Executive Summary<strong>Water</strong> resources of the planning region support various instream uses includingnavigation, recreation, treated wastewater assimilation, and environmental useswhile major reservoirs are also extremely important to the region and providesystem storage for flood control, recreation, and hydropower generation.Throughout the planning process, there was strong recognition by the Council thatthe water resources in the ACF River Basin are highly complex with significantpolitical and environmental issues that remain unresolved. Several rulings on theconsolidated litigation between the Corps of Engineers, Georgia, Alabama, andFlorida disputing Corps operations of the federal reservoirs were made during theplan development. In addition, EPA issued new nutrient standards for free flowingstreams and lakes in Florida, which may have substantial implications for waterquality management in this region.<strong>Plan</strong>ning ProcessAt the beginning of the planning process, the <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Chattahoochee</strong> Councildeveloped a Vision statement supported by specific goals including such things asprotecting the quantity, quality, and environmental resources of ACF system in theface of political, climate variability, andeconomic uncertainties. The visionand goals guided the Council indeveloping this Regional <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>particularly the selection ofmanagement practices as outlined inSection 6.After completing the vision and goals,the next step in the planning processVision <strong>State</strong>mentOur vision is that our descendants havesafe, clean and abundant water to meettheir needs in the <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Chattahoochee</strong>Region; seeking to accomplish thatthrough reasonable efforts in cooperation,education, and preservation.was to identify and quantify demands for water in the basin. With input from variousstakeholders, support from EPD and using population projections provided by theOffice of <strong>Plan</strong>ning and Budget, regional water and wastewater projections weredeveloped thru 2050. With the region’s population almost doubling (91.3% increase)by 2050, and with increasing efforts to conserve water, water needs are forecast toincrease significantly as shown in the figure below.MIDDLE CHATTAHOOCHEEAgricultural water needs are projected to increase by approximately 10% by 2050.Findings of this analysis also show that municipal and industrial water uses areprimarily supplied from surface water while agriculture in the region generally relieson the use of ground water.ES-2September 2011
Executive Summary<strong>Water</strong> Demand in 2010 and 2050Agriculture,34 MGD,15%2010Municipal,88 MGD,39%Agriculture,37 MGD,13%2050Municipal,148MGD,52%Energy,95 MGD,44%Total ≈ 220 MGDIndustrial,4 MGD,2%Energy,95 MGD,34%Total ≈ 284 MGDIndustrial,4 MGD,1%Wastewater Flow in 2010 and 205020102050Energy,57 MGD,40%Industrial,3 MGD,2%Total ≈ 144 MGDMunicipal,84 MGD,58%Energy,57 MGD,28%Industrial,3 MGD,2%Total ≈ 200 MGDMunicipal,140MGD,70%Notes:1 - Data Sources: <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Chattahoochee</strong> Municipal & Industrial Forecasts (Black & Veatch2010), Energy Forecasts (EPD 2010), Agricultural Forecasts (UGA 2010)2 - The 2005 thermoelectric water demands and returns were assumed constant through2050.3 - Values are totals for the entire water planning region, which includes portions of severalwatersheds.As part of the statewide water planning process, EPD developed water availabilityand water quality Resource Assessments (RA) for the <strong>State</strong>’s river basins andaquifers to evaluate the capacity of water resources to meet current and futuredemands for water supply and wastewater assimilation without causingunreasonable impacts. Potential shortcomings based on the results of these RA areclassified as “gaps.” A gap means that the existing or future conditions exceeded aRA metric, e.g., the sustainable yield of a specific groundwater aquifer is exceeded,thus, a potential “gap” exists in groundwater availability in that area. The Councildisagreed with the definition of the surface water availability gaps, as theassessment methodology did not consider desired river flows at specific locationsand did not prioritize lake level. The three resource assessments with both currentand future results summarized are shown in the following table.MIDDLE CHATTAHOOCHEESeptember 2011ES-3