12.07.2015 Views

Untitled - South East Asian Journal of Medical Education

Untitled - South East Asian Journal of Medical Education

Untitled - South East Asian Journal of Medical Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

environment. Our results are discussed inthe light <strong>of</strong> these studies.The majority <strong>of</strong> graduates agreed thatmost teaching/ learning activities wereuseful in gaining knowledge and skillsnecessary to practice as a house <strong>of</strong>ficer. Astudy <strong>of</strong> Students' perspectives on theeducational environment at the Faculty <strong>of</strong><strong>Medical</strong> Sciences, Trinidad; where theDREEM questionnaire administered t<strong>of</strong>inal-year medical students and first-yearmedical interns, the overall studentperceptions were positive with a meanDREEM score <strong>of</strong> 109.9 ( Bassaw et al.,2003).Traditionally, apprenticeship learning hasbeen relevant for the medical pr<strong>of</strong>ession(Vleuten et al., 2000), and still theapprentice system <strong>of</strong> clinical clerkshipremains the cornerstone <strong>of</strong> clinicalinstruction (Harth et al., 1992). This view isreflected by most graduates who found theclerkship based AHO scheme in Medicineto be useful. Yet a study at the University<strong>of</strong> Antwerp, Belgium concluded thatClinical clerkships do not automaticallyprovide an ideal learning environment formedical students (Remmen et al., 2000).Some teaching/ learning activities such aslabour room activities were found to beenjoyable by many graduates and thisview is reflected in the above study wheredelivery room activities were reportedmost favourably with regard to instructivevalue. The attitude <strong>of</strong> the consultants wasviewed as prejudiced and temperamentalby some graduates. This view is reiteratedin many studies by comments such as:tutors displayed favouritism, anger, apatronizing attitude, and even victimizedand ridiculed students (Harth et al.,1992).Incidents <strong>of</strong> humiliation by seniormedical staff occurred when the studentswere repeatedly unable to answer thesame questions or when they werecriticised for an inadequate clinicalexamination (Lempp & Seale, 2004). Theirindividuality was not recognised in thatneither their existing skills nor theexperience were acknowledged by doctors(Seabrook, 2004).This behaviour <strong>of</strong> consultants was rated asbeing highly stressful by many graduates.Even in other studies relationships withconsultants aroused strong feelings, withstudents describing stressful situationssuch as being humiliated in front <strong>of</strong> theirpeers (Radcliffe & Lester, 2003). Similaraspects <strong>of</strong> the teacher−studentrelationship have been reported asstressful, such as being expected to havemedical knowledge which they had notbeen taught and incidents when they wereshouted at or felt humiliated (Lempp &Seale, 2004). This highly negative aspect<strong>of</strong> stress in teaching through humiliation isa recurring theme.The low ratings for student-nurserelationship in the study are reflected inother studies and several reasonspostulated. In one study, “several incidentswhere nurses and midwives treatedmedical students disrespectfully arereported, and such behaviour may indicatea degree <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional rivalry” (Lempp &Seale, 2004). Another states that“students' relationships with nurses couldalso be difficult, reflecting some <strong>of</strong> thetensions between the two pr<strong>of</strong>essions, andthe lack <strong>of</strong> a formal role for nurses inmedical education” (Lempp & Seale,2004).With regards to assessing final yearclinical training, some graduates perceivedexaminers <strong>of</strong> long/ short cases to beprejudiced and inconsistent. According toPonnamperuma et al., 2003) thesetraditional forms <strong>of</strong> assessment have beenexcluded from current assessmentsystems <strong>of</strong> many institutions. Reiteratingour findings they further state that thesemethods lack standardisation andobjectivity, and suggest variants such asOSCEs and alternatives such as Portfolioassessments as better methods.The MCQ type currently used at the finalyear assessments are true/ falsequestions, which graduates found to testfacts. Swanson (Harth et al., 1992)highlights this deficiency by stating that “intrue/ false questions we are pushedtowards assessing recall <strong>of</strong> an isolatedfact”, and suggests that “application <strong>of</strong>knowledge, integration, synthesis andjudgement questions can better beassessed by one-best-answer questions.As a result, the NBME has completelystopped using true/ false formats on itsexaminations”28<strong>South</strong> <strong>East</strong> <strong>Asian</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Education</strong>Inaugural issue

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!