12.07.2015 Views

Chapter 22: Anomalies of Convergence and Divergence

Chapter 22: Anomalies of Convergence and Divergence

Chapter 22: Anomalies of Convergence and Divergence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Anomalies</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Convergence</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Divergence</strong> 501FIGURE <strong>22</strong>–1. Active divergence elicited by prisms base-in. A, Electromyogram <strong>of</strong> right lateral rectusmuscle (upper tracing) <strong>and</strong> left lateral rectus muscle (lower tracing) before introduction <strong>of</strong> the prism.B, Increased activity <strong>of</strong> both lateral rectus muscles after 18 base-in was added while fusion wasmaintained. (From Tamler E, Jampolsky A: Is divergence active? An electromyographic study. Am JOphthalmol 63:452, 1967.)monkeys by means <strong>of</strong> electrical stimulation <strong>of</strong> the17, 44oculomotor area in the frontal lobe, whichsuggests the existence <strong>of</strong> a supranuclear controlmechanism for divergence. Second, the existence<strong>of</strong> active convergence is universally accepted,even though Warwick 57 effectively shattered theFIGURE <strong>22</strong>–2. Electromyogram during fusional divergencemovement. As the left eye <strong>of</strong> a patient with 17Dintermittent esotropia is uncovered (arrow), there is increasedactivity <strong>of</strong> both left <strong>and</strong> right lateral rectus muscles(LLR, RLR) as the eye makes a fusional divergenceeye movement. (From Tamler E, Jampolsky A: Is divergenceactive? An electromyographic study. Am J Ophthalmol63:452, 1967.)concept <strong>of</strong> Perlia’s nucleus acting as a convergencecenter. Thus the lack <strong>of</strong> more precise anatomicalinformation regarding the site <strong>of</strong> a divergencecenter does not dispose <strong>of</strong> the physiologic<strong>and</strong> clinical data that support an active divergencemechanism.Jampolsky, 30 although accepting the fact thatdivergence is an active mechanism, denied theexistence <strong>of</strong> nonretinal tonic vergence innervations.He rejected the concept <strong>of</strong> divergenceinsufficiency <strong>and</strong> paralysis <strong>and</strong> accepted only thefusional form <strong>of</strong> active divergence, that is, thatwhich is elicited by temporal disparity <strong>of</strong> retinalimages. It would exceed the purpose <strong>of</strong> this chapterto analyze this hypothesis, which is discussedfurther in <strong>Chapter</strong> 5, except to say that, in ouropinion, a tonic vergence mechanism has not beendisproved by the evidence presented. Moreover,one may argue that convergence <strong>and</strong> divergenceparalyses, as well as convergence nystagmus, arewell-recognized entities that cannot be explainedsolely on the basis <strong>of</strong> deficient fusional divergence,14 that accommodation is not necessarilydefective in convergence insufficiency, <strong>and</strong> thatexperimentally administered ethanol 6, 15, 45 <strong>and</strong> barbiturates58 have been shown to affect the tonic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!