12.07.2015 Views

New Paths Towards Quantum Gravity (Lecture Notes in Physics, 807)

New Paths Towards Quantum Gravity (Lecture Notes in Physics, 807)

New Paths Towards Quantum Gravity (Lecture Notes in Physics, 807)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3 <strong>Lecture</strong>s on Quantization of Gauge Systems 153∫ ( if(x, c)expM (n|2k)h∑a)g(x, c)dxdc = h n−2k2 (2π) n 21√ | det(B(a))|det(L(a)) exp⎛⎝1 + ∑ Ɣ̸=Ø( ih f (a) + iπ 4 sign(B(a)) )⎞(ih) −χ(Ɣ) (−1) c(D(Ɣ)) F a (D(Ɣ))⎠ , (28)| Aut(Ɣ)|where all <strong>in</strong>gredients are the same as <strong>in</strong> (27) except that the summation is takenover the graphs with oriented fermionic edges and with weights from Fig. 3.10. Anexample is given <strong>in</strong> Fig. 3.11.3.6 F<strong>in</strong>ite-Dimensional Faddeev–Popov Quantizationand the BRST DifferentialIn this section we will study the <strong>in</strong>tegral (13) when a Lie group G acts on X faithfully(with no stabilizers) and the function f is <strong>in</strong>variant with respect to this action.3.6.1 Faddeev–Popov TrickLet X be a manifold with the action of a Lie group G. We assume here that theaction is free, i.e., that the stabilizer of every po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> X is trivial. Assume also thatX/G is a manifold. (Note that what is really important is the assumption that X/Gis smooth near orbits where f is critical.) In this casedim(X/G) = dim(X) − dim(G).Assume that the manifold X has a G-<strong>in</strong>variant volume form and that X is compact.It is clear that such restrictions are too strong, but we will see <strong>in</strong> the next sectionhow they can be relaxed to reasonable assumptions.Let f (x) be a G-<strong>in</strong>variant real analytic function. The goal of this section is toprepare the setup for the description of the asymptotic expansion of the <strong>in</strong>tegral∫I h =X(exp i f (x) )dx (29)has the sum of Feynman diagrams, just as it was done <strong>in</strong> section for functions on Xwith simple critical po<strong>in</strong>ts.S<strong>in</strong>ce the function f is G-<strong>in</strong>variant, its critical po<strong>in</strong>ts are not simple, except whena critical po<strong>in</strong>t is a fixed po<strong>in</strong>t of the G-action, but s<strong>in</strong>ce we assume faithfulness,there are no such po<strong>in</strong>ts.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!