york-north-yorkshire-iaow

Recommendations

Info

Appendix 7GlossaryAccreditedprogrammeApproved premisesCEOChildren’s social careserviceChild protectionCJSDesistanceDynamic factorsEPICETEHMI ProbationInterventions;constructiveand restrictiveinterventionsStructured courses for offenders which are designed to identify and reduce thefactors related to their offending behaviour. Following evaluation, the design of theprogrammes has been accredited by a panel of expertsApproved premises provide controlled accommodation for offenders undersupervisionChief Executive Officer of a Probation TrustLocal authority agency with lead responsibility for investigating child protectionand safeguarding concerns, and where necessary talking legal action to protectchildren. They also have available a range of resource to promote of childrenat risk including accommodation and other resources including some financialsupportWork to ensure that that all reasonable action has been taken to keep to aminimum the risk of a child or young person coming to harmCriminal justice system: Involves any or all of the agencies involved in upholdingand implementing the law – Police, courts, youth offending teams, probation andprisonsThe process by which people stop offending and build a new, crime-free identityAs distinct from static factors. Dynamic factors are the factors in someone’scircumstances and behaviour that can change over timeElectronic Probation Information System: Official website for the nationalProbation ServiceEducation, training and employment: work to improve an individual’s learning, andto increase their employment prospectsHer Majesty’s Inspectorate of ProbationA constructive intervention is where the primary purpose is to reduce likelihood ofreoffending.A restrictive intervention is where the primary purpose is to keep to a minimumthe individual’s risk of harm to others.Example: with a sex offender, a constructive intervention might be to put themthrough an accredited sex offender programme; a restrictive intervention (tominimise their risk of harm) might be to monitor regularly and meticulously theiraccommodation, their employment and the places they frequent, imposing andenforcing clear restrictions as appropriate to each case.IOMLDUNB: Both types of intervention are importantIntegrated Offender ManagementLocal delivery unit: an operation unit comprising of a probation office or offices.LDUs are generally coterminous with police basic command units and localauthority structuresInspection of Adult Offending Work in York and North Yorkshire61
LSCBMARACMAPPAnDeliusNOMSOASys/ eOASysOffendermanagementOffender managerOGRSOMI 2PCMSPOPSOPSRLocal Safeguarding Children Board: set up in each local authority (as a result ofthe Children Act 2004) to coordinate and ensure the effectiveness of the multiagencywork to safeguard and promote the welfare of children in that localityMulti-agency risk assessment conference: part of a coordinated communityresponse to domestic abuse, incorporating representatives from statutory,community and voluntary agencies working with victims/survivors, children andthe alleged perpetratorMulti-Agency Public Protection Arrangements: where probation, police, prison andother agencies work together locally to manage offenders who pose a higher riskof harm to othersNational Delius: the national probation case management system which wascompleted in 2012, based on the earlier Delius system used by some ProbationTrusts. The system is being rolled out through 2013National Offender Management Service: the single agency responsible for bothPrisons and Probation TrustsOffender Assessment System/electronic Offender Assessment System: thenationally designed and prescribed framework for both Probation and Prisons toassess offenders, implemented in stages from April 2003. It makes use of bothstatic and dynamic factorsA core principle of offender management is that a single offender managertakes responsibility for managing an offender through the period of time theyare serving their sentence, whether in custody or the community. Offendersare managed differently depending on their risk of harm to others and whatconstructive and restrictive interventions are required. Individual interventionprogrammes are designed and supported by the wider ‘offender managementteam or network’, which can be made up of the offender manager, offendersupervisor, key workers and case administratorsIn the language of offender management, this is the term for the officer with leadresponsibility for managing a specific case from ‘end to end’Offender Group Reconviction Score: a predictor of reoffending based only on staticrisks such as age, gender and criminal historyOffender Management Inspection 2: HMI Probation’s inspection programme whichran from 2009 to 2012Probation Case Management SystemProbation Officer: This is the term for a ‘qualified’ offender manager who hasundertaken a higher education based course for two years. The name of thequalification and content of the training varies depending on when it wasundertaken. They manage offenders posing the highest risk of harm to the publicand other more complex casesProbation Service Officer: This is the term for an offender manager who wasoriginally recruited with no qualification. From 2010 they may access locallydetermined training to ‘qualify’ as a probation services officer or to build on this toqualify as a probation officer. They may manage all but the most complex casesor those posing the highest risk of harm to the public depending on their level oftraining and experiencePre-sentence report: this refers to any report prepared for a court, whetherdelivered orally or in a written format62 Inspection of Adult Offending Work in York and North Yorkshire
Page 1 and 2:
Inspection ofAdult Offending Work i
Page 3 and 4:
SummaryOutcomesThe proportion of wo
Page 5 and 6:
such as full details of current and
Page 7 and 8:
Assistingsentencing16 Inspection of
Page 9 and 10:
was assessed as posing a high risk
Page 11 and 12: The report for this court appearanc
Page 13 and 14: Outcome 2: Delivering the sentence
Page 15 and 16: Sentence planning paid sufficient a
Page 17 and 18: 2.3. Initial and arranged ongoing c
Page 19 and 20: 2.12. Overall we found case recordi
Page 21 and 22: Section 2 - About Experience on Pro
Page 23 and 24: SummaryOverall, 85% of work to deli
Page 25 and 26: Outcome 3: Reducing the likelihood
Page 27 and 28: to alcohol this was recognised and
Page 29 and 30: Practice illustration - The desista
Page 31 and 32: elated interventions due to the tra
Page 33 and 34: Data SummaryThe following chart sum
Page 35 and 36: Outcome 4: Protecting the public by
Page 37 and 38: cases that individuals were not act
Page 39 and 40: equires them to give priority to at
Page 41 and 42: 3. Risk of harm is minimised3.1. Su
Page 43 and 44: 4.6. Trust staff had direct access
Page 45 and 46: Deliveringeffective workfor victims
Page 47 and 48: offender manager took full account
Page 49 and 50: 5.3. Approved premises and other re
Page 51 and 52: Appendices50 Inspection of Adult Of
Page 53 and 54: Appendix 2Contextual information ab
Page 55 and 56: Principal OffenceViolence against t
Page 57 and 58: Appendix 4Inspection arrangementsFu
Page 59 and 60: Appendix 5Scoring approachThis desc
Page 61: Appendix 6CriteriaThe aspects of ad
Page 65 and 66: Appendix 8Role of HMI Probation and
show all

york-north-yorkshire-iaow

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?