12.07.2015 Views

DALITS/SCHEDULED CASTES - 2013 - Indian Social Institute

DALITS/SCHEDULED CASTES - 2013 - Indian Social Institute

DALITS/SCHEDULED CASTES - 2013 - Indian Social Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

accused had been identified as Vinod and Prajeet, both about 21 years. Vinod and Prajeet are relativesand own an autorickshaw. They used to occasionally take the two girls, both sisters, aged 18 and 16years, in autorickshaw from their (girls’) house to a cashew factory about six kilometres away, for the lastone-and-a-half years. During this period, they developed a physical relationship with them. Both Vinodand Prajeet promised to marry the girls, then minors, and later went back on their word. A case has beenregistered under Sections 376 and 417 of IPC, the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention ofAtrocities) Act, Section 4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, on a complaintgiven by the mother of the two girls at Kollur police station and further investigations were on, the policesaid. (The Hindu 30/7/13)Another dalit-vanniyar couple run into community hurdle (2)CHENNAI: The ill-fated Divya-Elavarasan marriage, and the violence it triggered, has shattered peace inanother household where a dalit-vanniyar couple was leading a peaceful life for more than three years.Now the dalit woman, S Sudha , who married a vanniyar man in April 2010 at Kadaiyampatti village inDharmapuri district , has come knocking at the doors of the Madras high court, claiming that the entirefamily, including her in-laws , had been excommunicated. She sought protection from 'community leaders'Justice K K Sasidharan, before whom the matter came up for hearing, directed the Dharmapuri districtadministration to provide police protection to Sudha and her family members, and ensure that they livedpeacefully without any threat or attack from the 21 identified individuals of the village. Lamenting the lackof camaraderie among people from different castes, Justice Sasidharan said: "This petition projects asorry state of affairs in Tamil Nadu, and Dharmapuri district in particular. The petitioner (Sudha) had alove affair with a man of another community resulting in their marriage. She now wants to live in thevillage along with her in-laws . In a matter of this nature, the court has to strike a balance between theright of the petitioner to live in the village and the need to preserve peace and tranquillity in the area."Sudha said that after the Divya-Elavarasan episode, violence broke out in Dharmapuri. She claimed thatmembers of the vanniyar community in the village boycotted her family. Life became so miserable thatshe was forced to leave the village, she said, adding that 21 local leaders conducted a katta panchayat(kangaroo court) and excommunicated her and the family. She wanted police protection to live in thevillage. When the matter was taken up, the government pleader informed the court that police werealready providing protection to her and that two sub-inspectors and eight constables had been posted fortheir protection. Recording the submissions, Justice Sasidharan asked the Dharmapuri superintendent ofpolice to ensure that Sudha's family was able to live peacefully, and was allowed to use the village welland other common amenities without any problem…. (Times of India 31/7/13)Protect Dalit woman, Dharmapuri SP told (2)CHENNAI: The Madras High Court has directed the Dharmapuri district Superintendent of Police toprovide protection to Dalit woman S Sudha, who married an upper-caste man and thereby earned thewrath of the villagers and was ex-communicated. This writ petition projected a sorry state-of-affairsprevailing in the State in general and more particularly in Dharmapuri, Justice KK Sasidharan observedon July 26. In a matter of this nature, the court had to strike a balance between the right of the petitionerto live in the village and the need to preserve the peace and tranquility in the area, the judge added. Itwas open to Sudha to enter her village and live along with her in-laws. The police should ensure that shelived peacefully without any threat or attack by 21 persons named in her affidavit, or their men. The policeprotection must be meaningful and they should ensure that the petitioner was permitted to take water anduse other common amenities without any problem, the judge said while passing interim orders on a writpetition from Sudha. The judge also issued notices to the 21 persons, returnable by August 19. (new<strong>Indian</strong> Express 31/7/13)HC allows girl to live with Dalit husband (2)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!