12.07.2015 Views

OPEN PONDS AND CLOSED PHOTOBIOREACTORS ... - planktoleum

OPEN PONDS AND CLOSED PHOTOBIOREACTORS ... - planktoleum

OPEN PONDS AND CLOSED PHOTOBIOREACTORS ... - planktoleum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Open Ponds vs. Closed PhotobioreactorsParameter Relative advantage NoteContamination risk Ponds < PBRs Just a matter of time for eitherProductivity Ponds ~ PBRs NO substantial difference*Space required Ponds ~ PBRs A matter of productivityWater losses Ponds ~ PBRs Evaporative cooling neededCO2 losses Ponds ~ PBRs Depends on pH, alkalinity, etc.O2 Inhibition Ponds > PBRs O2 major problem in PBRsProcess Control Ponds ~ PBRs no major differences (weather)Biomass Concentration Ponds < PBRs function of depth, 2 -10 foldCapital/Operating Costs Ponds 10 x lower cost!*Productivity can be higher if PBRs are vertical or in cold conditions.CONCLUSION: Are PBRs better than ponds? Sometimes (e.g. incold climate), sometimes not. Advantages greatly overstated.40For biofuels can’t afford PBRs, except for inoculum productionJ. Benemann, 5 th Annual World Congress on Industrial Biotechnology, Chicago, April 30, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!