12.07.2015 Views

Ecofeminism in the twenty-first century

Ecofeminism in the twenty-first century

Ecofeminism in the twenty-first century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to an FAO analysis, deforestation was concentrated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g world,which lost nearly 200 million hectares between 1980 and 1995. Beacsue of reforestationand plantation efforts <strong>the</strong> net loss was assessed at some 180 million hectares, or 12million hectares per year. In <strong>the</strong> majority of countries that FAO surveyed, deforestationrates have actually <strong>in</strong>creased s<strong>in</strong>ce 1990. (FAO, 1997)An <strong>in</strong>dication of this reality is <strong>the</strong> distance covered for forest produce by <strong>the</strong> tribals <strong>in</strong>India: over <strong>the</strong> past 20 years <strong>the</strong> difference is more than 6 kms. Because of denudationand government controls placed over rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g forests (e.g. reserves), <strong>the</strong> areaavailable for slash-and-burn has been reduced. Land <strong>in</strong> Orissa which had a rotationsystem of eighteen years, is now re-cultivated every three years. This situation ofscarcity and over-exploitation has eroded traditional norms that prevented <strong>the</strong>occurrence of over-exploitation.. Whereas <strong>in</strong> normal circumstances work culture isorganized to ensure both immediate survival and long-term survival, when immediatesurvival itself is threatened, <strong>the</strong> relevance of long-term survival of <strong>the</strong> community oftendim<strong>in</strong>ishes.The position of women/children and men<strong>in</strong> natural resources managementHumanEnvironment/SociosphereMacrolevelMesolevelMicrolevel(-)=More povertyMore <strong>in</strong>equityMore population pressureDestabilizedMore time,energy, effortDangerous exposureSafety decreased(-)Shortage of:food, water, energy,shelter, ntfps, <strong>in</strong>comeEcological <strong>in</strong>securityHealth effectedUnsusta<strong>in</strong>abledevelopment=Tak<strong>in</strong>g moreDestabiliz<strong>in</strong>gfur<strong>the</strong>rNaturalEnvironment/Ecosphere(Cycles break<strong>in</strong>g down:biodiversity andquality dim<strong>in</strong>ish)(-)=Less biodiversityDecreased qualityDestabilizedCarry<strong>in</strong>g capacity dim<strong>in</strong>ishesBiodiversity/quality/quantity decreaseswomen/childrenmen(-) negative feedbackFigure2: An unsusta<strong>in</strong>able systemFigure 2 shows what happens when <strong>the</strong> system becomes unsusta<strong>in</strong>able, both at <strong>the</strong>level of <strong>the</strong> ecosphere and <strong>the</strong> sociosphere. At <strong>the</strong> level of <strong>the</strong> ecosphere, moreresources are taken than can be regenerated, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a decl<strong>in</strong>e of biodiversity. Theecological cycles <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> system get destabilized, which means that ecological processes12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!