TECHREVIEWLast <strong>of</strong> theIt’s unclear exactly how the Sun willset this month or what Oracle will bedoing with the hardware side <strong>of</strong> Sun.Will Sun servers soon get a coat <strong>of</strong> OracleRed and an “Unbreakable” stamp?Whatever happens, it seems that Oraclewill be inheriting a hardware engineer- <strong>The</strong> new Sun Fire X2270 and Sun FireX4270 servers are the fastest x64 serversSun has ever produced.<strong>The</strong> Sun X2270 is a low-cost, 1U rackX4270 is the X2270’s big brother, a 2Usystem starting at $3,445. Both servers X2270 packs a lot <strong>of</strong> compute <strong>power</strong>in a somewhat constrained chassis, theX4270 <strong>of</strong>fers slightly more <strong>power</strong> in a-Deployment options<strong>The</strong> quick skinny: <strong>The</strong> X2270 would doextremely well as a front-end Web server,a small database server, or a member <strong>of</strong> avirtualization farm, with the addition <strong>of</strong> a bays, but the low cost <strong>of</strong>fsets these limita-Sun serversSun’s fast and cheap Nehalem-<strong>power</strong>ed Sun Fire X2270 and Sun FireX4270 promise to put some sizzle into Oracle’s hardware businessBy Paul Venezia, InfoWorld (US)tions, depending on the application.<strong>The</strong> X4270 is the best <strong>of</strong> both worlds, <strong>of</strong>-cantexpansion opportunities and a wealth<strong>of</strong> local disk options. This is a shoe-in fora database server, application server, storageserver, or basically anything you canthrow at it. With the ability to house morethan 2.3TB locally across sixteen 146GB<strong>power</strong>, and six expansion slots, there’slittle that this box can’t handle.Virtual test benchTo test each server, I opted for my signedto mimic a large, database-drivenWeb application, using a randomizedmix <strong>of</strong> dynamic and static page delivery.- Web servers run a tweaked Apache 2.2Web server, with con<strong>ten</strong>t mounted on anNFS share to the database server. <strong>The</strong>database server runs a highly tweaked the Web root to the front-end servers. Allload balancing is handled by Nginx, run-purpose, in order to eclipse the eightphysical cores present in the serversunder test. Also, the static/dynamic callratio, though randomized, is seededto bring all boxes to a maximum load internal vSwitch, with only the load balancerdirectly linking to the lab <strong>net</strong>work.All load generation was driven from ab,the Apache benchmarking tool, running100,000 requests per test pass, 20 concurrentconnections.Slim and speedy 46 Computerworld Hong Kong Sept 2009 www.cw.com.hk
TECHREVIEWpactFlashcard with ESXi, slide it intothe slot, and boot the server as a diskless also be achieved with the X2270, albeitwith the use <strong>of</strong> the internal USB port, notLike its smaller sibling, the X4270 <strong>of</strong>-and several external USB ports. Alsolike the X2270, the X4270 performs ex-tingup numbers marginally better thanthe X2270.but short on most other assets. In keepingwith the Nehalem design, it can address 3.5-inch SATA drive bays up front, twoGigabit Ether<strong>net</strong> ports rather than the“normal” four that most Sun servers can-600W <strong>power</strong> supply. It does include thefull graphical support out <strong>of</strong> the box.In the lab, the X2270 moved like amuch more expensive system. I did twoon a single 500GB SATA drive, then an-share to a SAS array run from an AdaptecSnap Server 650. <strong>The</strong> difference wasnoticeable and resulted in a performanceincrease <strong>of</strong> around 15 percent. With thesingle local disk against a RAID 5 ar-surprising. In fact, applications that aremore disk I/O in<strong>ten</strong>sive should show aneven greater performance increase.<strong>The</strong>re’s lots <strong>of</strong> <strong>power</strong> in this littlepackage. <strong>The</strong> only downsides are thetwo Gigabit Ether<strong>net</strong> interfaces, ratherthan Sun’s normal allotment <strong>of</strong> four, andthe lack <strong>of</strong> a redundant <strong>power</strong> option.In many applications, a server like thiswill need more than two Ether<strong>net</strong> interfaces,and redundant <strong>power</strong> is always aplus. But for raw cost/performance, theX2270 is a very good deal.Big on the inside<strong>The</strong> X4270 uses 2.5-inch SAS, SATA,or solid-state drives instead <strong>of</strong> 3.5-inchSATA drives, allowing Sun to pack 16hot-swap drive bays into its 2U chassis.It’s almost out <strong>of</strong> necessity that theX4270 also has an integrated RAID controllerthat can handle RAID levels 0, 1,5, 10, and 50.<strong>The</strong> X4270 also bumps up the maxi- X2270’s supply <strong>of</strong> Gigabit Ether<strong>net</strong> interfaceswith a total <strong>of</strong> four. It also ex- this expansion bus, the X4270 has an in-Will Sun servers soonget a coat <strong>of</strong> Oracle Redand an “Unbreakable”stamp?This says more about the X2270 thanthe X4270. While they’re both very goodexamples <strong>of</strong> Intel’s Nehalem processorarchitecture, the low-end X2270 canhold its own with its pricier brethren.Both models are impressive entriesinto the Nehalem-based server market.Sun’s x64-based hardware has beensuperlative for the past few years, andthese new servers are the latest in a line<strong>of</strong> solid server platforms. Leveragingthe surprising <strong>power</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Nehalem just about anywhere —assuming thatOracle’s acquisition <strong>of</strong> Sun doesn’trock the boat.It’s too bad that so many questionssurround Oracle’s takeover. Sun hasbeen putting out extremely inexpensive,feature-rich, and solid x64 servers forquite some time, and it’s a shame thatthe future <strong>of</strong> Sun’s hardware productionis uncertain. Note to Oracle: Sun’s hardwaredevelopment is doing very well—no need to make any changes. www.cw.com.hkSept 2009 Computerworld Hong Kong 47