 125 and 126:
Book One: ―Exposition of Damnable