Amitai Etzioni David Katz Harsh Pant - Middle East Forum

ernmental goods and services to the market, seesthat they are properly transported to where themarket can gain access to them, or stored untilthey are ready for use, and exchanged for money,goods, or services. As an intermediary channel,the baradur ikhan also regularizes the transactionby standardizing the ordering, as well asvaluing and paying for goods or services betweenthe central government and the qawm. Asthe trade-relations mix is fulfilled by completedtransactions between the government and theqawm, trust is created between the local and nationalinstitutions.Cross-border sanctuaries present a challengeto any state. In theory, states either respectsovereign borders or declare war in orderto violate them. On the ground, weak or failedstates may be unable to control their borders,pursue national strategy asymmetrically throughdeniable proxy forces, or find it expedient to allowrestive minorities to become a neighbor’sproblem.To fight the Taliban and its allies in theirPakistan sanctuaries, the Afghan governmentcould make use of ghazis—semiautonomouswarlords operating as a vanguard for the centralgovernment—who would focus on expansioninto contested areas and sanctuaries outside theoperative Afghan state. These ghazis couldconduct limited campaigns in hostile or contestedPashtun territories with a view to confederatingindependent manteqas and tribes andconsolidating hostile manteqas under their authorityand de-facto Afghan central control. 19The ghazis must be co-opted, controlled,and counterbalanced in order to preclude competitionwith the state. U.S. funding, logisticaland combat support, as well as air power andspecial forces support are all available counterbalances.Shifting support among competingghazis could reinforce dependency on U.S. andallied forces. Upon successful societal reformulationof confederated or consolidated populations,the ghazis will have to be incorporatedinto the Afghan state institutions through “actsof union” granting equal rights to those populationsthrough locally arbitrated rather thancentrally appointed representation.FIGHTING ARMEDSALAFISMThe war in Afghanistan is both nativist andsectarian. Any viable strategy must engage anddefeat the Taliban in both. As an alien implant ina predominantly Hanifi Sunni society, armedSalafism in Afghanistan has exploitable weaknesses.For one thing, its doctrinarian oppressivenesscreates an enormous resource drainand places Salafism in opposition to many preexistinglocal constituencies and natural societalforces. For another, despite its atavisticyearning for the restorationof an idealized past,Salafism is a modernmovement that lacks historicweight compared totraditional Islam. TheTaliban, in particular, arepoorly tutored in Islamicand Afghan history andhave rudimentary familiaritywith the Qur’an andThe Russiansbegan usingSufism as acounterbalanceto Salafism inChechnya.the Shari‘a (Islamic law), not to mention politicaland theoretical developments in the Muslimworld during the twentieth century. 20 This in turnleaves them exposed to numerous counter-strategies.It is possible, for example, to exploitSalafism’s doctrinal characteristics and tendenciesto wedge it away from and render it foreignto Afghan society, then use that foreignness toinvoke an immune response from natural componentsof that society. It may also be possibleto enhance and intensify existing schisms betweendoctrinal purist Salafists and their morepragmatic and less theological jihadist counter-19 See a similar idea in Robert Bartlett, England under theNorman and Angevin Kings: 1075- 1225 (Oxford: ClarendonPress, 2000), p. 73.20 Ahmed Rashid, Taliban (New Haven: Yale University Press,2000), p. 93.Katz: Pashtun Society / 25