44Dwijen Rangnekar - <strong>Geographical</strong> <strong>Indications</strong>Thévenod-Mottet, E., 2001: The protection of geographical indications in multilateral systems: A cultural clash. Paperpresented at the DOLPHINS Meeting, Florence, September.Tran Wasescha, Thu-Lang, 2000: Recent developments in the Council for TRIPS (WTO). In WIPO (2000).Watal, J., 2001: Intellectual property rights in the WTO and developing countries. Kluwer Law International, TheHague.Williams, D., 2002: Extension of Stronger <strong>Geographical</strong> <strong>Indications</strong> Protection: Against the Interests of DevelopingCountries? Bridges 6(4), May. Available at http://www.ictsd.org/iprsonline/ictsd/docs/WillamsBridgesYear6N4May2002.pdfWIPO, 1999: Symposium on the international protection of geographical indications, Eger, Hungary, October 24 & 25,1997. Publication No. 760(E). WIPO, Geneva.WIPO, 2000: Symposium on the international protection of geographical indications, Somerset West, Cape Province,South Africa, September 1 & 2, 1999. Publication No. 764(E). WIPO, Geneva.WIPO – International Bureau, 2000: Possible solutions for conflicts between trademarks and geographical indicationsand for conflicts between homonymous geographical indications. Standing committee on the law oftrademarks, industrial designs and geographical indications, 5th session, September 11-15. SCT/5/3.WIPO – International Bureau, 2001a: <strong>Geographical</strong> indications: Historical background, nature of rights, existingsystems for protection and obtaining effective protection in other countries. Standing committee on the lawof trademarks, industrial designs and geographical indications, 6th session, March 12-16. SCT/6/3.WIPO – International Bureau, 2001b: Introduction to geographical indications and recent international developmentsat WIPO. Presented at the Symposium on the international protection of geographical indications, Montevido,November 28 & 29. WIPO/GEO/MVD/ 01/1.WIPO – International Bureau, 2002: What is geographical indications? Available at http://www.wipo.int/aboutip/en/index.htrademarkl;accessed on February 4, 2002.WTO, 1996: Annual Report of the Council on TRIPS of 6 November 1996. IP/C/8.WTO, 1996: Singapore Ministerial Declaration. WT/MIN(96)/DEC/.WTO, 1997: Overview of existing international notification and registration systems for geographical indicationsrelating to wines and spirits. Note by the Secretariat. IP/C/W/85, IP/C/W/85/Add.1WTO, 1999: Preparations for the 1999 ministerial conference – Agreement on TRIPS: Extension of the additionalprotection for geographical indications to other products. Communication from the Czech Republic.WT/GC/W/206.WTO, 1999: Preparations for the 1999 ministerial conference – Agreement on TRIPS: Proposal regarding extension ofprotection of geographical indications under paragraph 9(a)(i) of the Geneva ministerial declaration.Communication from Cuba, Dominican Republic, Egypt, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Nicaragua and Pakistan.WT/GC/W/208.WTO, 1999: Preparations for the 1999 ministerial conference – Agreement on TRIPS: Proposal regarding extension ofprotection of geographical indications under paragraph 9(a)(i) of the Geneva ministerial declaration.Communication from India. WT/GC/W/225.
ICTSD-UNCTAD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development45WTO, 1999: Preparations for the 1999 ministerial conference – Agreement on TRIPS: Extension of the additionalprotection for geographical indications to other products. Communication from Turkey. WT/GC/W/249.WTO, 1999: Preparations for the 1999 ministerial conference – The TRIPS Agreement. Communication from Kenya onbehalf of the Africa Group. WT/GC/W/302.WTO, 1999: Preparations for the 1999 ministerial conference: Proposal regarding the TRIPS Agreement, (paragraph9(a)(ii) of the Geneva ministerial declaration). Communication from Venezuela. WT/GC/W/282.WTO, 2000: <strong>Geographical</strong> indications and the article 24.2 review. Communication from New Zealand. IP/C/W/205.WTO, 2000: <strong>Geographical</strong> indications, article 24.2 review of the application of part ii, section 3: some backgroundissues. Communication from Australia. IP/C/W/211.WTO, 2000: Revision. Communication from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Egypt, Iceland, India, Kenya, Liechtenstein,Pakistan, Slovenia, Sri Lanka, Switzerland and Turkey. IP/C/W/204/Rev.1WTO, 2000: Work on issues relevant for the protection of geographical indications. Communication from Bulgaria, theCzech Republic, Iceland, India, Liechtenstein, Slovenia, Sri Lanka, Switzerland and Turkey. IP/C/W/204.WTO, 2001: Doha Ministerial Declaration of 20 November 2001. WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1.WTO, 2001: Extension of the protection of geographical indications for wines and spirits to geographical indicationsfor all products: Potential costs and implications. Communication from Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile,Guatemala, New Zealand, Paraguay and the United States. IP/C/W/289.WTO, 2001: Review under article 24.2 of the application of the provisions of the section of the TRIPS agreement ongeographical indications: Summary of the responses to the checklist of questions (IP/C/13 and add.1). Note bythe Secretariat. IP/C/W/253.WTO, 2001: Work on issues relevant to the protection of geographical indications, Extension of the protection ofgeographical indications for wines and spirits to geographical indications for other products. Proposal fromBulgaria, Cuba, The Czech Republic, Egypt, Iceland, India, Liechtenstein, Mauritius, Nigeria, Sri Lanka,Switzerland, Turkey And Venezuela. IP/C/W/247.WTO, 2001: Work on issues relevant to the protection of geographical indications, Extension of the protection ofgeographical indications for wines and spirits to geographical indications for other products. Proposal fromBulgaria, Cuba, The Czech Republic, Egypt, Iceland, India, Jamaica, Kenya, Liechtenstein, Mauritius, Nigeria,Pakistan, Slovenia, Sri Lanka, Switzerland, Turkey And Venezuela. IP/C/W/247/Rev.1.WTO, 2001: Work on issues relevant to the protection of geographical indications, Extension of the protection ofgeographical indications for wines and spirits to geographical indications for other products. Communicationfrom Bangladesh, Bulgaria, Cuba, The Czech Republic, Georgia, Hungary, Iceland, India, Jamaica, Kenya, TheKyrgyz Republic, Liechtenstein, Moldova, Nigeria, Pakistan, Slovenia, Sri Lanka, Switzerland and Turkey.IP/C/W/308/Rev.1.WTO, 2001: Compilation of Outstanding Implementation Issues Raised by Members. Job(01)/152/Rev.1.WTO, 2002: The Extension of the Additional Protection for <strong>Geographical</strong> <strong>Indications</strong> to Products other than Wines andSpirits. Communication from Bulgaria, Cuba, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, the European Communities and theirMember States, Georgia, Hungary, Iceland, India, Kenya, Liechtenstein, Malta, Mauritius, Pakistan, Romania,The Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Sri Lanka, Switzerland, Thailand and Turkey. IP/C/W/353.