12.07.2015 Views

Chief Executive's Report - East and North Herts NHS Trust

Chief Executive's Report - East and North Herts NHS Trust

Chief Executive's Report - East and North Herts NHS Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EAST AND NORTH HERTFORDSHIRE <strong>NHS</strong> TRUSTCHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REPORT27 th March 20131. Magic of Play Appeal – Thursday 28 th MarchThe charity will be launching the 'Magic of Play' appeal at an event held on Thursday 28 th March inthe Lister Education Centre. The event will be hosted by our patron Esther Rantzen CBE <strong>and</strong> willbe attended by over 75 guests including the Mayor of Stevenage, a representative of the LordLieutenant as well as fundraisers, potential donors, supporters <strong>and</strong> corporate representativessuch as Sainsbury’s who have already pledged to raise £45K for the appeal as part of theirregional 'charity of the year' activity. The event is aiming to build support for the appeal <strong>and</strong> helpconvince the local community to support the appeal. Building of the playroom is due to start in thefirst quarter of 2014.2. Children & Young People’s Emergency Department Visits by <strong>East</strong> of Engl<strong>and</strong> Child Health& Wellbeing Strategic Network – Friday 15 th MarchA peer review of the Paediatric Emergency Department Service took place on Friday 15 th March2013. The external assessment process was led by Dr Mel Clements <strong>and</strong> Kath Evans, NationalCYP Emergency <strong>and</strong> Urgent Care Clinical Leads at the <strong>NHS</strong> Institute.The review was part of a programme that involved the assessment of 16 Paediatric ED services.The assessment unit st<strong>and</strong>ards reviewed were:1. Organisation of services2. Workforce3. Care management processes4. What do children, young people <strong>and</strong> families want from Assessment Services?The verbal feedback from the team suggested that the <strong>Trust</strong> has:One of the best developed services in the <strong>East</strong> of Engl<strong>and</strong> Region, co-located CYP ED<strong>and</strong> Assessment Unit serviceA well managed Minor Injury Unit (QEII) embedded within the <strong>Trust</strong> <strong>and</strong> a sharedworkforce <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ardsA Medical, Nursing <strong>and</strong> Management Team that are committed to enhancing services forChildren <strong>and</strong> Young People – cross directorate/ matrix working is embeddedUser Experience embedded throughout the <strong>Trust</strong> at Strategic & Operational levels:collaboration with wider community, schools & on an individual levelInvested in workforce to deliver high quality services e.g. Nursing roles & Play Specialistservices.This is good news for the team working with the CYP service <strong>and</strong> demonstrates the continuedwork of our teams to ensure that the services we provide are amongst the best.1 of 4


3. Our Changing Hospitals (OCH) Phase 4 - Office of Government Commerce (OGC) GatewayReviewThe OGC Health Gateway team conducted a review of the OCH Phase 4 Programme during theperiod 19 th March to 21 st March 2013. The primary purpose of the review was to review theoutcomes <strong>and</strong> objectives for the programme <strong>and</strong> to provide their view regarding deliveryconfidence.The Gateway team reviewed programme governance structures, programme policies <strong>and</strong>procedures, risk management <strong>and</strong> benefits realization plans <strong>and</strong> interviewed a number ofindividuals, including Executive Directors, Programme team members, Clinical Project Directors<strong>and</strong> CCG representatives.The team delivered their conclusions to the Director of Strategic Development, the ProgrammeSenior Responsible Officer, on 21 st March 2013 <strong>and</strong> confirmed that an Amber/Green rating hadbeen achieved. The delivery confidence assessment reflects the conclusion from the Gatewayreview that successful delivery is likely.4. <strong>East</strong>ern Academic Health Science Network (EAHSN)On 20 th March 2013 I attended the EAHSN Clinical Study Group workshop. The workshopexplored the network response to the innovation <strong>and</strong> wealth creation agenda <strong>and</strong> receivedproposals from Clinical Study Group work streams for the spread of best practice to improveoutcomes.Informed by the Clinical Study Group Network, the Bedfordshire <strong>and</strong> Hertfordshire node of theEAHSN met on 21 st March 2013 to discuss <strong>and</strong> agree its strategic objectives. Whilst not yetfinalised, initial objectives <strong>and</strong> themes identified are as follows: Share best practice <strong>and</strong> to identify areas of mutual benefit in terms of improved outcomes<strong>and</strong> health <strong>and</strong> wealth creation across Bedfordshire <strong>and</strong> Hertfordshire Establish a Bedfordshire <strong>and</strong> Hertfordshire Innovation forum to consider national, regional<strong>and</strong> local innovation, best practice <strong>and</strong> evidence based improvements Establish the clinical outcomes for major chronic diseases <strong>and</strong> identify those diseaseswith the greatest scope for improvement in Bedfordshire5. John Henry Newman Visit - Thursday 7 th MarchOn Thursday 7 th March, accompanied by Sheelagh Molloy, Nursing Services Manager forMedicine, I visited the John Henry Newman RC Secondary school where I hosted an informal,open drop-in session for pupils interested in the range of careers <strong>and</strong> wider opportunities availablein the <strong>NHS</strong> <strong>and</strong> at the Lister Hospital. It was interesting to hear about what their local hospitalmeant to them <strong>and</strong> be able to help them underst<strong>and</strong> the tremendous range of opportunities wehold for them as pupils, volunteers <strong>and</strong> aspiring workers. Following the drop-in session Ipresented more formally to over 200 sixth formers, setting out the <strong>Trust</strong>’s vision <strong>and</strong> ambition <strong>and</strong>offering them the opportunity to get involved through public membership, volunteering <strong>and</strong> anynumber of rewarding careers.Our work with John Henry Newman has enabled us to recruit over 200 of their pupils as new,young public members. I know they have already started to make a real contribution to the <strong>Trust</strong><strong>and</strong> I am particularly excited about their work to create the art design for our new EmergencyDepartment <strong>and</strong> to help us re-design our offer for recruiting new young members in the future. Iam confident this partnership will be successful <strong>and</strong> innovative, based on our ability to support thepersonal development of pupils <strong>and</strong> their willingness to contribute fresh ideas <strong>and</strong> thinking across2 of 4


our involvement programme.6. Executive Committee Summary <strong>Report</strong> to BoardThe Executive Committee/Divisional Executive Committee has met a total of three times since thelast Board meeting. In addition another meeting was held to specifically review the <strong>Trust</strong> costimprovement programme for 2013/14 with each Division <strong>and</strong> Corporate Directorate. Below is asummary of the key issues <strong>and</strong> areas discussed:Further Improvements to codingThe Committee reviewed the proposals <strong>and</strong> associated action plan to enable furtherimprovements to coding. These were approved <strong>and</strong> will be monitored on a monthly basis.Draft Strategic AimsThe Committee considered a set of draft strategic aims that had been developed following theBoard Development session in February 2013. Minor amendments were proposed <strong>and</strong> it wasnoted that these would be consulted with key stakeholders before final consideration <strong>and</strong> approvalat the <strong>Trust</strong> Board meeting today.Staff Survey Results 2012The Committee was pleased to receive the initial findings from the National Staff Survey 2012.The following findings have improved since 2011 <strong>and</strong> we are above the national average for anAcute <strong>Trust</strong> <strong>and</strong> making progress to be amongst the best in the following areas:We have improved our engagement with staff since last year, staff feel able tocontribute towards improvements at work.Staff report positive job satisfaction <strong>and</strong> are motivated in their work.Our work at all levels to engage our staff <strong>and</strong> ensure that regular appraisals are takingplace is really paying off. We have improved since last year <strong>and</strong> are amongst the top20% of Acute <strong>Trust</strong>s.Out of the 28 key findings, 3 have improved <strong>and</strong> 16 remained the same regarding ourperformance. An action plan in response to the staff survey will be presented at the April 2013RAQC meeting.HR Advisory Service ReviewSubject to minor amendments the Committee approved the terms of reference.Summary of ongoing areas monitoredWeekly Monitoring Fortnightly Monitoring Monthly Monitoring <strong>Report</strong>ed Mortality – HCAIs (AT) (DEC) Surgicentre ContractExecs / DEC (JMcC/JB) PathologyMonitoring (SP - Execs) <strong>NHS</strong> Professionals (SP –from Feb 2013)Transformation(SP/SB)(DEC) Pressure Ulcers & Falls(AT - DEC) ESR project update (SP –from Feb 2013) M<strong>and</strong>atory Training (AT –from Sept 12) Implementation of actionplan to improve ClinicalCoding (MT – Execs)(New)3 of 4


The full action log is available to Board members on request.7. Floodlight ScorecardThe Month 11 <strong>Trust</strong> floodlight scorecard is attached as Appendix A. The Board committeeexecutive summary reports reflect the key discussions that have taken place at both the Finance<strong>and</strong> Performance <strong>and</strong> the Risk <strong>and</strong> Quality Committees. Explanation of red indicators is providedwithin the appropriate accountable Director’s report <strong>and</strong> the exception reports in the data pack.Nick Carver<strong>Chief</strong> Executive22 nd March 20134 of 4


2012/2013 <strong>Trust</strong> Floodlight Indicators : Month 11AlertsOutst<strong>and</strong>ing-(0)SHMI withPalliative CareAdjustment-(101.1)CLINICAL OUTCOMESSHMI-(110.8)HSMR (W & C)-(71.4)HSMR-(94.4)HSMR (Cancer)-(65.5)SHMI most recent published figuresHSMR(Medicine)-(99.4)HSMR (Surgery)-(95.7)INTERNAL FINANCIAL MEASURESCapital CostAbsorption-(3.5%)Capital PlanTrajectory-(56%)Cash Plan-(171%)Net surplus-(3%)CIP Pl<strong>and</strong>elivered-(97%)Year EndForecast-(Red)Drug Errors(Administering)-(169)Drug errors(Prescribing)-(120)Serious DrugErrors(Dispensing)-(1)Emergencyscreening-(90.77%)SI CompliancePATIENT SAFETYNever Events-(2)MRSA-(2)C difficile-(12)Falls resulting inSerious Harm-(14)Pressure Ulcers(Grade 2+)-(114)SafetyThermometer (Noof Harms)-(474)Medication SideEffects-(47.1)Privacy to DiscussTreatment-(88.1)Worries <strong>and</strong> Fears(63.8)PATIENT EXPERIENCEWho to Contactafter Discharge-(76)Involvement inDecisions-(69.5)Net PromoterScore-(79.53)MeridianCompliance-(98.3%)No of Complaints-(893)Complaint Pathway(


2012/2013 <strong>Trust</strong> Floodlight Indicators : Month 11Clinical OutcomesDescriptionYTD MeasurementThresholdsHistoric PerformanceIn Month PerformanceIndicative CurrentPerformanceAchieve Underachieve Fail 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 YTD RAGHSMR Rolling 12 mths, 3months in arrears ≤ 89 ≤ 99 > 99 101.9 99.0 98.2 93.0 82.3 90.0 95.3 97.9 97.5 99.5 87.0 TBC TBC TBC 94.4 AmberHSMR (Medicine) Rolling 12 mths, 3months in arrears ≤ 90 ≤ 100 > 100 119.4 108.2 101.9 91.0 94.9 97.8 98.1 99.8 101.9 103.6 91.7 TBC TBC TBC 99.4 AmberHSMR (Surgery) Rolling 12 mths, 3months in arrears ≤ 90 ≤ 100 > 100 124.6 115.5 96 106.7 62.8 77.7 108 108.1 117.3 82.2 80.2 TBC TBC TBC 95.7 AmberHSMR (Cancer) Rolling 12 mths, 3months in arrears ≤ 85 ≤ 90 > 90 48.0 47.5 63.7 99.2 27.9 69.9 58.1 57.3 49.1 85.1 59.2 TBC TBC TBC 65.5 GreenHSMR (W & C) Rolling 12 mths, 3months in arrears ≤ 85 ≤ 90 > 90 81.4 107.6 68.3 0 200 83.3 0 250 0 0 333.3 TBC TBC TBC 71.4 GreenSHMI Period Jul-11 to Jun-12 ≤ 95 ≤ 105 > 105 117.8 114.1 110.8 TBC TBC TBC TBC 110.8 RedSHMI with Palliative CareAdjustmentPeriod Jul-11 to Jun-12 ≤ 90 ≤ 100 > 100 102.5 103.7 101.1 TBC TBC TBC TBC 101.1 RedCentral Alerts Outst<strong>and</strong>ing End of period ≤ 0 > 0 Green Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GreenInternal Financial MeasuresDescriptionYTD MeasurementThresholds Historic Performance In Month PerformanceIndicative CurrentPerformanceAchieve Underachieve Fail 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 YTD RAGNet surplus In-month performance ≥ 100.0% ≥ 93.0% < 93.0% 102.0% 100.0% 101.0% 100.5% 106.1% 101.1% 95.3% 35.0% 1.9% 14.0% 134.0% 0.5% 17.0% 129.0% 3.0% RedCIP Plan delivered Financial Year to date ≥ 100.0% ≥ 93.0% < 93.0% 100.0% 91.0% 97.0% 83.5% 90.6% 82.3% 93.1% 110.0% 103.7% 88.7% 101.2% 93.0% 100.9% 110.0% 97.0% AmberYear-end forecast Financial Year to date ≥ 100.0% ≥ 93.0% < 93.0% TBC TBC TBC TBC TBC Green Red Green Red Red Red Red RedCash Plan Financial Year to date ≥ 90.0% ≥ 80.0% < 80.0% 219.0% 116.0% 101.0% 100.0% 113.4% 61.0% 65.0% 50.0% 46.0% 55.0% 65.0% 7.0% 57.6% 171.0% 171.0% GreenCapital Plan Trajectory In-month performance ≥ 90.0% ≥ 50.0% < 50.0% 99.0% 102.0% 99.0% 91.0% 3.0% 35.7% -12.5% 148.0% 79.0% 71.0% 61.0% 84.0% 76.0% -13.0% 56.0% AmberCapital Cost Absorption Financial Year to date =+/− 3.5% ≤+/− 0.1% >+/− 0.1% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% GreenPatient SafetyDescriptionYTD MeasurementThresholdsHistoric PerformanceIn Month PerformanceIndicative CurrentPerformanceMRSAFinancial Year to date(Threshold subject to change)Achieve Underachieve Fail 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 YTD RAG≤ 3 > 3 10 5 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 GreenC-Difficile (<strong>Trust</strong>) Financial Year to date ≤ 14 > 14 82 55 11 2 3 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 12 GreenFalls resulting in serious harmFinancial Year to date≤ 24 ≤ 36 > 36 3 1 0 1 0 3 1 2 1 2 0 14 GreenPresure ulcers (Grade 2+) Financial Year to date ≤ 120 0 0 > 120 335 323 9 7 21 9 18 7 11 12 7 7 6 114 GreenSafety ThermometerFinancial Year to date≤ 589 > 618 > 619 71 58 55 50 38 39 20 27 35 41 38 474 GreenNever Events Financial Year to date ≤ 0 > 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 RedSI complianceJudgement of≥ Compliant ≥Financial Year to daterisk< Non-compliant Compliant Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green GreenMRSA Emergency Screening Financial Year to date ≥ 100% ≥ 95% < 95% 87.8% 92.4% 90.5% 87.7% 88.7% 91.8% 93.5% 95.3% 91.6% 90.1% 90.3% 90.8% RedSerious Drug Errors (Dispensing)Financial Year to date≤ 3 ≤ 6 > 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 GreenDrug Errors (Prescribing) Financial Year to date ≤ 186 ≤ 187 > 187 12 27 13 13 8 10 7 14 5 11 0 120 GreenDrug Errors (Administering) Financial Year to date ≤ 145 ≤ 161 > 161 25 23 19 24 21 17 6 5 6 14 9 169 Red


2012/2013 <strong>Trust</strong> Floodlight Indicators : Month 11CQUINDescriptionYTD MeasurementThresholdsHistoric PerformanceIn Month PerformanceIndicative CurrentPerformanceAchieve Underachieve Fail 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 YTD RAGVTE PreventionImprove responsiveness topersonal needsDementia DiagnosisSafety ThermometerImproving COPD outcomesNet PromoterReducing Hospital MortalityImproving Carers ExperienceImproving stroke assessment &outcomesMaking Every Contact CountImproving Cancer ServicesImproving palliative care services≥ 98.0% ≥ 93.0% < 93.0% 62.6% 92.8% 99.4% 99.7% 99.6% 99.5% 99.2% 99.3% 99.3% 99.5% 99.5% 98.7% 98.1% 99.2% GreenQuarterly Position ≥ 67 ≥ 66 < 66 64.8* 696869TBC TBC 69 GreenQuarterlyTBC TBC TBC 108 Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber AmberTBC TBC TBC Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green GreenTBC TBC TBC Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber AmberAmber/Amber/GTBC TBC TBC Green Green Green GreenGreen/Green/GreenAmber/G Amber/Green/GreenTBC TBC TBC Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green GreenTBC TBC TBC Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green GreenTBC TBC TBC Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green GreenTBC TBC TBC Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green GreenTBC TBC TBC GreenGreenGreenGreen Green 0 Green GreenTBC TBC TBC Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green GreenAmber/GreenAmber/GreenAmber /GreenAmber/Green*Q4 Position OnlyPatient ExperienceDescriptionYTD MeasurementThresholdsHistoric PerformanceIn Month PerformanceIndicative CurrentPerformanceAchieve Underachieve Fail 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 YTD RAGNet Promoter Score In Month Performance ≥ 71 < 71 94.8 80.3 74.7 76.4 71.1 63.9 63.0 75.7 64.4 79.3 73.6 79.5 79.5 GreenMeridian compliance In Month Performance ≥ 90% ≥ 80% < 80% 109.7% 112.8% 90.0% 127.6% 124.5% 141.4% 139.9% 119.4% 83.4% 106.5% 98.3% 98.3% GreenComplaint numbers (count) ≤ 930 ≤ 1022 > 1022 Amber 92 97 71 74 78 75 84 91 64 99 68 893 GreenComplaint pathway (


2012/2013 <strong>Trust</strong> Floodlight Indicators : Month 11MCF / SHA Performance FrameworkDescriptionYTD MeasurementThresholdsHistoric PerformanceIn Month PerformanceIndicative CurrentPerformanceAchieve Underachieve Fail 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 YTD RAGCancer 31day :Subs Treatment Confirmed 1mth in arrears. ≥ 94.0% ≥ 89.0% < 89.0% 99.9% 99.3% 99.7% 98.8% 99.4% 99.2% 99.5% 99.3% 98.6% 96.7% 100.0% 100.0% 98.1% TBC 99.1% GreenCancer 62day : urgent RTT Confirmed 1mth in arrears. ≥ 85.0% ≥ 80.0% < 80.0% 89.2% 88.4% 87.5% 87.6% 87.3% 88.2% 86.1% 86.7% 86.6% 86.6% 86.1% 86.7% 86.2% TBC 86.8% GreenCancer 31day : Diag Confirmed 1mth in arrears. ≥ 96.0% ≥ 91.0% < 91.0% 98.9% 99.4% 99.3% 97.8% 96.9% 97.7% 98.7% 98.8% 96.4% 97.2% 98.3% 100.0% 96.6% TBC 97.9% GreenCancer 2week ref to appt Confirmed 1mth in arrears. ≥ 93.0% ≥ 88.0% < 88.0% 99.5% 99.1% 99.3% 99.2% 99.8% 98.5% 98.4% 98.5% 98.7% 97.6% 97.6% 99.0% 98.3% TBC 98.5% GreenRTT Admitted ≥ 90.0% ≥ 85.0% < 85.0% 21.3 92.8% 91.1% 91.7% 91.5% 90.0% 90.4% 90.4% 92.8% 93.3% 95.0% 94.9% 92.1% GreenRTT Non admitted ≥ 95.0% ≥ 90.0% < 90.0% 16 98.0% 97.8% 97.5% 97.0% 97.0% 97.4% 97.0% 96.2% 96.5% 97.1% 96.1% 97.1% GreenRTT - Open pathways ≥ 92.0% ≥ 87.0% < 87.0% 96.5% 96.7% 96.3% 95.8% 95.6% 95.4% 95.4% 95.1% 94.9% 95.3% 95.2% 95.2% GreenA&E 4 hour target ≥ 95.0% < 95.0% 98.6% 97.5% 95.9% 97.8% 97.2% 97.2% 97.9% 97.6% 95.5% 96.8% 95.2% 91.3% 93.5% 96.2% 96.1% Green*cancer performance figures are not finalised until 6-weeks after month-end <strong>and</strong> therefore subject to change.Clinical EfficiencyDescriptionYTD MeasurementThresholdsHistoric PerformanceIn Month PerformanceIndicative CurrentPerformanceAchieve Underachieve Fail 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 YTD RAGLOS OverallOccupied Bed DaysFinancial Year to date (Refresh in Q1)Confirmed 2 mths in arrears,*Provisional Figures≤ 4.5 ≤ 6.0 > 6.0 4.76 4.58 5.4 5.1 4.9 4.7 5.0 4.9 4.5 4.5 4.8 5.1 4.3 4.8 Amber≤ 0.0% ≤ 5.0% > 5.0% -19.2% 50.9% 8.9% -4.6% -2.2% -4.9% -3.8% -2.9% -10.1% -14.8% -58.7% -35.3% -14.9% GreenPre OP bed days (elective)Confirmed 2 mths in arrears,*Provisional Figures≤ 6.0% ≤ 12.0% > 12.0% 7.8% 5.4% 4.7% 10.1% 5.9% 12.5% 7.9% 7.3% 8.3% 8.7% 5.4% 1.4% 3.2% 3.4% 7.5% AmberDNAs Financial Year to date ≤ 7.4% ≤ 8.4% > 8.4% 10.4% 9.6% 8.9% 7.6% 7.4% 7.4% 6.9% 6.7% 6.6% 6.3% 6.7% 7.1% 8.3% 7.8% 7.1% GreenFollow up Rate Financial Year to date ≤ 1.75 ≤ 2.27 > 2.27 1.84 1.74 1.80 2.17 2.15 2.30 2.28 2.30 2.38 2.20 2.20 2.05 2.38 2.15 2.26 AmberTheatre Utilisation 1 mth in arrears ≥ 87.5% ≥ 75% < 75% 88.0% 88.2% 89.9% 94.1% 93.3% 94.1% 92.8% 96.8% 97.4% 95.6% 94.4% 96.1% 94.0% TBC 94.8% GreenDTOCs (<strong>Trust</strong>) Financial Year to date ≤ 3.5% ≤ 5% > 5% 2.4% 2.4% 3.2% 1.8% 2.6% 2.7% 2.4% 2.4% 1.7% 3.6% 4.2% 2.7% GreenReadmissions 2 mths in arrears ≤ 9.0% ≤ 13% > 13% 13.2% 10.2% 10.4% 12.9% 10.7% 9.4% 10.2% 10.5% 9.8% 10.3% TBC TBC 10.5% AmberHealth <strong>and</strong> SafetyDescriptionYTD MeasurementThresholdsHistoric PerformanceIn Month PerformanceIndicative CurrentPerformanceAchieve Underachieve Fail 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 YTD RAGRIDDOR Incidents Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤ 36 ≤ 40 > 40 6 1 0 2 1 4 7 2 0 0 2 25 GreenLiability Claims Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤ 17 ≤ 19 > 19 0 0 0 1 2 3 2 2 0 0 0 10 GreenWork Related Stress Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤ 16 < > 16 10 3 4 2 5 1 4 5 2 2 1 39 GreenFire Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤ 0 ≤ 2 > 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GreenPhysical assault Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤ 170 ≤ 189 > 189 4 5 2 1 8 6 16 6 9 5 12 74 Green


2012/2013 <strong>Trust</strong> Floodlight Indicators : Month 11Governance / RegulationMCF risk ratingGreen


2012/2013 <strong>Trust</strong> Floodlight Indicators : Month 11WorkforceDescriptionYTD MeasurementThresholdsHistoric PerformanceIn Month PerformanceIndicative CurrentPerformanceAchieve Underachieve Fail 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 YTD RAGTurnover Rolling 12mths +/− 10.0% ≤+/− 3.0% >+/− 3.0% 9.9% 10.1% 10.4% 10.5% 10.5% 10.5% 10.7% 10.9% 10.4% 10.2% 9.9% 10.2% 10.2% 10.2% AmberVacancy rate Month End ≤ 7.5% ≤ 10.0% > 10.0% 8.8% 9.1% 10.3% 10.1% 10.0% 8.7% 9.9% 10.0% 9.2% 8.5% 8.7% 8.8% 8.6% 8.6% AmberSickness rate (Calendar days) Month End ≤ 3.0% ≤ 5.0% > 5.0% 4.7% 3.5%* 3.4% 3.1% 3.3% 3.3% 3.4% 3.5% 3.6% 3.5% 3.7% 4.0% 3.8% 3.8% AmberAppraisal completions Rolling 12mths ≥ 90.0% ≥ 70.0% < 70.0% 88.1% 69.9% 70.8% 71.7% 80.5% 71.3% 69.3% 66.3% 68.8% 74.3% 73.4% 72.9% 73.5% 73.5% Amber% of staff cost: Agency Financial Year to date ≤ 2.0% ≤ 5.0% > 5.0% 4.4% 3.7% 3.4% 3.9% 3.3% 3.0% 2.5% 1.7% 1.7% 2.8% 2.3% 3.3% 3.8% 2.8% Amber% of staff cost: Bank Financial Year to date ≤ 4.0% ≤ 7.0% > 7.0% 4.6% 4.8% 5.5% 5.1% 4.8% 5.0% 5.3% 5.4% 4.8% 4.5% 3.9% 4.4% 4.3% 4.8% AmberStatutory M<strong>and</strong>atory Training** Month End ≥ 90.0% < 90.0% 85.0% 87.0% 66.7% 57.7% 56.5% 58.9% 61.5% 8.1% 10.6% 11.5% 12.4% 13.3% 13.3% Red** NOTE - Now reported as a % of staff fully compliant with all 9 elementsStatutory M<strong>and</strong>atory TrainingDescriptionYTD MeasurementThresholdsHistoric PerformanceIn Month PerformanceIndicative CurrentPerformanceAchieve Underachieve Fail 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 YTD RAGConflict ResolutionMonth End TBC TBC TBC 72.2% 73.8% 74.9% 74.6% 74.3% 74.3%Equality <strong>and</strong> Diversity Month End TBC TBC TBC 47.8% 50.3% 50.7% 50.9% 53.4% 53.4%Fire Month End TBC TBC TBC 62.8% 61.6% 65.6% 64.2% 63.9% 63.9%General Health <strong>and</strong> Safety Month End TBC TBC TBC 54.3% 58.1% 61.8% 63.8% 65.6% 65.6%Infection Prevention Month End TBC TBC TBC 68.1% 68.8% 69.7% 70.8% 71.6% 71.6%Information Governance Month End TBC TBC TBC 62.8% 61.6% 61.8% 65.5% 63.8% 63.8%Moving <strong>and</strong> H<strong>and</strong>ling Month End TBC TBC TBC 67.3% 68.8% 69.7% 70.0% 70.2% 70.2%Safeguarding Adults Month End TBC TBC TBC 54.7% 58.1% 60.0% 61.8% 63.6% 63.6%Safeguarding Children Month End TBC TBC TBC 71.3% 71.3% 73.1% 73.0% 72.5% 72.5%* Monthly <strong>Report</strong>ing OnlyCultureDescriptionYTD MeasurementThresholdsHistoric PerformanceIn Month PerformanceIndicative CurrentPerformanceAchieve Underachieve Fail 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 YTD RAGOpportunity to InfluenceTriennial Staff Survey≥ 3.68 ≥ 3.44 < 3.4461.0% 3.513.513.42TBC3.42 RedTeam Working Triennial Staff Survey ≥ 3.77 ≥ 3.53 < 3.53 3.63 3.833.833.81TBC3.81 GreenSupport from Manager Triennial Staff Survey ≥ 3.56 ≥ 3.32 < 3.32 3.61 3.29 3.293.29TBC3.29 RedRegular Team meetings Triennial Staff Survey ≥ 3.76 ≥ 3.52 < 3.52 3.573.573.58TBC3.58 AmberRecommend the <strong>Trust</strong> Triennial Staff Survey ≥ 3.82 ≥ 3.58 < 3.58 3.49 3.62 3.623.52TBC3.52 RedJob Satisfaction Triennial Staff Survey ≥ 3.3 ≥ 3.06 < 3.06 3.49 3.363.363.39TBC3.39 GreenJob Relevant Training Triennial Staff Survey ≥ 3.57 ≥ 3.33 < 3.33 76.0% 3.563.563.56TBC3.56 AmberQuality of Appraisal Triennial Staff Survey ≥ 3.51 ≥ 3.27 < 3.27 42.0% 3.493.493.44TBC3.44 AmberJob Design Triennial Staff Survey ≥ 3.36 ≥ 3.12 < 3.12 3.41 3.383.383.45TBC3.45 Green


2012/2013 <strong>Trust</strong> Floodlight Indicators : Month 11Strategy-on-TimeDescriptionYTD MeasurementEmergency Department Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤New Ward Block Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤Theatres & Endoscopy Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤Health Records Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤Level 7 (Closed)Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤PathologyPostion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤ChemotherapyPostion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤Level 10 Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤New QEIIPostion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤Achieve Underachieve Fail 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 YTD RAGOn or aheadof planOn or aheadof planOn or aheadof planOn or aheadof planOn or aheadof planOn or aheadof planOn or aheadof planOn or aheadof planOn or aheadof plan≤≤≤≤≤≤≤≤≤Thresholds≤ 28-daysslippage≤ 28-daysslippage≤ 28-daysslippage≤ 28-daysslippage≤ 28-daysslippage≤ 28-daysslippage≤ 28-daysslippage≤ 28-daysslippage≤ 28-daysslippage>>>>>>>>>> 28-daysbehind plan> 28-daysbehind plan> 28-daysbehind plan> 28-daysbehind plan> 28-daysbehind plan> 28-daysbehind plan> 28-daysbehind plan> 28-daysbehind plan> 28-daysbehind planHistoric PerformanceIn Month PerformanceIndicative CurrentPerformanceRed Red Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green GreenGreen Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Green Green Green Green GreenGreen Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Green Green Green Green GreenAmber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber AmberAmber Amber Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Closed Closed Closed Closed ClosedAmber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber AmberGreen Green Green Amber Amber Amber Amber Green Green Amber Amber Amber Amber AmberGreen Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green GreenGreen Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Amber Amber Amber Amber Amber AmberStrategy-on-BudgetDescriptionYTD MeasurementThresholdsHistoric PerformanceIn Month PerformanceIndicative CurrentPerformanceAchieve Underachieve Fail 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 YTD RAGEmergency Department Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤ 5% ≤ 10% > 10% Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green GreenNew Ward Block Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤ 5% ≤ 10% > 10% Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green GreenTheatres & Endoscopy Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤ 5% ≤ 10% > 10% Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green GreenHealth Records Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤ 5% ≤ 10% > 10% Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green GreenLevel 7 (Closed) Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤ 5% ≤ 10% > 10% Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Closed Closed Closed Closed ClosedPathology Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤ 5% ≤ 10% > 10% Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green GreenChemotherapy Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤ 5% ≤ 10% > 10% Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green GreenLevel 10 Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤ 5% ≤ 10% > 10% Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green GreenNew QEII Postion at time of <strong>Report</strong>ing ≤ 5% ≤ 10% > 10% Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Green GreenResearch <strong>and</strong> DevelopmentDescriptionYTD MeasurementThresholds Historic Performance In Month PerformanceIndicative CurrentPerformanceAchieve Underachieve Fail 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 YTD RAGIncrease Portfolio Recruitment Quarterly Position ≥ 80% ≥ 60% < 60% 78.0%70.0%TBC TBC 70.0% AmberInitiation of Local Portfolio Study Quarterly Position YES Pending NO GreenGreenTBC TBC Green GreenReview of R&D Approval &InitiationQuarterly Position YES Pending NO GreenGreenTBC TBC Green GreenIncreased Commercial Study Quarterly Position YES Pending NO AmberAmberTBC TBC Amber AmberDivisional Engagement Quarterly Position ≥ 10% < 10% GreenGreenTBC TBC Green Green

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!