30.11.2012 Views

Development of a Birth Certificate Trust Framework

Development of a Birth Certificate Trust Framework

Development of a Birth Certificate Trust Framework

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

y<br />

Garland Land<br />

NAPHSIS Consultant


Importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>Birth</strong> <strong>Certificate</strong>s<br />

Needed for:<br />

�Social Security Card<br />

�School Enrollment<br />

�Driver’s License<br />

�Passport


United States ID Document<br />

�No National ID Document<br />

�The de-facto ID Documents for persons<br />

born in the U.S. are:<br />

�Driver’s License<br />

�Passport


Importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>Birth</strong> <strong>Certificate</strong>s<br />

Driver’s Licenses and Passports are<br />

dependent on <strong>Birth</strong> Certifications.


The Problem<br />

Currently DMVs, the State Department<br />

and other parties relying on <strong>Birth</strong><br />

Certifications have no way to<br />

determine the level <strong>of</strong> trust they can<br />

place on a <strong>Birth</strong> Certification.


The Problem (cont.)<br />

� Registration and issuing policies and practices<br />

vary among vital records jurisdictions<br />

� Issuing practices vary between the state and<br />

local jurisdictions<br />

� Relying parties do not know the state and local<br />

registration and issuing policies and practices<br />

� This results in a general lack <strong>of</strong> trust <strong>of</strong> birth<br />

certifications


Solution<br />

� The solution is the development <strong>of</strong> security trust<br />

criteria that a vital records jurisdiction would<br />

strive to meet.<br />

� Adherence to the trust criteria would be assessed<br />

by an independent reviewer(s)<br />

� A Vital Records Agency security level <strong>of</strong> trust,<br />

would be made available to parties relying on birth<br />

certifications


Steps Taken to Develop a <strong>Birth</strong><br />

<strong>Certificate</strong> <strong>Trust</strong> <strong>Framework</strong><br />

� The concept <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Trust</strong> <strong>Framework</strong> was presented at<br />

the 2011 NAPHSIS annual meeting<br />

� The NAPHSIS Board authorized the Security<br />

Committee to develop the criteria for a <strong>Trust</strong><br />

<strong>Framework</strong><br />

� The security committee used the Security Guidelines,<br />

the Vital Statistics Standards and draft 2011 Model Law<br />

to develop <strong>Trust</strong> <strong>Framework</strong> Criteria, Assessment<br />

Procedures and Assessment Score Sheet


<strong>Trust</strong> Criteria Categories and<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Criteria<br />

1. Registration (10)<br />

2. Issuance (14)<br />

3. Security <strong>of</strong> the Document (4)<br />

4. Validity (10)<br />

5. Death Status (5)<br />

6. Authentication (6)


Registration Criteria<br />

<strong>Trust</strong> criteria to assure best practice<br />

policies and procedures are in place<br />

and followed on filing delayed and out<br />

<strong>of</strong> institution births


Examples <strong>of</strong> Registration<br />

<strong>Trust</strong> Criteria<br />

� Delayed reports <strong>of</strong> birth are filed based upon the<br />

documentary evidence <strong>of</strong> Appendix A (taken from<br />

Security Guidelines)<br />

� At a minimum annually, a report <strong>of</strong> all out <strong>of</strong><br />

institution births is filed by licensed and lay midwives<br />

to verify registration <strong>of</strong> births.<br />

� Appropriate courts are provided resources on state<br />

laws, regulations and standards related to the creation<br />

<strong>of</strong> delayed and out <strong>of</strong> institution records


Issuance <strong>Trust</strong> Criteria<br />

<strong>Trust</strong> criteria to assure best practice<br />

policies and procedures are in place<br />

and followed to only issue a birth<br />

certification to the person named on<br />

the birth record or an eligible person<br />

with a legal right and tangible interest


Examples <strong>of</strong> Issuance Criteria<br />

� 100% <strong>of</strong> employees, contractors and vendor employees<br />

that have access to records have signed confidentiality<br />

statements and re-sign them annually<br />

� Staff duties are separated for staff roles that may be<br />

susceptible to fraud or misuse<br />

� Local Registrars issue all certifications <strong>of</strong> birth records<br />

from a jurisdiction central data base or image system


Security <strong>of</strong> the Document<br />

<strong>Trust</strong> Criteria<br />

<strong>Trust</strong> criteria to assure birth<br />

certifications have alteration resistance<br />

features


Examples <strong>of</strong> Security <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Document Criteria<br />

� Certification paper has the substrate and<br />

printing security features consistent with<br />

Appendix E (taken from Security<br />

Guidelines)<br />

� All birth certification documents used in<br />

local <strong>of</strong>fices are provided or approved by the<br />

Jurisdiction Registrar


Validity <strong>Trust</strong> Criteria<br />

<strong>Trust</strong> criteria to assure best practice<br />

policies and procedures are in place<br />

and followed to prevent birth<br />

certification fabrication


Examples <strong>of</strong> Validity Criteria<br />

� Certification paper is properly stored and<br />

handled according to Appendix F (taken<br />

from Security Guidelines)<br />

� Jurisdiction participates in EVVE<br />

� Jurisdiction participates in Fraud Early<br />

Warning System (FEWS)


Death Status <strong>Trust</strong> Criteria<br />

<strong>Trust</strong> criteria to assure the person named<br />

on the birth certification is alive


Examples <strong>of</strong> Death Status Criteria<br />

� All death records that occurred within the jurisdiction<br />

or elsewhere are matched with birth records occurring<br />

within the jurisdiction. The date <strong>of</strong> death and state or<br />

country <strong>of</strong> death is noted on the birth file.<br />

� Initial matching <strong>of</strong> birth and death records and<br />

marking or flagging <strong>of</strong> birth records occur within ten<br />

calendar days after receipt <strong>of</strong> death records.<br />

� Jurisdiction and local certifications <strong>of</strong> birth records <strong>of</strong><br />

persons who have died are marked deceased


Authentication <strong>Trust</strong> Criteria<br />

<strong>Trust</strong> criteria to assure a person is<br />

presenting their own birth certification


Examples <strong>of</strong> Authentication<br />

<strong>Trust</strong> Criteria<br />

� A qualified applicant for a certification <strong>of</strong> live birth<br />

is limited to the registrant, his or her, child, parent,<br />

etc. (taken from 2011 draft Model Law)<br />

� When submitting an application in person (by<br />

mail), (through the Internet) only persons with a<br />

legal right can obtain certifications <strong>of</strong> birth<br />

records. To verify legal right the applicant must<br />

(specific documentation is specified for each<br />

application mode.


Conformance Assessment<br />

Procedures<br />

� A Conformance Assessment Procedures Manual has<br />

been developed to assist reviewers on how to determine a<br />

jurisdiction’s level <strong>of</strong> conformance with trust criteria so<br />

there is consistency in assessing conformance among<br />

jurisdictions.<br />

� Reviewers can give a jurisdiction 0,1 or 2 points for each<br />

criteria depending if the jurisdiction does not comply,<br />

partially complies or fully complies with the trust criteria<br />

as defined in the Conformance Assessment Procedures<br />

Manual


Determining <strong>Trust</strong> Level<br />

� Each <strong>Trust</strong> Criteria is given a weight <strong>of</strong> 1 or 2<br />

� The jurisdiction level <strong>of</strong> conformance score<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0,1 or 2 for each criteria is multiplied<br />

times the weight <strong>of</strong> 1 or 2<br />

� The jurisdiction’s weighted scores are<br />

totaled with a possible score <strong>of</strong> 162


Levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>Trust</strong><br />

�There are four different levels <strong>of</strong><br />

security trust a Vital Records Agency<br />

can obtain.<br />

�The level <strong>of</strong> security trust is dependent<br />

on the weighted trust criteria score and<br />

meeting some mandatory trust criteria.


Level 1 Vital Records<br />

Security Agency<br />

Scores 20-79 points and meets Level I mandatory trust<br />

criteria. A level I Vital Records Security Agency is able<br />

to detect and <strong>of</strong>fer resistance to some common forms<br />

<strong>of</strong> birth record fraud. The likelihood <strong>of</strong> fraudulent<br />

actions occurring are prevalent because <strong>of</strong> a low level<br />

<strong>of</strong> security provisions and dishonest individuals are<br />

expected to perceive the fraud barriers to be less<br />

difficult and the chance <strong>of</strong> success to be good. In the<br />

event that fraudulent actions are attempted these<br />

agencies will be less prepared to mitigate some types<br />

<strong>of</strong> fraudulent attempts.


Level IV Vital Records<br />

Security Agency<br />

Scores 140-162 points and meets mandatory Level IV<br />

trust criteria. A level IV Vital Records Security<br />

Agency is able to anticipate and effectively control all<br />

credible birth record related fraudulent attempts. The<br />

likelihood <strong>of</strong> fraudulent actions occurring are nearly<br />

eliminated because <strong>of</strong> very high security provisions<br />

and dishonest individuals are expected to perceive the<br />

fraud barriers to be nearly insurmountable and the<br />

chance <strong>of</strong> success to be nearly non-existent. In the<br />

event that fraudulent actions are attempted these<br />

agencies are prepared to fully mitigate the fraudulent<br />

attempts.


Possibilities for the Future<br />

�The trust framework criteria and<br />

Assessment Procedures should be pilot<br />

tested.<br />

�NAPHSIS will need to determine next<br />

steps for institutionalizing a formal<br />

<strong>Trust</strong> <strong>Framework</strong> Program.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!