- Page 1:
Stockwell TwoAn investigation into
- Page 4 and 5:
Very soon after the shooting, civil
- Page 6 and 7:
Caroline Murdoch, the Commissioner
- Page 8 and 9:
that the reason the media were runn
- Page 10 and 11:
At 10:15hrs on the 23 July 2005, th
- Page 12 and 13:
Stockwell TwoAn investigation into
- Page 14 and 15:
3 Complainant3.1 Ms Harriet Wistric
- Page 16 and 17:
12.2 The terms of reference were am
- Page 18 and 19:
13.3.3 Additional noticeOn 20 Decem
- Page 20 and 21:
14.3 Investigation team14.3.1 The t
- Page 22 and 23:
on or respond to the criticisms. Th
- Page 24 and 25:
Paragraph 16.6 Scene investigations
- Page 26 and 27:
16.4.8 The Stockwell 1 investigatio
- Page 28 and 29:
16.6.6 DCI Evans was made aware tha
- Page 30 and 31:
16.6.17 The pathologist, Dr Shorroc
- Page 32 and 33:
16.6.32 The investigation team unde
- Page 34 and 35:
operation at the address. DI McDona
- Page 36 and 37:
16.7.11 AC Brown states that at 13:
- Page 38 and 39:
16.7.21 Ms Murdoch rejects DAC Padd
- Page 40 and 41:
16.7.27 Assistant Chief Constable (
- Page 42 and 43:
16.7.36 ACC Beckley states there we
- Page 44 and 45:
Also, DAC Paddick states there was
- Page 46 and 47:
the general view from the sub-meeti
- Page 48 and 49:
was not the same as saying that he
- Page 50 and 51:
16.7.69 At 15:50hrs D/Supt. Kavanag
- Page 52 and 53:
16.8.13 About 19:00hrs D.Ch/Supt. d
- Page 54 and 55:
and not on speculation. About 16:30
- Page 56 and 57:
esponsibility in relation to the pr
- Page 58 and 59:
AC Hayman made a telephone call bef
- Page 60 and 61:
that was itself under observation b
- Page 62 and 63:
the investigation on Thursday 21st
- Page 64 and 65:
that the victim was Mr de Menezes b
- Page 66 and 67:
16.13.5 At sometime after 15:00hrs,
- Page 68 and 69: 16.14 Newspaper articles16.14.1 The
- Page 70 and 71: 16.14.10 Later the same day Mr Clar
- Page 72 and 73: 17 Responses and interviews with of
- Page 74 and 75: 17.1.16 He was asked what was known
- Page 76 and 77: 17.1.30 He was asked if there was a
- Page 78 and 79: four bombers but he was believed to
- Page 80 and 81: entirely supported by his conversat
- Page 82 and 83: 17.3.6 He detailed the unique manag
- Page 84 and 85: 17.3.20 In relation to the allegati
- Page 86 and 87: 17.3.34 He was then asked about his
- Page 88 and 89: 19.1 Findings19.1.1 The investigati
- Page 90 and 91: DAC Paddick then passed the informa
- Page 92 and 93: Not all of the failures in relation
- Page 94 and 95: 20.2 ConclusionsBy 23:25hrs on the
- Page 96 and 97: timings with Ms Murdoch and it was
- Page 98 and 99: 21.2 ConclusionsWhen the Commission
- Page 100 and 101: 22.1.5 It is evidenced that by the
- Page 102 and 103: 23 Did AC Hayman’s alleged action
- Page 104 and 105: 24.1.5 The issue has arisen as to w
- Page 106 and 107: 25.2 AC Hayman25.2.1 The matters re
- Page 108 and 109: Recommendation 1The investigation h
- Page 110 and 111: Appendix BMPS ranks and persons ref
- Page 112 and 113: A/Cmdr. Steven GwilliamMr Paul Half
- Page 114 and 115: Appendix CSummary of MPS and IPCC p
- Page 116 and 117: His clothing and behaviour at the s
- Page 120 and 121: DATE/TIMEEVENT22/07/2005 13:15:00 M
- Page 122 and 123: DATE/TIME22/07/2005SHORTLY AFTER 15
- Page 124 and 125: DATE/TIME22/07/2005APPROX 16:30:002
- Page 126 and 127: DATE/TIME22/07/200518:20:0022/07/20
- Page 128 and 129: DATE/TIME22/07/2005APPROX 18:45:00
- Page 130 and 131: DATE/TIME22/07/2005APPROX 20:30:002
- Page 132 and 133: DATE/TIME23/07/200509:00:0023/07/20
- Page 134 and 135: DATE/TIMEEVENT23/07/200521:28:00MPS
- Page 136 and 137: Friday 22nd July 2005 Friday 22nd J
- Page 138 and 139: Friday 22nd July 2005 Friday 22nd J
- Page 140 and 141: Saturday 23rd July 2005 Saturday 23
- Page 142: Independent Police Complaints Commi