US Army Combat Development Command 1973, Volume I

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Study T itleQUESTIONNAIRECommand Post Program StudviY3PLI0--._----_*Vl 1To assist in developing study decuments that contain the most suttabletype and organfzation of information, all study users are requested tofill in and return thirr. queetionnaire:1. DESIGNATION OF USER2. PURPOSE FOR WHICH STUDY WAS USED3. RECOMMENDATION /COMMENT ON CONTENT6. RECOMJENDATION/CCMMENT ON FORMAT5. DO YOU DESIRE A1)DITIONAL INFORMATION: YES -NO- (IF --'YES'LIST SPECIFIC INFORMATION DESIRED)6, OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS /COMMENTS
NOTICEThe contents of this study, including findings, conclusions, andrecommendations, are'not to Ee construed as an official Wpartmentof the Amy position, unless so designated by other authorized documents.
Page 1: ACN 18972.Command i @Post Program S
Page 5 and 6: SECURITY CFEXKLIST1. TITLE OF STUDY
Page 7 and 8: CONTENTS.QuestionnaireTitlepage..No
Page 9 and 10: STUDY CONTRIBUTORSCombat Developmen
Page 11 and 12: SUMMARYSee Executive Summary pub 1
Page 13 and 14: f TO determine testing requirements
Page 15 and 16: Forces as revealed in a recent uncl
Page 17 and 18: CHAPTER 3.SURVEY RESULTS1. REPRESEN
Page 19 and 20: e. QUESTION 5. Can you suggest a me
Page 21 and 22: (1) There was a 92.5X response to t
Page 23 and 24: staff elements are perennially orga
Page 25 and 26: echelons. Explanations given includ
Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER 4CONCLUSIONS1. GENERAL. In
Page 29 and 30: (4) Use of computers should be limi
Page 31 and 32: RECOMMENDATIONThe conclusions drawn
Page 33 and 34: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYHEADQUARTERSU
Page 35 and 36: IKCSCACS-CS 4 October 1972SUBJBCT:
Page 37 and 38: INCSCACS -CS 4 October 1972SUBJECT:
Page 39 and 40: THREATThe profile of the ground thr
Page 41 and 42: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYHEADQUARTERSU
Page 43 and 44: CDCINCSCACS -CSsuBJEfX: Combat Deve
Page 45 and 46: CDCINCSCACS -csSURTm: Combat Develo
Page 47 and 48: CIH:INcsCACs -CSSUBJECT: Combat Dev
Page 49 and 50: ~mbat IntelligenceISACDC -- Intelli
Page 51 and 52: THREAT CONSIDERATIONSThe profile of
Page 53 and 54:
5. Can the size, weight, and number
Page 55 and 56:
5.- Can the size, weight, and numbe
Page 57 and 58:
TRAINING TEXTS :16ACDC Intelligence
Page 59 and 60:
OTHER:~OIIUWII~ Post Systems, Exper
Page 61 and 62:
(2) Equipments other than those whi
Page 63 and 64:
PART IINTRODUCTIONPLEASE READ CAREF
Page 65 and 66:
Robably the most important contribu
Page 67 and 68:
PART 11 - PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Page 69 and 70:
PRINCIPAL STAFF EXPERIENCE *Gl/Sl 6
Page 71 and 72:
PART I11 - QUALITATIVE RESPONSEThis
Page 73 and 74:
QUESTION: In the combat environment
Page 75 and 76:
OUESTION:Can you suggest a means of
Page 77 and 78:
-: Can you suggest changes in the t
Page 79 and 80:
QUESTION: How could the QUALITY of
Page 81 and 82:
QUESTION:Can you suggest changes in
Page 83 and 84:
QUESTION:Can you suggest a means fo
Page 85 and 86:
-0- Can you suggest improvement in
Page 87 and 88:
PART IV - QUANTITATIVEThis portion
Page 89 and 90:
-: It has b-een suggested that the
Page 91 and 92:
QUESTION:If someone suggested that
Page 93 and 94:
_QUEST_ION:Current STAFF PROCEDURES
Page 95 and 96:
QUESTION:In terms of current author
Page 97 and 98:
m: Would you evaluate your ability
Page 99 and 100:
-: With current organization and eq
Page 101 and 102:
-: Do you find the idea of computer
Page 103 and 104:
PART V - FREE COMMENT
Page 105 and 106:
APPENDIX ESURVEY DATAData pertinent
Page 107 and 108:
ROTC : 24 or 36.4%OTHER: 9 or 13.6%
Page 109 and 110:
PART 111 - QUALITATIVE RESPONSEThis
Page 111 and 112:
structural realignment of the staff
Page 113 and 114:
QUESTION: In the combat environment
Page 115 and 116:
QUESTION: Can you suggest a means f
Page 117 and 118:
QUESTION: Can you suggest a means o
Page 119 and 120:
QUESTION: Can you suggest a means f
Page 121 and 122:
QUESTION: Can you-suggest changes i
Page 123 and 124:
QUESTION: Are the maps you are curr
Page 125 and 126:
QUESTION: How could the QUALITY of
Page 127 and 128:
QUESTION: Can you suggest innovatio
Page 129 and 130:
. The majority of C-ents suggested
Page 131 and 132:
suggested as replacing tentage for
Page 133 and 134:
QUESTIOl'J: Can you 8uggest a meane
Page 135 and 136:
QUESTION: , Can you suggest improve
Page 137 and 138:
QUESTION: (Please respond to this q
Page 139 and 140:
PART IV - QUANTITATIVEThis portion
Page 141 and 142:
a. General. Respondees replying tha
Page 143 and 144:
a. General. This question was invar
Page 145 and 146:
QUESTION: At your level, do you con
Page 147 and 148:
QUESTION: If someone suggested that
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
"6. CONCLUSIONS - The conclusions r
Page 153 and 154:
QUESTION: Current STAFF PROCEDURES
Page 155 and 156:
command has different requirements
Page 157 and 158:
are useful tools which only assist
Page 159 and 160:
Secure communications should also c
Page 161 and 162:
. Comments addressing corps echelon
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
and control prevents a command post
Page 169 and 170:
from becoming lost or misplaced, au
Page 171 and 172:
QUESTION: Wol-1.1 you describe your
Page 173 and 174:
FREE COMMENTSGeneral. In the free c
Page 175 and 176:
that must handle casualty reporting
Page 177 and 178:
1. A reduction in reporting.2. A co
Page 179 and 180:
3. Reduce the preparation of all ad
Page 181 and 182:
There is a Strong reluctance at eve
Page 183 and 184:
Returning to headquarters shortly a
Page 185 and 186:
Uncertain Line of ComunicationsLoca
Page 187 and 188:
Conmaanders Are ~~Gehensive81I woul
Page 189 and 190:
. Follow Up to see that instruction
Page 191 and 192:
Another matter of concern is compar
Page 193 and 194:
h. Commanded in Conbat: 12 or 44.4%
Page 195 and 196:
QUEST1OE.T: Can you suggest changes
Page 197 and 198:
QI'ESTIOPI: In the combat enviromen
Page 199:
QLTSTIO!?: Can you suggest a rreans
Page 202 and 203:
2 2 Yes En Comments addressed Air C
Page 204 and 205:
YesYesUse secure FH radiosUse 51j.r
Page 206 and 207:
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesIssue KY
Page 208 and 209:
23 Yes24 Yes25 Yes26 Yes27 Yes
Page 210 and 211:
QUESTION: Can you suggest innovatio
Page 212 and 213:
QIIESTION: Can you suggest chan~es
Page 214 and 215:
QUESTION: Can You suggest changes w
Page 216 and 217:
QUESTION: Can YOU suggest a means f
Page 218 and 219:
QUESTION: Can you suggest improveme
Page 220 and 221:
QUESTION: Can You suggest improveme
Page 222 and 223:
PART N - QUANTITATIVE RESPONSEPLEAS
Page 224 and 225:
QUESTION: Current TOE authorization
Page 226 and 227:
One element might overrike the othe
Page 228 and 229:
QUESTION: If someone suggested that
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
QUESTION: Some commanders establish
Page 234 and 235:
QUESTION: In terms of the informati
Page 236 and 237:
QUESTION: Current TOE authorization
Page 238 and 239:
QUESTION: In light of the mid-inten
Page 240 and 241:
QUESTION: Would YOU describe your "
Page 242 and 243:
PART V - FREE COMMEmHaving complete
Page 244 and 245:
APPENDIX GDISTI;IBUTIONADDRESSEECOP
Page 246 and 247:
ADDRESSEECOPIESCDR USACDC Systems A
Page 248 and 249:
ADDRESSEECOPIESMAIN COMPLETE EXECUT
Page 250 and 251:
Btu4*~-C-dWv-:vSAa,cIMcsMd ControlL
show all

US Army Combat Development Command 1973, Volume I

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?