42Oral Communicationsboth increased the percentage of apoptosis to amean value of 75%. (range 54-79%). The incubationwith BAY11-7082 and PS1145 decreased theproliferation of 49% (range 37-68%) and 51%(range 39-71%) respectively. The apoptosis wasincreased of 57% and 65% respectively. In additionthe colony growth was evaluated after incubation.The number of colonies was reduced of <strong>89</strong>% respectto the control after incubation with MG132, of 74%with PS341, of 35% with BAY 11-7082 and 48% withPS1145.These data demonstrated that the in vitrotreatment with NF-κB inhibitors is able to block theproliferation and to induce apoptosis in AML blastcells. NF-κB may therefore be considered an attractivetarget for a molecular therapy in AML patients<strong>no</strong>t candidate for conventional chemotherapy.CO-37DETECTION OF MLL REARRANGEMENTS INCLUDING THEMLL/AF9 FUSION IN ACUTE MYELOID LEUKAEMIA BY ASPECIFIC AND HIGHLY SENSITIVE FISH APPROACHCavazzini F, Cuneo A, Ciccone ML, Bardi A,Tammiso E, Agostini P, Castoldi GSezione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di ScienzeBiomediche e Terapie Avanzate, Università degliStudi di Ferrara, Italy11q23 chromosome translocations involving theMLL gene occur at a 3-5% incidence in acute myeloge<strong>no</strong>usleukemia (AML) and identify a sub-categoryof AML in the WHO classification. A number ofpartner chromosome were identified and the mostfrequent reciprocal translocation is represented bythe t(9;11)(p21;q23)/MLL-AF9, accounting for 30-50% of AML with 11q23 breaks. The identification of11q23/MLL rearrangement is important in clinicalpractice and it is <strong>no</strong>t clear whether the t(9;11) maycarry the same unfavourable prog<strong>no</strong>stic significanceas other 11q23/MLL breaks. Because the molecularapproach to the detection of MLL rearrangements istime consuming and conventional cytogenetics mayhave low sensitivity, we designed a two-step fluorescencein situ hybridization (FISH) approach to thedetection and characterization of MLL breaks,including the t(9;11)/MLL-AF9.Probes. We used as afirst step screening PAC probes dj271a21 anddj167k13 mapping proximal and distal to the 11q23breakpoint. These probes were labelled in green (5prime) and red (3 prime) and carried a minimal overlapresponsible for the green-yellow-red fusion signal.In those cases showing an 11q23/MLL break, asecond step analysis was performed using the sameMLL probes directly labelled in green and BAC probes73e6 and 336o12 labelled in red recognising DNAsequences proximal and distal to the k<strong>no</strong>wn AF9breakpoints. Samples. The probes were tested on 5<strong>no</strong>rmal BM controls, on 25 cases with AML withoutcytogenetic evidence of 11q23 translocation and on24 AMLs with an 11q23 translocation, 8 of whichhad the classical t(9;11)(p21;q23). The investigatorwas unaware as to the result of cytogenetic analysis.Results. More than ninety-eight percent of 1000interphase nuclei from the 5 control samples showedthe expected 2 fusion signal configuration using theMLL probes, and 97,3% of 1000 nuclei showed the<strong>no</strong>rmal 2 green 2 red signal pattern using the MLLand AF9 probes. No case of cryptic 11q23 break wasseen among 25 cases without evidence of 11q23break at cytogenetic analysis. In one patient withsub-optimal quality of metaphase spreads an MLLbreak was detected by interphase FISH. An MLL splitsignal was observed in 56-78% of interphase nucleiin all 24 cases with an 11q23 translocation. In 1 casedeletion of the telomeric portion of MLL was seen in68% of the cells. The second step FISH experimentswere performed in 10 out of 24 cases with documentedMLL break, the remaining cases being currentlyunder investigation. No evidence of MLL/AF9fusion was detected in 6 patients with 11q23translocation other than the t(9;11), whereas a dualfusion signal was seen in 67-91% of the cells in 4patients with cytogenetic evidence of t(9;11). Nopatient with MLL/AF9 fusion showed microdeletionssurrounding the MLL and AF9 genes. We arrived atthe following conclusions: (i) Our first step probesystem has a very high sensitivity and specificity inthe detection of MLL breaks; (ii) It enables detectio<strong>no</strong>f MLL deletions and duplications, which may in partbe missed by commercial probes; (iii) the MLL/AF9probes detected all k<strong>no</strong>wn cases with t(9;11), with a100% specificity in interphase nuclei; (iv) overall, thefrequency of microdeletions surrounding the MLLand AF9 breakpoints appears to be low.CO-38INTERNAL TANDEM DUPLICATION OF BOTH MLL AND FLT3GENES IN MYELOID LEUKEMIAS WITH TRISOMY 11Rege-Cambrin G,* Giuglia<strong>no</strong> E,* Scaravaglio P,*Serra A,* Michaux L,^ Stul M,^ Hagemeijer A,^Saglio G*Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Oncology,Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, Osp.S. Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassa<strong>no</strong>, Italy; ^Center forHuman Genetics, University of Leuven, BelgiumIntroduction. Trisomy 11 as a sole chromosomalab<strong>no</strong>rmality is a rare aberration observed in myelodysplasticsyndrome (MDS) and/or acute myeloblasticleukemia (AML). Molecular characterization of de<strong>no</strong>vo AML with trisomy 11 has shown a consistenthaematologica vol. <strong>89</strong>[suppl. n. 6]:september <strong>2004</strong>
VIII Congress of the Italian Society of Experimental Hematology, Pavia, September 14-16, <strong>2004</strong>43association with a partial tandem duplication (PTD)of the MLL gene, reported in 20% to 73% of the cases.This rearrangement leads to in-frame fusion of aportion of the proto-oncogene with itself, and thisseems to represent a new genetic mechanism forleukemogenesis. Self-fusion of the MLL gene hasbeen also observed in patients with <strong>no</strong>rmal karyotype,although at a much lower frequency. Internaltandem duplication (ITD) has been demonstrated asa oncogene-activating mechanism also in a<strong>no</strong>thergene involved in AML, namely the FLT3 gene, whichencode for a receptor tyrosine kinase widelyexpressed in hemopoietic cells and precursors. FLT3-ITD occurs in approximately 20% of unselected de<strong>no</strong>vo adult AMLs, with a higher frequency in patientswith <strong>no</strong>rmal cytogenetics and is associated with poorprog<strong>no</strong>sis in most series. Coduplication of MLL andFLT3 has been first observed by Jamal (Genes ChromCancer 2001) in two cases of AML, one also showingtrisomy 11.Aim of the study: to evaluate the presenceand the possible association of the MLL andFLT3 tandem duplication in 20 patients with myeloidmalignancies carrying a trisomy 11 as a primarya<strong>no</strong>maly. Methods: Karyotype was analyzed bothwith standard cytogenetics and FISH with centromericprobe for chromosome11 and double-colorprobe for MLL gene. Southern blot was used to evaluateMLL rearrangement, and MLL-PTD was confirmedby RT-PCR (Caligiuri MA, Cancer Res 1996).FLT3-ITD was analyzed by RT-PCR (Nakao M et al. ,Leukemia 1996). Results: Diag<strong>no</strong>sis was AML, eitherde <strong>no</strong>vo or secondary, in 15 patients; MDS in 4 cases;myeloproliferative disorder in accelerated phasein one case. We observed a MLL duplication in 41%of the patients with +11 (54% of AML patients). FLT3internal tandem duplication was observed in 31% ofthe patients with trisomy 11 (38.5% of AMLpatients), with a overall incidence similar to thatobserved in patients with <strong>no</strong>rmal karyotype. However,4 out of 5 (80%) of the FLT3-ITD + cases alsoshowed MLL-PTD, in contrast to FLT3-ITD negativecases where MLL-PTD was observed in 3/11 (27.3%).Median survival was 14.5 months for the wholegroup of +11 cases, 18 months for the patients negativefor the MLL-PTD and only 6 months for thepatients who had a MLL-PTD. Conclusions: Trisomy11 is associated with a group of AML and MDS characterizedby a poor clinical outcome; more than 40%of these patients also show the internal duplicatio<strong>no</strong>f MLL, and these cases have an extremely poorprog<strong>no</strong>sis. FLT3-ITD appears to be quite common inpatients with MLL self-fusion and coexpression ofthe two a<strong>no</strong>malies could be explained on the basisof a common pathogenetic mechanism and/or similarresponse to ge<strong>no</strong>toxic stress. FLT3 duplicationmay cooperate in determining the poor outcomeobserved in patients with trisomy 11.CO-39COMBINED ANALYSIS OF BCL-2 AND MDR1 PROTEIN IN 256CASES OF ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIAMazzone C, Maurillo L, Del Poeta G, Del Principe I,Venditti A, Panetta P, Cox C, Neri B, Ottaviani L,Amadori SCattedra-Divisione di Ematologia, Osp. S. Eugenio,Università di Rome "Tor Vergata", ItalyChemotherapy failure due to cellular drug resistanceis a major problem in the treatment of acutemyeloid leukemia (AML). The objectives of the studywas to investigate the coordinate expression ofMDR1 and bcl-2 proteins in de <strong>no</strong>vo AML. Theexpression of the two proteins was analyzed by flowcytometry in a large series of 256 consecutive casesof AML. The results were achieved as percentage ofpositivity and relative mean fluorescence intensity(rMFI). To determine individual protein levels, anindex which equals the product of the percentage ofpositive cells and rMFI, was also generated. Using acut-off of 800 and 300 of index value for bcl-2 andMDR1, respectively, we identified 4 different classesof AML: 1) double neg; 2) single pos[bcl-2 + MDR1 − ];3) single pos[bcl-2-MDR1 + ]; 4) double pos. The highestincidence of double neg cases was observed inthe M2 class whereas double pos cases occurredmore frequently in the M4, M5 and M6 subgroups.Seventy-eight percent and 71% of M0 and M1,respectively, belonged to the single pos[bcl-2+MDR1-] group (p = 0.00001). Accordingly, therewas a significant association between single pos[bcl-2 + MDR1 − ] pattern and CD34 expression (p =0.00001). In the double pos group, 57% of the caseshad a poor prog<strong>no</strong>sis karyotype, 37% intermediate,and only 6% of the patients had a good prog<strong>no</strong>siskaryotype (p = 0.04). Twenty-eight percent ofpatients belonging to the double pos categoryachieved CR, whereas for double neg, single pos[bcl-2 + MDR1 − ] and single pos[bcl-2-MDR1 + ] category,the CR rate was 69%, 52% and 56%, respectively (p= 0.00038). In multivariate analysis, the double posstatus independently affected frequency of CR (p =0.008). In conclusions, the combined analysis of bcl-2 and MDR1 allowed different classes of AML to beidentified. Bcl-2 is over-expressed in immature AML,conversely, MDR1 is over-expressed in terminally differentiatedAML. However, the occurrence of the twoproteins is <strong>no</strong>t mutually exclusive since their coordinateexpression defines a distinct subset of AMLwith a very poor prog<strong>no</strong>sis.haematologica vol. <strong>89</strong>[suppl. n. 6]:september <strong>2004</strong>
- Page 1 and 2: haematologicahJournal of Hematology
- Page 3: haematologicaeditorial boardeditor-
- Page 6: supplement 6, September 2004Table o
- Page 9 and 10: VIII Congress of the Italian Societ
- Page 11 and 12: VIII Congress of the Italian Societ
- Page 13 and 14: VIII Congress of the Italian Societ
- Page 15 and 16: VIII Congress of the Italian Societ
- Page 18 and 19: 12Main ProgramAcknowledgments: this
- Page 20 and 21: 14Main Programhaematologica vol. 89
- Page 22 and 23: 16Oral Communicationsexpression. TR
- Page 24 and 25: 18Oral CommunicationsBEST-06NK CELL
- Page 26 and 27: 20Oral Communications: Molecular He
- Page 28 and 29: 22Oral Communications: Molecular He
- Page 30 and 31: 24Oral Communications: Hematopoieti
- Page 32 and 33: 26Oral Communications: Hematopoieti
- Page 34 and 35: 28Oral Communications: Hematopoieti
- Page 36 and 37: 30Oral Communications: Non-malignan
- Page 38 and 39: 32Oral Communicationsmodulation of
- Page 40 and 41: 34Oral Communicationsfollow-up samp
- Page 42 and 43: 36Oral Communicationsinary results
- Page 44 and 45: 38Oral Communicationslow-grade NHL)
- Page 46 and 47: 40Oral CommunicationsOral Communica
- Page 50 and 51: 44Oral CommunicationsCO-40POTENTIAL
- Page 52 and 53: 46Oral Communicationsshowed an exte
- Page 54 and 55: 48Oral CommunicationsThe molecular
- Page 56 and 57: 50Oral Communicationsthe transcript
- Page 58 and 59: 52Oral Communicationsing to apoptot
- Page 60 and 61: 54Oral CommunicationsCO-54NEOPLASTI
- Page 62 and 63: 56Oral CommunicationsOral Communica
- Page 64 and 65: 58Oral Communicationssystem-Promega
- Page 66 and 67: 60Oral Communicationsthe relationsh
- Page 68 and 69: 62PostersPosterACUTE MYELOID LEUKEM
- Page 70 and 71: 64Postersone course of CI-FLA. Ther
- Page 72 and 73: 66Postersed to GST deletions and CY
- Page 74 and 75: 68Posterstion until optimal VPA pla
- Page 76 and 77: 70Posterseffective biotechnological
- Page 78 and 79: 72Postersdirectly to maintenance th
- Page 80 and 81: 74PostersPosterACUTE LYMPHOID LEUKE
- Page 82 and 83: 76Postersformed in half the patient
- Page 84 and 85: 78Posterspatients correlating data
- Page 86 and 87: 80Postersleukemia-related and thus
- Page 88 and 89: 82PostersCD33/CD16, CD13/CD16, CD45
- Page 90 and 91: 84PostersIn myelodysplastic syndrom
- Page 92 and 93: 86Postersin our series of 376 conse
- Page 94 and 95: 88PostersPO-041FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS
- Page 96 and 97: 90PostersPO-044FISHING NUP98 INVOLV
- Page 98 and 99:
92Postersof AML blasts to RA. In su
- Page 100 and 101:
94Postersafter 72-96 h treatment wi
- Page 102 and 103:
96PostersPosterMOLECULAR HEMATOLOGY
- Page 104 and 105:
98Postersanalyse the transcribed HU
- Page 106 and 107:
100Postersed with the gain of the i
- Page 108 and 109:
102Postershowever, been reported in
- Page 110 and 111:
104Postersand the intrinsic apoptot
- Page 112 and 113:
106Postersferentation by BM stromal
- Page 114 and 115:
108PostersPO-075NONMYELOABLATIVE AL
- Page 116 and 117:
110Posters9-12, 17-20/28 d on odd c
- Page 118 and 119:
112PostersPosterMULTIPLE MYELOMA II
- Page 120 and 121:
114Posterssion, the immunomodulator
- Page 122 and 123:
116Posters(p-ERK1/2) levels in myel
- Page 124 and 125:
118PostersPO-092ROLE OF THE MEVALON
- Page 126 and 127:
120Postershis study evaluates the p
- Page 128 and 129:
122PostersPosterNON-ONCOLOGICAL HEM
- Page 130 and 131:
124PostersPO-101A WHOLE BLOOD FLOW
- Page 132 and 133:
126Postersthat ITP DCs, after pulsi
- Page 134 and 135:
128PostersTherefore in the proposit
- Page 136 and 137:
130Postersods and early effective a
- Page 138 and 139:
132PostersPO-116FIP1L1-PDGFRA FUSIO
- Page 140 and 141:
134Postersand of course, as reducti
- Page 142 and 143:
136Posterscurrently under study bec
- Page 144 and 145:
138Postersmg/day (Haematologica 200
- Page 146 and 147:
140Postersno severe reaction were o
- Page 148 and 149:
142PostersCML for clinical and haem
- Page 150 and 151:
144PostersPO-135THE ATG-SAPORIN-S6
- Page 152 and 153:
146Postersthrough a flow cytometry-
- Page 154 and 155:
148Posterspredominant TCR peak prec
- Page 156 and 157:
150Postersrejection or cytopenia, w
- Page 158 and 159:
152Postersphocytes. Anti-leptin blo
- Page 160 and 161:
154Postersmy), which the patient re
- Page 162 and 163:
156Postersgr/m 2 +GCSF) followed by
- Page 164 and 165:
158Postersremission of 100% of MCL
- Page 166 and 167:
160Posterswould require an early an
- Page 168 and 169:
162PostersPO-165SPONTANEOUS MOBILIZ
- Page 170 and 171:
164PostersPO-168TLR7 AND TLR9 LIGAN
- Page 172 and 173:
166PostersFR and/or CDR clustering
- Page 174 and 175:
168PostersPO-174INDUCTION OF FAS UP
- Page 176 and 177:
170Postersup data were available, m
- Page 178 and 179:
172Posterssamples showing RFC methy
- Page 180 and 181:
174PostersIn the last few years the
- Page 182 and 183:
176PostersPO-187RELAPSED/REFRACTORY
- Page 184 and 185:
178Posters1.The association of prim
- Page 186 and 187:
180Posterswith generalizated lympho
- Page 188 and 189:
182PostersPO-196EPRATUZUMAB/SAPORIN
- Page 190 and 191:
184Postersantioxidant capacity of p
- Page 192 and 193:
186PostersCD16/CD56 + (NK) cells an
- Page 194 and 195:
188Postersby PBSCT, as the general
- Page 196 and 197:
190Postersnode biopsies, three from
- Page 198 and 199:
192PostersPO-212ANALYSIS OF IGV GEN
- Page 200 and 201:
194Postershaematologica vol. 89[sup
- Page 202 and 203:
IIVIII Congress of the Italian Soci
- Page 204 and 205:
IVVIII Congress of the Italian Soci
- Page 206 and 207:
VIVIII Congress of the Italian Soci
- Page 208 and 209:
VIIIVIII Congress of the Italian So
- Page 210 and 211:
XVIII Congress of the Italian Socie