12.07.2015 Views

Soulmates in the Bible by Ps Peter Tan.pdf - petertan.net

Soulmates in the Bible by Ps Peter Tan.pdf - petertan.net

Soulmates in the Bible by Ps Peter Tan.pdf - petertan.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Soulmates</strong><strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>Bible</strong>By <strong>Peter</strong> <strong>Tan</strong>© Copyright 2013 <strong>by</strong> <strong>Peter</strong> <strong>Tan</strong> Evangelism. All rights reserved. No part of this book may bereproduced or transmitted <strong>in</strong> any form or <strong>by</strong> any means, electronic or mechanical, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gphotocopy<strong>in</strong>g, record<strong>in</strong>g or <strong>by</strong> any <strong>in</strong>formation storage and retrieval system, without permission <strong>in</strong>writ<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> publisher0


The PDF copy of this book has been provided free for those who can’t afford it<strong>in</strong> order that <strong>the</strong>y may be blessed and grow spiritually. Please feel free to donatewhatever amounts you can afford towards <strong>the</strong> upkeep of our m<strong>in</strong>istry.Donations can be made via Pay Pal to elshaddai1@bigpond.com.Donations <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r forms are available on our website below:<strong>Peter</strong> <strong>Tan</strong> EvangelismGPO Box 330CanberraACT 2601, Australia.Website: www.<strong>petertan</strong>.<strong>net</strong>Email: elshaddai1@bigpond.com1


IntroductionThe concept of soulmate is <strong>in</strong> most of <strong>the</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>gs and philosophies of<strong>the</strong> world. In Christian <strong>the</strong>ology, some believe <strong>in</strong> it but o<strong>the</strong>rs do not.There is also very little Christian study done on this subject while suchmaterials are plentiful <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> non-Christian world. The understand<strong>in</strong>gthat marriage is only applicable to life on <strong>the</strong> physical earth from <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>terpretation of Scriptures on <strong>the</strong> resurrection prevails <strong>in</strong> Christianity.This book relooks at all relevant Scriptures <strong>in</strong> order to establish as towhe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re is such a concept as soulmate <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong>, and if <strong>the</strong>re is,what is <strong>the</strong> guidance on such matters.Besides <strong>the</strong> lack of teach<strong>in</strong>g on this subject, three major factors led to<strong>the</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g of this book. The first is <strong>in</strong> counsell<strong>in</strong>g hundreds ofmarriages, <strong>the</strong>re is a great prevalence of disparity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> areas of spirit,soul or body. The worst case scenarios have conflicts <strong>in</strong> all three areas <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong>ir relationship. O<strong>the</strong>rs have no conflict <strong>in</strong> spiritual areas but areconstantly fight<strong>in</strong>g with each o<strong>the</strong>r due to soul differences which <strong>in</strong> turnaffect <strong>the</strong>ir physical relationship. Some have no conflict <strong>in</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r spirit orsoul areas and outwardly seem to be happy but <strong>the</strong>y no longer share aphysical relationship. O<strong>the</strong>rs have ceased communicat<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> spiritand soul level but yet managed to have regular physical relationship.Rarely do we f<strong>in</strong>d couples who have harmony of spirit, soul and body.The second factor that led to <strong>the</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g of this book is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> extrabiblicalrevelation and visions from my associate pastor, <strong>Ps</strong> David, ourseven thunders prophet. In his vision, he saw <strong>the</strong> creation of Adam and<strong>the</strong> creation of Eve and it stirred a confirmation of some of <strong>the</strong> th<strong>in</strong>gsthat I had also seen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spiritual World revelations. I saw spirits whohad progressed <strong>in</strong> God and reta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong>ir mascul<strong>in</strong>e and fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e forms<strong>in</strong> some sort of eternal harmony; where <strong>the</strong>y have <strong>the</strong> abilities to fusetoge<strong>the</strong>r to function as one be<strong>in</strong>g. Not all spirits have such harmonious2


counterparts and demonstrate such abilities. This extra biblicalrevelation will be described more <strong>in</strong> this book but suffice to know that itdoes not contradict with Scriptures. Extra biblical revelation thatconflicts with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong> is def<strong>in</strong>itely not acceptable but where it fills <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> blanks of Scriptural revelation, it is acceptable but doctr<strong>in</strong>e must notbe built around it. Doctr<strong>in</strong>e must only be built upon <strong>the</strong> Word of Godand this will be done <strong>in</strong> this book.The third factor that led to <strong>the</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g of this book is a question thatwas asked of me <strong>by</strong> a bright young second generation person. Thequestion was whe<strong>the</strong>r one would ru<strong>in</strong> one’s potential eternity withGod’s appo<strong>in</strong>ted soulmate if one ends up marry<strong>in</strong>g someone o<strong>the</strong>r thanone’s predest<strong>in</strong>ed soulmate. It stirred <strong>the</strong> realization that <strong>the</strong>re is notmuch Christian teach<strong>in</strong>g and guidance provided <strong>in</strong> this area. As wehave about fifty more years to go before <strong>the</strong> Rapture, and <strong>the</strong> church willgrow to 10,000 churches of millions of young people around <strong>the</strong> world,guidance is necessary for <strong>the</strong> millions who will be look<strong>in</strong>g for soulmatesto become <strong>the</strong>ir life partners <strong>in</strong> marriage. This book aims to biblicallyanswer <strong>the</strong> questions that all <strong>the</strong> second and third generation have <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong>se areas.<strong>Peter</strong> <strong>Tan</strong>30 th July 20133


Bashert: Jewish view of soulmatesBashert, (Yiddish: ), is a Yiddish word that means "dest<strong>in</strong>y". It is oftenused <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context of one's div<strong>in</strong>ely foreorda<strong>in</strong>ed spouse or soulmate, who iscalled "basherte" (female) or "basherter" (male). It can also be used to express<strong>the</strong> seem<strong>in</strong>g fate or dest<strong>in</strong>y of an auspicious or important event, friendship, orhappen<strong>in</strong>g.The idea of basherte(r) comes from statements found <strong>in</strong> classical rabb<strong>in</strong>icliterature. A proverb that "marriages are made <strong>in</strong> heaven" is illustrated <strong>by</strong> astory <strong>in</strong> a midrash collection:A Roman matron, on be<strong>in</strong>g told <strong>by</strong> Rabbi Jose ben Halafta that God arranges allmarriages, said that this was an easy matter, and boasted that she could do asmuch herself. Thereupon she assembled her male and female slaves and paired<strong>the</strong>m off <strong>in</strong> couples; but on <strong>the</strong> morrow <strong>the</strong>y all went to her with compla<strong>in</strong>ts.Then she admitted that div<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>tervention is necessary to suitable marriages.(Genesis Rabba lxviii. 3-4).Even God Himself f<strong>in</strong>ds it as difficult an undertak<strong>in</strong>g as <strong>the</strong> divid<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> RedSea. Forty days before a child is born its mate is determ<strong>in</strong>ed upon (GenesisRabba lxviii. 3-4; also Ba<strong>by</strong>lonian Talmud, tractates Soṭah 2a; Sanhedr<strong>in</strong> 22a;comp. M. Ḳ. 18b; "Sefer Hasidim," § 1128).In modern usage, Jewish s<strong>in</strong>gles will say that <strong>the</strong>y are look<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong>ir bashert,mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>y are look<strong>in</strong>g for that person who will complement <strong>the</strong>m perfectly,and whom <strong>the</strong>y will complement perfectly. S<strong>in</strong>ce it's considered to have beenforeorda<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>by</strong> God whom one will marry, one's spouse is considered to beone's bashert <strong>by</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition, <strong>in</strong>dependent of whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> couple's marital lifeworks out well or not.5


The follow<strong>in</strong>g dictionaries def<strong>in</strong>e soulmate <strong>in</strong> various ways:Urban Dictionary (urbandictionary.com) -A person with whom you have an immediate connection <strong>the</strong> moment you meet -- a connection so strong that you are drawn to <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong> a way you have neverexperienced before. As this connection develops over time, you experience a loveso deep, strong and complex, that you beg<strong>in</strong> to doubt that you have ever trulyloved anyone prior. Your soulmate understands and connects with you <strong>in</strong> everyway and on every level, which br<strong>in</strong>gs a sense of peace, calmness and happ<strong>in</strong>esswhen you are around <strong>the</strong>m. And when you are not around <strong>the</strong>m, you are allthat much more aware of <strong>the</strong> harshness of life, and how bond<strong>in</strong>g with ano<strong>the</strong>rperson <strong>in</strong> this way is <strong>the</strong> most significant and satisfy<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>g you willexperience <strong>in</strong> your lifetime. You are also all that much aware of <strong>the</strong> beauty <strong>in</strong>life, because you have been given a great gift and will always be thankful.Mirriam-Webster dictionary (first known use <strong>in</strong> 1822) -1. a person who is perfectly suited to ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> temperament.2. a person who strongly resembles ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> attitudes or beliefs –ideological soul mates.Oxford dictionary -a person ideally suited to ano<strong>the</strong>r as a close friend or romantic partner.American Heritage dictionary -One of two persons compatible with each o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> disposition, po<strong>in</strong>t of view, orsensitivity.Coll<strong>in</strong>s English dictionary -a person for whom one has a deep aff<strong>in</strong>ity, esp. a lover, wife, husband, etc.Random House Kernerman Webster's College dictionary -a person with whom one has a strong aff<strong>in</strong>ity.The Thesaurus gives <strong>the</strong> synonym or related word for ‘soulmate’ as‘lover’ -Soulmate -someone for whom you have a deep aff<strong>in</strong>ityLover - a person who loves someone or is loved <strong>by</strong> someone6


Though most of <strong>the</strong> above def<strong>in</strong>itions of soulmate give some level ofunderstand<strong>in</strong>g which is helpful, <strong>the</strong>re are also o<strong>the</strong>r areas besides <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>tellect and emotional areas of <strong>the</strong> soul. In def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and understand<strong>in</strong>gwhat soulmate is, consideration must also be given to aspects of <strong>the</strong>spiritual and <strong>the</strong> physical dimension of <strong>the</strong> relationship; which is takenfor granted to work out if <strong>the</strong> soul aff<strong>in</strong>ity is found. Before we gofur<strong>the</strong>r, we need to also exam<strong>in</strong>e current research <strong>in</strong> psychology onpeople who believe <strong>in</strong> soulmates versus those who don’t.Research on <strong>Soulmates</strong> and Belief <strong>in</strong> Romantic Dest<strong>in</strong>yResearch <strong>by</strong> Knee (1998) 1 evaluated <strong>the</strong> impact of a belief <strong>in</strong> "romanticdest<strong>in</strong>y" (i.e. soulmates) on <strong>the</strong> quality of actual relationships. Moreparticularly, he compared relationships of people who believed <strong>in</strong> soulmates(e.g. a belief that people are meant for each o<strong>the</strong>r or not), withthose of people who believed <strong>in</strong> "relationship growth" (e.g. a belief thatrelationships are developed with work over time). Results of hisevaluation <strong>in</strong>dicated that:People who believe <strong>in</strong> romantic dest<strong>in</strong>y (soulmates) primarily look forpositive emotional reactions and <strong>in</strong>itial compatibility with a partner.They believe people ei<strong>the</strong>r "click" and are meant to be, or <strong>the</strong>y don't andshould move on. As a result, those beliefs tend to drive soulmatesearchers to be <strong>in</strong>tensely passionate and satisfied with partners at first,particularly while th<strong>in</strong>gs are compatible. However, when problems<strong>in</strong>evitably arise, believers <strong>in</strong> soulmates often don't cope well and leave<strong>the</strong> relationship <strong>in</strong>stead. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, a belief that soulmates shouldbe ideally compatible motivates <strong>in</strong>dividuals to just give up when arelationship isn't perfect. They simply look elsewhere for <strong>the</strong>ir "true"1 Knee, C. R. (1998). Implicit <strong>the</strong>ories of relationships: Assessment and prediction of romantic relationship<strong>in</strong>itiation, cop<strong>in</strong>g, and longevity. Journal of Personality and Social <strong>Ps</strong>ychology, 74, 360–370.7


match. As a result, <strong>the</strong>ir relationships tend to be <strong>in</strong>tense but short, oftenwith a higher number of quick romances and one-night stands.People who believe <strong>in</strong> romantic growth (cultivation) primarily look forsomeone who will work and grow with <strong>the</strong>m, resolv<strong>in</strong>g conflicts as <strong>the</strong>yarise. They believe that relationships can evolve with hard work andcompromise, even <strong>in</strong> difficult situations. As a result, <strong>the</strong>y tend to be lesspassionate and satisfied with partners at first. A romantic growth<strong>in</strong>dividual doesn't have <strong>the</strong> same <strong>in</strong>tense, euphoric response to partnerconnections. However, when problems arise, <strong>the</strong>y are motivated to solve<strong>the</strong>m and stay committed to <strong>the</strong>ir partner. As a result, <strong>the</strong>ir relationshipstend to be longer and more satisfy<strong>in</strong>g over time. Ra<strong>the</strong>r than reject<strong>in</strong>g apartner for m<strong>in</strong>or disagreements, <strong>the</strong>y work toge<strong>the</strong>r, evolve, and growa satisfy<strong>in</strong>g relationship.Subsequent research supports <strong>the</strong>se differences. Particularly, thosewho believe <strong>in</strong> soulmates tend to be less committed to a partner,especially when <strong>the</strong>re are relationship difficulties (Knee, Patrick, Vietor,& Neighbors, 2004). 2 Also, soulmate believers are often more anxious <strong>in</strong>relationships and less likely to forgive romantic partners (F<strong>in</strong>kel,Bur<strong>net</strong>te, & Scissors, 2007). 3 Overall, when <strong>the</strong> go<strong>in</strong>g gets tough with apartner, or requires work, soul mates tend to quit and look for <strong>the</strong> next"perfect" match.As a result of this research, Dr Jeremy Nicholson, <strong>the</strong> Attraction Doctor<strong>in</strong> psychologytoday.com, recommends that people should not believe <strong>in</strong>a soulmate argu<strong>in</strong>g as follows: 42 Knee, C. R., Patrick, H., Vietor, N. A., & Neighbors, C. (2004). Implicit <strong>the</strong>ories of relationships: Moderators of<strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>k between conflict and commitment. Personality and Social <strong>Ps</strong>ychology Bullet<strong>in</strong>, 30, 617-628.3 F<strong>in</strong>kel, E. J., Bur<strong>net</strong>te, J. L., & Scissors, L. E. (2007). Vengefully ever after: Dest<strong>in</strong>y beliefs, state attachmentanxiety, and forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social <strong>Ps</strong>ychology, 92, 871–886.4 The pros and cons of believ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> romantic dest<strong>in</strong>y (psychologytoday.com)Published on July 9, 2012 <strong>by</strong> Jeremy Nicholson, M.S.W., Ph.D. <strong>in</strong> The Attraction Doctor8


Given <strong>the</strong> research, if an <strong>in</strong>dividual wants <strong>in</strong>tensely-passionate, short-termfl<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>the</strong>n belief <strong>in</strong> soulmates will serve <strong>the</strong>m well. In all relationships,however, disagreement, conflict, and <strong>in</strong>compatibility will arise. Ultimately, noone is perfect - or a perfect fit for a partner. It takes work, growth, and change tokeep a relationship go<strong>in</strong>g and satisfy<strong>in</strong>g over time. When that happens,soulmate believers often become upset, disillusioned, and uncommitted.Therefore, if an <strong>in</strong>dividual f<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>the</strong>y are repeatedly fall<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> love with <strong>the</strong>"perfect" partner, only to be disappo<strong>in</strong>ted and dump<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m soon after, <strong>the</strong>irbelief <strong>in</strong> soulmates may be to blame. It may cause <strong>the</strong>m to give up when th<strong>in</strong>gsare not perfect (but may be still good or great). It may motivate <strong>the</strong>m to notcompromise, work, or change, when o<strong>the</strong>rs don't love <strong>the</strong>m completely for be<strong>in</strong>gexactly as <strong>the</strong>y are. A belief <strong>in</strong> soulmates may prevent <strong>in</strong>dividuals from f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> very relationships <strong>the</strong>y th<strong>in</strong>k <strong>the</strong>y are dest<strong>in</strong>ed to have.Overall, look<strong>in</strong>g for perfect compatibility and a soulmate kills motivation towork at successful relationships with good partners. In <strong>the</strong> long run, adopt<strong>in</strong>g abelief <strong>in</strong> romantic growth and cultivation is much more reward<strong>in</strong>g, especiallyfor those <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> long-term relationships. However, compared tosoulmates, a belief <strong>in</strong> growth does take more work, effort, and a desire to change.So, to truly have a satisfy<strong>in</strong>g relationship, an <strong>in</strong>dividual must not only give up<strong>the</strong> search for a "perfect" partner, but also be will<strong>in</strong>g to admit <strong>the</strong>y are notalways "perfect just as <strong>the</strong>y are" as well. Only <strong>the</strong>n can two people worktoge<strong>the</strong>r, grow, evolve, and meet each o<strong>the</strong>r's needs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> long run.In contrast to Dr Jeremy’s recommendation not to believe <strong>in</strong> soulmates,<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ter<strong>net</strong> is filled with hundreds of sites that claim to teach people orguide people how to f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong>ir soulmate and to recognize it when <strong>the</strong>yf<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong>ir soulmates. In a January 2011 Marist poll, 73% of Americansbelieve that <strong>the</strong>y are dest<strong>in</strong>ed to f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong>ir one, true, soulmate. Thepercentage is a bit higher for men (74%) than women (71%). The notionis also higher among younger <strong>in</strong>dividuals, with 79% of those under 459


eliev<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> soul mates (as opposed to 69% of those over 45). 5 Clearly,<strong>the</strong> majority of people believe <strong>in</strong> a soulmate.Hav<strong>in</strong>g seen <strong>the</strong> above secular def<strong>in</strong>itions of soulmate and hav<strong>in</strong>gconsidered <strong>the</strong> pros and cons of psychology research <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> beliefsystem of a soulmate, we def<strong>in</strong>e from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong> some of <strong>the</strong> betterunderstand<strong>in</strong>g of what soulmate is:1. Christians believe <strong>in</strong> predest<strong>in</strong>ation and that God has a specificand perfect plan for each <strong>in</strong>dividual (Ephesians 1:4, 5). This plan<strong>in</strong>cludes details that are recorded <strong>in</strong> a book for each of us (<strong>Ps</strong>alms139:13-16). Believe <strong>in</strong> a detailed predest<strong>in</strong>ation plan for each of us<strong>in</strong>dividually would automatically <strong>in</strong>clude any plans that God hasfor us <strong>in</strong> marriage to a specific life partner. There are, of course,plans for those who are chosen to a life of celibacy (1 Cor<strong>in</strong>thians7:7; Revelation 14:1-4).2. Although God has a specific predest<strong>in</strong>ation plan for each person, itdoes not remove free will and free choice. It is possible to chooseoutside of <strong>the</strong> perfect will of God and end up <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> permissivewill (Romans 12:2). It was not God’s perfect Will that Abrahamhad a child through Hagar for Abraham was always predest<strong>in</strong>edto have a child through Sarah (Genesis chapters 16 & 17).3. F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g one’s soulmate does not mean that <strong>the</strong>re is no more roomfor growth or cultivation of <strong>the</strong> relationship. The secular belief of asoulmate, as per psychology research data above, is superficial andbuilt upon laz<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g to work on a relationship. Peopleth<strong>in</strong>k that when <strong>the</strong>y f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong>ir soulmate that <strong>the</strong>re is no moreroom for improvement or cultivation and growth <strong>in</strong> each person’scharacter. The <strong>Bible</strong> speaks of <strong>the</strong> ability of love glory<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tribulation produc<strong>in</strong>g perseverance, character, hope and <strong>the</strong>n morelove aga<strong>in</strong> (Romans 5:2-5). It is <strong>the</strong> dynamics of <strong>the</strong> soulmates5 Marist Poll. (2011).Retrieved from http://maristpoll.marist.edu/210-its-dest<strong>in</strong>y-most-americans-believe-<strong>in</strong>soul-mates/10


e<strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r that streng<strong>the</strong>ns <strong>the</strong>m to love each o<strong>the</strong>r throughstorms, tests and trials. F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g one’s soulmate does not make lifeor th<strong>in</strong>gs easier, ra<strong>the</strong>r it streng<strong>the</strong>ns <strong>the</strong>ir resolve to be with oneano<strong>the</strong>r, and to stay toge<strong>the</strong>r, despite all odds and to choose tolove one ano<strong>the</strong>r above all else.4. The dictionary def<strong>in</strong>ition of a soulmate only <strong>in</strong>cludes qualities at<strong>the</strong> soul level. In Christianity, <strong>the</strong> spirit man is as important, if notmore important, than <strong>the</strong> soul (Proverbs 18:14; 20:27; Romans 8:5,16; 1 Cor<strong>in</strong>thians 2:11; 6:20; James 2:26). If we were to come upwith a Christian term it would be spirit-soul mate but that is toomuch of a mouthful so we reta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> word ‘soulmate’ but we redef<strong>in</strong>eit as compatibility, complementary aff<strong>in</strong>ity and attraction toone ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> all three areas: spiritual, soul (<strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>in</strong>tellect,emotions and will) and physical. A true soulmate would be onewho completely harmonizes with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> all three areas:a. Union of spirits <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> love of God.They would have <strong>the</strong> same passion and first love for God <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong>ir spirits. Unequal love for God (where one partner puts Godfirst and ano<strong>the</strong>r puts God second or third) has been a source ofspiritual conflict <strong>in</strong> many marriages. Where God haspredest<strong>in</strong>ed two spirit-souls to be toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>y would both beable to put God first and love God with equal passion. It ispossible that at first one might love God more than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rbut be<strong>in</strong>g soulmates, <strong>the</strong> same love for God easily <strong>in</strong>fuses one to<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>the</strong>y stir each o<strong>the</strong>r towards a passionate first lovefor God. It is imperative that God has our first love (Revelation2:4). True unity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> spirit is a threefold chord (Ecclesiastes4:12). It is <strong>the</strong> two spirits of <strong>the</strong> soulmates with God <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>centre, form<strong>in</strong>g a threefold chord. It is God who gives spirit lifeand our spirits are alive only because of God’s Spirit (Genesis2:7; Romans 8:10-13). He who is jo<strong>in</strong>ed with <strong>the</strong> Lord is onespirit with <strong>the</strong> Lord (1 Cor<strong>in</strong>thians 6:17). This oneness of two11


spirits can only be experienced when both <strong>the</strong> spirits of <strong>the</strong>soulmates are jo<strong>in</strong>ed with Lord as one spirit, and through <strong>the</strong>Lord are jo<strong>in</strong>ed with each o<strong>the</strong>r’s spirits.b. Union of souls through <strong>the</strong> Word of GodIt is possible for a whole church to be one heart and one soultoge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord (Acts 4:32). Paul urged <strong>the</strong> Philippianchurch to be one <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir comfort of love for one ano<strong>the</strong>r, oneaffection, hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> same love, one accord and one m<strong>in</strong>dtoge<strong>the</strong>r (Philippians 2:1-2). If such is possible <strong>in</strong> a churchenvironment that has numerous and diverse <strong>in</strong>dividuals, howmuch more greater <strong>the</strong> union of heart, soul and m<strong>in</strong>d will bewhen two soulmates f<strong>in</strong>d each o<strong>the</strong>r? The soul consists of <strong>the</strong>will, <strong>the</strong> emotion and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellect; qualities that need to beref<strong>in</strong>ed and developed. It is through souls purified <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> truthof God’s Word that true love can flourish and cause a jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ofhearts (1 <strong>Peter</strong> 1:22; John 17:17). This area of one soul between<strong>in</strong>dividuals will be explored more <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next chapter.c. Union of physical affections and attraction <strong>in</strong> three dimensions.Physical attraction is a part of soulmate relationship but suchmutual attraction may not always be <strong>the</strong> first spark that ignitestwo soulmates. The mutual attraction might at first be sparkedfrom <strong>the</strong> spiritual and <strong>the</strong>n lead to <strong>the</strong> soul <strong>the</strong>n physical. Or itmight be <strong>the</strong> soul attraction that takes place, <strong>the</strong>n lead<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>spiritual and physical. Or it can also be a physical attractionthat leads to confirmation of be<strong>in</strong>g soulmates through aff<strong>in</strong>ity ofspiritual and soul qualities discovered later <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> relationship.In <strong>the</strong> end, <strong>the</strong>re is always a three dimension attraction thattakes place – <strong>the</strong> spiritual, <strong>the</strong> soul and <strong>the</strong> physical. Attraction<strong>in</strong> just one area does not constitute true soulmates. David andJonathan were attracted to each o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> soul but <strong>the</strong>y werelike friends that sticker closer than a bro<strong>the</strong>r and not marriedspouses (1 Samuel 18:1, 13; Proverbs 18:24). Shechem wasattracted <strong>in</strong> his soul and body to D<strong>in</strong>ah, <strong>the</strong> daughter of Leahand Jacob, but <strong>the</strong>re was no attraction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> spiritual dimension12


(Genesis 34:3, 8). Nei<strong>the</strong>r was God first place <strong>in</strong> his life, forShechem broke <strong>the</strong> commandments of God <strong>in</strong> violat<strong>in</strong>g D<strong>in</strong>ah.True predest<strong>in</strong>ed soulmates will always have attraction <strong>in</strong> allthree dimensions, although one or two of <strong>the</strong>se dimensions maydevelop first before <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. In <strong>the</strong> end when <strong>the</strong> relationshipof two soulmates are <strong>in</strong> full bloom, all three dimensions arefully attracted to each o<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>the</strong>ir spirits, souls and bodiesfunction as one.5. <strong>Soulmates</strong> are essentially spirit be<strong>in</strong>gs who have been a part of onespiritual substance <strong>in</strong> God but whose two halves when comb<strong>in</strong>edtoge<strong>the</strong>r become one spirit, one soul and one body. Adam existedas one spirit, soul and body before God took Eve out of him andAdam found his perfect counterpart and soulmate <strong>in</strong> Eve (Genesis2:7-8, 18-24).The declaration of Adam, upon wak<strong>in</strong>g up (after be<strong>in</strong>g split <strong>in</strong>to twobe<strong>in</strong>gs from one be<strong>in</strong>g) and see<strong>in</strong>g Eve with him, are <strong>the</strong> words of onewho has found his complementary soulmate who completes his be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>spirit, soul and body when he declared:‚This is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be calledWoman for she was taken out from Man.‛ Thereafter, a man shall leavehis fa<strong>the</strong>r and mo<strong>the</strong>r and be jo<strong>in</strong>ed to his wife, and <strong>the</strong>y shall be oneflesh.‛ (Genesis 2:23-24).We understand this one flesh to also <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> spiritual and souldimension (Ephesians 5:23-33). This is <strong>the</strong> Christian understand<strong>in</strong>g ofsoulmate – one who is <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r complementary completion of one’sspirit, soul and body.13


Chapter 2<strong>Soulmates</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong>The <strong>Bible</strong> has many stories of various relationships some of whichexpresses soulmates f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g each o<strong>the</strong>r, while o<strong>the</strong>rs show <strong>the</strong> story ofunsuccessful attempts at f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g soulmates. They also express <strong>the</strong>difficulties that soulmates experience even after <strong>the</strong>y f<strong>in</strong>d each o<strong>the</strong>r. Ato<strong>the</strong>r times, <strong>the</strong>y show forth vary<strong>in</strong>g degrees of soulmate attraction butit is disqualified as true soulmate relationship because <strong>the</strong>re is none of<strong>the</strong> three dimensional relationship we are look<strong>in</strong>g for. We have def<strong>in</strong>edtrue soulmates as two halves who f<strong>in</strong>d each o<strong>the</strong>r and forms a threedimensional relationship of oneness <strong>in</strong> spirit, soul and body. We canlearn many pr<strong>in</strong>ciples from <strong>the</strong> soulmates <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong> and how <strong>the</strong>yprogress towards perfect oneness.Adam and Eve – <strong>the</strong> Orig<strong>in</strong>al <strong>Soulmates</strong>There is no doubt that Adam and Eve were soulmates. The follow<strong>in</strong>g isan extract of an extra-biblical vision of Adam and Eve:Before s<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong>re was no time. It looked like about three thousand years (likethree days) and Adam did not bo<strong>the</strong>r to go back to <strong>the</strong> garden where <strong>the</strong> treeswere especially <strong>the</strong> tree of knowledge. His ma<strong>in</strong> work was nam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> animalsthat <strong>the</strong> angels were br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g to him. The moment he say <strong>the</strong> name, <strong>the</strong> animalsbecame male and female <strong>in</strong> this manner. The angels brought <strong>the</strong>m away andafter some sort of a sleep became male and female. Each of <strong>the</strong> animals was like amale feature like Adam before <strong>the</strong>y became male and female. The animals werevery clean, no smell, no dirt. They don’t seem even to need to eat and exist <strong>by</strong><strong>the</strong> energy of God. Different areas have different types of animals, some taller,some bigger and huge, etc.14


When <strong>the</strong> angel said to go to ano<strong>the</strong>r place, Adam would see a vision given <strong>by</strong><strong>the</strong> angel and be transported <strong>the</strong>re. It was like <strong>the</strong> angel show him a frame of <strong>the</strong>place to go, and when he saw it, he was <strong>the</strong>re.Adam was about ten feet tall and very lean and perfect. His lips were likeJesus’ lips (medium th<strong>in</strong> lips). He was almost pure white, whiter than Noah. Hehad long arms. He had <strong>the</strong> same k<strong>in</strong>d of glory that Jesus had <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> highwayvision. It looks like he had no body hair, like very smooth. Melchizedek, <strong>the</strong>cherubim who was his guardian angel, was as tall. Melchizedek was someth<strong>in</strong>glike that also. They were almost alike. After <strong>the</strong> nam<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> animals, Adamfelt lonely. God appeared like a light to Adam. Whenever God spoke everyth<strong>in</strong>gwas quiet and respectfully giv<strong>in</strong>g honour to God. The atmosphere was alsocasual like an everyday th<strong>in</strong>g where God was talk<strong>in</strong>g to Adam. Moses saw thislight and when Moses came down from <strong>the</strong> mount, his body also became atransparent type of body.Adam spoke to his guardian angel, <strong>the</strong> cherubim Melchizedek of his lonel<strong>in</strong>ess.That was <strong>the</strong> first time that Adam slept when Melchizedek said to rest andtouched Adam. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sleep, <strong>the</strong> heart rate slowed down and it was like twocells divid<strong>in</strong>g (same with <strong>the</strong> animals). Except that it was <strong>the</strong> female who cameout from him and was slightly smaller than him (same with <strong>the</strong> animals). ForAdam, it was like his spirit and soul divided and his body followed. Adamlooked smaller and shorter after this. Adam was about 7 feet and Eve was about6 ft. The bodies of both of <strong>the</strong>m were bright and hairless. They had sexual organs<strong>the</strong>n but were still perfect with sh<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g light. Adam and Eve’s hair were likewhitish golden colour. There were no racial features that were dist<strong>in</strong>guishablebefore or after <strong>the</strong> fall.The tree of knowledge was like a huge bush. The fruit look oblong like a date orhuge grape. It was about 8-10cm long and diameter about 4-5cm. It wasreddish, dark blood red <strong>in</strong> colour. The serpent was like a scaly humanoidcreature; greenish, brownish <strong>in</strong> colour and it was actually a creation of Satan(us<strong>in</strong>g DNA from fallen worlds, s<strong>in</strong>ce Satan fundamentally cannot create). This15


creature was always target<strong>in</strong>g and eye<strong>in</strong>g Eve. Adam showed Eve all <strong>the</strong> places<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> garden, and Melchizedek was still <strong>the</strong>ir guardian angel. When Evediscovered about <strong>the</strong> garden, she started look<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> tree and started mak<strong>in</strong>genquiries of <strong>the</strong> tree, as to why <strong>the</strong>y can’t eat of <strong>the</strong> tree (although at that time,eat<strong>in</strong>g was not necessary). In her m<strong>in</strong>d was formed <strong>the</strong> idea that if she eat, thiswas <strong>the</strong> tree that she would eat. This thought was planted <strong>in</strong>to her <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> devilthat <strong>by</strong> now possessed <strong>the</strong> humanoid serpent. The jaw of <strong>the</strong> serpent was po<strong>in</strong>tedout and <strong>the</strong> head was flat <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> front. Its eyes were slit and sharp; <strong>the</strong> nose waslike <strong>the</strong> lizard just two holes, <strong>the</strong>re were no teeth and <strong>the</strong> tongue was very dark.It was a creature made <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> devil <strong>in</strong> his own image.By this time, Melchizedek was alerted and on guard aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> enemy. AfterEve, Adam communicated less with Melchizedek. Adam was always with Eveand when Adam was do<strong>in</strong>g work (nam<strong>in</strong>g o<strong>the</strong>r animals) Eve was alonesometimes and she wandered to <strong>the</strong> garden. The humanoid serpent, which wasalways observ<strong>in</strong>g her, followed her. Whatever <strong>the</strong> serpent said to her, sherepeated to Adam when she brought Adam to <strong>the</strong> tree. She plucked <strong>the</strong> fruit andate first and gave it to Adam who also ate. It was like bit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to blood as <strong>the</strong>juice was also red colour. Melchizedek was like stunned at <strong>the</strong> action and hecould not restra<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>m. The moment <strong>the</strong>y ate, <strong>the</strong>re was an energy that wastaken out and <strong>the</strong>y knew immediately that it was wrong. It was like all <strong>the</strong> timeperfect and suddenly <strong>the</strong>y could feel <strong>the</strong>ir weight. Before that everyth<strong>in</strong>g waslight and filled with light. Suddenly, <strong>the</strong>ir bodies change and <strong>the</strong>y could feelcold, heat, weight as <strong>the</strong>y became pure physical consciousness. Now power wastaken away and where before Melchizedek could have shown <strong>the</strong>m a frame and<strong>the</strong>y were transported, now <strong>the</strong>y could not. Melchizedek’s reaction was likeShammah when David signed <strong>the</strong> death warrant of Uriah <strong>the</strong> Hittite. Before <strong>the</strong>s<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong>y could feel that everyth<strong>in</strong>g was a part of <strong>the</strong>m but now <strong>the</strong>y realizedthat <strong>the</strong>y were vulnerable and physically disconnected from all th<strong>in</strong>gssurround<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m.Adam did not f<strong>in</strong>ish nam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> animals and when <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong> occurred, all <strong>the</strong>animals that were not named dissipated as <strong>the</strong> unnamed animals were not16


physical yet but a type of spirit form; wait<strong>in</strong>g for Adam to f<strong>in</strong>ish nam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m.Adam lost <strong>the</strong> power to name <strong>the</strong>m. When God stepped <strong>in</strong>, it was Melchizedekrepresent<strong>in</strong>g God who put <strong>the</strong>m out of <strong>the</strong> garden. Melchizedek appeared clo<strong>the</strong>d<strong>in</strong> spiritual garments and Adam and Eve were taken out of <strong>the</strong> garden <strong>by</strong>Melchizedek who brandished a flam<strong>in</strong>g sword. After <strong>the</strong>y came out, it was like aframe was taken so that <strong>the</strong> garden became <strong>in</strong>accessible. Melchizedek was <strong>the</strong>one who taught <strong>the</strong>m how to sacrifice. It was a spotted animal that was sacrifice.The above extra-biblical account relates <strong>in</strong> details <strong>the</strong> creation of Adamand Eve described <strong>in</strong> Genesis 2:18-25. We note very clearly that Adamwas like <strong>the</strong> angels, ten feet tall and without any sexual organs or sexualdifferentiation. After he slept and Eve was taken out from him, as per<strong>the</strong> biblical account, Adam was about seven feet tall and Eve was aboutsix feet tall. What was visible but <strong>in</strong> its glorified state were <strong>the</strong> presenceof sexual organs. They were blessed and told to be fruitful and multiplyand fill <strong>the</strong> earth (Genesis 1:28). This would imply that <strong>the</strong>y would havesexual relationship <strong>in</strong> a glorified state. We do not have an opportunity tosee or know what it is like but it would def<strong>in</strong>itely surpass <strong>by</strong> millions oftimes all that we know of sexual relationship <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> present physicalbody. In <strong>the</strong> millennium, those restored to a glorified body would havean opportunity to fulfil <strong>the</strong> unf<strong>in</strong>ished work of Adam and Eve with <strong>the</strong>irsoulmates.Adam and Eve became two halves of each o<strong>the</strong>r, and yet each could<strong>in</strong>dependently function without <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. They were like two spirits,souls and bodies but <strong>the</strong>ir union toge<strong>the</strong>r would recreate <strong>the</strong> oneness ofspirit, soul and body – <strong>the</strong> experience of <strong>the</strong> state of oneness <strong>in</strong>substance, shape and form that <strong>the</strong>y both orig<strong>in</strong>ally came from. Theywere <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al and most perfect soulmates that God had created foreach o<strong>the</strong>r. Many lessons can be learned from <strong>the</strong> soulmate relationshipthat Adam and Eve had:17


1. It is God who brought <strong>the</strong> soulmates toge<strong>the</strong>r and not so much<strong>the</strong>ir own efforts. Many people try too hard to seek out <strong>the</strong>irsoulmates and waste a lot of time and energy. If <strong>the</strong>y depend onGod and just put God first, and ask God to provide or lead <strong>the</strong>m to<strong>the</strong>ir soulmates, God would be delighted to do so. It was God whobrought Eve to Adam (Genesis 2:22). Note also that before that,God was <strong>the</strong> one who brought <strong>the</strong> animals to Adam to see what hewould call <strong>the</strong>m (Genesis 2:19). God knew that <strong>the</strong>re was nonecomparable to him, none could be his soulmate (Genesis 2:20).Although some people f<strong>in</strong>d delight <strong>in</strong> animals and pets and someeven live <strong>the</strong>ir entire adult lives with an animal as <strong>the</strong>ir closestcompanion, <strong>the</strong>se are imperfect and can never take <strong>the</strong> place of atrue soulmate.In <strong>the</strong> end, God decided to make him a soulmate (Genesis 2:18).<strong>Soulmates</strong> are made <strong>by</strong> God for us; <strong>the</strong>y are not products ofaccidents or chance. We must put our entire trust <strong>in</strong> God, just likeAdam did, and allow God to be <strong>the</strong> one to br<strong>in</strong>g our soulmates tous. If we seek first <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom of God and His righteousness andall our mundane needs are met, surely <strong>the</strong> provision of <strong>the</strong> mostimportant need <strong>in</strong> our present lives and eternity – our soulmates –would be abundantly provided <strong>by</strong> God our lov<strong>in</strong>g Fa<strong>the</strong>r(Mat<strong>the</strong>w 6:33). Get <strong>in</strong>to a deep first love relationship with God,and God will be <strong>the</strong> one who br<strong>in</strong>gs your soulmate to you. Godwill lead our soulmates across out paths as He led Eve to Adam(Genesis 2:22).2. Even though Eve was <strong>the</strong> perfect soulmate for Adam, <strong>the</strong>y still hadto learn to harmonise with each o<strong>the</strong>r. <strong>Soulmates</strong> have to growtoge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir relationship with <strong>the</strong> Lord. As soulmates, <strong>the</strong>yfailed <strong>in</strong> spend<strong>in</strong>g appropriate time toge<strong>the</strong>r to do th<strong>in</strong>gs toge<strong>the</strong>r.Adam did show Eve around <strong>the</strong> garden but Eve was left to herself18


when Adam was cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> work of nam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> animals.Adam did not <strong>in</strong>volve Eve <strong>in</strong> his work nor did Eve seek to be apart of Adam cont<strong>in</strong>ually. It was <strong>the</strong>ir dis-connection that <strong>the</strong>serpent took advantage of. Eve was alone and separated fromAdam. Adam, even after be<strong>in</strong>g split <strong>in</strong>to half – with his o<strong>the</strong>r halfnow walk<strong>in</strong>g alone <strong>by</strong> herself – still tried to cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>the</strong> samework as if he was <strong>the</strong> same person before <strong>the</strong> split.If <strong>the</strong>y had realized that <strong>the</strong>y are no longer complete <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong>mselves, that <strong>the</strong>y needed to f<strong>in</strong>d time to cultivate this sense ofunion and oneness (so that even though <strong>the</strong>y are physically apart,<strong>the</strong>y would still feel and experienced this union <strong>in</strong> spirit and soul –which is a powerful possibility <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> environment before <strong>the</strong> fall),it would have given <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong>ir first oneness victory toge<strong>the</strong>raga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> enemy.Perhaps <strong>the</strong> first th<strong>in</strong>g that Adam and Eve should have done is notjust to tour <strong>the</strong> garden, <strong>the</strong>y should have jo<strong>in</strong>ed with each o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>spirit, soul and body and cultivate <strong>the</strong> sense of that bond ofoneness experience <strong>in</strong> three dimensions for an extended time.Their first work as soulmates is to learn to cultivate oneness <strong>in</strong>three dimensions and not just return to work as per normal.<strong>Soulmates</strong> may be created <strong>in</strong> God but it takes time, communionand bond<strong>in</strong>g to forge a union of spirits, souls and body. Perfectbond<strong>in</strong>g and perfect love takes time and both must take time tolove and to bond.3. Although God is <strong>the</strong> one who provides <strong>the</strong> perfect soulmate, <strong>the</strong>reis an <strong>in</strong>herent ability with<strong>in</strong> each soulmate to recognize each o<strong>the</strong>r.Adam immediately recognized Eve as his o<strong>the</strong>r complementarycounterpart when God brought her to him (Genesis 2:23). Becausesoulmates are <strong>the</strong> exact tw<strong>in</strong>, replica and complementary part of19


<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> spirit, soul and body, <strong>the</strong>re is a spark that <strong>in</strong>itiateswhen <strong>the</strong> two parts come toge<strong>the</strong>r. This spark of recognition can atfirst be just <strong>in</strong> one dimension but as <strong>the</strong> soulmates grow, it takesplace <strong>in</strong> all three dimensions of spirit, soul and body. In <strong>the</strong>present imperfect world, this spark of recognition might take timeto be k<strong>in</strong>dled and only when <strong>the</strong> two soulmates relate toge<strong>the</strong>r andcommunicate.Enoch, Noah, Shem and GiddelBetween <strong>the</strong> patriarchs and <strong>the</strong> story of Abraham, we have severalpotential soulmates: Enoch and his wife, Noah and his wife, and Shemand Giddel, his wife. Enoch walked with God and was not (Genesis5:24). Enoch was a prophet and his wife must have been veryunderstand<strong>in</strong>g to allow him to spend so much time with God (Jude1:14). In <strong>the</strong> book of Jasher, we f<strong>in</strong>d that towards <strong>the</strong> end of his time onearth, Enoch spent 11 months a year with God and <strong>the</strong>n one monthcounsell<strong>in</strong>g and lead<strong>in</strong>g those who look up to him for guidance. Aftersome time he spent 51 weeks a year with God and only spent one week ayear with humans. Later it became just one day a year with humans and<strong>the</strong>n he totally disappeared <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> spiritual world. In his manymanifestations and appearances to men of God, his wife is not with him<strong>in</strong> spirit. Enoch had a wife who was with him for 65 years when <strong>the</strong>yhad <strong>the</strong>ir first child (Genesis 5:21).After his first child, Enoch spent most of his time with God and hewould have spent occasional time with his wife for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong> records tha<strong>the</strong> had sons and daughters (Genesis 5:22). In his various extra-biblicalappearances to Elijah <strong>in</strong> <strong>Bible</strong> times, and to those of us who have methim, Enoch is spiritually alone and his only spiritual soulmate and hiscompanion seem to be Elijah. Enoch and Elijah will serve aga<strong>in</strong> toge<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tribulation (Revelation 11:3-12). Enoch had a good wife who wasa good earthly companion and <strong>the</strong>y brought up a strong and good20


family <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord but we cannot tell if she was Enoch’s eternalsoulmate. Elijah was Enoch’s spirit and soul complementary. Enochnever found a counterpart complementary female spirit, soul and body,perhaps because his call<strong>in</strong>g and assignments were different.Noah had a good wife who played a fantastic role dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gof <strong>the</strong> ark, accord<strong>in</strong>g to extra-biblical revelation. She was <strong>the</strong> one whorebuked <strong>the</strong> children when <strong>the</strong>y were young and when <strong>the</strong>y were notfollow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ways of <strong>the</strong> Lord and Noah. She was an essential part ofhis earthly life of about n<strong>in</strong>e hundred years (Genesis 9:28, 29). They hadeach o<strong>the</strong>r for three hundred and fifty years after <strong>the</strong> flood. One wouldhave thought that <strong>the</strong>ir relationship would be tremendously close afterhundreds of years but apparently although she was a good wife andcompanion, Noah and his wife were not fully united as soulmates. If<strong>the</strong>y had united properly as soulmates, Noah would have found comfort<strong>in</strong> her arms and embrace and seek union with her spirit, soul and bodywhen he needed comfort ra<strong>the</strong>r than turn to dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g and w<strong>in</strong>e (Genesis9:20, 21). She would have been <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>e that he dr<strong>in</strong>k each time heneeded comfort, enjoyment and pleasure (Song 1:2).True soulmates enjoy <strong>the</strong> love <strong>the</strong>y have for each o<strong>the</strong>r more than w<strong>in</strong>e(Song 1:2). They would have been <strong>in</strong>toxicated with <strong>the</strong> kisses and love of<strong>the</strong>ir beloved soulmate and carried away <strong>in</strong>to a heavenly place ofperfumes and spices each time <strong>the</strong>y make love (Song 4:10). Instead oflook<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> pleasures of this life and all that it offers, soulmateswould f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> greatest and deepest pleasures of this life, and of <strong>the</strong> lifeto come, <strong>in</strong> union with each o<strong>the</strong>r’s spirit, soul and body. They wouldexplore each o<strong>the</strong>r as a garden that never ends, tast<strong>in</strong>g and dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g ofeach o<strong>the</strong>r’s love as honeycomb with honey, be drunk with love for oneano<strong>the</strong>r as with w<strong>in</strong>e and milk, and dr<strong>in</strong>k deeply of <strong>the</strong> pleasure ofspirit, soul and body <strong>the</strong>y are enabled to give each o<strong>the</strong>r (Song 5:1; 7:9;8:2). <strong>Soulmates</strong> recharge and rejuvenate through bond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir spirits,souls and bodies toge<strong>the</strong>r when <strong>the</strong>y need energiz<strong>in</strong>g. They do not turn21


to o<strong>the</strong>r th<strong>in</strong>gs or people when <strong>the</strong>y need to be comforted andencouraged; from now to eternity, besides God, <strong>the</strong>y would turn only toeach o<strong>the</strong>r.We conclude that Enoch and Noah had good wives and companionswhile on earth but somehow <strong>the</strong> example of perfect union of soulmateswas not present. Perhaps <strong>the</strong>y could be but if so, <strong>the</strong>re was no equalspiritual and soul progression as soulmates would have; unless, possiblyand mysteriously, <strong>the</strong> progression is upon <strong>the</strong> completion of all <strong>the</strong> workof Christ and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> new heaven and new earth. In extra-biblicalrevelation, Shem and his wife, Giddel, were like tw<strong>in</strong> spirits. Even <strong>in</strong>modern appearances <strong>in</strong> our endtime dispensation, <strong>the</strong>y appearconstantly toge<strong>the</strong>r. Not much is recorded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong> but <strong>the</strong>y wouldhave been an ideal example of soulmates who met on earth and cont<strong>in</strong>ue<strong>the</strong>ir eternal progress <strong>in</strong> God toge<strong>the</strong>r.Abraham and SarahAbraham was seventy-five years when he left Ur for <strong>the</strong> land ofCanaan (Genesis 12:4). When Abraham was a hundred years old, Sarahwas n<strong>in</strong>ety, which means that Sarah was younger than Abraham <strong>by</strong> tenyears (Genesis 17:17). It is very likely that Abraham and Sarah weresoulmates. Abraham said that <strong>the</strong>y both shared <strong>the</strong> same fa<strong>the</strong>r but not<strong>the</strong> same mo<strong>the</strong>r, which means that <strong>the</strong>y were step-bro<strong>the</strong>r and stepsister(Genesis 20:12). Besides shar<strong>in</strong>g similar physical DNA, <strong>the</strong>y mostlikely grew up toge<strong>the</strong>r and had known each o<strong>the</strong>r s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>y weresmall. Abraham, be<strong>in</strong>g older <strong>by</strong> ten years, might have even been <strong>the</strong> onewho carried her when she was a ba<strong>by</strong>; perhaps know<strong>in</strong>g that one day,he would be married to her. Their age differences did not prevent <strong>the</strong>mfrom be<strong>in</strong>g soulmates. They even were able to pass on <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>ywere bro<strong>the</strong>r and sister at each place that <strong>the</strong>y go, especially whereAbraham’s life was <strong>in</strong> danger of be<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>ated and Sarah taken awayfrom him (Genesis 12:11-20; 20:1-12). Sarah’s will<strong>in</strong>gness to comply with22


such deception shows forth her love and affection for Abraham and sheendangered her own life to save his life.Though <strong>the</strong>y love each o<strong>the</strong>r so much that <strong>the</strong>y were will<strong>in</strong>g to die forone ano<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>re was also sometimes disagreements that <strong>the</strong>y neededto iron out. Sarah had <strong>the</strong> same love for God that Abraham had butwhen she saw that time had passed after <strong>the</strong> promise of God for a child,she was will<strong>in</strong>g to sacrifice her marriage rights and allow Abraham tohave physical relationship with her maid <strong>in</strong> order to have a child(Genesis 16:1-6). In <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong>, it looks like it was her suggestion thatAbraham heeded to but <strong>in</strong> extra-biblical revelation, it was more out ofher love and affection for Abraham that she did it. She cared for him andsaw how despondent he was at times as <strong>the</strong>y had been childless right upto <strong>the</strong>ir seventies and eighties. It looked naturally right (which was <strong>the</strong>custom of those days) but it was not God’s perfect will.Though <strong>the</strong>y were soulmates, <strong>the</strong>y had issues with Hagar and Ishmael,until both of <strong>the</strong>se were put out of <strong>the</strong> house (Genesis 21:9-14). In <strong>the</strong>end, <strong>the</strong>ir issues were dealt with through obedience to God’s voice andGod’s word. Abraham felt grieved because of his love for his son,Ishmael, but he was will<strong>in</strong>g to obey God’s word above all else (Genesis21:11-12). It was obedience to God’s Word that brought peace to <strong>the</strong>setwo soulmates who love each o<strong>the</strong>r and live toge<strong>the</strong>r until Sarah died at<strong>the</strong> age of 127 (Genesis 23:1). Sometime after Sarah’s death, Abraham,who was about 137 to 140 years old, married Keturah and he lived onuntil he died at <strong>the</strong> age of 175 years (Genesis 25:1-7). This meant that hehad Keturah as wife for at least about 35 years, which is a lifetime formany modern families. There is not much record of Keturah or of herspiritual or soul qualities. We can safely assume that <strong>in</strong> Abraham’ssecond marriage to Keturah, she was a good wife and companion withwhom he produced many o<strong>the</strong>r sons and daughters but she was not hissoulmate like Sarah was.23


Isaac and RebekahIsaac was <strong>the</strong> only child of Abraham and Sarah. He was a product ofGod’s covenant promise and well-loved <strong>by</strong> his fa<strong>the</strong>r and mo<strong>the</strong>r, whowere 100 years old and n<strong>in</strong>ety years old respectively. He was <strong>the</strong> centreof his whole household, <strong>the</strong> object of love and affection. He had so muchlove that he did not feel <strong>the</strong> need of human companionship or asoulmate until his mo<strong>the</strong>r died (Genesis 24:67). Abraham must haveseen <strong>the</strong> p<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of his soul for comfort and <strong>in</strong>structed his top servant toseek out a wife for his son (Genesis 24:1-9). By that time, Isaac had alsopassed <strong>the</strong> test of first love to God, be<strong>in</strong>g will<strong>in</strong>g to be sacrificed <strong>in</strong>obedience to God’s test of love for Abraham (Genesis 22). He wasapproximately about 40 years old when he felt <strong>the</strong> need of a soulmateafter his mo<strong>the</strong>r’s death. As with Adam, when Isaac put God first <strong>in</strong> hislife, God was <strong>the</strong> one who provided him with a soulmate throughAbraham, his servant and <strong>the</strong> angels work<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong>ir behalf.On Rebekah’s side, she must have already been prepared <strong>by</strong> God andshe went to <strong>the</strong> well at <strong>the</strong> exact right time, and had a serv<strong>in</strong>g heart(Genesis 24:15-22). Her heart and love for people was so k<strong>in</strong>d and purethat she herself <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>the</strong> offer to draw water for <strong>the</strong> camels. Whenshe followed Abraham’s servant to a faraway land that she has neverbeen before, her faith and trust <strong>in</strong> God was tested. Isaac immediatelywas comforted when <strong>the</strong>y met and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong> declares that he loved her(Genesis 24:67). They were soulmates <strong>in</strong> spirit, soul and body. Isaac wasabout 40 years old when he married Rebekah and Rebekah accord<strong>in</strong>g toJewish traditions would be about twenty years old. 6 Their age6 The Rabbis agree that Rebekah died at <strong>the</strong> age of 133 years (Sifre, Deut. 357; Midr. Tadshe, <strong>in</strong> Epste<strong>in</strong>. "Mi-Ḳadmoniyyot ha-Yehudim," p. xxii.; "Sefer ha-Yashar," section "Wayishlaḥ," p. 56b). Her death occurred whileJacob was on his way back to his parents' home; and it was co<strong>in</strong>cident with that of Deborah (comp. Gen. 35:8).Her decease is not mentioned because Jacob, not hav<strong>in</strong>g yet arrived, Esau was <strong>the</strong> only son present to attendto her burial. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> ceremony was performed at night out of shame that her coff<strong>in</strong> should be followed<strong>by</strong> a son like Esau (Pesiḳ. l.c.; Midr. Agadah on Gen. l.c.). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Book of Jubilees (31:8-11, 48), Jacob,when he arrived home, found his mo<strong>the</strong>r alive; and she afterward accompanied him to Beth-el to accomplishhis vow (comp. Gen. 28:19-20). She died at <strong>the</strong> age of 155, five years before Isaac's death (Jubilees 35:1, 41),this determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g that her age when she married was twenty years.24


differences did not affect <strong>the</strong> two soulmates’ love for each o<strong>the</strong>r. Isaacwould be around 75 to 80 years old when he went down to Philist<strong>in</strong>edur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> fam<strong>in</strong>e after Abraham died (Genesis 25:7-10; 26:1-6).Abraham would have been around 140 years old when Isaac gotmarried and Abraham lived to be 175 years old. So about thirty-five toforty years after <strong>the</strong>ir marriage and after Abraham’s death, Isaac andRebekah were seen <strong>by</strong> K<strong>in</strong>g Abimelech to be fondl<strong>in</strong>g, affectionate andendear<strong>in</strong>g to one ano<strong>the</strong>r (Genesis 26:8). As soulmates, <strong>the</strong>y cont<strong>in</strong>ue toderive <strong>the</strong> greatest pleasure from each o<strong>the</strong>r spirit, soul and body when<strong>the</strong>y were young; and when <strong>the</strong>y were old, about eighty years old andsixty years old respectively, age did not dim<strong>in</strong>ish <strong>the</strong>ir love and unisonpleasures.It was when <strong>the</strong>y had fraternal tw<strong>in</strong>s and <strong>the</strong>ir unequal love foropposite tw<strong>in</strong>s causes some friction between Isaac and Rebekah (Genesis25:28). There was no visible or outward conflict between Isaac andRebekah but it was <strong>in</strong> full display <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir children. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> conflictbetween Jacob and Esau was from <strong>the</strong> womb, it could be that it was <strong>the</strong>children that brought <strong>the</strong>ir conflict to <strong>the</strong>ir parents. It is always a test forall soulmates to relate to o<strong>the</strong>rs with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir circle of love, especiallywhen such relationships seek to tear <strong>the</strong>m apart. Free choice is still <strong>the</strong>reand for Isaac and Rebekah, <strong>the</strong>y allowed <strong>the</strong> strife of <strong>the</strong>ir children tocreate strife between <strong>the</strong>mselves.Esau married two unbeliev<strong>in</strong>g wives and <strong>the</strong>y were a constant grief toIsaac and Rebekah (Genesis 26:34-35). Rebekah seems to be <strong>the</strong> morespiritually sensitive while Isaac favoured Esau primarily because ofnatural food (Genesis 25:28). It was Rebekah who voiced out her griefabout Esau’s ungodly wives when she requested send<strong>in</strong>g Jacob awayfrom home to protect him from Esau (Genesis 27:46). Isaac should haveallowed <strong>the</strong> spiritual sensitivity of Rebekah to become a part of his lifeand he would have avoided a lot of grieve <strong>in</strong> his old age. It was whenhis love was drawn away <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> comfort foods of Esau that grief began.25


He should have always obta<strong>in</strong>ed all his comfort from Rebekah and notfrom his children. All children are a great joy of love to both parents butsoulmates must remember that children are not a replacement for <strong>the</strong>precious relationship that <strong>the</strong>y have had even before children comes <strong>in</strong>to<strong>the</strong> picture.Jacob and RachelJacob was a lonely soul when he left home and headed for his uncle,Laban’s place. He must have been well-loved and one who obta<strong>in</strong>edmuch affection and comfort from his mo<strong>the</strong>r, Rebekah, who loved himdearly. By <strong>the</strong> time he had travelled many days and reached his uncle’scity, his soul was well-drawn out and he was p<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for a soulmate.Upon see<strong>in</strong>g Rachel, everyth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> him sparked up and he immediatelykissed her, lifted up his voice and wept (Genesis 29:9-13). He had foundhis soulmate. He was prepared to work seven years without salary justfor her (Genesis 29:18). And seven years seemed like just days for himfor he had a deep and great affectionate love and aff<strong>in</strong>ity for Rachel(Genesis 29:20). She was his love, his life, his energy and his <strong>in</strong>spirationday and night; and <strong>the</strong>y probably spent whatever free time <strong>the</strong>y hadtoge<strong>the</strong>r.However, circumstances beyond <strong>the</strong> control of ei<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong>m sought totear <strong>the</strong>ir relationship apart. Laban cunn<strong>in</strong>gly plotted to marry Leah toJacob <strong>in</strong>stead of giv<strong>in</strong>g him Rachel. His love and excitement for Rachelmust have been so great that dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> wedd<strong>in</strong>g night, Jacob did notdiscover that it was Leah until <strong>the</strong> next morn<strong>in</strong>g (Genesis 29:23-25). Leahwas not his soulmate and he ended up be<strong>in</strong>g married to her. Despite <strong>the</strong>deception <strong>by</strong> Laban, Jacob’s love was so great that he was still will<strong>in</strong>g towork ano<strong>the</strong>r seven years without salary just to have Rachel for his wife(Genesis 29:27-28). Jacob was about 84 years old when he married Leahand Rachel (both of whom are twenty-two year old tw<strong>in</strong>s) based on <strong>the</strong>follow<strong>in</strong>g calculations:26


Jacob died when he was 147 years old.He had lived <strong>in</strong> Egypt 17 years (Genesis 47:28).Thus, Jacob was 130 when he went to Egypt to be with Joseph.His arrival was <strong>the</strong> second year of <strong>the</strong> fam<strong>in</strong>e (Genesis 45:6).Joseph was <strong>the</strong>n 39 years old (compare Genesis 41:46 and add <strong>the</strong> 7years of plenty and <strong>the</strong> 2 years of fam<strong>in</strong>e).This means that Jacob was 91 when Rachel gave birth to Joseph.But Leah already had six children before Joseph was born (Genesis30:20-24). Reuben (Leah’s firstborn <strong>by</strong> Jacob) was conceived at least 7years before <strong>the</strong> birth of Joseph.This means that Jacob was about 84 years old when he first marriedLeah and Rachel.Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Jewish traditions, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> book of Jasher, Leahand Rachel were tw<strong>in</strong>s and <strong>the</strong>y married Jacob around <strong>the</strong> age oftwenty-two. 7 Their physical age difference of sixty-two years did notprevent Jacob and Rachel from enjoy<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> relationship of soulmates.Although Rachel was Jacob’s soulmate, Leah was now also his wifeand it was his responsibility to treat her with love, honour and respect.Leah was not <strong>in</strong> a good position as <strong>in</strong> accordance to <strong>the</strong> customs of thosedays, women do not have much say about <strong>the</strong>mselves or <strong>the</strong>ir lives, andshe ended up be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a marriage that she did not ask for. When Godsaw that she was be<strong>in</strong>g neglected and unloved, and <strong>the</strong> full rights of awife not given to her, God bless her with many children (Genesis 29:31-35). She desired to be loved and hoped that through more children hernow legal husband, who did not want her <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first place, would loveher more (Genesis 29:32). She suffered emotionally and through threebirths yearned to be loved, just like any person would yearn to f<strong>in</strong>d asoulmate who loved <strong>the</strong>m and cherished <strong>the</strong>m. With <strong>the</strong> firstborn, shesaid, ‚Now my husband will love me‛ (Genesis 29:32). With <strong>the</strong> second,she realized that <strong>the</strong> Lord saw that she was unloved, and <strong>the</strong> Lord7 Seder Olam Rabbah 227


lessed her with a child (Genesis 29:33). With <strong>the</strong> third son, she was stillyearn<strong>in</strong>g that her husband would be attached to her, hav<strong>in</strong>g given himthree sons (Genesis 29:34).Poor Leah, she had physical relationship with her husband but <strong>the</strong>rewas no union of her soul with her husband for her husband’s soul wasunited to her sister Rachel. Like everyone without a soulmate, <strong>the</strong>re is ayearn<strong>in</strong>g for a soul fusion with one’s predest<strong>in</strong>ed soulmate whichphysical relationships alone could not give. F<strong>in</strong>ally, she learn to givepraise to God for all her afflictions and suffer<strong>in</strong>gs and her imperfectsituation <strong>in</strong> life, which she can’t escape from nor can she do anyth<strong>in</strong>gabout, when she gave birth to her fourth son. She learned that first loveto God is still <strong>the</strong> most important and f<strong>in</strong>ally dedicates her life to <strong>the</strong>praise of God (Genesis 29:35).The rivalry between <strong>the</strong> tw<strong>in</strong> sisters Leah and Rachel cont<strong>in</strong>ue as <strong>the</strong>yvie for <strong>the</strong> love of Jacob. In those days, a woman who gave birth to lotsof children was greatly valued and praise and both of <strong>the</strong>m keptcontend<strong>in</strong>g with one ano<strong>the</strong>r for love via hav<strong>in</strong>g children, through <strong>the</strong>irown bodies and through <strong>the</strong>ir maidservants (Genesis 30:1-24). Thetension between <strong>the</strong> soulmates Jacob and Rachel reached a high whenshe told Jacob that she would ra<strong>the</strong>r die than live if she does not havechildren (Genesis 30:1-2). Out of love for her, Jacob was persuaded <strong>by</strong>her to have children for her via her maid, which Leah quickly follow suitand did <strong>the</strong> same. In <strong>the</strong> end, as Rachel learned to put God first andprayed to God, her womb was opened she gave Jacob, who was <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong>naged 91, her first born son.Jacob’s prioritiz<strong>in</strong>g of his love cont<strong>in</strong>ued towards Rachel, despite <strong>the</strong>fact that he now technically had two official wives and two concub<strong>in</strong>es.This love was spread more towards Rachel’s children and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>nocent children were greatly neglected. The o<strong>the</strong>r children did not ask28


to be part of this rivalry family and should have been loved equally.And <strong>the</strong> lot of <strong>the</strong> two maidservants who culturally were more likeslaves and had to do <strong>the</strong>ir master’s or mistress’s bidd<strong>in</strong>g was not ahappy path ei<strong>the</strong>r. Never<strong>the</strong>less, it is required of all, no matter howimperfect a situation, to first f<strong>in</strong>d happ<strong>in</strong>ess with God <strong>by</strong> lov<strong>in</strong>g Godfirst, and <strong>the</strong>n lett<strong>in</strong>g God provide and bless us with happ<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>whatever manner of relationships that already exists legally. Both Leah,and <strong>the</strong> two maidservants, toge<strong>the</strong>r with Rachel, <strong>the</strong> one who is greatlyloved <strong>by</strong> Jacob, all became <strong>the</strong> female patriarchs of <strong>the</strong> famous twelvetribes of Israel. In <strong>the</strong> end, <strong>the</strong> dest<strong>in</strong>y of God was fulfilled.There was probably no natural way that Rachel alone could haveprovided Jacob with twelve tribes. God used all imperfect situations tocreate perfect dest<strong>in</strong>ies. All th<strong>in</strong>gs do and will work out for good tothose who love God (Romans 8:28). The ma<strong>in</strong> purpose for this life is firstto accomplish God’s perfect Will on earth and that His k<strong>in</strong>gdom will beestablished on earth. If while fulfill<strong>in</strong>g God’s Will, one manages to f<strong>in</strong>done’s soulmate, blessed is that person; but if fulfill<strong>in</strong>g God’s perfect Willdoes not lead to or result <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of one’s soulmate, one shouldstill be able to f<strong>in</strong>d happ<strong>in</strong>ess and joy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord Jesus Christ; and withwhoever one is hav<strong>in</strong>g a relationship with as perfect love gives one <strong>the</strong>ability to love everyone equally with <strong>the</strong> love of God.Jacob did not succeed <strong>in</strong> br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g his soulmate Rachel <strong>in</strong>to spiritualharmony with him <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> worship of Yahweh God. Perhaps this isbecause his own relationship with God was not deep enough for whenhe first met God at Be<strong>the</strong>l, all he was <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> was food, cloth<strong>in</strong>gand shelter (Genesis 28:22). <strong>Soulmates</strong> cannot grow spiritually deeperthan <strong>the</strong> highest level of whichever one of <strong>the</strong>m is at. The higher canalways help <strong>the</strong> lower but <strong>in</strong> Jacob’s case, his whole life had revolvedaround food, cloth<strong>in</strong>g and shelter. Rachel had a background of idolworship and although she had belief <strong>in</strong> Yahweh God, she still stole <strong>the</strong>29


idols of Laban when <strong>the</strong>y left to go to Canaan (Genesis 31:34). Notknow<strong>in</strong>g that his soulmate Rachel had stolen <strong>the</strong> idols, Jacob declareddeath upon whoever stole <strong>the</strong> idols (Genesis 31:32). As <strong>the</strong>y weresoulmates and <strong>in</strong>ter-tw<strong>in</strong>ed and connected toge<strong>the</strong>r, his pronouncementof death resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> death of Rachel <strong>in</strong> child labour (Genesis 35:16-20). It must have been <strong>the</strong> saddest day of his life when his soulmatedied. Though his family cont<strong>in</strong>ued, Jacob held fast to his love for Rachel<strong>by</strong> outpour<strong>in</strong>g that love towards Joseph, who became a representation of<strong>the</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g memories of Rachel, his true love.Joseph and AsenathJoseph grew up well loved, abundantly and greatly favoured <strong>by</strong> hisfa<strong>the</strong>r, but experienced one of <strong>the</strong> most traumatic <strong>in</strong>cidents <strong>in</strong> his lifewhen he was thrown <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> pit <strong>by</strong> his bro<strong>the</strong>rs and <strong>the</strong>n sold as a slave(Genesis 42:2). Joseph was handsome <strong>in</strong> form and appearance (Genesis39:6). Potiphar’s wife wanted him but he chose to ignore all her dailyadvances and ended up <strong>in</strong> jail, falsely accused of try<strong>in</strong>g to rape her(Genesis 39:6-20). When he was thirty years old, he was promoted to be<strong>the</strong> Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister over <strong>the</strong> whole of Egypt and Pharaoh gave himAsenath <strong>the</strong> daughter of Potipherah, priest of On (Genesis 31:45). Josephdid not have much choice here but it was God who had arrangedeveryth<strong>in</strong>g and God made <strong>the</strong> choice for him through circumstancesbeyond his control.The <strong>Bible</strong> does not give <strong>the</strong> age of Asenath but several legends andmyths have grown around her. In one Jewish legend, it speaks abouthow when she was eighteen, she rejected all suitors <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Pharaoh’sson and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> end was convicted <strong>by</strong> Joseph to give up idols and marriedhim (<strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong>n probably around 20 years old). In ano<strong>the</strong>r Jewish legend,she was supposedly a daughter of <strong>the</strong> rape of Shechem upon D<strong>in</strong>ah andwas sent away to Egypt, and ended be<strong>in</strong>g adopted <strong>by</strong> Potipherah. All30


<strong>the</strong>se legends try to po<strong>in</strong>t to <strong>the</strong> fact that she was a wonderful soulmateand wife to Joseph and <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r of two of <strong>the</strong> Jewish tribes, Manassehand Ephraim. Joseph must have taken great comfort <strong>in</strong> hercompanionship for he named his sons, Manasseh (caus<strong>in</strong>g to forget) andEphraim (double fruitfulness). He declared that God had help himforget all his toil and his fa<strong>the</strong>r’s house and that God has caused him tobe fruitful <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> land of his affliction (Genesis 41:51-52). Althoughnei<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong>m had much decision choice <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir lives, both wereplanned <strong>by</strong> God to be soulmates that fulfilled <strong>the</strong>ir dest<strong>in</strong>ies.Moses and ZipporahMoses was adopted <strong>in</strong>to Egyptian royalty and grew up with muchprovision and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. At <strong>the</strong> age of forty, after kill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Egyptian,Moses fled to Midian and <strong>the</strong>re he met Zipporah and married her(Exodus 2:12-21). They had two sons and <strong>the</strong> first was Gershom(refugee), for Moses declared that he had refuge <strong>in</strong> a foreign land(Exodus 2:22). They were soulmates well suited to one ano<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>the</strong>irrecorded quarrel was over Jewish circumcision of which Zipporahdisagreed to but reluctant performed when Moses almost lost his life fordisobey<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Jewish covenant of circumcision given to Abraham(Genesis 17:9-14; Exodus 4:24-26). Apparently, Zipporah returned to herfa<strong>the</strong>r and was later brought back to Moses when Moses came back <strong>in</strong>to<strong>the</strong> land of Midian after <strong>the</strong> Exodus exploits <strong>in</strong> Egypt (Exodus 18:1-2).Later aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> murmur<strong>in</strong>g of Moses’s sister and bro<strong>the</strong>r aga<strong>in</strong>stZipporah (<strong>the</strong>y called her an Ethiopian because of her dark sk<strong>in</strong>), Godstepped <strong>in</strong> and protected Moses and Zipporah (Numbers 12:1-16).Their story tells us that soulmates need to grow <strong>in</strong> faith toge<strong>the</strong>r, eventhough <strong>the</strong>y might be well suited for each o<strong>the</strong>r. It also shows forth thatsoulmates do have to negotiate through quarrels and disagreements. It isnot all a bed of roses without thorns. It must have been difficult for31


Zipporah to accept <strong>the</strong> Jewish laws and customs but she crossed <strong>the</strong>cultural barriers to be part of <strong>the</strong> Jewish people. The <strong>Bible</strong> did not giveZipporah’s age when she got married but follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> customs of <strong>the</strong>times, she would most likely be <strong>in</strong> her twenties.Boaz and RuthRuth was a Moabite woman who experienced much sadness andsorrow. She came <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> Jewish family of Elimech and Naomi throughmarriage with one of <strong>the</strong>ir sons, Mahlon (Hebrew - weak or sickly), after<strong>the</strong> death of Elimelech. It is possible that Mahlon was a sick andunhealthy person which could expla<strong>in</strong> his early death. In <strong>the</strong> end bothMahlon and Chilion (Hebrew – p<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g or wast<strong>in</strong>g away) his bro<strong>the</strong>r diedleav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> widows Naomi, Ruth and Orpah (Ruth 1:1-5). If Ruth hadmarried <strong>in</strong>to a sickly family, it does show her sense of sacrificial loveand selflessness. After much weep<strong>in</strong>g, heart wrench<strong>in</strong>g tears, follow<strong>in</strong>gNaomi <strong>in</strong> her journey back to Israel, Orpah was persuaded to turn backto Moab but Ruth <strong>in</strong>sisted on follow<strong>in</strong>g Naomi to love her and take careof her. Ruth was not look<strong>in</strong>g for a soulmate, she married Mahlon to carefor him and with Naomi, she was will<strong>in</strong>g to fur<strong>the</strong>r sacrifice her entirefuture and freedom, just tak<strong>in</strong>g to care for her. She was will<strong>in</strong>g to:1. Leave her homeland and birth place permanently2. Forsake all possible future happ<strong>in</strong>ess with husband, family homeand kids3. Go to an unknown foreign land4. Cross cultural barriers5. Cross religious barriers6. Be converted to worship Yahweh God7. Live where Naomi live no matter what <strong>the</strong> condition8. Devote <strong>the</strong> rest of her life to Naomi unto death (Ruth 1:16-17)32


Upon arrival <strong>in</strong> Israel, Ruth faithfully took care of <strong>the</strong> daily needs andsustenance of Naomi and herself through <strong>the</strong> corn, barley and wheatharvest (Ruth 2:2, 23). Ruth had completely no thoughts of look<strong>in</strong>g for asoulmate but it was Naomi who decided to look after her <strong>in</strong>terest andneeds (Ruth 3:1). She taught Ruth how to offer herself for marriage toBoaz (Ruth 3:2-4). Ruth obediently followed Naomi’s suggestions andBoaz was caught <strong>by</strong> shock and surprise when he found her at his feet atmidnight (Ruth 3:5-8).Although Boaz had been her benefactor and protector dur<strong>in</strong>g her time<strong>in</strong> his field, <strong>the</strong>re was no emotional relationship between <strong>the</strong>m. It waspurely follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Jewish custom of provid<strong>in</strong>g an heir for Elimelech’sfamily l<strong>in</strong>e. Ano<strong>the</strong>r family relative was closer to Elimelech’s family andhad first right to marry Ruth and produce children (Ruth 3:13). If <strong>the</strong>yhad some level of love for one ano<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>y were will<strong>in</strong>g to withholdtak<strong>in</strong>g it fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>to marriage because <strong>by</strong> right, ano<strong>the</strong>r person had firstrights to marry Ruth. This is <strong>the</strong>ir level of love for God, performance ofHis righteousness first above all else, even self-desires. When God plansfor two soulmates to be toge<strong>the</strong>r, it will always take place no matterwhat <strong>the</strong> barriers or circumstances may be. Both just have to wait uponGod and allow God to move <strong>in</strong> His ways.Boaz was <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>sman of Elemech and <strong>the</strong> son of Salmon and Rahab(Ruth 2:1; 4:21; Mat<strong>the</strong>w 1:5) and much older than Naomi. Salmon,Boaz’s fa<strong>the</strong>r was born dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 40 year wilderness period of Moses,and was one of <strong>the</strong> two spies that went to Jericho and was protected <strong>by</strong>Rahab (Joshua 2:1-6). Salmon must have fell <strong>in</strong> love with Rahab and latermarried her. This place <strong>the</strong> story of Ruth occurr<strong>in</strong>g early <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> time ofjudges most likely dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Moabite oppression of eighteen years(Judges 3:14). Boaz would be older than Elimelech, and if we takeMahlon’s age <strong>in</strong>to account plus <strong>the</strong> ten years of sojourn <strong>in</strong> Moab, Boazcould be <strong>in</strong> his seventies when he married Ruth. The <strong>Bible</strong> does not sayhow old Ruth and Boaz were, but implies that Boaz is somewhat older33


than Ruth. However, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Jewish tradition Boaz was <strong>the</strong>n eightyyears of age, and Ruth forty. 8Boaz and Ruth were perfect soulmates for each o<strong>the</strong>r. Their story is atestimony of how God was <strong>in</strong> perfect control of all circumstancesbeyond <strong>the</strong>ir control, <strong>in</strong> br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g two perfect soulmates toge<strong>the</strong>r. For<strong>the</strong>m, God did work out all th<strong>in</strong>gs for good to those who love Him(Romans 8:29). They were both godly, did not seek <strong>the</strong>ir own needs ordesires, and totally consecrated to God. They allowed God to controlcircumstances; even to <strong>the</strong> last righteous act with <strong>the</strong> closer relative thatcould have nullified any potential relationship <strong>the</strong>y could have had. It istruly God who br<strong>in</strong>gs soulmates toge<strong>the</strong>r and not <strong>the</strong>ir own efforts.Aquila and PriscillaThe New Testament does not have many stories as <strong>the</strong> story of Jesusdom<strong>in</strong>ates and surpasses all o<strong>the</strong>rs but we do have <strong>the</strong> story of onecouple who is prom<strong>in</strong>ent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> book of Acts. They are first mentionedwhen <strong>the</strong> apostle Paul went to Cor<strong>in</strong>th (Acts 18:2). The special andunique th<strong>in</strong>g about <strong>the</strong>m was that <strong>the</strong>y were always mentioned as acouple and never <strong>in</strong>dividually throughout <strong>the</strong> six times that <strong>the</strong>ir namesoccurred <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Testament (Acts 18:2-3; 18, 26; Romans 16:3-4; 1Cor<strong>in</strong>thians 16:19; 2 Timothy 4:19). They were dealers <strong>in</strong> tents andtentmakers as was <strong>the</strong> apostle Paul (Acts 18:3). When <strong>the</strong> Romanemperor Claudius issued an edict expell<strong>in</strong>g all Jews from Rome, Aquilaand Priscilla moved to Cor<strong>in</strong>th.Of <strong>the</strong> six times that <strong>the</strong>ir names were mentioned, Priscilla’s name wasmentioned first three times (Acts 18:18; Romans 16:3-4; 2 Timothy 4:19).To be constantly mentioned as a couple and to have her namesometimes mentioned first is very unusual <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> male dom<strong>in</strong>atedsociety of <strong>Bible</strong> times. It implies that she is a prom<strong>in</strong>ent member of <strong>the</strong>pair and an important contributor to <strong>the</strong> relationship. Priscilla had8 Midrash Ruth, fol. 31. 4. & 34. 234


strong Jewish heritage and was a Christian convert <strong>in</strong> Rome; her name isa Roman dim<strong>in</strong>utive of Prisca. She was an equal partner <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>irrelationship, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>istry and also <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir bus<strong>in</strong>ess.Aquila was orig<strong>in</strong>ally from Pontus and also a Jewish convert (Acts18:2). He was possibly an early convert to Christianity <strong>by</strong> some of <strong>the</strong>Jews from Pontus who were present dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> outpour<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> HolySpirit (Acts 2:9). He immigrated to Rome and it was <strong>the</strong>re that he metPriscilla and married her. They both lived <strong>in</strong> Rome for about n<strong>in</strong>e yearsand became prom<strong>in</strong>ent members of <strong>the</strong> church <strong>in</strong> Rome before <strong>the</strong>irdeparture to Cor<strong>in</strong>th where <strong>the</strong>y met <strong>the</strong> apostle Paul. Their chronologyis presented below: 9Year (AD) Location Events ScriptureBirth ~40 Pontus Aquila, a Jew, born and raised <strong>in</strong> Pontus.Acts 18:2Unknown PossiblyRomeImmigrated to Rome.Priscilla (Prisca), Jewish heritage, born a high Roman girl.~40-49 Rome Aquila practiced his trade <strong>in</strong> lea<strong>the</strong>r.Acts 18:3Priscilla and Aquila meet and marry.They both became prom<strong>in</strong>ent members of <strong>the</strong> church <strong>in</strong>Rome.Expelled from Rome <strong>by</strong> edict of Claudius aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong>Jews, <strong>the</strong>y went to Cor<strong>in</strong>th.49-52 Cor<strong>in</strong>th Showed Paul hospitality and plied <strong>the</strong>ir trade toge<strong>the</strong>r. Acts 18:352-55 Ephesus Sailed from Cor<strong>in</strong>th to Ephesus with Paul.Carried on Paul’s m<strong>in</strong>istry when Paul left for Syria.Acts 18:18-19Acts 18:18Ephesian church met <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir home.Instructed Apollos <strong>in</strong> Christian doctr<strong>in</strong>e.Late 52 AD, Paul returned to Ephesus, and may have livedwith Priscilla and Aquila dur<strong>in</strong>g this fruitful 3 yearm<strong>in</strong>istry.55-60 Rome Priscilla and Aquila return to Rome.1 Cor. 16:19Acts 18:26Romans 16:3-5As <strong>in</strong> Ephesus, <strong>the</strong> church <strong>in</strong> Rome meets <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir home.60-64 Ephesus Supported Timothy <strong>in</strong> his work <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ephesian church. 2 Tim. 1:7, 16;4:19From <strong>the</strong> above chronology, we can see that Aquila and Priscilla gave<strong>the</strong>ir lives wholeheartedly to <strong>the</strong> Lord. Wherever <strong>the</strong>y migrated to, <strong>the</strong>church was <strong>the</strong> centre of <strong>the</strong>ir lives and even met <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir home. They9 Ramstad, M. International Journal of Frontier Missions, 19 (1) Spr<strong>in</strong>g 2002, pp. 28-3135


oth gave <strong>the</strong>ir lives as martyrs for <strong>the</strong> Lord Jesus for <strong>the</strong> day 8 th July isset apart to <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong> Roman Catholic martyrology. They were twosoulmates who had met <strong>in</strong> this lifetime and served toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>istryand <strong>in</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess. Their whole lives revolved around <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>istry and <strong>in</strong>fulfill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> work and will of God on earth. The apostle Paul was <strong>the</strong>irco-worker, fellow missionary, friend and teacher to <strong>the</strong>m. In life and <strong>in</strong>death, <strong>the</strong>y were toge<strong>the</strong>r, tw<strong>in</strong> spirits and souls who have found eacho<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> this life.ConclusionIn this chapter we learn that not all <strong>Bible</strong> characters found <strong>the</strong>irsoulmates <strong>in</strong> marriage <strong>in</strong> this life. And those who do still have a lot ofgrowth and development <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir relationship. Yet it is required of allwho enter <strong>in</strong>to a marriage relationship, whe<strong>the</strong>r it is with <strong>the</strong>irsoulmates or not, that <strong>the</strong>y rema<strong>in</strong> faithful to <strong>the</strong>ir marriage and <strong>the</strong>ycan still live a happy and fruitful life. The <strong>Bible</strong> stories show that it ispossible to have a good marriage without meet<strong>in</strong>g one’s soulmate. Italso shows that many soulmates cross boundaries of culture, time, age,social status, and many varied difficulties before <strong>the</strong>y f<strong>in</strong>d each o<strong>the</strong>r.It should be apparent to all who follow <strong>the</strong> above <strong>Bible</strong> stories that <strong>the</strong>fulfilment of God’s Will on earth and <strong>the</strong> establishment of His k<strong>in</strong>gdomon earth take first priority above f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g one’s soulmate on earth.Moreover <strong>in</strong> an imperfect fallen world environment, many people arestruggl<strong>in</strong>g with basic problems of food, cloth<strong>in</strong>g and shelter. Thankfully,<strong>in</strong> our modern world, slavery has been abolished but <strong>in</strong> many parts of<strong>the</strong> world, not every human be<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>in</strong> a situation where <strong>the</strong>y have freechoice. Illegal slavery still occurs and many people f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong>mselveswithout <strong>the</strong> freedom of spirit, soul and body to exercise free choice <strong>in</strong> allthree dimensions. Thus <strong>the</strong> first task of God and His angels is to free thiswhole world from evil and imperfection. This would cost <strong>the</strong> lives of36


many martyrs and demand <strong>the</strong> sacrifice of time, talents and all who arewill<strong>in</strong>g to pay <strong>the</strong> price that o<strong>the</strong>rs may be free.For this reason, people like Paul and <strong>the</strong> 144,000 sacrificed <strong>the</strong>ir basicrights to have a complementary soulmate <strong>in</strong> this life <strong>in</strong> order that o<strong>the</strong>rsmay benefit from <strong>the</strong>ir sacrifices. To those of us who benefit from <strong>the</strong>sacrifices of such, and are given <strong>the</strong> opportunity, privilege and honourof fulfill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> fullness of <strong>the</strong> existence of <strong>the</strong> human race’s creation ofmale and female genders we must live out our lives on earth and <strong>in</strong>eternity grateful that we are <strong>the</strong> rewards and <strong>the</strong> accomplishment of<strong>the</strong>se people. It blesses <strong>the</strong>m to see that <strong>the</strong>ir sacrifices for <strong>the</strong> humanrace have brought <strong>the</strong> fullest and highest expression and existence of <strong>the</strong>human race as before <strong>the</strong> fall and enter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to a new dimension <strong>in</strong>Christ <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> new heaven and new earth.Each person must live to fullness <strong>the</strong> perfect call and dest<strong>in</strong>y of ourLord Jesus Christ. The performance of <strong>the</strong> perfect Will of God on earth isand will always rema<strong>in</strong> priority number one. While perform<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>perfect Will of God on earth, through prayers and through faith, thosewho believe <strong>in</strong> God our Fa<strong>the</strong>r answer<strong>in</strong>g prayers, God will surelyprovide for each person <strong>the</strong> perfect soulmate. For this was His perfectplan for Adam and Eve and it is for this plan that Jesus paid <strong>the</strong> price ofatonement for. Rejoice greatly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> abundance of God’s grace <strong>in</strong> ChristJesus to restore mank<strong>in</strong>d to its orig<strong>in</strong>al plan and to reveal a greaterdest<strong>in</strong>y for <strong>the</strong> human race. The human race was split <strong>in</strong>to two gendersto enjoy co-creation with God through <strong>the</strong> attributes be<strong>in</strong>g male andfemale. Not all is revealed yet of <strong>the</strong> glory of be<strong>in</strong>g male and female,which will be revealed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> glory which is to come.37


Chapter 3The Dynamics of <strong>Soulmates</strong>There are dynamics of soul attachments <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong> that show thatsome soul attachments can be wrong while o<strong>the</strong>rs are beneficial. It isobvious that <strong>the</strong>re has to be some measure of soul bond<strong>in</strong>g andattachment whenever people become close or seek to be work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>harmony and fellowship. We are tripartite creatures with spirits, soulsand bodies (1 Thessalonians 5:23). When any two or three people worktoge<strong>the</strong>r or fellowship or bond toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>re will be <strong>in</strong>tellectual,emotional or volition bond<strong>in</strong>g that flows along with spiritual bond<strong>in</strong>g todo <strong>the</strong> Will of God on earth. Any dimension of <strong>in</strong>tellectual, emotional orfree will bond<strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r constitutes a measure of soul bond<strong>in</strong>g that isnecessarily for <strong>the</strong> carry<strong>in</strong>g out of God’s Will.The early church was so united toge<strong>the</strong>r that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong> said that <strong>the</strong>church had become one heart and one soul (Acts 4:32). The apostle Pauladvocates that <strong>the</strong> church should strive toge<strong>the</strong>r with one soul(Philippians 1:27 word m<strong>in</strong>d translated from Greek psuche which meanssoul). He fur<strong>the</strong>r exhorts that <strong>the</strong> church cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> comfort of love,<strong>the</strong> fellowship of <strong>the</strong> Spirit, <strong>in</strong> affections and mercies, to be like m<strong>in</strong>ded,hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> same love with one accord with one m<strong>in</strong>d (Philippians 2:1-2).Every time affections and m<strong>in</strong>d is mentioned it <strong>in</strong>volves <strong>the</strong> dynamics of<strong>the</strong> soul. There is obviously a positive dynamic of soul bond<strong>in</strong>g that isbiblical and powerful. The one accord and one soul church brought forth<strong>the</strong> full resurrection power of <strong>the</strong> Lord <strong>in</strong>to manifestation and <strong>the</strong>church reached its greatest demonstration of <strong>the</strong> grace of God upon<strong>the</strong>m (Acts 4:32-33). Where any two <strong>in</strong>dividuals agree as touch<strong>in</strong>ganyth<strong>in</strong>g on earth, it is so powerful that whatever <strong>the</strong>y ask is done for<strong>the</strong>m <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> heavenly Fa<strong>the</strong>r (Mat<strong>the</strong>w 18:19). No two <strong>in</strong>dividuals can38


ond toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> agreement (Greek symphoneo literally mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>symphony) without <strong>the</strong> union of soul and spirit. The promise of <strong>the</strong>manifested presence of Christ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> midst of two or three who ga<strong>the</strong>red<strong>in</strong> His name is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context of oneness of soul and spirit (Mat<strong>the</strong>w18:20).Friendships and Union of SoulsJust as <strong>the</strong>re are union of souls that are positive, <strong>the</strong>re can beattachments of souls that are negative. In one of his <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g visions,<strong>Ps</strong> David saw one married middle aged person with a str<strong>in</strong>g attached,and <strong>the</strong> str<strong>in</strong>g went all <strong>the</strong> way back to <strong>the</strong> person’s past. It represents asoul attachment to <strong>the</strong> person’s past that was still <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> person.Isaac’s soul was tied to Esau because of <strong>the</strong> natural foods which Esaubrought to him (Genesis 25:28; 27:4). Shechem <strong>the</strong> Canaanite’s soulcleaved to D<strong>in</strong>ah after he raped her (Genesis 34:1-3). After los<strong>in</strong>g hissoulmate, Rachel, and los<strong>in</strong>g Joseph, Jacob’s soul was deeply attachedand bound to <strong>the</strong> soul of Benjam<strong>in</strong> (Genesis 44:30 <strong>the</strong> word life comesfrom nephesh mean<strong>in</strong>g soul). The bro<strong>the</strong>rs of Joseph were afraid thatlos<strong>in</strong>g Benjam<strong>in</strong> would mean <strong>the</strong> end of Jacob’s will and desire to lives<strong>in</strong>ce his soul was bound to Benjam<strong>in</strong>’s soul.There are positive friendships and soul attachments that canstreng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> fellowship of two <strong>in</strong>dividuals. David and Jonathanshared a soul and friendship bond<strong>in</strong>g that lasted beyond <strong>the</strong>ir lives. Thesoul of Jonathan was knitted toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> soul of David and <strong>the</strong>yloved each o<strong>the</strong>r as <strong>the</strong>ir own souls (1 Samuel 18:1). This Scriptureshows that it is possible to share a deep and last<strong>in</strong>g friendship that lastsfor a lifetime and beyond, without <strong>the</strong> element of physical sexualrelationship that belong to a marriage relationship. The <strong>Bible</strong> advocatesthat <strong>in</strong> order to have many friends, one must show oneself friendly first,and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same verse, speaks of a friendship that is so deep that it39


transcends even family relationships; it is as one who sticks closer than abro<strong>the</strong>r (Proverbs 18:24). The word stick comes from <strong>the</strong> Hebrew worddabeq which means to adhere, cleave, or be jo<strong>in</strong>ed toge<strong>the</strong>r. Thefriendship of Jonathan and David was fur<strong>the</strong>r streng<strong>the</strong>ned <strong>by</strong> spiritualties and covenants which <strong>the</strong>y made with each o<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>the</strong>y cont<strong>in</strong>ueto declare <strong>the</strong>ir love for one ano<strong>the</strong>r through difficult and test<strong>in</strong>g times(1 Samuel 18:3; 20:17).If it is possible for two <strong>in</strong>dividuals of <strong>the</strong> same gender to share a deepand last<strong>in</strong>g friendship and relationship, without <strong>the</strong> physical sexualdimension, is it possible for two <strong>in</strong>dividuals of opposite gender to sharea deep friendship and relationship without it result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a sexualrelationship? From <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong>, it is obvious that Jesus shared a deeprelationship and friendship with both his disciples and his followers<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g those of <strong>the</strong> female gender. The relationship of Jesus withMary Magdalene rema<strong>in</strong>ed pure. Toge<strong>the</strong>r with Joanna and Susanna,Mary Magdalene followed Jesus and m<strong>in</strong>istered to Him (Luke 8:1-3).The reason why some people believe wrongly that Jesus did not die on<strong>the</strong> cross but ended up marry<strong>in</strong>g Mary Magdalene was due toApocrypha accounts that seem to show <strong>the</strong> closeness that Jesus had withher. 10 In look<strong>in</strong>g through <strong>the</strong> exact same accounts, all I f<strong>in</strong>d are just aclose friendship and fellowship that Jesus had with Mary Magdalenewithout hav<strong>in</strong>g any sexual connotations. With Jesus, <strong>the</strong>re are nei<strong>the</strong>rmale nor female for all are equal <strong>in</strong> His sight (Galatians 3:28). After Jesusascended, <strong>the</strong> disciples cont<strong>in</strong>ue to have a close friendship and work<strong>in</strong>grelationship with Mary, <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r of Jesus, Mary Magdalene and manyo<strong>the</strong>r women (Acts 1:14).10 In <strong>the</strong> Gospel of Mary, <strong>the</strong> apostles acknowledged <strong>the</strong> close relationship of Jesus and Mary. In <strong>the</strong> Gospel ofPhilip, it acknowledges that Jesus loved Mary Magdalene as much as <strong>the</strong> disciples, was his companion(ko<strong>in</strong>onos) and had kissed her often. Modern scholars who allude to a sexual relationship that Jesus had withMary Magdalene forget that ko<strong>in</strong>onos is <strong>the</strong> standard word for Christian fellowship and has been also used ofJames, John and <strong>Peter</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir fish<strong>in</strong>g partnership (Luke 5:10). It was also a custom of early Christians to sharea holy kiss (Romans 16:16; 1 Cor<strong>in</strong>thians 16:20; 2 Cor<strong>in</strong>thians 13:12; 1 Thessalonians 5:26; 1 <strong>Peter</strong> 5:14).40


After <strong>the</strong> brook of Cherith dried up, Elijah was told <strong>by</strong> God to staywith a s<strong>in</strong>gle woman, a widow who had a son, for <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> threeyears and three months that <strong>the</strong> land of Israel was without ra<strong>in</strong> (1 K<strong>in</strong>gs17: 7-16; 18:1; James 5:17). A friendship and good relationship wouldhave developed through <strong>the</strong> years without hav<strong>in</strong>g any physicalrelationship between Elijah, <strong>the</strong> widow and her son.A notable woman prepared a room for Elisha so that whenever hecame to her town, he would stay <strong>in</strong> her house (2 K<strong>in</strong>gs 4:9-11). Elishawas well taken care <strong>by</strong> her and blessed her and her husband with achild. If Ruth had not proposed to Boaz to marry her, Boaz would haverema<strong>in</strong>ed her protector and friend without cross<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e of a physicalrelationship. For even when Ruth was alone with him and ly<strong>in</strong>g at hisfeet, he did not become <strong>in</strong>timate with her nor had physical relationshipwith her (Ruth 3:7-15). Ruth had actually offered herself physically tohim and he had eaten and had drunk and was merry (Ruth 3:7). Whenhe discovered her at his feet at midnight, and after convers<strong>in</strong>g with her,he asked her to lie down until morn<strong>in</strong>g (Ruth 3:8, 13-14). They cont<strong>in</strong>ueto lie <strong>in</strong> bed from midnight to morn<strong>in</strong>g, physically close toge<strong>the</strong>r, withher at his feet under <strong>the</strong> same blanket but he did not have physicalrelationship with her.With Jesus as our example and all <strong>the</strong> various accounts above, it isdef<strong>in</strong>itely possible for different genders to have good last<strong>in</strong>g spiritualand soul friendships without it cross<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>to a physicalrelationship. Obviously, this must be so, o<strong>the</strong>rwise <strong>the</strong> apostle Paul’sexhortation that <strong>the</strong> church be one heart, one affection, one m<strong>in</strong>d andone soul cannot be carried out for <strong>the</strong> church would <strong>in</strong>variably consistsof people of both genders.41


Tim<strong>in</strong>g and Read<strong>in</strong>ess for <strong>Soulmates</strong>The human race came about through <strong>the</strong> splitt<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al entityof Adam who was once a s<strong>in</strong>gle entity of spirit, soul and body <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong>two halves of male and female genders. This <strong>in</strong>herent differentiation hascaused <strong>the</strong> eternal desire and p<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for one’s complementarycounterpart.Human history and bible history are filled with love stories of variouslevels: of lovers, of parents and children, of brethren, and of friends.Sometimes, <strong>the</strong> relationships lasted a lifetime and beyond and at o<strong>the</strong>rtimes <strong>the</strong>y lasted only until <strong>the</strong>y reached barriers which both sides couldnot overcome but <strong>the</strong>y all express <strong>the</strong> same goal and motivation – <strong>the</strong>desire for friendships and soulmate built <strong>in</strong>to our DNA.David moved <strong>in</strong> his call<strong>in</strong>g and ano<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g very early <strong>in</strong> his life,probably a teenager as he was only about thirty years old when he wasano<strong>in</strong>ted k<strong>in</strong>g over Judah (2 Samuel 5:4, 5). As a teenager, he had <strong>the</strong>opportunity to slay Goliath and officially entered <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> army of Israel,though he was still too small size to fit <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> armour of Saul (1 Samuel17:38, 39; 18:13, 14).Before that he had served as <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>g’s musician (1 Samuel 16:17-23).With David, it is more difficult to determ<strong>in</strong>e who was his real soulmateas he had a fan club of women who sang songs of him and he hadseveral wives who had helped him dur<strong>in</strong>g his life (1 Samuel 18:6-7). Thefollow<strong>in</strong>g are <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> women who had impacted his life:42


elationship with Bathsheba and married her <strong>the</strong> same year(around 980 BC). Bathsheba was <strong>the</strong> granddaughter of one ofDavid’s key advisors, Ahithophel (2 Samuel 11:3; 23:34). Eliam <strong>the</strong>fa<strong>the</strong>r of Bathsheba, was one of <strong>the</strong> thirty mighty men beforeDavid ascended to <strong>the</strong> throne, imply<strong>in</strong>g he was a full grown manand warrior (2 Samuel 23:34). David ascended to <strong>the</strong> throne at age30, and Solomon, who was conceived <strong>the</strong> next year after marriageto Bathsheba, was considered as quite young when he <strong>in</strong>herited<strong>the</strong> throne (1 K<strong>in</strong>gs 3:7; 1 Chronicles 22:5; 29:1).The approximate time, tak<strong>in</strong>g all th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gAhithophel’s age and <strong>the</strong> rebellion of Absalom shortly after,would put <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong> David and Bathsheba <strong>in</strong>cident around<strong>the</strong> middle of David’s forty year reign, giv<strong>in</strong>g a calculation thatSolomon would be around twenty when he ascended to <strong>the</strong>throne. That would put Bathsheba’s age at <strong>the</strong> time she marriedDavid to be around twenty-one to twenty-three years old.Michal was a potential soulmate as she was David’s first love and firstwife but Saul had given her to ano<strong>the</strong>r husband after David fled fromhim (1 Samuel 25:44). David still had love for her and valued her above ak<strong>in</strong>gdom for when he was offered <strong>the</strong> ten tribes <strong>by</strong> Abner, his conditionwas that he must have his first love and wife back (2 Samuel 3:12-14).Sadly, Michal could not get pass all <strong>the</strong> hurts and abandonment that shemust have felt, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g her estrangement from her recent husband,Paltiel. Her soul, once united and <strong>in</strong> love with David, was now filledwith anger and spite and she could not spiritually unite with David <strong>in</strong>celebration of <strong>the</strong> Lord’s ark com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to Jerusalem (2 Samuel 6:20-23).<strong>Ps</strong> David saw one of <strong>the</strong> evil spirits, a ly<strong>in</strong>g spirit, that was formerlywith her fa<strong>the</strong>r, Saul, whisper<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>to her ears, and she believed<strong>the</strong>m. She might have been pretty and lovely physically, but her souland spirit were now corrupted with unforgiveness and anger. She could44


not be one with David <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> soul and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> spirit, so she disqualifiedherself from be<strong>in</strong>g David’s soulmate. If all th<strong>in</strong>gs had gone well and Saulhad not turned evil, she and David could have lived happily ever after;for after Saul dies and Jonathan receives <strong>the</strong> throne, he would <strong>the</strong>n giveit to David and <strong>by</strong> automatic succession, David fulfilled God’s prophecyto be a k<strong>in</strong>g without all <strong>the</strong> drama created <strong>by</strong> Saul’s rebellion.Abigail was both beautiful and <strong>in</strong>telligent, and a godly woman (1Samuel 25:3). She was good for David and potentially was his soulmate.She was also one of <strong>the</strong> two wives captured at Ziklag but rescued <strong>by</strong>David (1 Samuel 30:5, 18). No o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>Bible</strong> records are given of her exceptfor <strong>the</strong> birth of one child, Daniel, <strong>in</strong> her relationship with David (1Chronicles 3:1). On top of her <strong>in</strong>telligence and beauty, she was a godlywoman and would have made an excellent soulmate to <strong>the</strong> right person.Unfortunately for her, David’s soul was divided several ways and wasnever wholly given to one person. David still had aff<strong>in</strong>ity for Michalfrom <strong>the</strong> fact that she was first on his m<strong>in</strong>d when offered <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rnk<strong>in</strong>gdom, and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that David considered <strong>the</strong> love andcompanionship of Jonathan better than marriage to women (2 Samuel1:26 – Your love to me was wonderful, surpass<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> love of women). Withsuch divided attention for his soul, it is doubtful whe<strong>the</strong>r David couldbe satisfied with <strong>the</strong> love of his soulmate if he had found her <strong>in</strong> hislifetime.Bathsheba would have grown up as a child <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> palace of David asEliam her fa<strong>the</strong>r and her grandfa<strong>the</strong>r Ahithophel would be frequentvisitors to David. She must have been <strong>in</strong> awe of David, <strong>the</strong> famouswarrior who slayed Goliath and God’s ano<strong>in</strong>ted leader and k<strong>in</strong>g over allof Israel, with whom her fa<strong>the</strong>r and grandfa<strong>the</strong>r served. Thus, eventhough she was married to Uriah, when David summoned for her, shecame (2 Samuel 11:4). When David’s s<strong>in</strong> was exposed <strong>by</strong> Nathan <strong>the</strong>prophet, David repented and after los<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> child who was conceived,45


David and her found comfort <strong>in</strong> each o<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>the</strong>y had ano<strong>the</strong>r son,Solomon (2 Samuel 12:1-24). Apparently, Bathsheba became David’sma<strong>in</strong> wife and comfort for <strong>the</strong>y had several more children after that (1Chronicles 3:5). She was a godly woman and her <strong>in</strong>structions arerecorded <strong>in</strong> Proverbs 31, which credits K<strong>in</strong>g Lemuel’s 12 mo<strong>the</strong>r for <strong>the</strong>wise <strong>in</strong>structions (Proverbs 31:1).Bathsheba was united completely with David’s vision and although<strong>the</strong>ir circumstantial com<strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r was imperfect, <strong>the</strong>ir relationshipblossom to cover all three areas of union <strong>in</strong> spirit, soul and body. Shewas <strong>the</strong> perfect soulmate for David for <strong>the</strong> rest of his life. Abigail mighthave been <strong>the</strong> perfect one but at that time, David was still not over hislove for Michal and Jonathan, and while runn<strong>in</strong>g away from Saul, hewas still p<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong>m. Bathsheba came at <strong>the</strong> right time <strong>in</strong> David’slife when he was humbled <strong>by</strong> his arrogant pride and s<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>to repentance.Sometimes <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiation of a relationship with <strong>the</strong> right soulmate mustnot be too early or too late but it must be just at <strong>the</strong> right time. After all,for <strong>the</strong> union of souls and spirit, <strong>the</strong> soul and spirit must be at <strong>the</strong> rightplace and ready to be united with ano<strong>the</strong>r.The story of Solomon is similar <strong>in</strong> some ways but different from David.He was young and around twenty when he ascended to <strong>the</strong> throne.Seven hundred wives, pr<strong>in</strong>cesses and three hundred concub<strong>in</strong>es couldnot all satisfy him (1 K<strong>in</strong>gs 11:3). Many of his marriages had a politicalelement <strong>in</strong>volved and although his heart clung <strong>in</strong> love to many foreignwomen, none could be his soulmate (1 K<strong>in</strong>gs 11:1-2).Only one woman could satisfy Solomon, it was <strong>the</strong> Shulamite woman<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Song of Solomon (Song 1:1; 6:13). Only one woman truly lovedhim (Song 8:4-7). The sadness <strong>in</strong> Solomon’s life is that he should havewaited for <strong>the</strong> one true love and not spread his soul among <strong>the</strong> multiplewives and concub<strong>in</strong>es. By <strong>the</strong> time he met her he has 60 wives and 8012 Lemuel is a biblical k<strong>in</strong>g and derived from <strong>the</strong> word ‘Lael’ which means ‘man consecrated to God’. Thisreference applies to K<strong>in</strong>g Solomon and might be a name of endearment given to him <strong>by</strong> his mo<strong>the</strong>r Bathsheba.46


concub<strong>in</strong>es (Song 6:8). This also gives us <strong>the</strong> tim<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong>Song of Solomon, it would have to be when he was still a young adultand <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early stages of his reign s<strong>in</strong>ce he accumulated 1000 wives andconcub<strong>in</strong>es dur<strong>in</strong>g his reign of forty years. The problem here is thatSolomon was not look<strong>in</strong>g for one soulmate, his first <strong>in</strong>itial marriages tovarious foreign wives show us that his view of marriage is notpartnership <strong>in</strong> spirit, soul and body but it <strong>in</strong>cludes political and carnalth<strong>in</strong>gs of this life.Although he had <strong>the</strong> Old Testament to read, it did not strike him thatGod only made one Adam for one Eve. His story rem<strong>in</strong>ds us that Goddid not make more than one soulmate to be <strong>the</strong> exact and perfectcomplementary. We can have many spiritual and Christian bro<strong>the</strong>rs andsisters with whom we can share oneness <strong>in</strong> heart, m<strong>in</strong>d and soul <strong>in</strong>biblical fellowship and m<strong>in</strong>istry as advocated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> book ofActs and <strong>the</strong> epistles (Acts 4:32; Philippians 1:27; 2:1-2; Mat<strong>the</strong>w 18:19,20). But <strong>the</strong>re can be only one soulmate for each opposite gender whocomplements <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> all three dimensions of spirit, soul and body.The possible understand<strong>in</strong>g and positions that we can take on <strong>the</strong>concept of soulmate are as follows:1. Belief that <strong>the</strong>re is no such th<strong>in</strong>g as soulmates.This frees a person from look<strong>in</strong>g and seek<strong>in</strong>g for one but it leavesunanswered questions as to why <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> history of mank<strong>in</strong>d, storiesof love abound, and why <strong>the</strong>re is a universal desire to have acomplementary opposite gender as a companion. This belief isshattered if one believes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> story of God’s creation of Adamand Eve <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong>; that <strong>the</strong>re is only one complementary personfor each person. Without a belief system, it leaves open o<strong>the</strong>r beliefsystems that justify polygamy, polyandry, homosexual and lesbianrelations.47


2. Belief that <strong>the</strong>re is only one perfect soulmate for each person <strong>in</strong>this life.This belief is Scriptural but it puts pressure on a person to seek outthat one and only person on earth with whom <strong>the</strong>y can live a lifetime with. This is possible if <strong>the</strong> earth is a perfect world withouts<strong>in</strong> and if <strong>the</strong> task of seek<strong>in</strong>g for a soulmate is <strong>the</strong> most importantwork on pla<strong>net</strong> earth. Unfortunately, <strong>in</strong> a world that is dy<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> s<strong>in</strong>and death, <strong>the</strong>re are many o<strong>the</strong>r urgent tasks more important thanspend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> rest of our lives look<strong>in</strong>g for a soulmate. The <strong>Bible</strong>stories show that it is possible to meet one’s soulmate <strong>in</strong> this lifebut many of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong> people have made sacrifices, some to vowsof celibacy, to surrender <strong>the</strong>ir personal long<strong>in</strong>gs and desires toChrist and trust that God will take care of <strong>the</strong>ir needs <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong>ir need of a soulmate.Where <strong>the</strong>y need some level of companionship, God has providedfriends or helpers to encourage <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uance of <strong>the</strong>irfunction; like God tell<strong>in</strong>g Elijah to call Elisha as a prophet tra<strong>in</strong>ee<strong>in</strong> his place when Elijah expressed lonel<strong>in</strong>ess and a desire to die (1K<strong>in</strong>gs 19:4, 10, 19). It is possible to live joyfully on earth do<strong>in</strong>gGod’s Will with <strong>the</strong> provision <strong>by</strong> God of companions who providespiritual and soul k<strong>in</strong>ship without <strong>the</strong> physical relationship. OurLord Jesus took His disciples of both genders to be His friends andhad close spiritual and soul-phileo relationships with bothgenders.3. Belief that <strong>the</strong>re is only one perfect soulmate that God hasprovided for us when He created us and we have both this life andan eternity to eventually meet <strong>the</strong>m.This seems to be <strong>the</strong> best position to take and it is based on <strong>the</strong> factthat we should let God be <strong>the</strong> one who br<strong>in</strong>g our soulmate to us <strong>in</strong>this life, if that is His perfect plan for us now. It acknowledges that48


none of us <strong>in</strong> our own strength, with our own abilities, even if wehave 120 years of life, would be able to f<strong>in</strong>d our own soulmate. Itwas God who created and brought Eve to Adam; and it will still beGod who had created our soulmates and will br<strong>in</strong>g our soulmatesto us. Dependence on God is <strong>the</strong> key here. In a sense, Adam andEve did not have a choice; <strong>the</strong>re was only one perfect person foreach of <strong>the</strong>m and that was each o<strong>the</strong>r. As mank<strong>in</strong>d multiplied, and<strong>the</strong> earth is filled with billions of <strong>the</strong>m now, plus count<strong>in</strong>g thosewho have lived throughout history, and add<strong>in</strong>g those that willcont<strong>in</strong>ue to be born <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next fifty years, how do we meanderthrough and <strong>in</strong>terview every s<strong>in</strong>gle person now, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past and <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> future to discover <strong>the</strong> exact person who will be <strong>the</strong>complementary soulmate? It is a task too great for us <strong>in</strong> such ashort life.The guidance <strong>the</strong>n is to be led <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit and God’s Word,and make good friends of both genders with whom we have ak<strong>in</strong>ship of spirit and soul. K<strong>in</strong>ship of spirit and soul must alwayscome first before <strong>the</strong> physical attraction dynamics. Then amongstour friends with whom we have a k<strong>in</strong>ship of spirit and soul, if<strong>the</strong>re is a lead<strong>in</strong>g to br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> relationship fur<strong>the</strong>r amongst those of<strong>the</strong> opposite gender <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> physical dimension, under <strong>the</strong>guidance of <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit and with God’s confirmation andpermission, <strong>the</strong> relationship is taken <strong>in</strong>to holy matrimony with <strong>the</strong>view that it will enhance <strong>the</strong> performance of God’s Will <strong>in</strong> each lifewhile on earth and toge<strong>the</strong>r as a couple.This should be done without los<strong>in</strong>g o<strong>the</strong>r friends with whom weare do<strong>in</strong>g God’s Will toge<strong>the</strong>r. Every relationship, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g thosewhom we are <strong>in</strong> holy matrimony with, should be taken to be alearn<strong>in</strong>g curve and an experience of perfect<strong>in</strong>g God’s love <strong>in</strong> us <strong>in</strong>various ways. In <strong>the</strong> end, even with or without soulmates, our49


dest<strong>in</strong>y is to personify God’s perfect love <strong>in</strong> all its glory. Weshould not be discouraged if <strong>in</strong> our earthly walk and relationshipswe f<strong>in</strong>d disparity with our partners <strong>in</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r spirit or soul or body.We should commit ourselves to God and understand that <strong>in</strong> Hisperfect eternal plan for us, we will <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> end have completeness ofcomplementary <strong>in</strong> our spirits, souls and bodies.God’s Predest<strong>in</strong>ed SoulmateWhile it is possible to have vary<strong>in</strong>g levels of spiritual and soulrelationships with all o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dividuals of both genders, it is obviousthat God would have only designed one Adam for one Eve and no more.When God created Adam and Eve, He created <strong>the</strong>m from one spiritualentity, one soul and one body. Adam was ten feet tall and had a spirit,soul and body but without any sexual characteristics. It is out of this o<strong>net</strong>ripartite be<strong>in</strong>g that God formed <strong>the</strong> male Adam and <strong>the</strong> female Eve,seen feet tall and six feet tall, respectively. It was only after this creationof male and female that <strong>the</strong> two of <strong>the</strong>m had sexual characteristicsvisible <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir glorified bodies, with sexual organs that show <strong>the</strong>irmaleness and femaleness. Even before <strong>the</strong> fall, <strong>the</strong>y were told to befruitful and multiply thus sanction<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> union of spirit, soul and bodyas a sacred act of two spirit-soul mates express<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> one union of body(Genesis 1:27-28; Hebrews 13:4).Based on <strong>the</strong> story of Adam and Eve, <strong>the</strong>re can be only one perfectspirit-soul mate for each human be<strong>in</strong>g. We can have many friends <strong>in</strong> thislife and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next life but only one true soulmate that can complementus <strong>in</strong> three dimensions of spirit, soul and body. From <strong>the</strong> creation ofAdam and Eve through Noah and <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ued propagation of humank<strong>in</strong>d, if all <strong>the</strong> humans from all of time and geography were ga<strong>the</strong>red <strong>in</strong>one place, it is possible that God could l<strong>in</strong>k all those who are one50


hundred per cent complementary <strong>in</strong> spirit, soul and body toge<strong>the</strong>r assoulmates like Adam and Eve was. Only He would have <strong>the</strong> perfectknowledge of all persons created and know each person’s specialcharacteristics <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir spirits, souls and glorified bodies for He is <strong>the</strong>Creator and Fa<strong>the</strong>r of us all. The question is whe<strong>the</strong>r such relationshipscont<strong>in</strong>ue to exist after earthly life.The <strong>Bible</strong> seems to perpetuate that marriages only last until death(Romans 7:3; 1 Cor<strong>in</strong>thians 7:39). There are complications if marriageslast <strong>in</strong>to eternity as expressed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sadducees’ question to Jesus about<strong>the</strong> man who married seven times (Mark 12:18-25). Jesus said that once<strong>the</strong>y rise from <strong>the</strong> dead, <strong>the</strong>y nei<strong>the</strong>r marry nor are given <strong>in</strong> marriagebut are like <strong>the</strong> angels <strong>in</strong> heaven (Mark 12:25). This can be taken to implythat <strong>the</strong> resurrected body is sexless, with nei<strong>the</strong>r male nor femalecharacteristics (Galatians 3:28) or that <strong>the</strong> male and female genders arepresent but <strong>the</strong>re is no more necessity for such unions <strong>in</strong> heaven. Upondeath and resurrection, <strong>the</strong> glorified body will no longer have some of<strong>the</strong> organs like <strong>the</strong> physical organs like stomachs, etc. (1 Cor<strong>in</strong>thians6:13). It implies that sexual organs, too, will be done away. This raisesseveral questions, if restoration is to <strong>the</strong> Garden of Eden and Adam’sstate before <strong>the</strong> fall, shouldn’t <strong>the</strong>re be an element of sexualcharacteristics as present with Adam and Eve before <strong>the</strong> fall? Secondly,does this apply only to those who died and are resurrected but does notapply to those who do not experienced death like those <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rapture?And who cont<strong>in</strong>ues to propagate <strong>the</strong> glorified human race dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>Millennium?We do not have <strong>the</strong> answers to some of <strong>the</strong>se questions. At <strong>the</strong>moment we can only surmise that marriage <strong>in</strong> its human form andhuman level covenants are only part of this earth system. That does notexclude <strong>the</strong> possibility that <strong>the</strong>re will be eternal spiritual partnershipsand friendships of <strong>the</strong> spiritual k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong> eternity – some sort of eternal51


soul mateship, for lack of a better word. Logic dictates that if humanbe<strong>in</strong>gs have been made <strong>in</strong>to halves with male and female entities, <strong>the</strong>n<strong>the</strong> two halves must come toge<strong>the</strong>r to become one; and that <strong>the</strong>re canonly be one perfect complementary part for each half.There is also <strong>the</strong> unknown reality of what it would be like if Adam andEve had not fallen. When <strong>the</strong>ir two halves become one <strong>in</strong> spirit, soul andbody <strong>in</strong> its glorified state, what manner of experience and what mannerof supernatural power would be released? It def<strong>in</strong>itely would not be like<strong>the</strong> fallen physical dimension which was under a curse from <strong>the</strong> fall ofmank<strong>in</strong>d (Genesis 3:7-21). Under blessedness and glory, <strong>the</strong> union oftwo such spirits, souls and bodies might be a powerful demonstration of<strong>the</strong> union of <strong>the</strong> Godhead that has never been witnessed before <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong>Universe (Ephesians 5:30-32). There is <strong>the</strong> possibility that God hasreserved <strong>the</strong> last of <strong>the</strong> human race present up to Jesus Second Com<strong>in</strong>g,who do not see death, to enter <strong>in</strong>to this unique call<strong>in</strong>g that was<strong>in</strong>complete <strong>in</strong> Adam and Eve but now completed and re-launched <strong>in</strong>Christ Jesus <strong>the</strong> last Adam and <strong>the</strong> second man (1 Cor<strong>in</strong>thians 15:45-48).In conclusion we can po<strong>in</strong>t to <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>re is a perfect Adam toevery Eve and vice versa. There is a perfect counterpart spirit, soul andbody to every human person that would constitute <strong>the</strong>ir spirit-soulmate.This seems reasonable and logical <strong>in</strong> look<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> creation of <strong>the</strong>human race and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> universal deeply felt desire of each human be<strong>in</strong>gto seek companionship with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r complementary half. It is aspiritual reality that <strong>the</strong> race of mank<strong>in</strong>d consist<strong>in</strong>g of male and femalegenders has resulted from <strong>the</strong> split of one genderless entity. Theshortness of time <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> earthly dispensation might not be sufficient tof<strong>in</strong>d a true spirit-soulmate. But <strong>in</strong> eternity, <strong>the</strong>re could exist acomplementary spirit-soulmate although all are complete <strong>in</strong> Christ.52


The eternal journey of <strong>the</strong> human race is but <strong>in</strong> its <strong>in</strong>fancy. We do notsee all nor understand all while <strong>in</strong> this earthly life. There exist manyo<strong>the</strong>r mysteries of <strong>the</strong> Universe around us and of <strong>the</strong> mysteries with<strong>in</strong>us to be explored for all eternity. Perhaps this is <strong>the</strong> greatest journey <strong>in</strong>eternity for which all who are <strong>in</strong> Christ have an eternity for. The journeyto discover a union of existence which would reflect <strong>the</strong> union of <strong>the</strong>Godhead: of <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, of <strong>the</strong> Son and of <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit. The ultimateknowledge of <strong>the</strong> Universe is to know God <strong>in</strong> all His fullness. And thisknowledge is found <strong>in</strong> Christ who came <strong>in</strong> human likeness and called usto a mysterious union with Him which is based on <strong>the</strong> union of <strong>the</strong> maleand female species of our race (Ephesians 5:32). We are to be one withGod and one with Christ, He <strong>in</strong> us and we <strong>in</strong> Him <strong>in</strong> perfect love andunion (John 17:22-24). This union is expressed <strong>in</strong> human relationships ofmale and female, and would be eternally expressed through <strong>the</strong> onenessof humans <strong>in</strong> eternity who are one perfectly with one ano<strong>the</strong>r (Song 2:16;6:3; Ephesians 5:31-32; John 17:23).53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!