12.07.2015 Views

Sources of self-categorization as minority for mixed race individuals

Sources of self-categorization as minority for mixed race individuals

Sources of self-categorization as minority for mixed race individuals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Sources</strong> <strong>of</strong> Self-Categorization 9For others to consider an individual <strong>for</strong> affirmative action, the individual must be judgedan ethnic <strong>minority</strong> (Crosby, 1994). Bossuyt (2002) notes that the process <strong>of</strong> determiningeligibility <strong>for</strong> affirmative action is especially complicated <strong>for</strong> <strong>mixed</strong>-<strong>race</strong> <strong>individuals</strong>, who maybe members <strong>of</strong> both <strong>minority</strong> and majority racial groups. In fact, part-White biracial <strong>individuals</strong>are generally perceived <strong>as</strong> less qualified <strong>for</strong> affirmative action b<strong>as</strong>ed scholarships (Sanchez &Bonam, 2009), partly due to being seen <strong>as</strong> less <strong>minority</strong> than single-<strong>race</strong> ethnic minorities.While we know that perceivers judge affirmative action appropriateness by considering ethnic<strong>minority</strong> membership, little research h<strong>as</strong> addressed whether <strong>minority</strong> <strong>self</strong>-<strong>categorization</strong> inbiracial people affects whether they view themselves <strong>as</strong> appropriate <strong>for</strong> these <strong>race</strong>-b<strong>as</strong>ed policies.Work by Wenzel on category-b<strong>as</strong>ed entitlements (Wenzel, 1996, 1997, 2000, 2004) suggests thatif <strong>individuals</strong> <strong>self</strong>-categorize <strong>as</strong> a members <strong>of</strong> a particular group, they perceive themselves <strong>as</strong>equal, and there<strong>for</strong>e entitled, to benefits/resources designated <strong>for</strong> members <strong>of</strong> that group. Thus,<strong>individuals</strong> who <strong>self</strong>-categorize <strong>as</strong> ethnic <strong>minority</strong> group members should perceive themselves <strong>as</strong>eligible <strong>for</strong> or entitled to affirmative action-b<strong>as</strong>ed resources and opportunities. Affirmativeaction scholars have specifically noted the importance <strong>of</strong> understanding how multiracial<strong>individuals</strong> perceive <strong>of</strong> their own racial <strong>categorization</strong> in determining affirmative actioneligibility (Leong, 2006). According to SCT <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> the work by Wenzel mentioned above,multiracial <strong>individuals</strong> must <strong>self</strong>-categorize themselves <strong>as</strong> members <strong>of</strong> a <strong>minority</strong> racial grouprather than a majority racial group in order to perceive themselves <strong>as</strong> eligible <strong>for</strong> or entitled toaffirmative action-b<strong>as</strong>ed resources. Indeed, international committees have explicitlyrecommended that, in c<strong>as</strong>es where the <strong>minority</strong> status <strong>of</strong> an individual is in question, decisionsregarding appropriateness <strong>for</strong> affirmative action be b<strong>as</strong>ed on the <strong>self</strong>-<strong>categorization</strong> <strong>of</strong> theindividual (Bossuyt, 2002).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!