Fukushima: re/insurance coverage issues - IPBA 2012
Fukushima: re/insurance coverage issues - IPBA 2012
Fukushima: re/insurance coverage issues - IPBA 2012
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Fukushima</strong>:<strong>re</strong>/<strong>insurance</strong> <strong>coverage</strong> <strong>issues</strong>Angus Rodger2 March <strong>2012</strong>
INTRODUCTION• Exclusions• Causation• Agg<strong>re</strong>gation• Business Interruption352403 2
EXCLUSION 1:NUCLEAR CONTAMINATION“loss or damage arising di<strong>re</strong>ctly or indi<strong>re</strong>ctly fromnuclear radiation or radioactive contamination howeversuch nuclear radiation or radioactive contamination mayhave been caused.”3524033
EXCLUSION 2:EARTHQUAKE“loss of or damage to property di<strong>re</strong>ctly or indi<strong>re</strong>ctlyoccasioned by, happening through or in consequence ofearthquake, volcanic eruption, subterranean fi<strong>re</strong> orany such convulsion of natu<strong>re</strong>”3524034
EXCLUSION 3:FLOOD“Loss or damage caused by or <strong>re</strong>sulting from Flood:-meaning rising water; surface water; waves; tidalwaves or tidal water; overflow of st<strong>re</strong>ams, rivers,lakes, ponds, or other bodies of water; or spray fromany of the fo<strong>re</strong>going; all whether driven by wind or notand <strong>re</strong>gardless of any other event which contributesconcur<strong>re</strong>ntly or in any sequence to the loss or damage.”3524035
CAUSATION:BASIC PRINCIPLE• In order for a loss to fall within<strong>insurance</strong> <strong>coverage</strong>, the loss must beproximately caused by an insu<strong>re</strong>d peril.• If the loss is caused by an excludedperil, the<strong>re</strong> will be no <strong>coverage</strong>.3524036
CAUSATION:CONCURRENT CAUSES• Two or mo<strong>re</strong> causes that operate concur<strong>re</strong>ntly.• One cause is an insu<strong>re</strong>d event and the other anexcluded event.Interdependent: If neither cause would havecaused loss without the other, the excludedtakes priority and the insu<strong>re</strong>d cannot <strong>re</strong>cover.Independent: If one event would havecaused loss without the other, the insu<strong>re</strong>d can<strong>re</strong>cover.3524037
AGGREGATION• Agg<strong>re</strong>gation is significant for determining policy limitsand the application of deductibles.• Usually based on an event or occur<strong>re</strong>nce.3524038
AGGREGATION12108642Retention0One Occur<strong>re</strong>nceTwo Occur<strong>re</strong>nces3524039
AGGREGATION12108642Limit of coverRetention0One Occur<strong>re</strong>nceTwo Occur<strong>re</strong>nces35240310
AGGREGATION BY EVENTThe “Four Unities”:•cause•locality•time•intentionCaudle v Sharpe [1995] LRLR 43335240311
AGGREGATION: HOURS CLAUSES• All damages from a given peril during a specific timeperiod.• Categories of hours clause:events based (NMA2244)manifestation of insu<strong>re</strong>d peril (NP)catastrophe based (LP098)35240312
BUSINESS INTERRUPTION:OVERVIEW• Actual financial loss from total or partial suspensionof operations• caused by• di<strong>re</strong>ct physical loss or damage to property.35240313
BUSINESS INTERRUPTION:CHANGE IN MARKETOrient Exp<strong>re</strong>ss Hotels v Generali[2010] EWHC 118635240314
QUESTIONS?35240315
Angus Rodger, PartnerSteptoe & Johnson99 G<strong>re</strong>sham St<strong>re</strong>etLondon EC2V 7NGarodger@steptoe.comTel. +44 20 7367 8000Fax +44 20 7367 8001www.steptoe.com35240316