york-north-yorkshire-iaow

Each scoring question in the inspection tool contributes to a score for the relevant section in the report.This approach enables us to say how often each aspect of the work was done well enough. Each section ofthe report focuses on a key outcome.The score is based on the proportion of work judged sufficient (‘above the line’) across all the cases weinspected.The score for each of sections 1-5 is then calculated as the average of the scores for the componentgeneral criteria.The ASSISTING SENTENCING score is calculated as an average, over all the relevant questions in thecase assessment tool, of the proportion of work judged ‘above the line’.The DELIVERING THE SENTENCE OF THE COURT score is calculated as an average, over all therelevant questions in the case assessment tool, of the proportion of work judged ‘above the line’.The REDUCING THE LIKELIHOOD OF REOFFENDING score is calculated as an average, over all therelevant questions in the case assessment tool, of the proportion of work judged ‘above the line’.The PROTECTING THE PUBLIC score is calculated as an average, over all the relevant questions in thecase assessment tool, of the proportion of work judged ‘above the line’.The DELIVERING EFFECTIVE WORK FOR VICTIMS score is calculated as an average, over all therelevant questions in the case assessment tool, of the proportion of work judged ‘above the line’. Some ofthe questions in this section also contribute to the Protecting the Public score.Development of the inspection criteriaWe are grateful to the service users we met through Revolving Doors for their input on ‘what an experienceof supervision should be like’. Their thoughtful comments contributed to our detailed inspection criteria,and helped to shape our inspection guidance and set benchmarks for the quality of practice we define assufficient.Inspection of Adult Offending Work in York and North Yorkshire59