12.07.2015 Views

Transaction Audit - Comptroller and Auditor General of India

Transaction Audit - Comptroller and Auditor General of India

Transaction Audit - Comptroller and Auditor General of India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter IV – <strong>Transaction</strong> <strong>Audit</strong>laboratory services at affordable cost <strong>and</strong> generating employment for women. Theproject envisaged setting up <strong>of</strong> clinical laboratories in Primary Health Centres(PHCs) in 52 Grama Panchayats at a total cost <strong>of</strong> Rs 31.20 lakh. This includes Rs26 lakh for purchase <strong>of</strong> equipments <strong>and</strong> chemicals <strong>and</strong> Rs 5.20 lakh for creatinginfrastructure facilities. The laboratories were to start functioning in December2001.The Implementing Officer placed (August 2002) orders for supply <strong>of</strong> equipments<strong>and</strong> chemicals for 46 laboratories with a local firm without ensuring provision <strong>of</strong>infrastructure facilities at the PHCs. He obtained an invoice from the supplier,certified receipt <strong>of</strong> the materials in good condition, recorded entries in the stockregisters <strong>and</strong> made payment <strong>of</strong> Rs 22.64 lakh (between January – March 2003)but kept the items in the premises <strong>of</strong> the supplier. The Implementing Officerstarted lifting the goods for delivery to PHCs after the expiry <strong>of</strong> 14 months fromthe date <strong>of</strong> supply. He made distribution (between March – July 2004) <strong>of</strong>equipment <strong>and</strong> chemicals to 19 PHCs even though infrastructure was not ready in11 PHCs.The guarantee period <strong>of</strong> two years on equipments <strong>and</strong> chemicals expired inDecember 2004 even though 27 PHCs (out <strong>of</strong> which infrastructure was not readyin 22) were yet to receive the supply. The District Panchayat did not appointlaboratory technicians in any <strong>of</strong> the PHCs.Failure to synchronize purchase <strong>of</strong> equipments <strong>and</strong> chemicals with completion <strong>of</strong>the infrastructure facilities rendered expenditure <strong>of</strong> Rs 22.64 lakh unfruitful. As aresult, the objective <strong>of</strong> providing employment to women in paramedical field <strong>and</strong>extension <strong>of</strong> laboratory services at affordable costs to rural population remainedillusory.The matter was referred to Government in June 2004; reply has not beenreceived(December 2004).4.6 Idle investment on establishment <strong>of</strong> blood banksInvestment <strong>of</strong> Rs 20.28 lakh made during 1997-2002 for creation <strong>of</strong> bloodbanks remained unproductive as Local Self Government Institutions failed toprovide requisite infrastructure for the blood banks.Local Self Government Institutions (LSGIs) formulated projects for establishment<strong>of</strong> blood banks during 1997-2001. As per the project report, the LSGIs were toconstruct buildings, procure necessary equipment, secure m<strong>and</strong>atory licencesfrom Drugs Controller, appoint required staff <strong>and</strong> provide other infrastructurefacilities like water supply, electricity etc. Test-check <strong>of</strong> the accounts <strong>of</strong> fourLSGIs disclosed that Rs 20.28 lakh spent during 1997-2002 on construction <strong>of</strong>buildings to house the blood banks remained unfruitful for reasons given in thefollowing table:49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!