INTERVIEWNABARD is set up by the Government of <strong>India</strong> as adevelopment bank with the mandate of facilitatingcredit flow for promotion and development ofagriculture and integrated rural development. Themandate also covers supporting all other alliedeconomic activities in rural areas, promotingsustainable rural development and ushering inprosperity in the rural areas.Dr. Venkatesh Tagat is theChief General Manager, Karnataka Region.Strength lies in buildingempowered communitiesWhat is the role of NABARD in agricultural credit?It is an apex institution handling matters concerning policy,planning and operations in the field of credit for agriculture andfor other economic and developmental activities in rural areas.Essentially, it is a refinancing agency for financial institutionsoffering production credit and investment credit for promotingagriculture and developmental activities in rural areas. Itcoordinates the rural financing activities of all the institutionsengaged in developmental work at the field level and maintainsliaison with the government of <strong>India</strong>, State governments, theReserve Bank of <strong>India</strong> and other national level institutionsconcerned with policy formulation. It functions as a regulatoryauthority, supervising, monitoring and guiding cooperative banksand regional rural banks.In Karnataka, NABARD has been playing the role of ensuringadequate credit flows to farmers, rural groups and enterprises, toscale up production or activity. These include means andinstruments like providing additional financial resources,refinancing etc.What have been the ways of reaching the smallholders with credit?We have been following two models in reaching the unreached.One is the SHG - Bank Linkage Model wherein the SHGs arefinanced directly by the banks. The other is the - JLG - BankLinkage Model wherein the JLGs are financed by banks.For NABARD, financial inclusion means credit and other financialservices, building skills of these organized groups like SHGs,farmer clubs in handling technologies as well as markets. Besidesfacilitating training programmes to organize themselves to availcredit, help potential individuals to become entrepreneurs inassociation with institutes like RUDSETI. Also, the trainings arenot only focused on recipients but also banking staff dealing withcommunities.It is also believed that bank loans are alwayspackages, not giving need based flexibility to theborrower?It is not entirely true. Kisan credit cards were meant for thatpurpose. They combined agricultural loan, personal accident coveras well as consumer loan, with a certain cash credit limit. However,instead of using them judiciously, as an after thought are beingused for borrowing the total amount. In fact, payment in time isencouraged by certain states to charge zero percent (Tamil Nadu)when repayment is done in time.What has been the most effective way of reachingthe poor and why?It is definitely through the SHGs. SHGs are small, cohesive andparticipative groups of the poor, who pool their thrift regularlyand use it to make small interest bearing loans to members and inthe process learn the nuances of financial discipline. Subsequentlythey graduate to access bank credit to augment their resources forlending to their members in need of financial assistance for meetingtheir credit needs. Over the years the pooled resources of the SHGsbecome a sizeable corpus, which complimented by higher volume20<strong>LEISA</strong> <strong>INDI</strong>A • JUNE 2010
of bank loan enables them to take up livelihood activities whichresults in improving their standard of living.Self Help Groups (SHGs) have become the common vehicle ofdevelopment process, converging all development programmes.SHG–Bank Linkage Programme launched by NABARD way backin 1992 envisaging synthesis of formal financial system andinformal sector has become a movement throughout the country.According to the Status of Micro Finance in <strong>India</strong> 2009-2010released recently by National Bank for Agriculture and RuralDevelopment (NABARD) there are 69,53,000 SHGs in the countrywhose savings are linked with banks. The estimated number offamilies covered under this model is about 970 lakhs. The totalsavings amount of all the SHGs with banks as on 31 March 2010amounts to Rs.6198.71 crore and the total amount of loansoutstanding against SHGs as on 31 March 2010 is Rs.28038.28crore.NABARD has also been bringing out simple guidelines for NGOsas well as involving in street plays, ‘Yaksha Gana’ in buildingawareness. IT enabled services have helped simple transactions attheir door step like withdrawals and deposits while bringing downthe transaction costs. Business Correspondents (BCs) and BusinessFacilitators (BFs) were instruments created to strengthen financialinclusion processes. With advancement in technologies, thetransaction costs would come down further.What has the above model achieved?The SHG-Bank Linkage Model is the largest financial inclusionprogramme in the world. It is considered as the largest microfinanceprogramme in terms of outreach in the world and many othercountries are keen to replicate this model. This programme is alsothe main contributor towards the Financial Inclusion process inthe country. This model pioneered by NABARD was not just meantfor financial inclusion for rural poor women who usually belongto backward classes, scheduled castes and tribes. It had an holisticapproach, i.e. besides financial inclusion, economic and socialempowerment of poor women.Overall findings indicate that the decision making capacity ofwomen members with various SHG activities has improved frompre-SHG situation. SHG members were part of the decision makingprocess in children’s education, purchase of assets, marriage oftheir daughters, etc. Members also reported in changing undesirablehabits of their husbands.Therefore, it is apparent that over the years, the SHG-Bank LinkageModel has invested sufficiently in building social capital in thecountryside. This investment in the form of training and capacitybuilding has enabled the rural poor woman to undertakeresponsibilities which she was not capable of taking up in pre-SHG situation.Will credit not become expensive to the small holderswith high interest rates being levied in a SHG?Money saved by the members are lent internally among the needymembers of the group and the interest charged vary between 12-24-36%. Some might say the interest rates or high. But one has tounderstand that the interest rates are decided by members and notby any outsider. Further, the interest earned on internal loansremains within the group and becomes part of its corpus. It is notsucked out.Moreover, SHGs work out Differential Rates of Interest. Theserates are worked very well by the group members. While for healthloans no interest is charged, for education it is a small percentageand higher rates are charged for economic purposes. Farmer isseen as a productive asset. Therefore, loans taken for health andeducation are also considered to increase his productivity.How does MFI – bank linkage model differ fromSHG-bank linkage model?SHG-bank linkage is still in operation. However, loans to MFIwas considered as lending to priority sector and from 2005-06,MFIs started lending credit to the poor in a big way.It is given that MFIs are not the pioneers in microfinance. Theyhave come into existence only after the SHG-Bank Linkage Modelproved that poor are bankable. Most of the MFIs are operating inplaces where the banking density is quite high in the country andcredit to deposit ratio is satisfactory. MFIs are focussing more inirrigated areas of Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka fortheir lending activities rather than reaching out to the poor in otherregions of the country.MFIs do not spend time and resources in formation of groups andtheir capacity building. They usually poach members fromestablished SHGs and form groups only to lend and recover loans.There is no capacity building to make them aware about the benefitsof savings, smart borrowings, intelligent investments and financialdiscipline. In this method, the MFIs do not incur any cost information and capacity building of groups. Therefore, the highrates of interest charged by MFIs even to these groups is totallyunjustified. In the SHG-Bank Linkage Model, capacity buildinggains precedence over credit. This has resulted in strengtheningcommunities through investments in social capital.The biggest bane in MFI model is transparency in interest rates.Borrowers are not aware of the actual rate of interest they pay tothe MFIs on their loans. Apart from the interest, which is often ata flat rate, there are other charges like document charges, upfrontfees, etc. MFIs and their defenders argue that a member of SHGmay be charged an interest rate of 12-24-36% on the loans takenfrom SHGs. But what they miss to see is that the interest paid bySHG-Bank Linkage model proved thatpoor are bankable<strong>LEISA</strong> <strong>INDI</strong>A • JUNE 201021