12Basildon near London, Town and ShoppingCenter13Stevenage Town Center1CiNC'FITH CAFIC'LINA AFICHITECTand business offices and recreationfacilities. There are also localshopping facilities in each"village", including the obligatoryEnglish pub; these earliertowns are designed much moredispersed than Cumbernauld.One interesting feature is thatmany of the industrial plants, inorder to attract female labor,have found it necessary to provideadditional nurseries and daycare centers for pre-school children.This especially in the newtowns since the average age ofthe inhabitants is relativelyyoung, and they are planned forfamilies with children.What then are the basic differencesbetween these towns andtheir housing discussed and whatis being built in the US?First of all there is a difference inattitude. lt is agreed in most ofthese northern industrial democraciesthat every citizen has theright to a living job and to decenthousing, and right to freehealth care and free education,to social security and adequatesupport when old, as well as supportbetween jobs. The basicdifference between the US andthese countries is that this is regardedas the right of each citizenit would not occur to anyone- to call this charity as it is oftenstill done here. In fact, thepeople are supporting this legislationwith their own money, andthe taxes are very steep indeed.Nor is housing considered a consumerproduct on which to makea maximum profit-as in the US.The actual building of the housingis organized in different ways,depending on the country, buteverywhere there is a wide varietyof choices, f rom singlehouses to large apartmentblocks. There is private ownership,cooperatives, as well as
government financed rental housingwhere rents are adjusted tothe income of the inhabitants.But everywhere the governmenttakes part in the financing andsometimes also construction andupkeep.The other basic difference, whichindeed is crucial and which theUS cities lack: Stockholm, as wellas Oslo and Helsinki, own theland surrounding them. The landdevelopment legislation in GreatBritain is well known. Withoutthis control it would be impossibleto build these new towns orindeed to plan any rational developmentfor the benefit anduse of the majority of the peoPle(rather than in the US for thespeculative gain of a few). Thereare no suburbs which follow theirown destiny ignoring the citY.The new communities plannedby the cities on their own landprovide new and better livingconditions and housing, whilesome of the worst old sections inthe cities are being torn downand rebuilt. Schools, shoppingcenters, health facilities, recreationand industrial parks areplanned as integral parts of thenew towns. Traffic is organizedfor maximum safety for children,and frequently pedestrians moveentirely separated from cars.By contrast, the one thing that isentirely absent from all the developmentsI saw near the citiesis the cheap and ugly commercialdevelopment that accompaniesall roads out of town in theUS, from used car lots to gas stations,doughnut and ice creamparlors, motels of every kind,cheap stores and eateries, allfestooned with umpteen signsoutdoing each other by attentionseeking, blaring vulgarity. Thissimply is not tolerated by plannersor by the public, a factwhich is no loss to the enterprisesinvolved because no oneengages in this kind of showoffsport. All development isplanned, and commercial developmentis designated to certainareas. In England, green beltssurround all new towns near London,and there are definiteplanned city limits. The commercialreal estate speculator isnot permitted for his own Profitto ruin the view for the motoristor spoil the attractive environmentfor the use of people.By comparison with these peopleand government supported efforts,we have done painfully littlein the US for the average US citizenand nothing at all for the bottomthird of the country, some40-50 million people, many morein fact than all the populationscombined of all the Scandinaviancountries. What we havebuilt in terms of new communitiesis available only due tocost to the middle and -mostlyupper- middle class.The most attractive planned newdevelopment in the US that canbe called a town is Reston in Virginia,some 30 miles outside ofWashington and near the newDulles Airport. The others thatshould be mentioned here areGolumbia, Maryland (betweenBaltimore and Washington), andlrvine Ranch in Orange County,south of Los Angeles.Reston's town center is just 18miles from the White House.On the edge of Lake Anne (whichis used for swimming and boating)and punctuated by a highriseapartment building, the towncenter is reserved for pedestrians.With shops, restaurants,and community facilities, it presentsa gay and lively picture tothe visitor. In terms of housingand recreation and just plain attractiveliving, Reston certainlyis tops. But it is evident that atthe prices this handsome, privatelydeveloped communitymust charge to those who wantto live there, not even many employedin the shops of the towncan afford to rent, let alone buyaccommodations. Therefore inReston as obviously also withboth the-other communities mentioned,as well as all suburbandevelopments everywhere in theUS price simply excludesmore than half, if not two-thirds,of the population.In Reston, which is well ahead indevelopment of the other twoAPFu L {s6e 17