12.07.2015 Views

The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A ...

The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A ...

The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the IT itself provides the primary product or service. <strong>The</strong> data collected <strong>in</strong> this study,analyz<strong>in</strong>g potential adopter <strong>in</strong>tended use <strong>of</strong> a book-sell<strong>in</strong>g Web site for the twodist<strong>in</strong>ctly different activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>quiry about and purchase <strong>of</strong> books, support thisproposition. <strong>The</strong> responses show that PU <strong>in</strong>fluenced adoption <strong>of</strong> the Web site forboth purchase and <strong>in</strong>quiry objectives, while PEOU <strong>in</strong>fluenced adoption <strong>of</strong> the Website only when its <strong>in</strong>tended use <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong>quiries.II. LITERATURE REVIEWTHE TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODELTAM is one <strong>of</strong> the most widely researched models predict<strong>in</strong>g IT adoption.Davis (1989) orig<strong>in</strong>ally exam<strong>in</strong>ed an e-mail system and a file-editor used at the timeat IBM Canada and found that both PEOU and PU were significantly correlated withself-reported use <strong>of</strong> both systems. However, when the comb<strong>in</strong>ed effect <strong>of</strong> PU andPEOU on self-reported use was exam<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>ear regression, only PUsignificantly affected use. In a follow-up study presented <strong>in</strong> the same paper, Davisasked 40 MBA students to evaluate two graphics systems with which they werepreviously unfamiliar. <strong>The</strong> subjects used workbook manuals to learn how to useboth packages before fill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>struments. Analysis <strong>of</strong> the responses given bythe MBA subjects showed that for both graphic systems, only PU determ<strong>in</strong>ed their<strong>in</strong>tention to use the s<strong>of</strong>tware.In a separate study, Davis et al. (1989) asked MBA students to fill out<strong>in</strong>struments regard<strong>in</strong>g a word-processor after exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g it for one hour and aga<strong>in</strong>after 14 weeks. Unlike the first study, Davis et al. found that PEOU, after one hour,significantly affected <strong>in</strong>tended use even when the effect <strong>of</strong> PU on <strong>in</strong>tended use wascontrolled. This significant regression relationship became <strong>in</strong>significant, however,when reexam<strong>in</strong>ed 14 weeks later with the same subjects. Unlike PEOU, PUsignificantly affected self-reported use <strong>in</strong> both time-periods.Later studies <strong>in</strong> the TAM research stream are also <strong>in</strong>consistent with respectto the effect <strong>of</strong> PEOU on downstream effects and on the mediat<strong>in</strong>g effect <strong>of</strong> PU.Journal <strong>of</strong> the Association for Information Systems 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!