12.07.2015 Views

Guidelines for Marking the work of Students who - University of ...

Guidelines for Marking the work of Students who - University of ...

Guidelines for Marking the work of Students who - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The rationale <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> this policy is to maintain equality <strong>of</strong>opportunity <strong>for</strong> students with dyslexia in respect to <strong>the</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong>course<strong>work</strong>.3. Circumstances under which special assessmentguidelines should be applied1. This marking policy should be applied to <strong>the</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> all submittedwritten <strong>work</strong> and examination or test scripts that are produced by astudent <strong>who</strong> you have been in<strong>for</strong>med has dyslexia. There is also anaspect <strong>of</strong> this policy that should be applied to <strong>the</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> an oralpresentation.2. The only circumstance that overrides point 1 above is when a corerequirement has been established as a necessary learning outcome <strong>for</strong>assessment and this core requirement conflicts with <strong>the</strong> ability to followcertain guidelines in this document. However, <strong>the</strong>se guidelines should stillbe followed as closely as possible, only excluding recommendations withinthis document that conflict with specified core requirements.3. If a core requirement exists that conflicts with this marking policy, thisshould be detailed within <strong>the</strong> module specification template and both <strong>the</strong>relevant dyslexic student and <strong>the</strong> Special Needs Tutor <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> schoolshould be made aware <strong>of</strong> this circumstance.4. Decisions to specify a core requirement that disallows students withdyslexia access to certain marking concessions outlined in this documentshould be clarified with caution. There should be clear, justifiable reasonsthat relate to academic standards and that could not be seen asdiscriminatory practice. For example, if an issue <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional training orcompetency is considered a reason <strong>for</strong> upholding basic skills as a corerequirement, it is advisable to check that <strong>the</strong> relevant pr<strong>of</strong>essional bodyactively supports this decision.5. Ideally, <strong>the</strong> relevant dyslexic student and <strong>the</strong> Special Needs Tutor <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>school should be made aware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> conflict detailed in point 3 above at<strong>the</strong> time an assignment brief is issued and both parties should be madeaware <strong>of</strong> which exclusions are to be applied.6. Written feedback provided <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> assignment or examination script shouldclearly state why <strong>the</strong>se marking guidelines were only partially applied andPage 4 <strong>of</strong> 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!