30.11.2012 Views

AAPI 8th Quarterly Report Jul-Sept 2012

AAPI 8th Quarterly Report Jul-Sept 2012

AAPI 8th Quarterly Report Jul-Sept 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ice farmers and individuals receiving training) were new indicators and did not have targets set<br />

in the operational plan. The remaining two (i.e., area under FDP technology and number of<br />

farmers adopting the technology) apply to the Aman crop and will be reported in the next quarter.<br />

Nine custom indicators were established (under the CA) for the <strong>AAPI</strong> project . In this<br />

quarter, targets were either achieved or exceeded in four of the indicators. Progress was below<br />

target in five of the results indicators. The failures arose from the failure of the Aus crop due to<br />

drought. While this affected all production data, it is important to note that the farmers’ use of Guti<br />

urea and FDP did result in a positive impact on yields and reduced fertilizer use, even though the<br />

target achievement. Details are shown in the following table. Full explanations are provided in the<br />

main text.<br />

<strong>AAPI</strong> Results Achieved Against Targets in Quarter 8 (<strong>Jul</strong>y-<strong>Sept</strong>ember <strong>2012</strong>)<br />

<strong>Jul</strong>y-<strong>Sept</strong>ember <strong>2012</strong><br />

Total (FTF and % of Achievement<br />

FTF M&S<br />

M&S)<br />

Against Target<br />

Result Indicators<br />

FTF Core IndicatorS<br />

Unit Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual FTF M&S Total<br />

Area under FDP<br />

technology – rice<br />

ha<br />

Area under FDP<br />

technology – vegetable<br />

ha<br />

Rural households<br />

benefiting directly<br />

No. 85,968 95,420 19,602 21,288 105,570 116,708 111 109 111<br />

Value of incremental<br />

sales of rice<br />

million<br />

US $<br />

3.99<br />

0.18 4.20<br />

Farmers adopting FDP<br />

technology<br />

No.<br />

Gross margin of rice<br />

farmers (total)<br />

$/ha<br />

-8<br />

-112 -12<br />

Number of jobs<br />

attributed to FTF<br />

implementation<br />

Number of individuals<br />

Person/<br />

year<br />

147 184 3 25 150 209 125 750 139<br />

receiving short term<br />

training<br />

Custom Indicators<br />

Persons<br />

95,478<br />

21,273 116,751<br />

Increased yield of rice kg/ha 535 370 535 401 535 375 69 75 70<br />

Incremental rice<br />

production<br />

mt 74,822 48,275 14,563 1,957 89,386 50,751 64 13 57<br />

Increased value of rice<br />

million<br />

US $<br />

23.94 16.63 4.66 0.67 28.60 17.49 69 14 61<br />

Urea saving mt 6,993 5,506 1,361 178 8,354 5,684 79 13 68<br />

Value of urea saved<br />

million<br />

US $<br />

2.38 3.10 0.46 0.10 2.84 3.20 130 22 113<br />

GOB saving on urea<br />

subsidy<br />

million<br />

US $<br />

1.36 1.88 0.27 0.06 1.63 1.94 138 23 119<br />

Average incremental<br />

value per hectare<br />

US $ 210 128 210 138 210 129 61 66 62<br />

Farmers trained No. 85,880 95,310 19,600 21,273 105,480 116,583 111 109 111<br />

Fertilizer briquette<br />

machines sold<br />

No. 88 110 2 15 90 125 125 750 139<br />

ix

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!