painngs o im cant seem to agree on wic soulder was iger, and it seems tat te difference wasexaggerated greatly in many o te painngs modern antropologists recon tat te sideways curvature o Ricards spine would ave ad lile impacton te way e waled and lived is lie even tesources tat are negave towards Ricard grudginglyadmit tat e was a silled and rave warrior o denitely not te ump o oul deormity descried yaespeareEven toug all o te evidence was now seeming topoint towards tis eing Ricard, te sciensts needed to e asolutely sure ne o te next maor teststat could disprove te teory in an instant was tecaron dang test Caron dang wors y looing atte natural radioacvity rom isotopes o caron,mainly caron14 As it is present in all tings tat areliving or one living, it allows us to date tem as tecaron14 decays, it emits eta radiaon, wic cane measured y a Geiger counter nce te decay asoccurred a set numer o mes, te caron is nolonger radioacve, so over me te count drops Iwe compare te count rom our sample to te nownallie o caron14 te allie is te me taenor al te radioacve atoms in a sample to decayand ecome stale) we can wor out te age o tesample However, tere are complicaons omeoods tat te person may ave eaten suc as sactually asor caron14 rom te ody, loweringte count Wen tey rst tested te sample romte seleton, te me period appeared to e too lowBut wen corrected to account or various reasonssuc as te seaood, te range given was slapangwere we oped it would e i te ones were Ricards o tats anoter c in te oxHowever, te most important test in proving te seletons identy was te NA test Even i a ody aseen dead or years, traces o mitocondrial NAare sll present on te ones Anoter advantage ocollecng it rom mitocondria is tat tis orm oNA is only passed down rom te moters side aste sperms tail tat contains tis NA reas offaer erlisaon is means tat tere is nocontaminaon o te NA, allowing a clear line toe traced to living descendants In tis case, te linewas traced to urniture maer icael Isen, wo is adirect descendent o Ricards sister Anne, meaningtat is paern o ases in is mitocondrial NA isidencal to tat o te seleton, idenying tat eyonddout te seleton was Ricard III Witout science, wewould ave not een ale to carry out tis test, oweverwitout istory we wouldnt ave enoug inormaon totrace Ricards loodline Witout istory and science coworing togeter, tis amazing discovery could avenever appenedNow tat wed idened te remains, one tas remainedrom science to determine wat te real Ricard IIIlooed lie Aer Boswort, many o te portraits oRicard were tampered wit in one was or anoter, maing small canges to mae im loo lie a villain or example, tey narrowed is eyes, gave im a small gtlipped mout and sarpened is ngers into ‘claws onone painng, is tum is literally a spie!) Now tat weave is sull, we could use our current nowledge aoutte posioning and dept o muscle ssue on te ace toreconstruct wat e really looed lie e result seeimage elow) ore a resemlance to te painngs andexposed all o te sutle canges made to teme current plan is to ury te seleton in eicester, ollowing tradional protocol and eicesters nders eepers principle However, in is will, Ricard explicitly saidtat e wanted to e uried in or, is irtplace However, tere is an online peon currently signed y over1, people proaly more y te me tis is pulised!) tat is trying to get Ricards nal wis ullledou can sign it at :hp://epeons.direct.gov.uk/peons/2and elp te last o te Plantagenets e properly put torest at last in te place tat e wanted As Pilippa angley put it, ‘Its as i Ricard wanted to e oundYou can read more about this amazing find at:bb---21063882
MATTER’SEVIL TWINEver since the paper on it in 1928, antimatter hascaptured the thoughts of science fiction writers andfans alike. Yet it is a real substance that is pro-duced in small quantities every day! Dom reports.Anmaer e very word causes science con tospring to mind, rom rocet uels or te uture to‘flawless energy generaon et in tis case, anmaeris actually science act, predicted wit a proper sciencteory in 198 and proved 4 years later Its een descried as te most expensive sustance in te world; in te general esmate was tat million dollars could produce 1 milligrams o positrons Not tatanyone would actually sell anmaer to you, no maerow ric you are – its capaility or destrucon is anoter ting tat as made it amous Wen anmaercomes into contact wit normal maer, suc as te atoms in your ody, it anniilates it completely wit aurst o enormous energy – terell e more aout tatlater But ear not, people o Eart, anmaer weaponsare not someting well e seeing in te near uture owe can rest easyor nowhat actually is anmaer?But wat really is anmaer? Beore we can understandtat, we need to loo at ‘carge and ‘spin, two intrinsicproperes o suatomic parcles suc as te electronElectric carge is a property o maer tat causes it toexperience a orce wen near oter maer wit an electrical carge is is your ‘posive and ‘negave carge– same carges repel, wile lie carges aract Easy,rigt? pin is less simple In scienc terms, its an inerent orm o angular momentum carried y elementaryparcles, composite parcles, and atomic nuclei omae it a it easier to understand, picture a asetall rotang on a players nger It can rotatele to rigt, or rigt to le, on an axis perpendicular to te nger, wic in tis analogy could represent opposite spin Now tat were clear on teterminology, anmaer is virtually idencal tomaer, wit opposite carge and spin For example, te anparcle counterpart o te electron iste ‘positron, wic as a posive carge as itsname suggests e act tat it is very similar tomaer as led to speculaon tat tere could esomewere tat is made enrely o anmaer,wit an anyou tat youd really not want tomeet! In act, te only reason our maer is‘maer is ecause in our universe tere seems toe a sortage o anmaer, so we named wat iscommon to us rsthy do maer and anmaer annihilate?I you and your anyou were to sae ands, allell would rea loose As a general rule o parcle pysics even tougt tere are some excepons), tings lie to decay into oter tings tatave as small a mass as possile is is wy eavier parcles suc as muons decay witin a racono a second Wen an anparcle and a parcleanniilate, tey produce potons, wic aremassless is is te ulmate state to acieve orparcles tat are ale to decay An electron on itsown can't simply decay into potons as carge is