12.07.2015 Views

Jurisdictions Guidelines for Accepting a UCC Record for Filing

Jurisdictions Guidelines for Accepting a UCC Record for Filing

Jurisdictions Guidelines for Accepting a UCC Record for Filing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2h. The filer provides in<strong>for</strong>mation in item 1e that doesnot appear to be a type of organization.2i. The filer fails to provide any in<strong>for</strong>mation in item1f (assuming a debtor name was provided in item 1a).2j. The filer provides in<strong>for</strong>mation that does not appearto be a jurisdiction in item 1f.2k. The filer fails to provide in<strong>for</strong>mation or check“none” in item 1g (assuming a debtor name wasprovided in item 1a).2l. The filer provides in<strong>for</strong>mation that does not appearto be an organization identification number in item 1g.2m. The filer provides a debtor name that wraps tomultiple lines in the name field.*Accept 9-520(a) ID: Reject if “other” or left blank.NJ: Reject – 12A:9-516(c)(1)Reject 9-516(b)(5)(C)(ii) LA, OK, TN: AcceptCA, PA: Only requires that 1e, 1f or 1gbe completed per Section 9-516(b)(5)(C)(iii)Accept 9-520(a) ID: RejectNJ: Reject – 12A: 9-516(b)(6)Reject 9-516(b)(5)(C)(iii) AR, CA, GA, OH (ORC§1309.503(A)(1)), OK, TN, LA: AcceptDE: Accept. Requires only 1e and 1f (9-516(5)(C)NJ: Possibly accept – 12A: 9-516(b)(6)AL, NY: Accept – Does not have 9-516(b)(5)(C)(iii)PA: Only requires that 1e, 1f or 1g becompleted per Section 9-516(b)(5)(C)(iii)Accept 9-520(a) ID: RejectAccept 9-520(a)* Acceptance implies that the font and character sizeare legible.Revised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 4 of 35


2n. The filer provides part of a long debtor name initem 1a and continues the name in another debtorname field (item 2a or on the <strong>UCC</strong>1Ad in item 11a).Accept and index 1aas first debtor nameand index 2a and/or11a as separateadditional debtor(s)9-520(a)IL: Accept, will accommodate requests ifintent is clear.2o. The filer provides part of a long debtor name initem 1a and continues the name in the collateral ormiscellaneous field (item 4 or on the <strong>UCC</strong>1Ad in item10 or item 16).Accept and index thedebtor name as onlywhat is presented initem 1a.9-520(a)IL, MT: Accept, will accommodaterequests if intent is clear.Revised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 5 of 35


Section 3. Secured Party In<strong>for</strong>mation3a. The filer provides an organization name in item 3aand an individual name in item 3b. One address isprovided in item 3c.Option 1 – RejectOption 2 – Accept asto item 3a and item3b using item 3c asaddress <strong>for</strong> both9-516(b)(5)(B)Option 1: AL, CO, ID, IL, KY, LA,MA, ME, MI, MN, MO, MT, NC, ND,NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH, RI, TN, VA,WA, WI, WY, UTOption 2: DE, GA, KS, MD, MT, NC,NE, NH, OK, OR, PA, SD, TX, WVAR- Accept by paper only3b. The filer provides in<strong>for</strong>mation in the city field andeither the state or <strong>for</strong>eign country field in 3c.Accept 9-520(a) CA, DE, GA, IL (IARC 14 §180.15b),KY, ME, MA, NC, NJ, OH (ORC§1309-513(B)(5)(a)), OK, OR, RI, TN,UT, WV (516(b)(5)(A)): Reject as musthave address, city, state and zip code orUSPS standardAL, PA: Requires street address and zipcode or a street address, city and stateCO: Reject, requires address, city andstateMI, MN, ND: Requires city, state andzip code onlyNV: Reject <strong>for</strong> state, accepts <strong>for</strong>counties. (NAC 104.200 (b))SD: Reject per Administrative RuleRevised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 6 of 35


Financing Statement AddendumSection 9. Name of First Debtor on RelatedFinancing Statement9a. The filer fails to replicate in<strong>for</strong>mation in item 9 as Accept 9-520(a) Noneprovided in item 1.9b. The filer truncates the in<strong>for</strong>mation in item 9 that Accept 9-520(a) Nonewas provided in item 1.9c. The filer abbreviates the in<strong>for</strong>mation in item 9 that Accept 9-520(a) Nonewas provided in item 1.9d. The filer fails to provide in<strong>for</strong>mation in item 9. Accept 9-520(a) NoneSection 10. Miscellaneous10a. The filer provides in<strong>for</strong>mation that appears torequire filing officer action.Accept and take noaction9-520(a)SD: Takes actionCO, DE, GA, WV: Accept and takeaction if intent is clearKS: Takes action <strong>for</strong> non-<strong>UCC</strong> filingsonlyTX: Indexes party in<strong>for</strong>mation if intentis clearSection 11. Additional Debtor11a. See debtor in<strong>for</strong>mation in Section 1 of thisdocumentRevised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 9 of 35


Section 12. Additional Secured Party12a. The filer provides in<strong>for</strong>mation in the city field,and either the state or <strong>for</strong>eign country field in 12c.Accept 9-520(a) CA, DE, GA, IL, KY, ME, MA, MD,NC, NJ, OH (ORC §1309-513(B)(5)(a)),RI, UT, WV: Reject as must haveaddress, city, state and zip code or USPSstandardAL, PA: Requires street address and zipcode or a street address, city and stateMI, MN, ND: Requires city, state andzip code only.NV: Reject <strong>for</strong> state, accepts <strong>for</strong>counties per Administrative RulesSection 18(2)OR: Accepts the filing, but rejects theadditional Secured Party <strong>for</strong> incompleteaddress. 9-516(4)CO: Accept, but do not index additionalSecured PartySD: Reject according to administrativerulesTN: Partial reject if no state and 12 notindexed; must have complete mailingaddress (earlier version of MARproviding partial rejects <strong>for</strong> SPs and516(b)(4))12b. The “Assignor” box is checked. Accept – index thein<strong>for</strong>mation as asecured party9-514(a)AL, DE, IL, OK, TN,: Accept and takeno actionWV: Accept and add AssigneeRevised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 10 of 35


1c. The filer provided a number assigned to anamendment (<strong>UCC</strong>3) rather than an initial financingstatement number.Reject 9-516(b)(3)(B)(i) AL, NJ, WV: Does not assign a newnumber to a <strong>UCC</strong>-3 filingOK: Accept, filer must make surenumber is original numberSection 2. Termination2a. A termination is received after othertermination(s) filed.Accept 9-520(a) WV: RejectNE: Accept only if originally terminatedpost RA9Section 3. Continuation3a. Multiple continuations received within the sixmonthcontinuation window.Accept – only extendlapse date on firstcontinuation9-520(a)MT: Not currently accepting but willaccept when new computer system isdesigned.MD, MO, WV: Will not accept secondcontinuationMN: Reject online, accept if filed bypaper.CO: Accept first continuation, reject allothersNone3b. Continuation statement received within the sixmonthcontinuation window but after termination andprior to lapse date.Accept and extendlapse date9-520(a)Revised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 14 of 35


Sections 5, 6 and 7. Amendment (PartyIn<strong>for</strong>mation)Assumption: Name “change” and Name “add” asindicated in item 5 and item 7a or item 7b meansname not previously provided, i.e., new name. Thisassumption applies to both secured party and debtor.5a. The amendment affects the debtor. The filerchecks “Change” in item 5 and provides in<strong>for</strong>mationin item 7a and omits item 7e, item 7f, or item 7g.ID: With regard to sections 5, 6, and 7,accept and take no action when filer doesnot check change, delete, or add but hascompleted in<strong>for</strong>mation in item 7.AL, DE, GA, MO, NC, NE, OK, UT:Rejects assumption. Recognize“Change” as a party that has beenpreviously indexed and “Add” as a partythat has not previously been indexedOR, ND: Rejects assumption.Reject 9-516(b)(5)(C) LA, TN: AcceptDE, ND: Accept per 9-520(a) namechange does not affect jurisdictionOR: If in<strong>for</strong>mation is given in item 6,accept and index. If no info is given,accept and take no action.CA, PA: Only requires 7e, f, or g perSection 9-516 (b)(5)(iii)Revised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 16 of 35


5b. The amendment affects the debtor. The filerchecks “Change” in item 5 and provides in<strong>for</strong>mationin item 7a or item 7b, and presents in<strong>for</strong>mation in thecity field and either the state or <strong>for</strong>eign country field ofitem 7c.5c. The filer checks “Change” and only providesin<strong>for</strong>mation in item 6 (current record in<strong>for</strong>mation).5d. The filer checks “Delete” and only providesin<strong>for</strong>mation in item 7 (Changed (New) or AddedIn<strong>for</strong>mation).Accept 9-520(a) CA, GA, IL, KY (516(b)(4) and (5)(A)),ME, MA, MD, MO, NJ, OH (ORC§1309.516(B)(5)(a)), OK, RI, TN(516(b)(5)(A)), UT: Reject as must haveaddress, city, state and zip code or USPSstandardAL, PA: Requires street address and zipcode or a street address, city and stateMI, MN, ND: Requires city, state andzip code onlyNV: Reject <strong>for</strong> state, accepts <strong>for</strong>counties. (NAC 104.200 (b))SD: Reject according to administrativerulesReject 9-516(b)(4), (5) DE, GA, LA, OR: Accept and take noactionAccept and take no 9-520(a)MT, MO, NC, ND, OH (ORCaction§1309.512(E)(1) & (E)(2)), UT, WI,WV: Reject as need an indication ofdebtor or secured partyTN: Reject; record not communicatedby an authorized method 9-516(b)(1)5e. The filer checks “Add” and only providesin<strong>for</strong>mation in item 6 (current record in<strong>for</strong>mation).Reject 9-516(b)(4), (5) DE, GA, LA, OR: Accept and take noactionRevised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 17 of 35


5f. The filer does not check “change,” “delete,” or“add” in item 5. The filer has only providedin<strong>for</strong>mation in item 6 (current record in<strong>for</strong>mation).5g. The filer does not check “change,” “delete,” or“add” but does check “secured party” or “debtor” initem 5. The filer has only completed in<strong>for</strong>mation initem 7 (Change (New) or Added In<strong>for</strong>mation).5h. The filer checks “Change” or “Add”. No otherin<strong>for</strong>mation is provided.Accept and take noaction9-520(a)MO, MT, OK, TX, WV: Reject, mustindicate the type of amendmentAR, NY: RejectNE, ND, NV, UT: Reject per 9-516(c)(2). Need indication of type ofamendmentTN: Reject; record not communicatedby an authorized method - 516(b)(1)IL, PA: Reject (9A-516(c)(1)Accept and add 9-520(a)AR , MD, MA, MO, MT, ND, NV, OHdebtor/secured party(ORC §1309.512), OK, TX, WI, WV:Reject, <strong>for</strong>m must indicate the type ofamendment (change debtor, deletesecured party, continuation, etc.)CO, ID, ME, RI, OR, NE: Accept andtake no actionIL, TN: Reject; record notcommunicated by an authorized method -516(b)(1)NY, PA, UT: Reject (9A-516(c)(1)Reject 9-516(b)(4), (5) CO, DE, GA, LA, OR: Accept and takeno actionRevised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 18 of 35


5i. The filer fails to check either “Debtor” or “SecuredParty” but an action is indicated in item 5 and requiredin<strong>for</strong>mation is provided in item 7.5j. The filer checks “Debtor” and “Change” in item 5,only provides debtor name in item 6 and in<strong>for</strong>mationin item 7e, item 7f and item 7g.5k. The filer checks “Secured Party” and “Change” initem 5, only provides a secured party name in item 6aor item 6b, and a secured party name in item 7a oritem 7b.5l. The filer checks “Secured Party” and “Add” initem 5, only provides a secured party name in item 6aor item 6b and a secured party name in item 7a or item7b.5m. The filer checks “Debtor” or “Secured Party” and“Change” in item 5, only provides a name in item 6aor item 6b and in<strong>for</strong>mation in item 7c.Accept and take noaction9-520(a)AR, MO, NY, WV: RejectMA, MI, ND, NV, OK, TX, UT, WI:Reject need an indication of debtor orsecured partyMT, OH (ORC §1309.512): Rejectrequire <strong>for</strong>m to indicate the type ofamendment (change debtor, deletesecured party, continuation, etc.)TN: Reject; record not communicatedby an authorized method - 516(b)(1)CA, IL, PA: Reject (9A-516(c)(1)Reject 9-516(b)(5)(A) AR, DE, ID, LA, OR, TX, WV: Acceptand take no actionCO, OK, UT: Accept and indexND, SD: Accept and index if on originaldebtor in<strong>for</strong>mationReject 9-516(b)(4) AR, DE, ID, IL, LA, SD, TN, TX, WI:Accept and add name with existingaddress (TX reject if name in 6 does notmatch the index)CO, MD, ND, OK, OR, UT: Acceptand indexReject 9-516(b)(4) LA: Accept and add nameReject 9-516(b)(4), (5) AL, AR, CO, DE, GA, IL, LA, MD,MI, ND, OH (ORC 1309.516(B)(4) and(B)(5)) OR, RI, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA:Accept and index new addressin<strong>for</strong>mation as indicatedRevised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 19 of 35


5n. The filer checks “Debtor” and “Change” in item 5and provides the same name in item 6a and item 7aand in<strong>for</strong>mation in item 7c only, omitting item 7e,item 7f or item 7g.5o. The filer checks both “Debtor” and “SecuredParty” boxes in item 5.5p. The filer checks “Debtor” and “Change” in item 5,provides debtor name in item 6a or 6b and same debtorname in item 7a or 7b, plus completes in<strong>for</strong>mation initems c, e, f, and g.5q. The filer checks “Debtor” and “delete” in item 5and provides a name in item 6.Reject 9-516(b)(5)(C) CO, DE, GA, LA, MI, ND, OR, PA(Section 9-516 (b)(5)(iii)), TN: Acceptand indexRejectAccept and index(Filer is addingorganizationalin<strong>for</strong>mation to therecord)Accept and take noaction9-516(c)(1) withrespect to 9-516(b)(4), (5) and(6)9-520(a)9-520(a)LA, OR: Accept and take no actionSD: Accepts multiple changes on oneamendment <strong>for</strong>m.MT, OK: Will accept if amendment isclear as to the debtor and secured partybeing modified and they have checkedthe “add”, “delete” or “change” box.NoneCO, DE, GA, LA, MD, MT, ND, NV,OK, OR, RI, UT: Accept and index.ID, MO: Accept and delete the debtor.Section 8. Amendment (Collateral Change)8a. The filer provides in<strong>for</strong>mation in item 8 and failsto indicate requested action “deleted, added, restated,or assigned”.Accept and take noaction9-520(a)MO, MT, NV, OK, UT, WI, WV:Reject. Requires the <strong>for</strong>m to indicate thetype of amendment (change debtor,delete secured party, continuation, etc)AR, GA, IL, ND, NE, PA: Reject per 9-516(c)(2). Need indication of type ofamendment.LA: Accept and enter exactly as given in8.Revised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 20 of 35


8b. The filer checks all boxes in item 8. Accept 9-520(a) AR, ID, IL, MO, MT, ND, NV, OK,PA, UT, WI: Reject as indecipherable.Section 9. Name of Secured party Authorizing thisAmendment9a. The filer does not provide a Secured Party orDebtor name in item 9.NE: Reject per Administrative RulesAccept 9-520(a) FL, GA, IL (810 ILCS 5/9-509(d)(1),5/9-514), MT: Reject if the currentsecured party and debtor of record doesnot appear on the amendment <strong>for</strong>m.Section 10. Optional Filer Reference Data10a. The filer provides in<strong>for</strong>mation in item 10. Accept and take noaction9-520(a)Note:<strong>Jurisdictions</strong> thatrequire morein<strong>for</strong>mation thansimply the filenumber, the filingoffice has the dutyto locate suchin<strong>for</strong>mation on the<strong>for</strong>mNoneAMENDMENT ADDENDUM:a. The filer provides in<strong>for</strong>mation in item 13. The filerhas not provided the initial financing statementnumber in item 11.b. The filer provides in<strong>for</strong>mation in item 13. The filerdoes not provide the Name of Party Authorizing theamendment in item 12.Accept 9-520(a)Accept 9-520(a)NoneNoneRevised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 21 of 35


c. The filer provides in<strong>for</strong>mation in item 13 thatappears to require filing office action.Accept and take noaction9-520(a)CO, DE, GA, MD, ND, OK, SD, TX,UT: Accept and index if intent is clearMT: Will reject if adding or changing aparty name because they must identifywhether party is an individual ororganizationAMENDMENT COMBINATIONSa. The filer checks item 2 (termination) and item 3(continuation).Accept; index item 2and extend lapse date9-520(a)CA, OH, OK, WV: Reject, invalidcombinationCO: Reject, 9-516(c)(1)MT, NE, NY, SD, WI: Reject perAdministrative RulesGA, IL (Admin Rule 180.12 e), LA, MA(950 CMR 140.14), MD, MI, MS, NE,NH, NM, NV, PA, RI: Reject, will notallow multiple actionsRevised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 22 of 35


. The filer checks item 2 (termination) and item 4(assignment).Accept; index bothitem 2 and item 49-520(a)DE: Accept and index assignment ifitem 7 is completed. Managementsystem will not accept multiple actionsCA, OH, OK, WV: Reject, invalidcombination.MT, NE, NY, SD, WI: Reject perAdministrative RulesNH: Reject, 9-512(f), 9-512(b)(8)c. The filer checks item 2 (termination) and item 5(party in<strong>for</strong>mation).Accept; index item 2and item 59-520(a)AL, GA, IL (Admin Rule 180.12 e), LA,MA (950 CMR 140.14), MD, MI, MS,NE, NH, NV, PA, RI: Reject, will notallow multiple actionsMT, NE, NY, SD, WI: Reject perAdministrative RulesAL, GA, IL (Admin Rule 180.12 e), LA,MA (950 CMR 140.14), MD, MI, MS,NE, NH, NV, PA, RI: Reject, will notallow multiple actionsCA, OH, OK, WV: Reject, invalidcombination.Revised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 23 of 35


d. The filer checks item 2 (termination) and item 8(collateral change).Accept; index bothitem 2 and item 89-520(a)DE: Accept and index as collateralchange. Management system will notaccept multiple actionsSD: Accept and disregard item 8MT, NE, WI: Reject per AdministrativeRulesAL, GA, IL (Admin Rule 180.12 e), LA,MA (950 CMR 140.14), MI, MS, NE,NH, NV, PA, RI: Reject, will not allowmultiple actionsCA, OH, OK, WV: Reject, invalidcombination.e. The filer checks item 3 (continuation) and item 4(assignment).Accept; extend lapsedate and index item 49-520(a)DE: Accept and extend lapse date; noaction taken on assignmentNH: Reject, 9-512(f), 9-512(b)(8)SD, NE: Reject per AdministrativeRulesGA, IL (Admin Rule 180.12 e), LA, MA(950 CMR 140.14), MD, MI, MS, NE,NH, NV, PA, RI: Reject, will not allowmultiple actionsRevised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 24 of 35


f. The filer checks item 3 (continuation) and item 5(party in<strong>for</strong>mation).Accept; extend lapsedate and index item 59-520(a)DE, OK: Accept, index continuation,ignore party amendment as managementsystem will not allow multiple actions.NH: Reject, 9-512(f), 9-512(b)(8)SD, NE, WI: Reject per AdministrativeRulesGA, IL (Admin Rule 180.12 e), LA, MA(950 CMR 140.14), MD, MI, MS, NE,NH, NV, PA, RI: Reject, will not allowmultiple actionsg. The filer checks item 3 (continuation) and item 8(collateral change).Accept and extendlapse date and indexitem 89-520(a)NH: Reject, 9-512(f), 9-512(b)(8)SD, NE, WI: Reject per AdministrativeRulesh. The filer checks item 4 (assignment). The filerchecks box in item 5 (party in<strong>for</strong>mation-debtor) otherthan “delete.” Items 6 & 7 are left blank.i. The filer checks item 4 (assignment). The filerchecks box in item 5 (party in<strong>for</strong>mation-securedparty) other than delete. Items 6 & 7 are left blank.RejectReject9-516(c)(1) withrespect to 9-516(b)(5) and (6)9-516(c)(1) withrespect to 9-516(b)(4) and (6)GA, IL, LA, MA (950 CMR 140.14),MD, MI, MS, NE, NH, NV, PA, RI:Reject, will not allow multiple actionsSD, WV: AcceptSD, WV: AcceptRevised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 25 of 35


j. The filer checks item 4 (assignment). The filerchecks “delete” in item 5 (party in<strong>for</strong>mation-debtor).Accept; index bothitem 4 and item 59-520(a)DE, OR: Accept and index <strong>for</strong>assignment only (if item 7 is complete).CA, OK: Reject, invalid combination.GA, IL (Admin Rule 180.12 e), LA,MA, MD, MI, MS, NE, NH, NV, NY,PA, RI: Reject, will not allow multipleactionsUT: Reject as intent is uncleark. The filer checks item 4 (assignment). The filerchecks “delete” in item 5 (party in<strong>for</strong>mation-securedparty).Accept; index bothitem 4 and item 59-520(a)WV: Accept and index both if 7 iscomplete.CA, OK: Reject, invalid combination.UT: Reject as intent is unclearDE, OR: If item 7 is completed, acceptand index <strong>for</strong> assignment onlyGA, IL (Admin Rule 180.12 e)LA, MA,MD, MI, MS, NE, NH, NY , NV, NY,PA, RI, WI: Reject, will not allowmultiple actionsRevised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 26 of 35


l. The filer checks item 4 (assignment) and item 8(collateral change).m. The filer checks item 5 (party in<strong>for</strong>mation) anditem 8 (collateral change).Accept; index bothitem 4 and item 8Accept; index bothitem 5 and item 89-520(a)DE, OR: Accept and index asassignment, if item 7 is complete. If notcomplete accept as an amendment.UT: Accept if item 7 is complete;otherwise Reject.CA: Reject, invalid combination.GA,IL, LA, MA, MD,MI, MS, NE (perAdministrative Rules), NH, NV, PA, RI:Reject, will not allow multiple actions9-520(a) DE, WI: Accept and index as to item 5,ignore collateral change as managementsystem will not allow multiple actions.OK, UT: Accept and index as to item 8,disregard item 5 if action is required.GA, IL, LA, MA, MD, MI, MS, NH,NV, PA, RI: Reject, will not allowmultiple actionsMISCELLANEOUS ITEMSa. Use of words such as “same,” “N/A,” “notapplicable,” “none;” or “see attached,” “seeaddendum,” “see exhibit;” or comparable phrases.Accept - Words usedin the <strong>for</strong>m fieldsshould not beinterpreted by thefiling office. <strong>Filing</strong>Office should indexall <strong>for</strong>m fields exactlyas given.9-520(a)IL, OK, TX, WV: Ignores words orreviews attachments.Revised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 27 of 35


. Forms1. Forms other than national or model <strong>for</strong>ms Reject 9-521 AL: File as nonstandard with additional$5 fee, LA: addl. $15 fee, WI: addl. fee.CO, DE, MD, MO, ND, NM, NJ, OH,WV: AcceptFL, ND, SD: Accept, also accept own<strong>for</strong>ms.Revised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 28 of 35


2. Forms that mimic national or model <strong>for</strong>ms (fieldsare different sizes, etc.):Accept 9-521 AL, SD: Reject as nonstandard <strong>for</strong>m.3. IACA Model <strong>for</strong>ms:Accept and Index9-521<strong>UCC</strong>-1 Initial Financing StatementAccept and Index9-521None<strong>UCC</strong>-1 Initial Financing Statement AddendumAccept and Index9-521None<strong>UCC</strong>-3 AmendmentAccept and Index9-521NoneAdditional Party Addendum (<strong>UCC</strong>-1 and <strong>UCC</strong>-3Accept and Index9-521Nonec. Attached Pages• Filer adds an attachment that is not the nationaladdendum <strong>for</strong>m.Accept – do notindex in<strong>for</strong>mation onattachment.CO, GA, LA, ND, SD, WV, WY: IndexIL, DE, NY, OK, TX: Accept and indexif content is clear• Filer adds an attachment that is not the nationaladdendum <strong>for</strong>m, but that contains properly<strong>for</strong>matted in<strong>for</strong>mation.d. Bogus or fraudulent filingsAccept – do notindex in<strong>for</strong>mation onthe attachment.MD: RejectMT: In both cases, we will accept ifadding additional collateral but willreject if adding additional partiesFor Item d.1:1. Filer provides the same name in items 1 and 3of IFS (i.e., debtor and secured party are thesame).Accept9-520(a)AL, MT, ND, OR, SD: Reject peradministrative ruleMI (MCL 440.9520(5)(c) and (e)), NC,WV: Reject per statuteIL, TX (Gov. Code 405.022)– Submit toAttorney General <strong>for</strong> review – most getrejectedNE, NJ, VA: RejectRevised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 29 of 35


For Item d.2:GA: Accept and set five year lapseperiod.2. Individual debtor is listed and box 18 ischecked indicating the debtor is a transmittingutility.Accept – set lapsedate to be effectiveuntil terminated.9-520(a), 9-515(f)AL, DE, ID, IL, MI (MCL440.9520(5)(c) and (e)), MT, ND, NJ,NM, NV, OH (ORC 111.24(A)), OR(ORS 79.102(1)(bbbb), SD: RejectOK: Transmitting Utilities filed at statelevel only; reject at county level.PA: Reject if it appears that the debtor isnot a legitimate TU, 9-516(c)(1).WV: Reject without proof oftransmitting utilityTX (Gov. Code 405.022) – Submit toAttorney General <strong>for</strong> review – most getrejectedMN (MNR 8280.0150(D)): Do not lapseTU because they don’t know if allSecured Parties terminated.Revised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 30 of 35


For Item d.3:3. Copies of personal documents, such as birthcertificate, social security number, etc. areattached.Accept9-520(a)AL (Administrative Rules 820-4-3.02(3)(b)), MI (MCL 440.9520(5)(c)and (e)), MT, NJ, OH (ORC 111.24(A)),OR (ORS 79.0516(2)(h), SD, TX:RejectMO: Reject social security numbers,others accepted.For Item d.4:4. Debtor listed is a public official.Accept9-520(a)AL(Administrative Rules 820-4-3.02(3)(b)), DE, ID, MI (MCL440.9520(5)(d)), NJ, NV, OH (ORC111.24(A)), OK, OR, PA, SD: RejectTX (Gov. Code 405.022)– Submit toAttorney General <strong>for</strong> review – most getrejectedNE, WA (RCW 60.70.030(2)): Mayreject, if recognized on the recordWI: Accept or reject based on legalreviewIL(810 ILCS 5/9-516(b)(3.5)): Rejectand submit to General Counsel <strong>for</strong>further reviewRevised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 31 of 35


5. The filing appears on its face to be bogus orfraudulent.Accept*<strong>Filing</strong> officer canonly reject if astatutory rejectionreason is present. Thefiling officer maychoose to notify thedebtor of a bogusfiling, but is notrequired to do so.9-520(a)For Item d.5:AL (AAR 820-4-3.02(3)(b)), DE, MI(MCL 440.9520(5)(c)), MT (MCA 30-9A-420), NC, NJ, OH (ORC 111.24(A)),OR (ORS 79-516(2)(h)), SD: Reject perAdministrative RuleNV: Reject unless proven to beregistered utility based on opinion byAttorney GeneralPA: Reject, 9-516(c)(1)IL, TX (Gov. Code 405.022): Submit toAttorney General <strong>for</strong> review – most getrejectede. Customer Service Issues• <strong>Filing</strong> requests made in cover letters or post-itnotes,such as “file first.”Use reasonablejudgment toaccommodate request9-520(a),NoneRevised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 32 of 35


<strong>Jurisdictions</strong> that have validated in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> 2010 Conference:AR, CA, CO, DE, GA, ID, IL, KS, LA, MA, ME, MI, MN, MO, MT, NC, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NV, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, TX, UT, VA, WA, WI,WY<strong>Jurisdictions</strong> that have not provided input:AZ, DC, FL, HI, SC, VTRevised 06/25/2010 Copyright, International Association of Commercial Administrators, 2002 Page 35 of 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!