S. aureus Nasal Carriage - Epidemiology - Erasmus MC

I - 12INTRODUCTION/ Chapter 1/ What Determines Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage?42. Rountree, P.M. Staphylococci harboured by people in westernhighlands of New Guinea. Lancet 1, 719-720 (1956).43. Armstrong-Esther, C.A. Carriage patterns of Staphylococcusaureus in a healthy non-hospital population of adults and children. Ann HumBiol 3, 221-7 (1976).44. Goslings, W.R.O. & Buchli, K. Nasal carriage rate of antibioticresistantstaphylococci. Arch Int Med 102, 691-715 (1958).45. Hoffler, U., Bulanda, M., Heczko, P.B. & Pulverer, G. A comparisonof staphylococcal nasal carrier rates in Germany and Poland. Med MicrobiolImmunol 164, 285-290 (1978).46. Maxwell, J.G., Ford, C.R., Peterson, D.E. & Mitchell, C.R. Long-termstudy of nasal staphylococci among hospital personnel. American Journal ofSurgery 118, 849-854 (1969).47. Riewerts Eriksen, N.H., Espersen, F., Thamdrup Rosdahl, V. &Jensen, K. Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus among 104 healthy personsduring a 19 month period. Epidemiol Infect 115, 51-60 (1995).48. White, A. Quantitative studies of nasal carriers of staphylococciamong hospitalized patients. J Clin Invest 40, 23-30 (1961).49. Bruun, J.N. Post-operative wound infection: predisposing factorsand the effect of a reduction in dissemination of staphylococci. Acta MedScand 514, 1-89 (1970).50. Calia, F.M., Wolinsky, E., Mortimer, E.A., Jr., Abrams, J.S. &Rammelkamp, C.H., Jr. Importance of the carrier state as a source ofStaphylococcus aureus in wound sepsis. J Hyg.(Lond) 67, 49-57 (1969).51. White, A. Increased infection rates in heavy nasal carriers ofcoagulase- positive staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 30, 667-670(1963).52. Van Belkum, A. et al. Coagulase and protein A polymorphisms donot contribute to persistence of nasal colonisation by Staphylococcus aureus.J Med Microbiol 46, 222-32 (1997).53. VandenBergh, M.F. et al. Follow-up of Staphylococcus aureus nasalcarriage after 8 years: redefining the persistent carrier state. J Clin Microbiol37, 3133-40 (1999).54. Noble, W.C., Williams, R.E.O., Jevons, M.P. & Shooter, R.A. Someaspects of nasal carriage of staphylococci. J Clin Path 17, 79-83 (1964).55. Aly, R., Shinefield, H.R., Litz, C. & Maibach, H.I. Role of teichoicacid in the binding of Staphylococcus aureus to nasal epithelial cells. J InfectDis 141, 463-5 (1980).56. Carruthers, M.M. & Kabat, W.J. Mediation of staphylococcaladherence to mucosal cells by lipoteichoic acid. Infect Immun 40, 444-446(1983).57. Patti, J.M., Allen, B.L., McGavin, M.J. & Hook, M. MSCRAMMmediatedadherence of microorganisms to host tissues. Annu Rev Microbiol48, 585-617 (1994).58. Foster, T.J. & McDevitt, D. Surface-associated proteins ofStaphylococcus aureus: their possible roles in virulence. FEMS Microbiol.Lett.118, 199-205 (1994).59. Espersen, F. & Clemmensen, I. Isolation of a fibronectin-bindingprotein from Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 37, 526-531 (1982).60. Shuter, J., Hatcher, V.B. & Lowy, F.D. Staphylococcus aureusbinding to human nasal mucin. Infect Immun 64, 310-318 (1996).61. Thomas, V.L., Sanford, B.A. & Ramsay, M.A. Calcium- and mucinbindingproteins of staphylococci. J Gen Microbiol 139, 623-629 (1993).62. Sanford, B.A. & Ramsay, M.A. In vivo localization of Staphylococcusaureus in nasal tissues of healthy and influenza A virus-infected ferrets.Proc.Soc Exp.Biol.Med. 191, 163-169 (1989).63. Sanford, B.A., Thomas, V.L. & Ramsay, M.A. Binding ofstaphylococci to mucus in vivo and in vitro. Infect.Immun. 57, 3735-3742(1989).64. Biesbrock, A.R., Reddy, M.S. & Levine, M.J. Interaction of a salivary2004 © J.L. Nouwen \ December 8 th 2004 \ Thesis: Determinants, Risks & Dynamics of Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage