International Court of Arbitration Cour internationale d'arbitrage ...

Recommendations

Info

4SECTION I - THE FACTS AND THE PROCEDURE!MMERCE IICOUR INTERNATIONALE U'ANyi I t1Atit t"INTERNATIONAL COURT OF ARBITRATIONA02338488/0.31/16 Oct 2002r/o° C'AMBAR 0
51. ABBREVIATIONS - DEFINITIONSP. ACTORSBrusselsCore Minority ShareholdersCSFBDJGBLGillamKPNMinority ShareholdersNon Core Minority ShareholdersPartiesPartyRCFValvisionVDHVisionVision B.V.Vision N.V.Brussels Securities S.A.Brussels and GillamCredit Suisse First BostonMr. De JongGroupe Bruxelles LambertGillam S.A.Koninklijke PTT Nederland N.V.All the shareholders of RCF except for the MajorityShareholder, VisionAll the minority shareholders of RCF except forthe Core Minority ShareholdersClaimant and RespondentsThe Claimant, the Respondents or either of themas the context allowsReseaux Cables de France S.A.Valvision Telecommunication B.V.Mr. Van der HoevenVision Networks N.V. and Vision Networks HoldingB.V.Vision Networks Holding B.V.Vision Networks N.V.A02338488/0-31/16 Oct 2002pMMERCE IN/toINTERNATIONAL COURT OF ARBITRATIONGOArF9To `L r CHAMBERoV COUR INTERNATIONALE D'ARBITRAGE'
Page 1 and 2: International Chamber of CommerceTh
Page 3 and 4: In the matter of an arbitrationBETW
Page 5: 37. Conclusion 545. The context of
Page 9 and 10: 7II.THE PARTIESThe parties in this
Page 11 and 12: 9agreement entered into in 1995 bet
Page 13 and 14: 115. The Terms of Reference were si
Page 15 and 16: 13On February 6, 2001, a witness su
Page 17 and 18: 15In particular, the Arbitral Tribu
Page 19 and 20: 17On April 15, 1999, the seller sen
Page 21 and 22: 19On the same day, Vision N.V. waiv
Page 23 and 24: 21Valvision had incurred substantia
Page 25 and 26: 23an amount of FRF 337,100 (= 51,39
Page 27 and 28: 251. IN GENERAL§1. THE JURISDICTIO
Page 29 and 30: 27The Arbitral Tribunal is of the o
Page 31 and 32: 2949. The question arises as to the
Page 33 and 34: 3153. As a conclusion, the Arbitral
Page 35 and 36: 33paragraphs of this provision appe
Page 37 and 38: 35bank employees, including Sunday.
Page 39 and 40: 37could reasonably derive from each
Page 41 and 42: 39§5. VISION N.V. AND VISION B.V.'
Page 43 and 44: 4180. In R.sub 5, Vision N.V. and V
Page 45 and 46: 43UPC se developpe rapidement en Eu
Page 47 and 48: 45the General Agreement and, more s
Page 49 and 50: 47towards the seller. (See also, Pr
Page 51 and 52: 49ers a price adjustment, which mig
Page 53 and 54: 51Should Vision N.V. and Vision B.V
Page 55 and 56: 53F.2: "Seller shall furnish Purcha
Page 57 and 58:
55He reiterated the same message on
Page 59 and 60:
57Such interpretation, which is con
Page 61 and 62:
59Vision N.V. also allowed the Core
Page 63 and 64:
61123. The Arbitral Tribunal is how
Page 65 and 66:
63128. The concept of "damage" refe
Page 67 and 68:
65the Hoge Raad of February 20, 197
Page 69 and 70:
672. The abstract method138. This t
Page 71 and 72:
69presented together to the judge/a
Page 73 and 74:
71Proportion of Mediareseaux' purch
Page 75 and 76:
733. Valvision lawyers' fees149. Va
Page 77:
75Place of arbitration : Londonv V,
show all

International Court of Arbitration Cour internationale d'arbitrage ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?