DOC request two, part 1/5 - Cannabis Defense Coalition
DOC request two, part 1/5 - Cannabis Defense Coalition
DOC request two, part 1/5 - Cannabis Defense Coalition
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
From:sent:To:Subject:Meiusborn-Marsh,Stefani L. (<strong>DOC</strong>), Friday, November 17,20061:58 PM ,Gerstenberger, Peter (<strong>DOC</strong>); Baddgor, Amy N. (<strong>DOC</strong>)RE: Medical MariJuana,' ,Lori Ram'sdell was at the SElme meeting where this was discussed. She feels that if the courts'ays nO marijuana, then they will uphOld that regardless of whether the offender has a'card/prescription. There is also an'issue ofhow much-I believe the law says 2 months worth,which could be interpreted many ways. lfin doubt~ take it to a hearing and see what they say. Ifit is OAA, we need to follow the OAA hearing process. But if they have a court-ordered conditionthat I]eeds clCirification, then that Clarification goes to the court. If the PA's office,is non~responsive, site the offender into court., -----Original Message-----From: Gerstenberger, Peter (<strong>DOC</strong>)Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 1:46 PM -,To:Meusborn~Marsh, Stefani L. (~OC)Subject: FW: Medical Marijuana-----Original Message-----From: Baddgor, Amy N. (~OC)Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 9:12 AMTo:<strong>DOC</strong> OL SW 380 ALL STAFFSubject: FW: Medical MarijuanaStef, I have a similar case but provided me with a .confusing document that did not appear tobe a valid prescription from up north. I submitted a special report asking the patosite himinto court for a ruling: There was no response. I told the offender that I would hCjve to denyhis use of marijuana wi~hout court authorization., He could obtain an attorney and let theattorn~y pursue court authorization/memo of disposition and I would follow th~ court order, 'otherwise, I would not allow further use of marijuana~ If he continues to use, I would violatehim. His isan oaa case. , Have you heard'what the hearings unit's position is on this?Should I send the violation to the court ,instead for resolution? thanks---~-Original Message----- "From: Meusborn-Marsh, Stefani L. (~OC)Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 9:03'AM ,To: 'Baddgor, Amy N. (<strong>DOC</strong>); Wilcox, Scott H. (<strong>DOC</strong>); Albert, Frank S. 'Scott' (<strong>DOC</strong>); A,mell, Gelinda L.(<strong>DOC</strong>); Cain, Wayne P. (<strong>DOC</strong>); Degroat, John J. (<strong>DOC</strong>); Frice; Jeffery S. (<strong>DOC</strong>); Hall, Edward J.(<strong>DOC</strong>); Harris, Janet S; 'Jan' (<strong>DOC</strong>); Kopf, John A. (<strong>DOC</strong>); O'Brien, Mary F. 'Diane' (<strong>DOC</strong>); Story,Robert J. (<strong>DOC</strong>); Swanson, David W (<strong>DOC</strong>)Subject: RE: Medical Marijuana, "Amy-:- We had a discussion about this yesterday at the Community Corrections DivisionMeeting. If we have an offender with a medical marijuana card/prescription- it has to be aWashington prescription/card- it cannot be one issued in Oregon. It is the offendersre~ponsibility to provide the correct documentation. There is only one doctor that is ,prescribing in this state and it sounds like it is quite a process. Also, the court can overridethat and prohibit the consumption if they chose, so we can site it before the court for thediscussion if we want. " ,-----Original Message-----From: Baddgor, Amy N. (<strong>DOC</strong>)Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 8:19 AMTo: ,Meusborn-Marsh, Stefani L. (<strong>DOC</strong>)"Subject: Medical MarijuanaStefani-'00,0013
Change language