30.11.2012 Views

DISCRETE MATHEMATICS THROUGH GUIDED DISCOVERY ...

DISCRETE MATHEMATICS THROUGH GUIDED DISCOVERY ...

DISCRETE MATHEMATICS THROUGH GUIDED DISCOVERY ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In the last few problems, you began with a set of lists and first you had<br />

to decide when two lists were equivalent representations of the objects you<br />

were trying to count. Then you drew the directed graph for that particular<br />

relation of equivalence. Go back to your digraphs and check that each vertex<br />

has an arrow to itself. This is what is meant when it is said that a relation is<br />

reflexive. Also, check that whenever you have an arrow from one vertex to<br />

a second, there is an arrow from the second back to the first. This is what is<br />

meant when a relation is said to be symmetric. There is another property<br />

of those relations you have graphed. Namely, whenever you have an arrow<br />

from L1 to L2 and an arrow from L2 to L3, then there is an arrow from<br />

L1 to L3. This is what is meant when a relation is said to be transitive.<br />

A relation on a set is called an equivalence relation on the set when it<br />

satisfies all three of these properties.<br />

91. If R is a relation on a finite set, how can the digraph be used to check<br />

whether or not the relation is reflexive? To check symmetry? To check<br />

transitivity?<br />

92. The matrix of a relation R on an n-element set {x1, . . . , xn} is defined<br />

to be the n × n matrix A whose (i, j) entry equals the number of edges<br />

from xi to xj in the associated digraph. For at least three relations<br />

on the set [4], find the adjacency matrix A and calculate A 2 . Use this<br />

information to formulate a conjecture about what is recorded in the<br />

entries of A 2 .<br />

93. Let B be the matrix obtained from the matrix A 2 by changing every<br />

positive entry to 1. Explain how the matrix A−B can be used to determine<br />

whether the relation is transitive. If the relation is not transitive,<br />

explain how the matrix A − B can be used to find a counterexample to<br />

transitivity.<br />

Check that each relation of equivalence in Problems 88, 89 and 90 satisfies<br />

the three properties, and so each is an equivalence relation. Carefully<br />

visualize the same three properties in the relations of equivalence that you<br />

use in the remaining problems of this chapter. Work through Appendix C<br />

if you would like more practice with checking whether or not a relation is<br />

an equivalence relation.<br />

You undoubtedly have noticed that for each of the equivalence relations<br />

you’ve considered so far, the digraph is divided into clumps of mutually<br />

connected vertices. In the next section you will show that this “clumping”<br />

property holds for all equivalence relations, and that it is exactly this<br />

property which makes equivalence relations a powerful tool for counting.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!