CHATTERBOX - Lochwinnoch
CHATTERBOX - Lochwinnoch
CHATTERBOX - Lochwinnoch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A point of view<br />
In the course of a conversation the other<br />
day I mentioned that I had written to the<br />
leader of Renfrewshire Council to tell<br />
him that, even with my new lightweight<br />
wheel chair, I could not access the<br />
proposed library at the Mckillop Hall<br />
because the ramp is too steep and far too<br />
dangerous for me to come down. I then<br />
said, that in his reply, Mr MacKay told<br />
me that he had referred the matter to<br />
various people including his colleague<br />
Mr Davie Arthur.<br />
My neighbour turned to me and said<br />
“You do have to remember that Davie<br />
Arthur is your representative on the<br />
Council”. That statement hit at the very<br />
root of everything I stand for.<br />
David Arthur does not represent me on<br />
the Council. Just who he represents I<br />
have no idea, but when he stood up in<br />
our first Public Meeting about the<br />
proposal to close our present library and<br />
said that he was voting for the proposal<br />
to move the Library to the McKillop and<br />
that he was using his brains and not his<br />
heart, he forfeited all rights to speak for<br />
me because he had not then heard many,<br />
if any views from the floor, no message<br />
had come to me by any means from the<br />
Council to say they had any such<br />
proposal in mind, I had found no one<br />
across <strong>Lochwinnoch</strong> who knew anything<br />
about the proposal ahead of the<br />
Community Council's call to a Public<br />
Meeting. Absolutely nothing was posted<br />
locally anywhere. There is no such thing<br />
as a Public Notice Board in<br />
<strong>Lochwinnoch</strong>.<br />
So who does David Arthur represent and<br />
what agenda does he subscribe to? Is<br />
there an SNP Party ruling to close some<br />
libraries and reduce the scale and<br />
staffing of others?<br />
Is this a local SNP matter or one from<br />
Executive level? The MSPs all deny it is<br />
their doing.<br />
Is it nothing at all to do with politics and<br />
is this whole thing a matter of the local<br />
Chief Executive and his staff making a<br />
decision and more or less telling the<br />
elected Council what to do and when?<br />
Rehabilitation at Home<br />
Is it not enough that two very able and<br />
necessary part time library assistants<br />
have been dismissed to the loss not<br />
only of themselves but all of the<br />
community?<br />
What ever else it is, this latest Library<br />
project is poorly thought out,<br />
deceitfully announced, totally<br />
unrepresentative of local feelings and<br />
resolves only problems the Council has<br />
itself created.<br />
I am old enough to remember when<br />
Public servants were just that, when it<br />
was an honour to be on the local<br />
council and for the Mayor to be made a<br />
Justice of the Peace.<br />
This has brought to the forefront of my<br />
thinking the need for us all to look<br />
again at what Councils are for.<br />
One thing absolutely definite is that a<br />
Local Council is not a Parliament. We<br />
do not elect councillors to make<br />
decisions on our behalf as we do<br />
members of Parliament.<br />
We elect them to represent our points<br />
of view. We expect our views to be<br />
taken into account. We do not expect<br />
to be told that a decision cannot be<br />
changed because six months has not<br />
expired.<br />
The First rule for the Council so far as<br />
I can make out is: Don't whatever you<br />
do put the brakes on, steer a better<br />
course or go into reverse.<br />
What you do is Part two of Rule one:<br />
crawl away into some corner and hide<br />
your miserable self until the danger<br />
has passed.<br />
We have almost precisely a year to<br />
make sure the Council understands<br />
that we have had enough of their ways<br />
however they are defined.<br />
Let us begin by giving notice very<br />
clearly we have had enough of drifting,<br />
of inefficiency, of salaries being paid<br />
for poor performance. We have heard<br />
enough about how good we are from<br />
the Council. Overall they are not very<br />
good: some are and some are not. On<br />
this matter of our Library and the<br />
Annexe they have failed in every<br />
I offer physiotherapy services in the comfort of your own home<br />
including :<br />
Injury rehabilitation / Relief from back pain<br />
Managing long term conditions<br />
(eg COPD, Parkinsons, stroke or heart problems)<br />
Massage – remedial and relaxing<br />
Palliative physiotherapy<br />
If you think I can be of service, please contact me:<br />
Sabita Stewart BSc (Hons) MCSP 07940 587943<br />
sabitathephysio@gmail.com<br />
Health Professions Council: PH91860 Member of the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy: 083677<br />
6<br />
regard of us and our librarians.<br />
I am not asking Mr Mackay to do me a<br />
favour and will he please put in a ramp<br />
just for me. I have told him in a<br />
courteous way that he has a problem.<br />
His permanent staff have set about redesigning<br />
the inside of a building for an<br />
unnecessary purpose and have neglected<br />
to obey the law in one particular regard<br />
and that is that all people shall be<br />
treated equally. That means that along<br />
with any other disabled person I should<br />
be able to get myself into and out of any<br />
public building. His staff has so far<br />
failed to make that possible. They and he<br />
can hide behind so called building<br />
services decisions, in this case that this<br />
is not a new building and a ramp exists.<br />
That is so. But that ramp is not usable<br />
because it is too steep and it has only<br />
one hand rail so even if I could get up it I<br />
could not get back down again.<br />
I understand that last year a 17 year old<br />
disabled lad could not get into his<br />
Natwest Bank in Yorkshire and asked for<br />
help from the Bank which then<br />
suggested he could do his transactions<br />
on the pavement. The youngster's<br />
parents objected, lawyers became<br />
involved and took the matter to the High<br />
Court. Natwest/RBS lost and the Judge<br />
ruled that the bank must provide a low<br />
rise lift for disabled people. The<br />
youngster was awarded £6000 damages<br />
and the Banks costs came to £200,000<br />
or so I understand.<br />
I am pointing out that there is more to<br />
moving a Library than knocking down a<br />
wall and doing some re-decoration.<br />
If Mr Mackay and his Council fail to<br />
make proper provision for disabled<br />
people at any of their premises then<br />
they, like the rest of us, are subject to<br />
real Laws, both UK ones and European<br />
ones. In particular the Disability Acts.<br />
They could argue that they do not have<br />
the funds and that is always a case; but a<br />
Judge might reasonably ask. “That being<br />
the case Mr Mackay, why were you<br />
embarking on the project in the first<br />
instance?”<br />
Alan Lovegreen April 23rd 2011<br />
16 Graham's Avenue. <strong>Lochwinnoch</strong><br />
Editor’s Note—this is Alan’s personal view<br />
and is not endorsed by the editorial team<br />
or <strong>Lochwinnoch</strong> Community Council<br />
Sorry Sabita!<br />
Due to an unfortunate production problem<br />
local physio Sabita Stewart's<br />
Rehabilitation at Home ad last month<br />
was missing the last digit of her Health<br />
Professsional Council registration number.<br />
This meant that anyone trying to check her<br />
credentials would have been unable to do<br />
so. We apologise to anyone who was<br />
inconvenienced by this error and of course<br />
to Sabita. We hope the gremlins won't<br />
strike this time. Ed.