12.07.2015 Views

Annex I - “Description of Work” - Hlandata

Annex I - “Description of Work” - Hlandata

Annex I - “Description of Work” - Hlandata

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATATable <strong>of</strong> ContentsPART A........................................................................................................................................................................ 3A.1. PROJECT SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................... 3A.2. LIST OF BENEFICIARIES............................................................................................................................... 3A.3. OVERALL BUDGET BREAKDOWN FOR THE PROJECT ....................................................................... 4PART B........................................................................................................................................................................ 5PROJECT PROFILE ................................................................................................................................................. 5SECTION B1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES .......................................................................... 8B1.1. PROJECT OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................ 8B1.2. EU DIMENSION............................................................................................................................................. 19B1.3. MATURITY OF THE TECHNICAL SOLUTION...................................................................................... 20SECTION B2. IMPACT........................................................................................................................................... 22B2.1A. TARGET OUTCOMES AND EXPECTED IMPACT.............................................................................. 22B2.1B. UNDERLYING CONTENT ........................................................................................................................ 24B2.2. LONG TERM VIABILITY ............................................................................................................................ 31B.2.3. WIDER DEPLOYMENT AND USE ............................................................................................................ 32SECTION B3. IMPLEMENTATION..................................................................................................................... 34B3.1. CONSORTIUM AND KEY PERSONNEL................................................................................................... 34B3.2A. CHOSEN APPROACH................................................................................................................................ 46B3.2B. WORK PLAN ............................................................................................................................................... 46B3.3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................................... 70B3.4. SECURITY, PRIVACY, INCLUSIVENESS, INTEROPERABILITY, STANDARDS AND OPEN-SOURCE.................................................................................................................................................................... 75B3.5. RESOURCES TO BE COMMITTED........................................................................................................... 75B3.6. DISSEMINATION / USE OF RESULTS...................................................................................................... 7723/03/10 v11 2


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAPART BPROJECT PROFILEProposal acronym: HLANDATAProposal full title: Creation <strong>of</strong> value-added services based on Harmonized Land Use and LandCover DatasetsInformation on the proposed service/solutionDescription <strong>of</strong> the issue and proposed service/solutionLand Use and Land Cover information has been managed at national, regional or local level. This hasresulted in a suite <strong>of</strong> datasets, not always compatible with each other. But in a context whereenvironmental threats (for example; climate change, biodiversity loss, and food security) become moreand more global, there is a need to better integrate various sources <strong>of</strong> information at various scales. So,at present there is an urgent need for harmonization and standardization <strong>of</strong> land cover and land useinformation at various levels. HLANDATA project will make a proposal for the harmonization <strong>of</strong>these data and will demonstrate its validity for any <strong>of</strong> their possible uses and users through thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> some user oriented value-added services.Target users and their needsTarget users <strong>of</strong> the proposed services are Land Use/Land Cover information users. Among them, theones more directly addressed in the project are the intermediate-level users, defined as users needingfunctionalities such as the visualization <strong>of</strong> Land Cover / Land Use layers, the overlay <strong>of</strong> the owninformation to other sources, spatial and temporal analysis and downloads <strong>of</strong> the data in differentformats. This mainly includes Technicians <strong>of</strong> the Public Administration at local, regional and nationallevels; services and networks Commonwealths; public entities from different sectors (urban land,forest and rural environments); private companies; Universities; cabinets and consulting enterprisesfor the Agronomical, Forest or Environmental Engineering; architects and other engineers.UsageThe implemented solutions (pilot projects) will be used through free-access web services providingdifferent functionalities. The specific usage <strong>of</strong> the services will depend on the pilot project we areconsidering and the target user using the service.TechnologyHLANDATA will create value-added services for the spatial and temporal analysis in the differentpilots, integrating open source developments and own developed s<strong>of</strong>tware.Services freely accessible through the web will be developed, assessing the different existing solutionsbut also guaranteeing the use <strong>of</strong> standard services (Web Map Services – WMS, Web ProcessingServices – WCS, Web Features Services – WFS).23/03/10 v11 5


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAHLANDATA will provide access to the services <strong>of</strong> the developed pilots in the context <strong>of</strong> the projectthrough a Geo-gateway which will put together the project information with the access to its achievedresults.ContentYes, the service does need specific contents to be properly managed, concretely Land Cover and LandUse information. Such contents will have to be provider by the partners playing a role as contentproviders. In HLANDATA; each <strong>of</strong> the partners carrying out a pilot project needs to make available itsown data for the considered service.SustainabilityThe proposed service will be maintained after the end <strong>of</strong> the project by each one <strong>of</strong> the partners beinginvolved in its development. Each partner will assume the whole costs <strong>of</strong> such maintenance once theproject has concluded. In the case <strong>of</strong> HLANDATA, this is not an issue, as many <strong>of</strong> the partners arepublic administrations which are the owners <strong>of</strong> the data and which have to provide them to thepossible users. So, in the case <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the pilot projects within HLANDATA, the pilot projects willbe useful and helpful for giving the data users a better and an easier access to the data. In some othercases, the pilot projects to be implemented within HLANDATA for the demonstration <strong>of</strong> the validity<strong>of</strong> the proposed solution are pilot projects in which the partners <strong>of</strong> the project are highly interested.OwnershipEach <strong>of</strong> the partners will be the owner/provider and maintainer <strong>of</strong> the service/ solution.OtherThere have been other previous initiatives and projects in the field <strong>of</strong> Land Cover and Land Useinformation harmonization but there is no valid data harmonization model for the Land Cover andLand Use datasets yet, which takes into account both the data categorization and the data model andthe end users’ specificities. HLANDATA searches concrete solutions aimed at a particular kind <strong>of</strong>end-users (intermediate-level users, as defined above).23/03/10 v11 6


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAACRONYMS:CMSDSECEEAESAFP7GISGMESGSEHLANDATAICT PSPLCLCCSLSIILULUCASOGCRSSEISSIOSESLASWCSWFSWMSWPGMES Core Mapping ServicesGMES Downstream ServicesEuropean CommissionEuropean Environment AgencyEuropean Space AgencyEC 7 Framework ProgramGeographic Information SystemGlobal Monitoring <strong>of</strong> Environment and SecurityGMES Service Elements (ESA)Creation <strong>of</strong> value-added services based on Harmonized Land Use and LandCover DatasetsICT Policy Support ProgrammeLand CoverLand Cover Classification SystemLithuanian Spatial Information InfrastructureLand UseLand Use land Cover Area Frame Statistical SurveyOpen Geospatial ConsortiumRemote SensingShared Environmental Information SystemSpanish Land Cover Information SystemStatistical Land Accounting SystemWeb Coverage ServiceWeb Feature ServiceWeb Map ServiceWork Package23/03/10 v11 7


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATASection B1. Project description and objectivesB1.1. Project objectivesPROJECT BACKGROUND:Land Cover is referred to the physical, chemical, ecological or biological categorization <strong>of</strong> the earthsurface, such as artificial surfaces, agricultural areas, forests, natural areas, wetlands, etc. The LandUse is referred to the categorization <strong>of</strong> the territory based on its current and future planned socioeconomic purpose such as residential, industrial, commercial, agricultural, recreational, etc.Land use and Land cover are amongst the most important geographic information themes todaybecause they are essential for many applications areas: On the one hand, it is taken into account for thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> projects which are subject to an Environmental Impact Evaluation. In these cases, theweight <strong>of</strong> the aspects related to the land cover, the land use and the land property (cadastre) is veryrelevant. On the other hand, this information has an increasing importance for applications such as:GMES applications, calculations on CO2 drains for the National Greenhouse Gas Registry, irrigationland’s evolution and evaluation-projection on water consumption for agricultural goals, study onhabitats and ecosystems with desertification risk, preliminary calculations on erosive states, study andevaluation <strong>of</strong> town-planning growth models (specially around big cities), etcHistorically, Land Use and Land Cover information has been managed at national, regional or locallevel. The many activities producing information from national to local scale have been sometimesdeveloped independently, addressing specific requirements (such as; information to be acquired, level<strong>of</strong> detail both geometric and semantic, updating periods, timelines, precision). This has resulted in asuite <strong>of</strong> datasets, not always compatible with each other, not taking into account the interoperability <strong>of</strong>the information. However, in a context where environmental threats (for example; climate change,biodiversity loss, and food security) become more and more global, there is a need to better integratevarious sources <strong>of</strong> information at various scales. So, at present there is an urgent need forharmonization and standardization <strong>of</strong> land cover and land use information at various levels. Themain European geographic information harmonization initiative, INSPIRE Directive, states that,before the 15th <strong>of</strong> May <strong>of</strong> 2012, the rules for the implementation <strong>of</strong> the datasets included inINSPIRE’s <strong>Annex</strong>es II and III must be approved by the Member States, and the implementation ruleswill establish the way the datasets owned by the different Member States will be implemented in orderto allow their interoperability. All European Member States will have to make available theirgeographic information as established in INSPIRE, being Land Cover one <strong>of</strong> the themes included inthe <strong>Annex</strong> II <strong>of</strong> the Directive, and Land Use one <strong>of</strong> the themes included in the <strong>Annex</strong> III <strong>of</strong> theDirective.It is expected that the INSPIRE Directive will be a key driver for the standardization andharmonization <strong>of</strong> land cover and land use information in the EU, but there is a long and tough way toreach this situation and INSPIRE will need to make use <strong>of</strong> the existing experiences in the field. This iswhy, some initiatives have been carried out (and are being carried out) which may support INSPIRE inachieving its objectives. On the one hand, there are initiatives which have worked in harmonizing thecategorization <strong>of</strong> the information related to the Land Use and Land Cover themes, while otherinitiatives have been focused in the harmonization <strong>of</strong> the data models <strong>of</strong> the information related toLand Cover and Land Use themes.Regarding the initiatives related to the harmonization <strong>of</strong> the categorization <strong>of</strong> the Land Use-LandCover information, several organizations at regional, national, continental and world level launchedmany different Land Use and Land Cover information programmes:• At international level with the ISO and OGC standards and the Land Cover ClassificationSystem (LCCS) created by the UN FAO.23/03/10 v11 8


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATA• In Europe there is a long history <strong>of</strong> European (top-down) approaches to Land Cover / LandUse monitoring, including harmonization aspects (in the sense <strong>of</strong> a common nomenclaturecategorization).These activities can be divided in different spatial components:oooGlobal: ESA Globcover program, currently GlobCORINE project.Continental/regional: Currently represented by CORINE Land Cover, but furtherdevelopment are on the way towards CORINE Land Cover ++ supported by ESAGSE and EC FP (GEOLAND, GEOLAND2) projects.Local: Urban Atlas supported by DGREGIO with coverage <strong>of</strong> 300+ Large UrbanZones – 2009-2011 (initial mapping) 2011-2013 (first update).All these activities are nowadays framed within GMES Land Monitoring and supported to befully operational from 2013. For complete picture EUROSTAT LUCAS exercise is nowadaysmore and more considered as part <strong>of</strong> the GMES Land monitoring developments with focus onin-situ component. For most <strong>of</strong> these mapping activities CLC nomenclature is considered asde-facto standard to which other nomenclatures are referring.Regarding the initiatives related to the harmonization <strong>of</strong> the data model <strong>of</strong> the Land Use-LandCover information, some initiatives have been launched or are being carried out at the moment: Forexample, the Spanish SIOSE project has proposed an object oriented UML normalized model at aSpanish level and at European level the most significant initiative is the Plan4All project, launchedrecently and which deals with the harmonization <strong>of</strong> spatial planning data. It is expected that the projectwill provide among its results a proposal for the Land Cover and Land Use data model.On the other hand there is a growing bottom-up effort in Land Cover / Land Use monitoring domainrelated to INSPIRE and SEIS development at Member States level, which have to be integrated andboth options to be harmonized into the final mixed approach setup. Spanish SIOSE, but also UK,Germany or Finland initiatives are good example <strong>of</strong> such integration <strong>of</strong> European and national sourcesfor harmonised Land Cover / Land Use monitoring services on European level for added-valueservices use.Unfortunately, despite the initiatives which have already been carried out others that are being carriedout at present moment, there is no valid data harmonization model for the Land Cover and LandUse datasets, taking into account both the data categorization and the data model and the endusers’ specificities, which is could be valid for all the application areas and at a European level.The initiatives carried out until the present moment have resulted in generic harmonized data modelswith do not take into account the end user needs. Furthermore, there is no running initiative in thissense which could be used by INSPIRE teams at the time <strong>of</strong> starting the work with the Land Coverand Land Use themes.PROJECT CONCEPT:The HLANDATA project aims at making a significant step forward in overcoming theaforementioned barrier, fostering the use <strong>of</strong> the Land Use and Land Cover geographic data at aEuropean level through the creation <strong>of</strong> value-added European services. The project approach will bedifferent from those carried out up to the moment: While other initiatives carried out up to themoment have addressed the harmonization <strong>of</strong> the Land Use and Land Cover data from thecategorization or data model perspective from a generic perspective, without taking into accountthe specific perspective <strong>of</strong> the end users, the HLANDATA project will broaden this approachaddressing the same problem from a very practical approach, taking into account both the datamodel and the data categorization together with the different users’ and applications’ needswhen using these datasets.Multipurpose aspect is particularly relevant for Land Cover Land Use data as this is an essentialfeature <strong>of</strong> this domain – good multipurpose data model will also ensure effective use <strong>of</strong> Land Cover23/03/10 v11 9


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATALand Use monitoring investments on European and national level enabling data sharing and multiscalefocus.So, in this context, the starting point <strong>of</strong> the HLANDATA project will study the differentharmonization initiatives carried out up to the moment, and others being carried out at presentmoment, both from the data model and data categorization harmonization perspectives. In parallel, thepotential Land Use and Land Cover datasets Users’ needs will be assessed. Taking into account theresults <strong>of</strong> these activities, a Land Use and Land Cover harmonization proposal will be developed,which will be the base for the development <strong>of</strong> specific web services for different application areas <strong>of</strong>the Land Cover and Land Use datasets.At this point, the newly developed web services will be used for the development <strong>of</strong> 3 Pilot Projects in3 different application areas, which will be used to validate the harmonization proposal made:• PILOT 1: Land Use- Land Cover Data analysis System for intermediate-level users• PILOT 2: Harmonized and Interoperable Land Information Systems• PILOT 3: Stratification <strong>of</strong> waste dumpsEach <strong>of</strong> the pilot projects will result on a Land Use model for a specific application area. Theassessment <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> these pilot projects and the related Land Use models will lead to thegeneration <strong>of</strong> a harmonized Land Use Classification scheme and a methodology for the harmonization<strong>of</strong> the Land Use datasets. This project concept and project approach is shown next:Harmonizationinitiatives on DataModelsHarmonizationinitiatives on DataCategorizationUsers andUsers’ needsASSESSMENTPROPOSAL FOR THE HARMONIZATION OFLAND USE/ LAND COVER DATADEVELOPMENT OF COMMON DATASHARING INFRASTRUCTUREPILOT 1PILOT 2 PILOT 3ASSESSMENT &CONCLUSSIONS23/03/10 v11 10


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAPROJECT OBJECTIVES:In the aforementioned context, where no harmonized data model allowing to access the land use andland cover information owned by the different Member States exists yet, the main objective <strong>of</strong> theproject is to demonstrate the feasible European level harmonization <strong>of</strong> the Land Use and LandCover datasets taking into account both the data categorization and the data models, for any <strong>of</strong>their possible uses and users, through the development <strong>of</strong> user oriented value added services.The specific objectives <strong>of</strong> the project are the following:• To make the assessment <strong>of</strong> the relevant information related to the harmonization <strong>of</strong> the LandUse and Land Cover Datasets:o Previous harmonization initiatives and related results:• Data modelso• Data CategorizationsUsers: Types <strong>of</strong> users and users’ real needs (from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> theapplications).• To make a proposal for the harmonization <strong>of</strong> the Land Use and Land Cover datasets based onthe previously gathered practical experience.• To make the development and optimization <strong>of</strong> common data sharing infrastructure (based onweb services) needed for the management <strong>of</strong> the harmonized Land Use and Land Coverdatasets coming from different sources, allowing to make the visualization and overlay <strong>of</strong> theinformation• To make the implementation <strong>of</strong> 3 pilot projects making use <strong>of</strong> the previous web servicesdemonstrating the feasibility <strong>of</strong> the harmonization <strong>of</strong> these datasets and providing some valueadded service to a certain type <strong>of</strong> end users.• To make the assessment and disseminate the obtained pilot results within their respectivefields <strong>of</strong> action.• To promote the creation <strong>of</strong> an experts’ network composed <strong>of</strong> producers and users <strong>of</strong> thisinformation.DESCRIPTION OF THE ICT BASED SERVICES TO BE IMPLEMENTED (PILOTS):Three pilot projects will be implemented in HLANDATA project, addressing different users andusages each, but based on the same concepts and same framework:The first phase <strong>of</strong> the pilot projects will be a common phase, aimed at implementing a harmonizeddata sharing infrastructure based on integration <strong>of</strong> harmonized European, national and regionalsources <strong>of</strong> data relevant to land cover and land use ‘Themes’. This will contribute to increasing useand reuse <strong>of</strong> harmonized data sets related to land cover and land use themes enumerated in annexes I-III <strong>of</strong> the INSPIRE directive through network services for sharing spatial data between publicauthorities and other stakeholders, enabling the creation <strong>of</strong> value added services.Once these common web services have been developed and have been tested, each <strong>of</strong> the pilot projectswill demonstrate the practical usability <strong>of</strong> the common networking infrastructure through the provision<strong>of</strong> some value added services.So, the pilot projects will have a common technological framework, and some common functionalities,being particularized in each <strong>of</strong> the countries participating in the project in order to provide differentvalue added services in each.This is shown in the next figure:23/03/10 v11 11


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATACOMMON DATA SHARING INFRASTRUCTURE:Common webservices allowing to visualize, overlayinformation from different sourcesPILOT 1:LU/LC dataAnalysissystem(Spain, Latvia)PILOT 2:National Landsystems(Czech Rep,Lithuania)PILOT2.1:(CzechRep)PILOT2.2:(Lithuania)PILOT 3:Wastedumpsstratification(Slovakia)Common data sharing infrastructure (web services):Partners: GN, IGN/CNIG, GISAT, AGI, TDF, SEA, CEITData provided from: Spain, Czech Republic, Lithuania, Latvia, SlovakiaThe project will focus mostly on technical, but also on organizational support required to set up datasharing cycle <strong>of</strong> the different national and regional providers <strong>of</strong> partial land cover / land use data in aharmonized way, so that the common networking infrastructure to be implemented gives access toharmonized land use and land cover datasets for several applications, allowing to exploit them throughnetwork services. On rewards, all national actors will benefit from access and use <strong>of</strong> integrated landinformation contained in these different national and European databases. As previously explained, theharmonization <strong>of</strong> the datasets will be based on a combination <strong>of</strong> the previous & ongoing initiatives inLand Use/Land Cover data harmonization and the HLANDATA own contributions.All the pilot projects to be developed will support some common web services, already adapted to thespecific needs <strong>of</strong> the Land Use/Land Cover data users. The minimum generic and common webservices to be provided by all the pilots projects and on top <strong>of</strong> which the rest <strong>of</strong> web services will bedeveloped are the following:• Visualization <strong>of</strong> the information layers from different sources.• Overlay and integration <strong>of</strong> information from several sources.PILOT 1: Land Use - Land Cover Data Analysis System for intermediate-level usersPartners: GN, TRACASA, IGN/CNIG, TDF, CEITData provided from: Spain, LatviaThe PILOT 1, carried out in Spain and Latvia will develop a system allowing to make the analysis andexploitation <strong>of</strong> the harmonized Land Use and Land Cover data addressed to the so called intermediateusers. The segmentation <strong>of</strong> the users <strong>of</strong> the Land Cover / Land Use Cartography distinguishes among:• Low-level users: They just need to visualize the information layers overlaid with an ortophoto.The most usual low level user is the public in general, accessing the land cover and land usedata through the spatial data infrastructures• Intermediate-level users: This group includes Technicians <strong>of</strong> the Public Administration atlocal, regional and national levels; services and networks Commonwealths; public entitiesfrom different sectors (urban land, forest and rural environments); private companies;Universities; cabinets and consulting enterprises for the Agronomical, Forest orEnvironmental Engineering; architects and other engineers. Their needs include other23/03/10 v11 12


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAfunctionalities such as the visualization <strong>of</strong> the Land Cover / Land Use layer, the overlay <strong>of</strong> theown information to other sources, spatial and temporal analysis and downloads <strong>of</strong> the data indifferent formats.• High-level users: They carry out high-level analysis by making use <strong>of</strong> GIS tools. Possibly theservices to be created are not sufficient for their needs, but they will be able to get Land Coverand Land Use layers through downloading applications in order to incorporate them to theirGIS.As said, the potential users <strong>of</strong> the services which are going to be launched by the pilot project are theintermediate level users.Some examples <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> these users’ specific demands and <strong>of</strong> the response given to such demandscould be the following:• A request (done by these end-users to the information owners) <strong>of</strong> the Land Use and LandCover information in different formats (for example CAD). This request is in many timesdone through e-mail gateways.• In some other cases (being the Regional Administration and Regional Public Entities the endusers) Land Cover and Land Use layers are managed through desktop viewers with somelimitations regarding its non-universal use (its installation requires a commercial licence) andthe lack <strong>of</strong> spatial and temporal analysis functions and <strong>of</strong> download applications.Thanks to this pilot, the intermediate-level users will be provided some added-value services andfunctionalities allowing them to fulfil needs such as the ones described above. For example, thefunctionalities provided by the pilot project will allow the intermediate level users to make theselection <strong>of</strong> a concrete Land area in an autonomous way, making the election <strong>of</strong> the thematic variables<strong>of</strong> interest for them, allowing to process the data selected together with other data, and to thedownload and print the obtained results. In addition, the pilot project will allow making thisinformation available and to place it at the disposal <strong>of</strong> a significantly bigger amount <strong>of</strong> users.The pilot to be implemented will be based on advanced web services which will allow users to makeadvanced analysis <strong>of</strong> the Land use and Land Cover datasets with information coming from differentsources at a European level. The next are the main advanced functionalities which will be provided bythe project:• Advanced Visualization <strong>of</strong> the information layers:o Visualization <strong>of</strong> the “Land Use/Land Cover” layers to different scales thanks tozooming tools (in and out); pan; screening fine-tuning, etc.o Search and localization tool in screen <strong>of</strong> the requested land item (such as thebinoculars visor).o Surface and distance measuring tools in the screen.o Consultation tool, “Query” type, allowing to select part <strong>of</strong> the layer according to theestablished criteria and to visualize and work only with the selected area. It could bedownloaded to different formats.o Thematization <strong>of</strong> the “Land Use/Land Cover” layer by means <strong>of</strong> an attribute linked tothe layers.o Possibility <strong>of</strong> modifying the symbols <strong>of</strong> the thematic layer.o Labelling function (direct introduction <strong>of</strong> by loading a file with coordinates andassociated labels).o Editing function starting from the thematic layer including the legend, title and othertitle page items.o Thematic map printing and editing with selection <strong>of</strong> formats and output scale.o Layers’ metadata consultations.o Dynamic visualization <strong>of</strong> the Land Use layer.23/03/10 v11 13


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAdown/bottom-up approach is needed combining strengths <strong>of</strong> both workflow options for multi-scaleland information system feeding European, national, regional and even local application.GISAT and CENIA 1 , which jointly serve as the National Reference Center (EIONET NRC) for SpatialAnalysis and Land Cover in Czech Republic, take the lead in the setup <strong>of</strong> such land nationalinformation system and the pilot implementation <strong>of</strong> the National Land Information System is to bedemonstrated as the Czech pilot within the HLANDATA project.The pilot project in the Czech Republic aims to implement a national land information system basedon integration <strong>of</strong> harmonized European, national and regional sources <strong>of</strong> data relevant to land coverand land use ‘Themes’. The projects will contribute to increasing use and reuse <strong>of</strong> harmonized datasets related to land cover and land use themes enumerated in annexes I-III <strong>of</strong> the INSPIRE directivethrough network services for sharing spatial data between public authorities and other stakeholders,enabling the creation <strong>of</strong> value added services. Supported by current transposition <strong>of</strong> the INSPIREDirective in the Czech Republic as well as current achievements in the GMES area, it will demonstrateits practical implementation in land cover / land use domain, allowing data sharing between theindividual actors involved through network services.Schematic picture shows individual general concept <strong>of</strong> the Pilot, actors involved within the NationalLand Information System as well as the interaction with European level products.In this pilot project, besides the shared information system comprised by all the pilots, additionaladded-value <strong>of</strong> proposed integrated and interoperable concept is to be demonstrated on application <strong>of</strong>“focused” land cover / land use data use for the land accounting purposes in the Czech Republic asexplained next:1 CENIA is the Czech Environmental Information Agency, taking part in HLANDATA as subcontractor <strong>of</strong>GISAT.23/03/10 v11 15


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAValue-added application and result assessment:Demonstrating the value-added potential <strong>of</strong> the National Land Information System on land accountingapplication, integrated assessment service and integration with conventional statistical data will beconceptually based on developments in land cover accounts methodology as pioneered by theEuropean Environmental Agency. Based on the methodology <strong>of</strong> the integrated system <strong>of</strong> economicenvironmental accounting (SEEA2003) <strong>of</strong> the United Nations, land cover accounts are connected toother sets <strong>of</strong> tables which describe the use <strong>of</strong> the natural resources by the economy. The frameworkhas been developed to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> policy makers by showing how spatial indicators anddescriptive statistics can be used to monitor the interaction between the economy and the environment.Thus, land cover accounts will be used to serve as well as a platform to account for ecosystemintegrity and it will provide a set <strong>of</strong> tools that can be used in the context <strong>of</strong> natural capital valuation forsustainable development, strategic planning and policy analysis.An understanding <strong>of</strong> the implications <strong>of</strong> changes in land cover and land use is a fundamental part <strong>of</strong>planning for sustainable development. On the one hand the transformation <strong>of</strong> land cover and land useby human action can affect the integrity <strong>of</strong> natural resource systems and the output <strong>of</strong> ecosystem goodsand services. On the other, by careful planning, the development <strong>of</strong> new patterns <strong>of</strong> land cover and usecan enhance the well-being <strong>of</strong> people. The need to consider the coupling <strong>of</strong> social and ecologicalsystems through the study <strong>of</strong> land use change has been identified as an urgent priority by a number <strong>of</strong>organizations and need to develop and apply systems <strong>of</strong> economic-environmental accounting has beenwidely recognized by the international community.Land accounts, like those for other types <strong>of</strong> environmental assets, seek to describe how resource stockschange over time in a consistent and systematic way. By doing this, the implications <strong>of</strong> those changescan better be understood. The cover <strong>of</strong> land is not, however, simply an attribute or quality <strong>of</strong> land, buta concrete set <strong>of</strong> natural and anthropogenic features that largely results from its use. A given landcover can be modified, degraded or destroyed (consumed) and a new type generated. As such, theconsumption and formation <strong>of</strong> land cover is very similar to the transformation <strong>of</strong> capital goods in theeconomy. Since land cannot, in general terms, be created or destroyed land cover change can generallybe characterized in terms <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> flows between land cover types. A key focus <strong>of</strong> landcover accounts is, then, the understanding <strong>of</strong> the way in which the stocks <strong>of</strong> different land covers anduses are transformed over time. Proposed LEAC framework features the following capabilities:• Stock and flows land accounts.• Spatial insight into consumption & formation and intensity <strong>of</strong> processes (dynamics).• Understanding <strong>of</strong> context (neighbourhood) <strong>of</strong> stocks and flows.• Framework for integration <strong>of</strong> socio-economic data.• Framework for spatial indicator development, statistic desegregations and modelling.Sub-Pilot 2.2: Establishment <strong>of</strong> a national land statistical accounting system based onGMES core mapping service productsPartner: AGI, CEITData provided from: LithuaniaStatistical land accounting system (SLAS) basically is used to keep the record <strong>of</strong> the amounts <strong>of</strong> differentland assets (arable land, forests, built-up areas, etc.) <strong>of</strong> the country and is essential in planning <strong>of</strong> budgetassignments and incomes, agricultural quotas as well as spatial planning on national and municipal levels.The current SLAS <strong>of</strong> Lithuania still follows practices inherited from the former Soviet statistical system,which was based on land asset estimates provided by <strong>of</strong>ficials in administrative units <strong>of</strong> the country, i.e. it'sdone on paper and provides numbers <strong>of</strong> “best judgment”, <strong>of</strong>ten seriously biased due to various reasons. Infact, similar practices are still in use at various extent all over the former “Soviet block” countries, nowmembers <strong>of</strong> EU.Since joining the EU in 2004, the entire domain <strong>of</strong> land management has changed dramatically in Lithuaniadue to implementation <strong>of</strong> EU regulations related to agricultural production planning and accounting,23/03/10 v11 16


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAenvironment protection and Natura-2000 network, water framework directive, directives on carbonemissions and climate change, as well as necessity to carry out balanced development planning for urbanand rural areas, therefore the so far existing inertic and unreliable land accounting system becamecompletely inappropriate. Therefore a National authority responsible for SLAS – National Land Serviceunder the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture – formulated a request for development <strong>of</strong> a completely new SLAS <strong>of</strong>Lithuania, based on advanced GIS and Remote Sensing technologies and particularly on the emergingGMES Core Mapping Services (CMS), developed within FP7 projects coordinated by EC in cooperationwith EEA and ESA, as well as GMES Service Elements (GSE) carried out by ESA Member-States,possibly developing additional GMES Downstream Services (DS) for specific thematic content particularlyrequested by National stakeholders.After successful implementation <strong>of</strong> the SLAS pilot project, the National Land Service <strong>of</strong> Lithuania isplanning to launch a regular monitoring program and incorporate high-resolution LU/LC datasets andstatistical land accounting products into the recently established Lithuanian Spatial InformationInfrastructure (LSII).Value-added applicationThe first practical step towards establishment <strong>of</strong> SLAS in Lithuania will take place already in 2009.National Land Service is planning to call a national tender and provide funding for implementation <strong>of</strong> afeasibility study, which will summarize the existing situation, identify information gaps and expectations <strong>of</strong>the major stakeholders, test the existing spatial data properties, recent GMES technologies and practicalissues related to production <strong>of</strong> high-resolution LU/LC datasets, as well as provide the necessary technicaland thematic specifications and spatial data infrastructure (SDI) requirements for the National SLAS.Therefore we expect that by the end <strong>of</strong> 2009 all the technical specifications <strong>of</strong> the Lithuanian SLAS will beavailable (including satellite imagery, thematic content and definition <strong>of</strong> statistical sampling framework,etc.), so that implementation <strong>of</strong> technological process and production work could start already in 2010.It is worth mentioning that similar institution <strong>of</strong> the neighbouring Latvia is highly interested in theLithuanian SLAS initiative and is willing to test the service and possibly implement it in Latvia as well.Therefore, the main objective <strong>of</strong> the current HLANDATA pilot project would be practical implementationand operational testing <strong>of</strong> the SLAS on the basis <strong>of</strong> GMES CMS products based on the HLANDATAmethodology for data harmonization and over two trans-boundary river basins – Nemunėlis (4,047 km2)with dominating natural landscapes and Mūša (5,463 km2) with intensely agricultural landscape – bothstretching along the area <strong>of</strong> northern Lithuania and southern Latvia.Pilot 3: Stratification <strong>of</strong> waste dumpsPartner: SEA, CEITData provided from: SlovakiaMain aim <strong>of</strong> the PILOT 3 would be webmap service and application focused on stratification <strong>of</strong> wastedumps in Slovak territory based on these GIS layers: Land Cover / Land Use, settlements, population,waste production. Problem <strong>of</strong> waste production and dumps localization is complex and <strong>of</strong>ten cause conflictsituation. Due to that the public mapservice would be very helpful to overcome discrepancies betweengovernment, industrial sector, environmental communities and public. Interactive mapservice would behelpful also in process <strong>of</strong> mapping existent <strong>of</strong>ficial dumps, forbidden dumps and during proposal <strong>of</strong> newdumps based on Land Cover / Land Use multitemporal GIS dataset.Pilot 3 services are focused on crucial GIS functionalities, which are necessary for potential users. Thefollowing table lists them briefly:23/03/10 v11 17


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAView &OverlaySearch bydifferentcriteriaEditpositionEditAttributesAnalysisE, C, F, P E, C, F, P F - E publicE, C, F, P E, C, F, P F F E,C,F InspectoratesE, C, F, P E, C, F, P - - E, C, F, P Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment, Regionalgovernmental bodies, MunicipalitiesE, C, F, P E, C, F, P E,C,F,P E, C, F, P E, C, F, P SEA - Centre <strong>of</strong> Waste ManagementE, C, F, P E, C, F, P - - E, C, F, P EIONET Reporting projects, etc.UserE – existing waste dumpC – closed waste dumpF – forbidden waste dumpP – proposed zone for new waste dumpPublic as one <strong>of</strong> the 1st potential user may help in mapping <strong>of</strong> forbidden waste dumps by GPS localisationor by simple editing <strong>of</strong> position thanks to othophoto or civil maps in the background. Next relevantInspectorates may check the status <strong>of</strong> such dumps, put them under the control and discuss solutions withlocal regional governmental bodies and municipalities. Inspectorates may overlay available transport layerand propose forbidden dump disposal on the base <strong>of</strong> cost-distance analysis. Locality <strong>of</strong> existing, closed orforbidden dump might be also helpful in investigation <strong>of</strong> contamination sites (searching possible causes <strong>of</strong>soil, water, air pollution). Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment, local governmental bodies and municipalities havetough task during proposal <strong>of</strong> locality/zone for new waste dump. Population and industrial activities insome settlements are quickly growing and it is really difficult to predict situation in next 5-10 years. Wastedump stratification in near future would be Salmonian decision task especially in densely populatedcountries. Multitemporal analysis on the base <strong>of</strong> key layers like population, waste production, LC/LU,DEM, hydrology and environment protection might be very helpful for decision makers. SEA Centre <strong>of</strong>Waste Management would be another crucial user, because its main responsibility is inventory <strong>of</strong> wasteproduction and waste dumps over the whole country. Further development <strong>of</strong> the proposed webmapservices’ functionalities for this user is crucial. The last mentioned category <strong>of</strong> users would be internationalinstitutions and several control mechanisms e.g. EIONET reporting obligations, Basel convention etc.Harmonization <strong>of</strong> webmap services and datasets at EU or global level are principal for objective,unprejudiced decision making process. In conclusion all the above mentioned users and their opinion mighthelp to clear difficulties in this complex task <strong>of</strong> waste dumps stratification.23/03/10 v11 18


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATARegarding the added value <strong>of</strong> the HLANDATA project face to other initiatives being carried out inthis field by other projects funded by the former eContentplus programme, it is worth taking intoaccount that the standardization and harmonization <strong>of</strong> Land Cover and Land Use data will havetremendous positive effects on:- Cross-border planning projects (still different categorization and terms are misleading andtend to complicate cross-border negotiations).- Cross-border emergency and rescue operations.- Analysis <strong>of</strong> "functional areas" that exceed administrative units, in terms <strong>of</strong> sociology, ecologyand economy.- Up-to-date cross-border tourist information and "seamless recreation areas".In many cases, the harmonization <strong>of</strong> Land Cover and Land Use data is a precondition for harmonizingcrucial services like search and rescue operations. Although there are currently other Europeanprojects ongoing also dealing with cross-border Land Use data, such as Plan4All, their main focus ismade on planning data, whereas HLANDATA will span a much wider spectrum <strong>of</strong> use cases that arenot otherwise covered by these other projects. Plan4All will not change the fragmented situation <strong>of</strong>planning data across Europe, since it will only deliver the corresponding metatools.On the contrary, what it is going to be implemented by the HLANDATA project is a combination <strong>of</strong>the proposed European Land Cover products and end-user specified additional thematic information oralternative ways <strong>of</strong> information handling. This could be interpreted as a practical test <strong>of</strong> the existingGMES thematic specification and GMES line <strong>of</strong> Land Cover products against the nationalrequirements <strong>of</strong> Land Use / Land Cover thematic information and operational services, which areraised by the major stakeholders from the public sector.It is this diverse approach to a similar practical problem developing in different countries whichactually brings the highest added value to this project. It will be tested how "practical" it is for theMember States to use GMES products and what the current thematic or technological gaps consist <strong>of</strong>.The true scope <strong>of</strong> procedures, thematic priorities, spatial data infrastructure requirements, dedicatedinvestments in terms <strong>of</strong> man-power and resources available from public sector, as well as additionalexpectations related to thematic content and cost-effectiveness, etc. while implementing those nationalservices into practice will also be addressed.A successful result <strong>of</strong> the HLANDATA project would imply a ready-to-go setup <strong>of</strong> GMES-based orOODM-based land monitoring/accounting services, tested on real-life examples and, mostimportantly, providing a clear operational background to the GMES policy, research and industry onuser expectations and interests as far as large-scale deployments <strong>of</strong> GMES technology are considered.Moreover, as already exposed, HLANDATA will additionally stress on the generation <strong>of</strong> aharmonized Land Use classification scheme and a methodology for the harmonization <strong>of</strong> the Land Usedatasets, taking advantage <strong>of</strong> the previous work results being delivered by the other ongoing projectsin the same field in the frame <strong>of</strong> eContentplus.In this sense, the HLANDATA Consortium foresees the setting out <strong>of</strong> a solid cooperation networkamong the different actors involved in the abovementioned European projects currently operativerelated to the Land Use / Land Cover thematic, so that the separate results <strong>of</strong> every single undertakenproject can be turned into shared efforts <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> them and so that HLANDATA itself can takeadvantage <strong>of</strong> the results delivered by previous works, to which it constitutes a significantenhancement.B1.3. Maturity <strong>of</strong> the technical solutionThe solutions to be provided and implemented in HLANDATA will be based on consolidated workand on mature technical solutions. The philosophy <strong>of</strong> the project is that <strong>of</strong> using and taking advantage23/03/10 v11 20


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATASection B2. ImpactB2.1a. Target outcomes and expected impactTarget Outcomes:HLANDATA project is relevant to the expected target outcomes listed in the Objective 6.2 in the ICTPSP 2009 Work Programme, as this European Project aims at widening the use <strong>of</strong> spatial data (LandUse and Land Cover data) by public and private sector organizations and citizens. As previouslyexplained, the project aims at developing 3 pilot projects, based on the harmonization <strong>of</strong> the Land Useand Land Cover datasets at a European level, which will provide value added services to certain types<strong>of</strong> end users. The pilot projects will serve as the validation platform for the harmonization proposalmade in the project. In this context, the project is consistent with the main conditions andcharacteristics enumerated for such Objective 6.2 <strong>of</strong> the ICT PSP Work Programme, as it is explainedin the next points:Added value: The proposal provides a clear added value compared to other initiatives alreadyimplemented in this field. The added value comes from the fact that HLANDATA project will providea harmonization proposal which will take into account and reuse the previous results available fromother initiatives, and will also incorporate a new perspective: While most <strong>of</strong> the past initiatives havebeen focused in providing a harmonized data concept model from a generic perspective, theHLANDATA project will incorporate the specific perspective <strong>of</strong> the different end users and theirspecific needs.Enabling services: As required by the Objective 6.2 conditions, the HLANDATA project aims atdeveloping 3 pilot projects in 5 different European Countries providing added value services whichwill be supported by web services providing several functionalities such as the visualization <strong>of</strong>different information layers overlay <strong>of</strong> information, spatial and temporal analysis…etc . The providedinformation shall come from different sources (partners) situated in different European countries andterritories.Reusable and easily accessible datasets: As explained, the project contemplates the implementation<strong>of</strong> several web services providing free and universal access and non-limit usability <strong>of</strong> the collectedinformation and datasets.Multilingual aspects: Since the project is going to be carried out by 9 partners from 7 differentEuropean Countries and is intended to be accessible through separate internet gateways for eachpartner, multilingual aspects <strong>of</strong> the access to the harmonized information is taken into account.Moreover, for the harmonization <strong>of</strong> the categorization aspects <strong>of</strong> the land use and land cover datasets,multilingual aspects need to be a specific issue, closely related to the semantic issues involved in thistask.Quality and quantity <strong>of</strong> the digital content contributed to the project is ensured through theparticipation <strong>of</strong> 6 public institutions with the content provider role within the project. The detail <strong>of</strong> thedigital content provided is given in chapter B2.1b.Significant impact in terms <strong>of</strong> increasing access and use on a large number <strong>of</strong> users in the largestpossible number <strong>of</strong> EU countries: As already stated, the whole set <strong>of</strong> databases and collectedinformation from all partners is going to be made available at each gateway for every interested citizenor organization. The internet application developed by every partner is going to provide not only itsown harmonized geographic information, but also the one contributed by the other partners. This factwill imply an undoubted increase in terms <strong>of</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> European users being able to access suchinformation.23/03/10 v11 22


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAAvailability <strong>of</strong> the content: The inclusion within the Consortium <strong>of</strong> 5 public institutions fromdifferent European Countries and Regions as data providers, ensures the necessary availability <strong>of</strong> thenecessary territorial data sets in order to carry out the activities <strong>of</strong> the project and in order to be used(and reused) by any citizen or organization once the pilot projects are running. As already mentioned,the public availability <strong>of</strong> the content is guaranteed thanks to the condition <strong>of</strong> public entities <strong>of</strong> thedifferent data providers (see point B 2.1b underlying content).Validation <strong>of</strong> the project results by the target users: The validation <strong>of</strong> results <strong>of</strong> the project will bedone through the assessment <strong>of</strong> the pilots projects implemented. And this assessment will be done bythe end users <strong>of</strong> the value-added services implemented by the pilot projects. In the case <strong>of</strong>HLANDATA; the content providers themselves in most <strong>of</strong> the cases also correspond to the end users<strong>of</strong> the information (the public administrations in many cases play a double role: they are the dataproviders and one <strong>of</strong> the main users <strong>of</strong> the data too). However, in the case <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the pilotprojects, other different target users will be considered during the validation phase. Concretely, inPilot 2, ISOCARP will act as validator due to its nature <strong>of</strong> association <strong>of</strong> territorial planners.Clear exploitation and dissemination plan: Both project results exploitation and dissemination havebeen taken into account for the design <strong>of</strong> the project. All the project outcomes will be disseminated tothe following target audience: public administrations and public entities, policy stakeholders, privatesector specialized entities and citizens. In order to reach that audience, different disseminationactivities, at European and local level will be carried out during the project by all the partners: projectweb site, dissemination material, project congresses, demonstration, seminars, etc will be some <strong>of</strong> thetools to be used for the project results dissemination. Regarding the exploitation <strong>of</strong> results, the addedvalue services being developed during the project will continue being provided by the project partnersat the end <strong>of</strong> the project, as they are applications which are <strong>of</strong> the highest interest for them. Theseexploitation and dissemination aspects are explained in Sections B2.2 and B2.3 with more detail.Synchronization <strong>of</strong> deliverables to the roadmap <strong>of</strong> the INSPIRE Directive: One <strong>of</strong> the advantages<strong>of</strong> this project is that it will be easily synchronized with the INSPIRE roadmap. The INSPIREroadmap in regards to Land Use and Land Cover datasets is not clear at the moment <strong>of</strong> presenting thisproposal, but it is expected that at the estimated time <strong>of</strong> initiating the project this roadmap will bealready defined and it will not be complicated for HLANDATA to adapt its activities to this roadmap.In this sense, the chronological distribution <strong>of</strong> the foreseen deliverables <strong>of</strong> the project shall beestablished in accordance with the milestones conceived for the progressive implementation <strong>of</strong> theINSPIRE Directive.Expected impact:This project will undoubtedly imply a strong impact in the European Countries or Regionsparticipating in the implementation <strong>of</strong> the pilot projects defined. The availability <strong>of</strong> harmonized LandCover and Land Use Databases freely accessible through interoperable web services, together with theadded-value <strong>of</strong> the implementation <strong>of</strong> high-level services providing further functionalities, willcertainly suppose a great step forward in the way towards the harmonization and fully interoperability<strong>of</strong> the geographical information systems and databases at a European Level, which implies a relevantEuropean level impact <strong>of</strong> the project.As for the expected impact <strong>of</strong> this project, the project also fits in with the expected impact descriptionproposed at the ICT PSP Work Programme for 2009, since the pilot projects to be delivered shall infact meet all set out conditions. As the WP says:“It shall allow users to identify, access, use and reuse the information in an interoperable andseamless way and for a variety <strong>of</strong> users, aggregated geographical information covering a significantpart <strong>of</strong> Europe and coming from a wide range <strong>of</strong> sources, from the local level to the European level”;23/03/10 v11 23


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3 Pilot BHLANDATATable 0: Template – Underlying contentThis table identifies the digital content (and related metadata) to be contributed to the project by each content provider.Provider 2 Type 3 Quantity &Definition 4GN Vector 1956Cultivationsand LandUses Map <strong>of</strong>Navarre at1:25.000 scaleGN Vector Cultivationsand LandUses Map <strong>of</strong>Navarre at1:25.000 scaleGN Vector 2007Cultivationsand LandUses Map <strong>of</strong>Navarre at1:25.000 scaleGN Vector 2008Cultivationsand LandUses Map <strong>of</strong>Navarre at1:25.000 scaleincluding theinformationon UrbanLand UsesQuantity and Quality <strong>of</strong> the ContentFormat & IPR 6 Current Use 7 Existing Language Additional commentsQuality 5 Metadata 8ESRI: shape Public Mainly used for the generation <strong>of</strong> changes No Spanish It is the land <strong>of</strong> Navarre generatedmaps among subsequent yearly MCAfrom the ortorectification and laterseries. Such information provides indicatorsfotointerpretation <strong>of</strong> the US military<strong>of</strong> the evolution <strong>of</strong> the analyzed land uses.flight over Navarra’s territory in1956-1957. It has got a legend <strong>of</strong> 27classes.ESRI: shape Public Historical information on land uses in 1999 Yes SpanishESRI: shape Public Complete update <strong>of</strong> MCA99. Yes SpanishESRI: shape Public Used as basic information in projectsrelated to land planning, environment,agriculture, urban growth planning,renewable energies, agricultural statistics,pastures evaluation, environmental impactassessment.Yes Spanish Represents the land cover in itsagronomical aspect (24 codes), forestaspect (70 codes), and improductiveagricultural aspect (7 simple codesand 41 urban associations predefinedin accordance with SIOSE), Coverpercentage is provided for each plotin simple, associated or mosaic form.2 Short name <strong>of</strong> the participant who provides the content3 E.g. Text, image, movie, sound, music etc.4 E.g. 1,000 film clips, 2 million pages, 20,000 books etc.5 E.g. Format - JPEG, MPEG, Quicktime, HTML, PDF etc., Quality – Resolution, sampling rate, colour/greyscale etc.6 Access rights to use the content in the proposed project e.g. public domain or license7 Describe current users <strong>of</strong> the content, including the number (e.g. registered users)8 Describe fields, languages and structure <strong>of</strong> the metadata23/03/10 v11 25


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3 Pilot BHLANDATAfrom SIOSEGN Vector GeographicInformationSystem fortheCommunitaryAgriculturalPolicyGN Vector Cadastre ESRI:microstation(dgn)GN Vector VegetationSeries Map <strong>of</strong>Navarre at1:25.000 scaleGN Vector CombustibleModels Map<strong>of</strong> Navarre at1:25.000 scaleGN Vector AgrologicalClasses Map<strong>of</strong> Navarre at1:100.000scaleGN Vector LandCartographyMap <strong>of</strong>Navarre at1:25.000 scaleGN Vector AgrologicalClasses andSubclassesMap <strong>of</strong>Navarre at1:25.000 scaleGN Vector IrrigationLand ClassesESRI: shape Public Used as basis for the European help to theagricultural sector.PublicBasic information on urban and rural plotsused by tax <strong>of</strong>ficers and in propertytransactions.ESRI: shape Public Used to determine the potential vegetation<strong>of</strong> an area independently from its currentuse.ESRI: shape Public Basic information to get risk indices relatedto fire risks in forestry areas.ESRI: shape Public Used for the elaboration <strong>of</strong> land planningstrategies for Navarre’s territory.ESRI: shape Public Basic information used as start point for thegeneration <strong>of</strong> irrigation land classes andsubclasses maps, as well as agrologicalclasses and subclasses maps.Yes Spanish Created in 2003 and yearly updated.It constitutes the cartographic basisfor the European agriculturalfinancing.Yes SpanishYes Spanish Characterization <strong>of</strong> potentialvegetation and its substitutive series,based on climatic, edafologic andtopographic data.Yes Spanish Based on Rothermel models adaptedto Navarre’s territory, on the MCAcartography and on the vegetationseries map.Yes Spanish It reflects the production capacity <strong>of</strong>the land and the risk <strong>of</strong> losing suchcapacity. The used method for thedetermination <strong>of</strong> the agrologicalclasses <strong>of</strong> Navarre at 1:100.000 scaleis based on the system initiallydesigned by the USDA (factorsranges method), although lateradapted to the conditions that can befound in the area <strong>of</strong> study.Yes Spanish Currently being executed, notcomplete for Navarre yet. Elaboratedfrom field work, lab samples analysisand orthophotography 3Dphotointerpretation by using the SoilTaxonomy classification method.ESRI: shape Public Information on land agronomical aptitude. Yes Spanish Achieved from land maps, slopemaps, MCA and rainfall maps.ESRI: shape Public Information on land aptitude for irrigation. Yes Spanish Achieved from land maps, slopemaps and MCA.23/03/10 v11 26


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3 Pilot BHLANDATAIGN-CNIGIGN-CNIGEEA/IGN-CNIGVectorVectorVectorandSubclassesMap <strong>of</strong>Navarre at1:100.000scaleSpanish LandCoverInformationSystem(SIOSE)SIOSE (LandCover andUseInformationSystem <strong>of</strong>Spain)CORINELANDCOVER <strong>of</strong>Spain 2006GISAT Vector M24/M26 -ImperviousAreasGISAT Vector M21/M25 –generic landcover /ESRI:geodatabaseGeodatabase<strong>of</strong> ESRI,Acces <strong>of</strong>Geomedia(INTERGRAPH), GML -1:25.000 scaleESRI: shape1:100.000scaleESRIGeodatabaseESRIGeodatabaseExistingagreement onthedistributionpolicy forSIOSEproductsExistingagreement onthedistributionpolicy forSIOSEproductsMost important foreseen uses are:- Dinamical studies on land cover topics- Environmental impact assessment- Obtention <strong>of</strong> environmental indicators- Maintenance and observation <strong>of</strong> theecological stability- Land planning- Integration within environmentalmodels- New management strategies in coastzones- Sustainable development promotion- Causes and consequences <strong>of</strong> natural orartificial processesMost important foreseen uses are:- Dinamical studies on land cover topics- Environmental impact assessment- Obtention <strong>of</strong> environmental indicators- Maintenance and observation <strong>of</strong> theecological stability- Land planning- Integration within environmental models- New management strategies in coast zones- Sustainable development promotion- Causes and consequences <strong>of</strong> natural orartificial processesYes Spanish SIOSE fits in the frame <strong>of</strong> theSpanish National TerritoryObservation Plan (PNOT),coordinated by the NationalGeographic Institute <strong>of</strong> Spain (IGN)and the National Centre <strong>of</strong>Geographical Information (CENIG).It is an information on the land usethroughout Spain at a 1:25.000 scale,including one unique geometric layermaking use <strong>of</strong> a conceptualnormalized data model, beinginteroperable and harmonizedaccording to the ISO19101.Yes,accordingto ISO19115 /ISO19139Public The Community´s enviroment policy Yes,accordingto ISO19115PublicPublic- urban sprawl monitoring and assessment- spatial planning- agriculture intensity monitoring- water quality modeling- multipurpose useSpanishEnglishyes English /Czechyes English /CzechSIOSE fits in the frame <strong>of</strong> theSpanish National TerritoryObservation Plan (PNOT),coordinated by the NationalGeographic Institute <strong>of</strong> Spain (IGN)and the National Centre <strong>of</strong>Geographical Information (CNIG).SIOSE include one unique geometriclayer making use <strong>of</strong> a conceptualnormalized data modeel, objectoriented, being interoperable andharmonized according to theISO19101ESA GSE GSELAND based dataESA GSE GSELAND based data23/03/10 v11 27


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3 Pilot BHLANDATAagricultureuse extensionGISAT Vector M11 – UrbanAtlasGISAT Raster FTSP SoilSealingGISAT Vector Corine LandCoverCENIA Vector CENIA(GISATGeoPortal &subcontracWeb Servicestor)AGI Vector GDB10LT –scale 1:10000(hidrography, transportand streetnetworks,administrativeboundaries,forests, urbanareas)AGI Vector GDB50LT –scale 1:50000(hidrography, transportand streetESRIGeodatabasePublic - urban planning yes English /CzechESA GSE GSELAND based dataGeoTIFF EEA 9 licence - urban sprawl assessmentyes English EO based GMES FTSP data focused- soil sealing intensity monitoringon urban sprawl and soil sealing- run-<strong>of</strong>f modellingintensity monitoringESRI EEA 10 licence - multipurpose use yes English Pan-European LC/LU layer managedGeodatabaseby EEA.ESRI Public 11 Governmental and public support in yes Czech CENIA is organisation acting underGeodatabaseintegrated assessment <strong>of</strong> environment issuesthe auspices <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong> theviain the spatial planning contextEnvironment. The objective <strong>of</strong>WMS/WFSCENIA is to provide information onthe environment enabling the publicto get a comprehensive view <strong>of</strong> thecondition and sustainability <strong>of</strong> theenvironment. More then 50 thematiclayers relevant to land cover / landuse domain are provided via WebAny OGRvector formatAny OGRvector formatLicensed byNational LandServiceLicensed byNational LandServiceCurrently used as base-map data layer insmall-scale cartography, planning,environment, agriculture, and urbanproducts and applications.Currently used as base-map data layer inmedium- or large-scale cartography,planning, environment, agriculture, andurban products and applications.INGISstandard(national)INGISstandard(national)LithuanianLithuanianServices.Will be used as high-resolutionreference for development <strong>of</strong>statistical sampling frameworkWill be used as a standard vectordataset for production <strong>of</strong> essentialGSE layers (Water, Forest, SoilSealing), as well as mediumresolutionstatistical samplingframework and masking operations9 EEA data distribution policy - Data Dissemination Agreement to be applied10 EEA data distribution policy - Data Dissemination Agreement to be applied11 Some restriction can apply for other then Web Service use23/03/10 v11 28


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3 Pilot BHLANDATAnetworks,administrativeboundaries,forests, bogs,open soilareas, urbanareas)AGI Raster ORT10LT-2005 (colorort<strong>of</strong>otoimagry scale1:10 000referenceyear 2005)AGI Vector CORINELand Cover2006AGI Raster IMAGE2006(SPOT-4and IRS-6images)SEASEASEAVectorpolygonVectorhierarchy<strong>of</strong> point,polygonorregionaltopologyVectorpointCORINElandcoverCLC1990CLC2000CLC2006at 1:100.000scaleSettlementsSIDLA2001SIDLA2010at scale 1:50.000PopulationCENSUS2001,Any OGRraster formatAny OGRvector formatAny OGRraster formatLicensed byNational LandServiceLicensed byEnvironmentProtectionAgencyLicensed byEnvironmentProtectionAgencyCurrently used as base-map data layer insmall-scale cartography, planning,environment, agriculture, urban, emergencyand military applications, as well as qualitycontrol <strong>of</strong> various GIS/RS datasets.Currently used mostly for medium- orlarge-scale environmental applications andscientific researchCurrently used mostly for medium- orlarge-scale environmental applications andscientific researchESRI: shape, Public output from the international project;several application in urban planning, soilerosion, flood prevention, censusmanagement, water quality in lakes etc.ESRI:ArcInfocoverage orgeodatabasePublicbackground for census activities and anyapplications linked with administrativedistricts/regions ; applications inepidemiology, transport optimisation,environment protectionESRI: shape Public output from census that is regurarly doneeach decenium (10y); applications inepidemiology, transport optimisation,yes - Will be used as high-resolutionancillary data for photo-interpretation<strong>of</strong> satellite images and quality control<strong>of</strong> vector and raster datasetsYes,INSPIREcompliantYes,INSPIREcompliantEnglishWill be used as ancillary data forproduction <strong>of</strong> CMS Land Cover- Will be used as supplementary source<strong>of</strong> information duringphotointerpretationYes English It is an up to date information onCLC within SLOVAK territory at1:100.000 scale, including a legend<strong>of</strong> classes distributed into covergroups.http://www.sazp.sk/corineYes Slovak http://atlas.sazp.sk/zsj/zsj/info.htmlYes Slovak http://atlas.sazp.sk/zsj/zsj/info.html23/03/10 v11 29


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3 Pilot BHLANDATASEAVectorpolygonCENSUS2010attribute infolinked tosettlementshierarchywasteproductionWASTE1996WASTE1997WASTE1998WASTE1999WASTE2000WASTE2001WASTE2002WASTE2003WASTE2004TDF Vector Corine LandCoverenvironment protectionESRI: shape partly Public registry <strong>of</strong> waste production according toBasel convention, several categories <strong>of</strong>wastes anounced on regular periodESRIGeodatabaseNo Slovakwebmaphttp://atlas.sazp.sk/zsjhttp://enviroportal.sk/odpad/verejne-informacie.phpEEA 12 licence - multipurpose use yes English Pan-European LC/LU layer managedby EEA.12 EEA data distribution policy - Data Dissemination Agreement to be applied23/03/10 v11 30


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAB2.2. Long term viabilityLong term impact at European levelAs it has been already explained, this project will undoubtedly imply a strong impact in the EuropeanCountries or Regions participating in the implementation <strong>of</strong> the pilot projects defined. Thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> harmonized Land Cover and Land Use Databases freely accessible throughinteroperable web services, together with the added-value <strong>of</strong> the implementation <strong>of</strong> high-level servicesproviding further functionalities, will certainly suppose a great step forward in the way towards theharmonization and fully interoperability <strong>of</strong> the geographical information systems and databases at aEuropean Level. Moreover, these newly developed services will be specifically aimed at a concretetarget user, already defined as intermediate-level user and with well-determined characteristics andneeds.In addition, the experience and knowledge collected along the project through the implementation <strong>of</strong>the different Work Packages planned, jointly with the different features <strong>of</strong> each pilot project, willproduce as a result very useful public guidelines and best practices for further initiatives developed onsuch area, which may be used in the future by other public or private organizations as well as policystakeholders. The usage <strong>of</strong> the HLANDATA results and experience for the coming INSPIRE activitiesis expected to be very advantageous.Although the aforementioned relevant consequences <strong>of</strong> the HLANDATA project are indeed veryimportant, the expected long term impact will not be achieved if the dissemination activities plannedfor the obtained results are poor. For such reason, the Consortium is made up <strong>of</strong> public and privatepartners that can assure the dissemination <strong>of</strong> the project results, not only at local level, but also at aEuropean level and to the public and private sector as well as to European geographic informationpolicy makers. The dissemination plan <strong>of</strong> the project, to be led by ISOCARP, with the support andcooperation <strong>of</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> the partners within the Consortium, will collect all the activities to assure theimpact <strong>of</strong> the project results in a long term.Viability and sustainabilityThe set <strong>of</strong> newly developed pilot services conceived as final results <strong>of</strong> the HLANDATA Project showthemselves as public services aimed at providing high-quality functionalities to the citizens <strong>of</strong> theirrespective geographical areas. It seems reasonable to make a distinction between two different kinds<strong>of</strong> viability issues to be taken into account:- Technical viabilityThe technical viability <strong>of</strong> the HLANDATA proposal gets ensured by the fact that all foreseendevelopments to be undertaken plan to make use <strong>of</strong> already existing technologies (mainly matureinformation management and computing technologies). As already stated when referring to thematurity <strong>of</strong> the technical solution adopted, the activities to be carried out in the frame <strong>of</strong> theHLANDATA work plan do not imply any specific difficulty from a technological point <strong>of</strong> view,whereas the key point to deal with will be rather related to functional and organizational issues.In addition to this, the involvement <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> public bodies and technological companies with wellknownand proved expertise and long experience in the field <strong>of</strong> Geographical Information Servicesreinforces the strengths <strong>of</strong> the HLANDATA technical proposal, contributing to its positiveperspectives in terms <strong>of</strong> technical viability.- Financial viability23/03/10 v11 31


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAAll the public and private entities participating in the HLANDATA project have the necessaryfinancial resources (50%) in order to assume their assigned tasks within the project. The execution <strong>of</strong>the project is therefore assured, if it is finally selected by the EC.After the conclusion <strong>of</strong> the foreseen tasks and once the pilot projects have been implemented, thefinancial viability <strong>of</strong> the HLANDATA final results should be guaranteed.The project pilots to be implemented will be maintained by the pilot owners in each <strong>of</strong> the cases, theservices being financially supported by these. The reason for this is that the pilot project owners areinterested in maintaining these pilot projects running even after the end <strong>of</strong> the project, as they willprovide functionalities which will help the entities in their day to day work, or will put the basis forfurther developments to be carried out by the pilot owners in the framework <strong>of</strong> INSPIRE. This is thecase for example <strong>of</strong> the• Pilots 2.1, 2.2 and 3, which will be developed in Czech Republic, Lithuania and Slovakia, andwhich have very high interest for these countries’ public administrations as they address theirday to day needs in some fields. Moreover, the pilots will give these administrationsinvaluable experience in order to be prepared to make the transposition <strong>of</strong> INSPIRE once itcomes into force in the subjects <strong>of</strong> interest for the project.• Pilot 1, which will provide some advanced functionalities which are <strong>of</strong> interest for the publicadministrations developing them, but also for external users which will have easier access tothe data <strong>of</strong> interest avoiding the bureaucratic procedures that many times have to be carriedout in order to get access to some data.Regarding the strong commitment <strong>of</strong> all the members <strong>of</strong> the Consortium in terms <strong>of</strong> the financialviability <strong>of</strong> the project, it is worth mentioning that all partners have been managing Land Use andLand Cover information for many diverse goals at regional and national levels along a significantperiod <strong>of</strong> time. The HLANDATA project represents for all participating organizations a greatopportunity to improve the dissemination and impact <strong>of</strong> the previously carried work in this area,reinforcing its consistency as contributing to its alignment with the most innovative Europeaninitiatives on this matter.In order to be able to manage the access to the implemented services in terms <strong>of</strong> user’s categories orinterests and to keep control on the particular pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the these users, the requirement for registrationfor the users <strong>of</strong> such services has been foreseen.ScalabilityScalability is one <strong>of</strong> the main concepts behind the objectives <strong>of</strong> the HLANDATA project. The aim <strong>of</strong>harmonizing different web services providing access to geographic information databases throughoutEurope means in fact the implementation <strong>of</strong> their respective scalability to be integrated with eachother. Such scalability will allow the coordination <strong>of</strong> individual or geographically isolated initiatives inthe context <strong>of</strong> an expected European geographic information system. The efforts committed to suchcoordination will also set the main guidelines to be followed by other European entities from the GISsector in order to adapt their own services and conventions to a newly developed Europeanframework.B.2.3. Wider deployment and useMaintenance <strong>of</strong> the solution and exploitation plansThe envisaged web services and high-level applications to be delivered as results <strong>of</strong> the HLANDATAproject will on their own be an extension and deployment <strong>of</strong> the currently existing services providingaccess to Land Cover and Land Use Geographic Information Systems in different European countriesand territories.23/03/10 v11 32


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAEach one <strong>of</strong> the public or private entities participating in the HLANDATA project as content providerswill also become end users <strong>of</strong> the achieved services and functionalities, with the already pointedpeculiarity that the intermediate-level users <strong>of</strong> such kind <strong>of</strong> implemented solutions will be specificallyconceived as target users <strong>of</strong> the delivered applications.The usefulness <strong>of</strong> the different web services and pilot projects, together with the public or semi-publicnature <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the entities involved in the project, assure on the one hand the maintenance andfinancial viability in the future <strong>of</strong> the services, and on the other hand the free deployment <strong>of</strong> theachieved objectives and functionalities through a variety <strong>of</strong> ways. Each partner will be in charge forthe support and economical maintenance <strong>of</strong> the web services and high-level applications after the end<strong>of</strong> the project, which is in any case not problematic, provided the extraordinary benefits to be extractedby the partners from the successful accomplishment <strong>of</strong> the project objectives. At the end <strong>of</strong> the project,each <strong>of</strong> the pilot owners will develop an exploitation plan (task 4.3 within WP4) aimed at assessingand explaining the way the pilots will be adapted to an operational version aimed at giving stable andcontinuous service to the end users <strong>of</strong> these pilots. Due to the public nature <strong>of</strong> the partners developingthe pilots, these exploitation plans will not be led by the objective <strong>of</strong> getting a financial benefit fromthe exploitation <strong>of</strong> the pilots, but they will look into the ways <strong>of</strong> integrating the pilots in an operationalway in the systems they already run giving a public service to those interested parties.HLANDATA project will also be a reference initiative towards the INSPIRE transposition regardingthe Land use and Land Cover data. The experience gained in the project will be highly relevant for thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> the implementation rules and therefore the project results will be a valuable input forthis. This is why among its deliverables the project will deliver guidelines and recommendations forthe European countries for the establishment <strong>of</strong> the harmonization <strong>of</strong> their Land Use/Land Cover Dataand the development <strong>of</strong> their Land Use/Land Cover Data sharing Infrastructures.23/03/10 v11 33


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATASection B3. ImplementationB3.1. Consortium and key personnelConsortium as a whole:The European Consortium committed to the development <strong>of</strong> the HLANDATA Project is made up <strong>of</strong> awell balanced group <strong>of</strong> public and private partnership comprised <strong>of</strong> 9 partners coming from 6 differentEuropean countries, with the aim <strong>of</strong> cooperating for the successful accomplishment <strong>of</strong> the plannedobjectives <strong>of</strong> the project.All the organizations involved in the project are well known stakeholders with recognized expertise inthe geographic information field and in the concrete knowledge areas addressed by HLANDATAProject. The Consortium includes among its partners several entities acting as content providers(Government <strong>of</strong> Navarre, National Geographic Institute <strong>of</strong> Spain, Institute <strong>of</strong> Aerial Geodesy <strong>of</strong>Lithuania, Latvian Technology Development Forum, GISAT and the Slovak Environmental Agency)providing the critical mass <strong>of</strong> content necessary for the project development. Regarding the necessarypresence <strong>of</strong> end users for the Pilot Projects’ validation, all the aforementioned content providers willalso play the role as final users <strong>of</strong> the developed web services and pilot applications. This is the usualdouble role played by public administrations in the field <strong>of</strong> geographic information, as they are at thesame time the owners <strong>of</strong> the geographical information and the main end users <strong>of</strong> this data for their dayto day activities.Other partners such as TRACASA and CEIT ALANOVA will play a differentiate role. They aretechnology experts playing the role <strong>of</strong> technology providers within the project, supporting the contentproviders in developing their pilot projects. CEIT Alanova, will also play the specific role <strong>of</strong> being anend user for several <strong>of</strong> the pilots, while ISOCARP will manly carry out tasks related to thedissemination activities and the validation <strong>of</strong> the achieved results. The next table shows the roles thateach <strong>of</strong> the partners will be playing in the project:Participant Participant organisation name Country Roleno.*1 (Coordinator)Gobierno de Navarra – Departamentode Desarrollo Rural y Medio AmbienteSpain - Content provider forPilot 1- End user for Pilot 12 (Participant) Trabajos Catastrales S.A. Spain - Technology provider for3 (Participant) Instituto Geográfico Nacional – CentroNacional de Información GeográficaSpainPilot 1- Content provider forPilot 1- End user for Pilot 14 (Participant) UAB Aerogeodezijos Institutas Lithuania - Content provider forPilot 2- End user for Pilot 25 (Participant) GISAT Czech Rep. - Content provider forPilot 2- End user for Pilot 26 (Participant) Technology Development Forum Latvia - Content Provider forPilot 1- End user for Pilot 17 (Participant) Slovak Environmental Agency Slovakia - Content provider forPilot 3- End user for Pilot 323/03/10 v11 34


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATA8 (Participant) CEIT ALANOVA Austria - Technology provider forPilots 1, 2 and 3.9 (Participant) ISOCARP Netherlands - Dissemination <strong>of</strong> projectresults, end user andvalidator for Pilot 2Apart from these partners, the Czech organization CENIA (the Czech Environmental InformationAgency) is also supporting HLANDATA. The National Land Service <strong>of</strong> Lithuania, under the ministry<strong>of</strong> agriculture also supports the project.It is guaranteed that for each one <strong>of</strong> the pilot projects to be developed in each participating EuropeanCountry or Territory, there will be a suitable group <strong>of</strong> organizations including the necessarystakeholders in the value chain in order for the pilot project goals to be fulfilled, as it is shown next:PILOT 1 PILOT 2 PILOT 3SPAIN / LATVIA CZECH REP / LITHUANIA SLOVAKIAGN, TRACASA,IGN/CNIG, TDFGISAT, AGISEAContentproviders:GNIGN/CNIGTDFTechnologyproviders:TRACASACEITEndusers:GNIGN/CNIGTDFContentproviders:GISAT, AGITechnologyproviders:CEITCENIAEndusers:GISAT, AGI,ISOCARPContentproviders:SEATechnologyproviders:CEITEndusers:SEAThe description <strong>of</strong> each partner and <strong>of</strong> the key people involved in the HLANDATA Project comesnext:Individual partners:PARTNER 1: GOVERNMENT OF NAVARRE (SPAIN)Partner description:The Government <strong>of</strong> Navarre (Gobierno de Navarra), an Autonomous Region in the North <strong>of</strong> Spain,has devoted a great deal <strong>of</strong> effort to the integration, management and dissemination <strong>of</strong> geographicinformation concerning the territory <strong>of</strong> Navarre. During the last years, they have been working toachieve a real Territorial Information System <strong>of</strong> Navarre (SITNA) configured as part <strong>of</strong> theCorporative Information System. This component makes available spatial data from several sources, inorder to provide services not only to the Public Administration but also to the citizens in a friendly andfree way. In this context, the Department <strong>of</strong> Rural Development and Environment contributes to suchcorporative initiative with many specially relevant actions, such as the Cultivations and Land CoverMap, pastures evaluation, potential vegetation and soils, all <strong>of</strong> them at detailed scales, continuous andup to date for the whole territory.Key staff CVs:Delia Sola, who will act as Project Coordinator, is Chief <strong>of</strong> the Section <strong>of</strong> Evaluation <strong>of</strong> AgriculturalResources within the Department <strong>of</strong> Rural Development and Environment <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong>Navarre. She holds an Agronomical Engineering Degree. Since 1986 she has been teacher in the23/03/10 v11 35


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAUniversity Engineering School <strong>of</strong> Technical Agricultural Engineers <strong>of</strong> Navarre, as well as associatedteacher at the Department <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Production <strong>of</strong> the Public University <strong>of</strong> Navarre. Since 1992she has been working at the Department <strong>of</strong> Rural Development and Environment <strong>of</strong> the Government<strong>of</strong> Navarre. She has collaborated with several research projects funded by the Government <strong>of</strong> Navarre,CICYT and other private companies. She is author or co-author <strong>of</strong> sixteen technical and scientificresearch publications. She has presented several contributions to Agricultural Congresses. Sheparticipates as representative <strong>of</strong> the General Direction <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Stockbreeding <strong>of</strong> theDepartment at the Navarre’s Commission <strong>of</strong> Climate Change, Land Planning, Territorial InformationSystem (SITNA) and National Plan <strong>of</strong> Remote Sensing and is in charge <strong>of</strong> his Regional statisticalprograms.Ana Mª Vicente, Leader <strong>of</strong> Pilot 1, is Technical Agricultural Engineer and Agronomical Engineer.She is Chief <strong>of</strong> the Agricultural Information Systems Section within the Department <strong>of</strong> RuralDevelopment and Environment. Among her duties she is in charge <strong>of</strong> the development andmanagement <strong>of</strong> the Agricultural Geographic Information System <strong>of</strong> Navarre. Since 1988 she has beenworking at the Department <strong>of</strong> Rural Development and Environment, making an important contributionon land cover cartography, studies on land characteristics, potential vegetation and pasturesevaluation, among others. She provided several contributions to congresses and scientific meetings.She has been a member <strong>of</strong> the work group on Agriculture <strong>of</strong> the Spanish SIOSE, representing Navarre,and she is currently a member <strong>of</strong> the work group on agricultural applications <strong>of</strong> remote sensing withinthe National Plan <strong>of</strong> Remote Sensing, as well as a member <strong>of</strong> the Technical Committee <strong>of</strong> SITNA.Fernando Alonso-Pastor is Biologist and Master in Geographical Information Systems ProjectsDirection. He is from 1996 Head <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Information Unit at the DG Environment andWater <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> Navarre. He launched in 1991 the design and implementation <strong>of</strong> theEnvironmental Information System <strong>of</strong> Navarra, which was the first departmental information systemcreated at the Government <strong>of</strong> Navarra. He is the main responsible for the Biodiversity DataInfrastructure.Cecilia Osácar is Technical Agricultural Engineer and Biologist. She develops duties as Chief <strong>of</strong> theEnvironmental Control Negotiate, supervising the environmental aspects <strong>of</strong> the agricultural actions <strong>of</strong>the Government <strong>of</strong> Navarre. She has been collaborating with several works in the field <strong>of</strong> ThematicCartography since 1985. She is a Member <strong>of</strong> Navarra’s Energy and Water Forum as well, on behalf <strong>of</strong>the Department <strong>of</strong> Rural Development and Environment.PARTNER 2: TRABAJOS CATASTRALES S.A. - TRACASA (SPAIN)Partner description:TRACASA is a public company dedicated to providing mapping and cadastre services, as well asdeveloping and implementing information systems in the field <strong>of</strong> Territorial Engineering andInformation and Communication Technologies. The main activity lines are based on spatial data:systems production, data management and spatial tools development. It has a large experience in thedeployment <strong>of</strong> platforms for the exploitation <strong>of</strong> spatial data. European Projects in which TRACASA iscurrently participating are:- EURADIN – European Addresses Infrastructure - eContentplus Program- NATURE SDIplus – eContentplus Program- CINESPACE – VI Frame ProgramKey staff CVs:María Cabello is Director <strong>of</strong> European Projects. She has 25 years experience in information systemsmanagement and more than 18 years involved in GIS projects and spatial information withinTRACASA. Over the last five years she has been in charge <strong>of</strong> European projects, representing the23/03/10 v11 36


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATACompany in Europe and participating in several activities at global level. She will coordinate theactivities <strong>of</strong> TRACASA in the project and support coordination team.Isabel Goñi, Leader <strong>of</strong> Work Package 2 and Project Technical Coordinator, holds a MSc inAgricultural Engineering from the Public University <strong>of</strong> Navarre (2003), together with a Postgraduateprogram: Geo-information studies from the Van Hall Instituut in Groningen in 2002. She is aSenior GIS project manager and has a broad experience in the management, coordination andimplementation <strong>of</strong> governmental GIS projects. She has been involved in large international projectssuch as Crossis and EURADIN as team leader and expert.Ana Leránoz is in charge for the Area <strong>of</strong> Territorial Engineering <strong>of</strong> the Information SystemsDepartment <strong>of</strong> TRACASA, having more than 23 years experience in the management <strong>of</strong> territorialprojects related to remote sensing and IGS tools: agricultural statistics (Mars Project Action VI),territorial planning, Land Cover mapping (CORINE Land Cover, SIOSE, MCA), temporal changesdetection, cartography and so on. She currently coordinates a work team made up <strong>of</strong> 25 technicianscarrying out IGS and remote sensing projects.Félix del Barrio is responsible for the Section <strong>of</strong> Land Cover Projects within the Area <strong>of</strong> TerritorialEngineering <strong>of</strong> TRACASA, having 15 years-experience in the direction and execution <strong>of</strong> projectsrelated to land cover themes, making use <strong>of</strong> remote sensing tools and photointerpretation <strong>of</strong> imagesand ortophotos. The main project he implemented consisted <strong>of</strong> elaborating a Map <strong>of</strong> Cultivations andLand Uses in Navarra, which still remains nowadays as the most accurate one. He also took part in theSIOSE Navarra project, as well as in the MCA based on the historical ortophoto from 1956.PARTNER 3: NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE (SPAIN)Partner description:The National Geographic Institute <strong>of</strong> Spain (Instituto Geográfico Nacional, IGN) is the NationalAuthority for Cartography and the National Agency <strong>of</strong> the Central Public Administration with themandate <strong>of</strong> ensuring the execution <strong>of</strong> geographical information policy, whereas National Centre <strong>of</strong>Geographic Information (Centro Nacional de Información Geográfica, CNIG) has the role <strong>of</strong> theparticipation in research programs, technological development and innovation, following Europeanand national guidelines and the duty to distribute all the geographical products and give technical andcommercial assessment concerns. The different departments <strong>of</strong> CNIG/IGN deal with projects as thenational base cartography and are involved in data exchange and fulfilment <strong>of</strong> data quality: seismicdatabases, geodesic services, etc.CNIG/IGN has been developing different projects to establish a common data model for managingnational geographic information, in order to integrate and interoperate within different data <strong>of</strong> Nationaland Regional Spanish administrations, satisfying the INSPIRE Directive and the requirements <strong>of</strong>National/Regional Administrations combining bottom-up & top-down approaches (integrating datafrom different sources at different scales).Key staff CVs:Nuria Valcárcel, Leader <strong>of</strong> Work Package 1, is Head <strong>of</strong> Land Cover / Land Use Department (LC/LU)within IGN Spain and Leader <strong>of</strong> CLC and SIOSE projects in Spain, with experience in the design <strong>of</strong>Object Oriented Spatial Data Models. She has long experience in GIS and Remote Sensing projects,with an active participation in several International and European projects such as GMES Urban Atlas,and UNEP/MAP Information System Activities. She is Coordinator <strong>of</strong> Spanish SDIC (Spatial DataInterest Community) relative to LC/LU.Antonio Arozarena, Assistant Manager Cartographic Production, IGN Spain. Project Leader <strong>of</strong>National Plan for Observation Territory (PNOT). Project Manager <strong>of</strong> National and International23/03/10 v11 37


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATARemote Sensing projects in IGN-Spain such as: MEDBEOGASE, ETC/CL, CORINE , LACOAST,MURBANDY, etc. Active membership <strong>of</strong> AET, SELPER, EARSEL, ASTIC, IPGH and EuroSDR.Responsible <strong>of</strong> the design <strong>of</strong> SIOSE Object Oriented Land Cover Data Model. Great experience inCartography and Remote Sensing projects.Guillermo Villa, Head <strong>of</strong> Remote Sensing Department. IGN Spain. Has participated in several LandCover Projects: Corine Land Cover 90, CLC 2000, Medgeobase Maroc, etc. Participated in thedefinition <strong>of</strong> SIOSE Project and in the design <strong>of</strong> SIOSE Object Oriented Land Cover Data Model.Experience in topographic map generalization. Member <strong>of</strong> technical team in Spanish OrthophotoProgram (PNOA). Leader <strong>of</strong> Spanish National Remote Sensing Program.Mª Ángeles Benito, Section Head in Land Cover/Land Use Department, IGN Spain, has participatedin LC/LU European/national projects, such as SIOSE and CLC.PARTNER 4: INSTITUTE OF AERIAL GEODESY (LITHUANIA)Partner description:A precursor <strong>of</strong> the joint stock company “Institute <strong>of</strong> Aerial Geodesy” <strong>of</strong> Lithuania was established forthe Soviet land reform. During its fifty years <strong>of</strong> existence it became a main mapping centre inLithuania. The main target <strong>of</strong> the enterprise was the production <strong>of</strong> maps using aerial photographs inorder to create maps for land cadastre and inventory <strong>of</strong> farming lands. The whole territory <strong>of</strong> 352thousand square kilometres was covered by cadastre and land use maps at 1:10 000 scale (updatedevery 10 years). Maps at 1:25 000 scale and 1:50 000 scale were also prepared.After the restitution <strong>of</strong> Lithuania’s Independence in 1990, the Institute started to function as centre <strong>of</strong>topographic mapping and was renamed as State Institute <strong>of</strong> Aerial Photogeodesy.In 1996, the Institute was reorganized into the joint stock company “Institute <strong>of</strong> Aerial Geodesy”(UAB Aerogeodezijos Institutas, AGI). Modernizing its production lines and applying newtechnologies, AGI became one <strong>of</strong> the most modern cartography companies in Baltic States with morethan 160 employees. Its main activities correspond to the production technologies used nowadays andcartographic products at worldwide level.Key staff CVs:Dr. Gediminas Vaitkus, Leader <strong>of</strong> Work Package 4 and Leader <strong>of</strong> Pilot 2.2, is Manager <strong>of</strong> AppliedResearch Centre and active researcher, and has not only a considerable scientific background inecology and eco-informatics (> 30 scientific publications), but also a deep knowledge and experiencein the fields <strong>of</strong> general IT, GIS, Remote Sensing and information systems design. He has got expertknowledge <strong>of</strong> Open Source operating systems and applications. He has been involved in dozens <strong>of</strong>large international projects as team leader and expert.Gintaras Rumšas, Technical Director, has broad experience in management <strong>of</strong> spatial data productionprocess, development <strong>of</strong> technical specifications for spatial databases and cartographic products, aswell as management <strong>of</strong> technical quality control process. Experience <strong>of</strong> project management workingwith foreign partners.Vitalijus Kalenda, Production Director, has former experience in coordinating military cartographicproduction projects and currently manages all the GIS and remote sensing production work at thecompany. Expert in cartographic standards and quality control process. Experience <strong>of</strong> projectmanagement working with foreign partners.Asta Kairienė, Database production team leader, coordinates the final stage <strong>of</strong> GIS and cartographicproduction process. Expert in photo-interpretation, cartographic standards and quality control process.23/03/10 v11 38


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATARimanta Valaitienė, Expert in photogrammetry with long-term experience in, photointerpretation andprocessing <strong>of</strong> high-resolution optical and laser-scanning data, stereoscopic photo-interpretation, aswell as quality control <strong>of</strong> high resolution optical imagery and digital elevation datasets.Evgenia Gurova works as Researcher at the Applied Research Center and has good skills in projectmanagement and international cooperation, as well as pr<strong>of</strong>essional knowledge in the fields <strong>of</strong>geoinformatics, remote sensing and design <strong>of</strong> internet information systems. Advanced user skills inOpen Source operating systems and applications. Scientific experience in marine remote sensing andoceanology. Practical experience in photo-interpretation and processing <strong>of</strong> optical satellite imagery.Experience <strong>of</strong> project management working with foreign partners. Excellent communication skills.Andrey Jeliseev, Researcher at the Applied Research Center, has pr<strong>of</strong>essional background ingeophysics and mathematical cartography. Long-term experience in photo-interpretation and qualitycontrol <strong>of</strong> high-resolution mapping products, including radar satellite imagery. Experience in OpenSource operating systems and applications. Excellent researcher capabilities.PARTNER 5: GISAT (CZ)Partner description:GISAT, operating since 1990, is the first privately run Remote Sensing and Geoinformation ServiceCompany in the Czech Republic. The mission <strong>of</strong> the company is to provide its clients with wide range<strong>of</strong> value-added, complete, high-quality and ‘state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art’ geoinformation services based on theEarth Observation technology. The service portfolio extends from satellite data and geomaticss<strong>of</strong>tware distribution, through specialized image & GIS data processing and analysis, up to advancedgeoinformation products and services.GISAT is an SME sized company comprised <strong>of</strong> small core team <strong>of</strong> 15 permanent staff and extensivenetwork <strong>of</strong> supporting multidisciplinary experts for specifically oriented tasks. The educationalbackground <strong>of</strong> the GISAT team is in agriculture, cartography, geography and natural sciences, landmanagement, surveying and informatics. All the staff members are holding MSc. Degree orequivalent.The application <strong>of</strong> satellite data mapping for environmental monitoring and assessment is one <strong>of</strong> thekey activities <strong>of</strong> the company. In particular, GISAT experts have been involved for more than a decadein European land monitoring activities (e.g. CORINE Land Cover Programme) and various LC/LUdata applications including land accounting and agro-environmental indicator development.With respect to the HLANDATA project, two more relevant activities shall be mentioned:1) Participation in EEA “Working Group for Object Oriented CLC model development” led by IGNSpain (as CZ NRC together with CENIA). Activity aims at the harmonization <strong>of</strong> national land cover /land use models based on the SIOSE experiences.2) Participation in ESA/EEA joint project SOSI (Spatial Observation Services and Infrastructure) ledby Siemens Austria. The aim <strong>of</strong> SOSI is to demonstrate the innovative technology <strong>of</strong> ESA SSE andservice concepts within the context <strong>of</strong> the European Shared Environmental Information System. SSEallows the integration <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> heterogeneous EO and GIS services.It is also important to highlight GISAT’s presence in previous Land Cover / Land Use activities (oncontent side) – SAGE, GUS, GSELAND, its current participation in GEOLAND2 and GlobCORINE,as well as being a partner in the ETCLUSI - European Topic Link for Land Use and Spatial Analysisinvolved in CLC update support (technical team member), land use data centre development landaccounting framework development.Key staff CVs:23/03/10 v11 39


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATATomas Soukup, Leader <strong>of</strong> Work Package 3 and Leader <strong>of</strong> Pilot 2.1, holds a MSc. in Geodesy,Cartography and GIS/RS from the Czech Technical University in Prague. He has more than 15 years<strong>of</strong> experience in spatial data integration, visual interpretation and digital processing <strong>of</strong> satelliteimagery and spatial data processing and analysis within GIS environment. He is involved in Europeanland cover/land use mapping programmes since 1994, first as RS/GIS expert for Czech Republic andSlovakia (CORINE Land Cover programme), from 1997 then as LC expert in various internationalactivities as well as within GMES. He is a member <strong>of</strong> I&CLC2006 Technical team (as part <strong>of</strong> ETC-LUSI), responsible for technical QA/QC and data integration. Besides, he has strong expertise inapplications <strong>of</strong> land cover/land use datasets including land accounting and indicator development.Main domains <strong>of</strong> interest include environmental applications and agro-environment issues. He haslong term experience project coordination & project management within international teamenvironment (various EC and ESA projects – ETCLUSI, GSELAND, GEOLAND2, …).Katerina Jupova holds a MSc. in Cartography and Geoinformatics from the Charles University inPrague. Her key qualifications include environmental indicators calculations and interpretations, GISanalysis in various s<strong>of</strong>tware environments, land cover and land use relevant tasks including visualinterpretation <strong>of</strong> satellite imagery, environmental accounting using land cover datasets, statisticalevaluation and interpretation <strong>of</strong> land cover data. Main domains <strong>of</strong> interest include environmentalapplications and agro-environment issues. She has been involved in number <strong>of</strong> domestic andinternational activities including ESA PECS and EEA projects as well as EC FP research cooperation(e.g. ETCLUSI, GSELAND).Jan Kolomazník holds a MSc. in Cartography, Geoinformatics, Remote Sensing, Database Systemsand Spatial Statistics from the Charles University in Prague (Czech Republic) in 2007. He isexperienced in spatial data integration, web service development, spatial data processing, analysiswithin GIS environment and accuracy assessment. He is familiar with working in internationalenvironment as well as with processing <strong>of</strong> large datasets, due to his extensive data production and datasupport experiences from FTSP Soil Sealing or SOSI projects.Miroslav Kopecky holds a MSc. in Geodesy and Cartography from the Czech Technical University<strong>of</strong> Prague. He has more than 15 years <strong>of</strong> experiences in GIS application & development and spatialdata integration. His key qualifications include land cover database integration, environmentalindicators development & application and large GIS datasets management. He has been involved inmany domestic and international projects (ETCLUSI, FTSP Soil Sealing, SOSI).Erika Orlitova holds a MSc. in Automatic Control Systems and GIS at the Czech TechnicalUniversity in Prague in 1987. She is a senior data manager experienced in GIS development andprogramming, satellite data processing and interpretation, geo-information assessment, spatial analysisand thematic mapping, taking a part in various domestic and international projects related to spatialdata processing. Erika is also experienced in utilization <strong>of</strong> GIS/RS Open Source projects leading aCzech part <strong>of</strong> FP6 CASCADOSS project.Vaclav Vobora holds a MSc. in Geomatics, Geodesy and Geoinformation Systems from University <strong>of</strong>West Bohemia in Pilsen (Czech Republic) in 2007. He is skilled in GIS application & developmentand spatial data integration including data modelling, programming and web services applications. Hehas been involved in many domestic and international projects (GSELAND, GEOLAND2, FTSP SoilSealing, SOSI).PARTNER 6: TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT FORUM – TDF (LATVIA)Partner description:23/03/10 v11 40


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAThe Latvian society "Technology Development Forum" was initially registered within the PublicOrganizations Register <strong>of</strong> the Latvian Register <strong>of</strong> Enterprises as “Technology DevelopmentFoundation”, on 10th March 2004. After deregistration in Association and Foundation Register on17th February 2005 its current status and title – Technology Development Forum (TDF) - has beenconfirmed.Since its foundation TDF has implemented a list <strong>of</strong> projects in accordance to the main priorities set forthis organization: education, applied science, society, entrepreneurship. As business development,especially promotion <strong>of</strong> innovative business and technological business, is one <strong>of</strong> TDF priorities, TDFparticipated in development <strong>of</strong> Technology park in Jelgava city (2005-2006) and participated inestablishment <strong>of</strong> two NGOs - "Science, innovation and testing centre"and "Science and technologicalcentre", both connected with Technology park and business incubator in JelgavaNetworking as one <strong>of</strong> the main tools for achieving results has become a part <strong>of</strong> all activities performedby TDF and through realised projects can be seen on local and international level. Local level initiallystarted from establishment <strong>of</strong> TDF, as itself it is a result <strong>of</strong> network <strong>of</strong> innovative institutions andexperts in Latvia, and later this network increased by partner institutions - state institutions, NGO's,local authorities etc. International network has been created and used for international projects andinternational initiatives and mainly involves partners from Baltic states and Europe, as well as formerSoviet states.ICT is one <strong>of</strong> the main topics for innovative business, therefore TDF has worked also in this field. Asas innitiative within last years can be mentioned internation project GRISI, that forecasteddevelopment <strong>of</strong> geomatic informative system. This system concers also development <strong>of</strong> touristicinitiatives as foreseend development <strong>of</strong> international data base including information for this sector.TDF’s members have also a broad experience in different fields, e.g. development <strong>of</strong> on-line learnings<strong>of</strong>tware tools for dissemination <strong>of</strong> knowledge, use <strong>of</strong> wireless sensors systems and processing <strong>of</strong>satellite data and satellite images for GIS applications.TDF’s partners have long experience with GIS developments towards SDI in the areas <strong>of</strong> tourism,rural development and environment protection working for different projects in a variety <strong>of</strong>organizations in Latvia.Key staff CVs:Kaspars Skalbergs, Project Manager; Member <strong>of</strong> the Board <strong>of</strong> TDF, holds a Diploma in Economics,University <strong>of</strong> Latvia; and a Masters Degree in Business Administration, University <strong>of</strong> Latvia. He hasbeen involved in numerous projects, such as: Phare 2002 Baltic Sea Region Programme Project“Galileo – a Constellation to Beacon the Way in the Baltics", 2005; Interreg IIIC projects “GeomaticRegional Information Society Initiative” – GRISI, 2005-2008 and “Development <strong>of</strong> EuropeanBusiness Advisor Training and Exchange” – DEBATE, 2005-2007; EEA grants seed fund project„Establishment <strong>of</strong> collaborative network for promotion and implementation <strong>of</strong> innovative & efficientrenewable energy technologies”, 2008.Sarmite Barvika, Expert, Deputy Head, Strategic and Development Department, Strategic PlanningDivision <strong>of</strong> The State Land Service <strong>of</strong> Latvia. He holds a Diploma <strong>of</strong> Architect, Faculty <strong>of</strong>Architecture and Building Construction, Riga Technical University, as well as an MBA in EuropeanUnion Law and Business, Riga Stradins University. His pr<strong>of</strong>essional experience includes architecturaldesign, territorial planning, and main responsibilities (real estate valuation, project development andmanagement, foreign cooperation) in SLS since 1998.Project experience: Land valuation project – 1998 – 2000, EULIS project – 2006-2007; EURADIN –2008; (participation in preparation <strong>of</strong> proposal); Plan4all – 2008-present (expert); Researches <strong>of</strong>Centre for European Union Studies – 2006-2008.Development <strong>of</strong> commercial, residential objects, detail planning in Riga region (2004-2008).23/03/10 v11 41


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAOther experts: Dr.Maris Alberts, Peteris Bruns.PARTNER 7: SLOVAK ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY – SEA (SLOVAKIA)Partner description:The Slovak Environmental Agency (SEA) is a pr<strong>of</strong>essional organization <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong> theEnvironment <strong>of</strong> the Slovak Republic (MoE SR) with nationwide scope <strong>of</strong> powers, which focuses onthe environment protection and landscape planning in accordance with the principles <strong>of</strong> sustainabledevelopment.SEA was established by the Decision <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Environment <strong>of</strong> the Slovak Republic <strong>of</strong> 17May 1993 as an agency <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Environment <strong>of</strong> the SR fully funded from the statebudget. Since 1 January 2001 it has been operating as a subsidized organisation receivingcontributions from MoE SR. In 2005 SEA was awarded the Quality Management System Certificateand the Environmental Management System Certificate in accordance with ISO 9001 and 14001standards.SEA provides the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment with expert and supporting documentation for draftstrategies, concepts, programmes and legal regulations; moreover it coordinates activities, holdsconferences, seminars, trainings, exhibitions and other events, compiles plans and assesses theirfulfilment, prepares or procures projects, standpoints, expert opinions, information and documents,provides pr<strong>of</strong>essional supervision over application <strong>of</strong> environmental legal regulations and expertactivities focused on fulfilment <strong>of</strong> commitments <strong>of</strong> the Slovak Republic resulting from internationalconventions, provides the Ministry with expert assistance in the harmonization <strong>of</strong> environmentallegislation <strong>of</strong> the Slovak Republic with regulations and procedures <strong>of</strong> the European Union andcooperates with concerned expert institutions in the Slovak Republic and abroad.Key staff CVs:Jan Tobik holds Dipl. Ing. in forestry with specialisation in forest cableways from the TechnicalUniversity in Zvolen. He has had more than 7 years <strong>of</strong> experiences in Geographical InformationSystems. He has been involved in CORINE Land Cover programme <strong>of</strong> Slovakia since 2005. His maindomains <strong>of</strong> interest are system administration <strong>of</strong> Metadata systems, implementation <strong>of</strong> INSPIREdirective in Slovak Republic, network services, open source projects and GIS applications.Nada Machkova holds MSc. in Geodesy and Cartography with specialisation in astronomicalgeodesy from the Slovak Technical University in Bratislava. She has more than 20 years <strong>of</strong>experiences in spatial data integration, visual interpretation and digital processing <strong>of</strong> satellite imagery,thematic mapping and spatial data processing and analysis within GIS environment. She is involved inCORINE Land Cover programme in Slovakia since 1998. Her main domains <strong>of</strong> interest are systemadministration <strong>of</strong> unix servers, network services, open source projects, implementation <strong>of</strong> satellitedatasets in environmental GIS applications.Peter Mozolík holds university degree in information science and ecology from University MatejaBela in Banská Bystrica. At university he specialized in XML technologies - XML, XSLT, XQUERY,XPATH etc.. After he graduated, he was employed in Slovak environmental agency as web developerand system analyst. He participated in IT projects concerning water qaulity management as systemanalyst preparing UML documentation. His main domain <strong>of</strong> interest are web technologies especialyXML technologies, system analysis - UML documentation, system integration, implementation <strong>of</strong>OGC standards.Jan Cimerman holds MSc. in Mechanical engineering with specialisation in instrumentation,regulatory and automation technology at the Technical University in Kosice. He has 20 years <strong>of</strong>23/03/10 v11 42


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAexperiences as analyst and programmer in information systems, mostly he participated at developingback-<strong>of</strong>fice logic by SQL language. He is member <strong>of</strong> INSPIRE work group at SEA (SlovakEnviromental Agency). At present he works as developer at environmental GIS applications usingArcIMS/ArcGIS server.Martin Koska holds MSc. in Forestry with specialisation in forest mapping and cadastre at theTechnical University in Zvolen. He has several years <strong>of</strong> experiences as GIS specialist, OGC services –WMS, WFS specialist. Now he works GIS server administrator (ArcIMS, ArcGIS), key expert in SDI(metadata, data specification, webmap services) development and implementation, participant atNATURESDIplus, member <strong>of</strong> task force group for NESIS, member <strong>of</strong> INSPIRE national level workgroup, project team manager.Miroslav Rolko holds MSc. in Informatics with specialisation in applied mathematics at the TechnicalUniversity in Zilina. He has several years <strong>of</strong> experiences as developer <strong>of</strong> discrete simulation systems.He has been participating at developing enviromental information system implementing directive96/82/ES (SEVESO II). At present he works as developer <strong>of</strong> environmental GIS applications usingArcIMS/ArcGIS server.PARTNER 8: CEIT ALANOVA (AUSTRIA)Partner description:CEIT ALANOVA is an applied research institute dealing with the future <strong>of</strong> cities & regions. CEITALANOVA acts in close cooperation with public administrations, companies and R&D institutions, tosupport and ensure the flow <strong>of</strong> knowledge between research and practical application. The teamconsists <strong>of</strong> urban planners, geographers & technicians. The main fields <strong>of</strong> activity are:• Urban-, Environmental- and Transport Technologies• Urban Planning and Regional Development, Urban Development in Information andKnowledge Society• “Cities for everybody”, “Healthy Cities”, “Smart, sustainable and integrative cities”• Urban Sustainability and Resource Management• Geographic Information Technologies and Spatial Scientific ManagementCEIT ALANOVA has been involved in several reference projects and contracts within its field <strong>of</strong>study, such as:• CORP - Competence Centre <strong>of</strong> Urban and Regional Planning – Association for Support andResearch in the fields <strong>of</strong> City Planning and Regional Development in the Information Society• CentropeMAP (ongoing)• ePSIplus (ongoing)• Traffic concept Schwechat (ongoing)• ÖROK-Scenarios 2030 – Spatial development scenarios for Austria• AIRCLIP - AIRports and CLImate Protection (finished beginning <strong>of</strong> 2009)• Ways2Go – Bus Stop 3.0 (started end <strong>of</strong> 2008)• Plan4all - European Network <strong>of</strong> Best Practices for Interoperability <strong>of</strong> Spatial PlanningInformation (started May 2009)Key staff CVs:Manfred Schrenk, Engineer, Managing director <strong>of</strong> CEIT ALANOVA, holds a MSc. in SpatialPlanning and Regional Science and has been working in numerous projects on urban and transportplanning and GIS. Vice President <strong>of</strong> ISoCaRP - International Society <strong>of</strong> City and Regional Planners,Board Member <strong>of</strong> the ÖGR – Austrian Spatial Planning Society , Vice President <strong>of</strong> AGEO – AustrianUmbrella Organisation for Geo-Information , Founder and Director <strong>of</strong> the CORP – CompetenceCentre for Urban and Regional Planning.23/03/10 v11 43


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAWolfgang Wasserburger, Engineer, Senior Researcher, holds a MSc. in Spatial Planning andRegional Science and has been working in numerous projects on urban and transport planning, GIS,web mapping, ICT applications.Clemens Beyer, Engineer, Junior Researcher, holds a MSc. in Spatial Planning and Regional Science,his main fields <strong>of</strong> experience are urban and transport planning, GIS, web mapping, ICT applications.Project Manager at CORP – Competence Centre for Urban and Regional PlanningChristian Eizinger, Senior Researcher, has carried out several studies in Spatial Planning andRegional Science and has been working in numerous projects on urban and transport planning, labourmarket researches, housing market researches and subsidized housing projects. Board Member <strong>of</strong> theÖGR – Austrian Spatial Planning Society, Project Manager at CORP – Competence Centre for Urbanand Regional PlanningTanja Egger, Bakk.techn., Junior Researcher, holds an BSc. on Environmental and ResourceManagement, main fields <strong>of</strong> experience are environmental and resource management, environmentaltechnologies, energy efficiency, communication, marketing and graphic design.PARTNER 9: ISOCARP (NETHERLANDS)Partner description:ISOCARP is a global association <strong>of</strong> experienced, pr<strong>of</strong>essional planners in an international network. Itwas founded in 1965 with a vision <strong>of</strong> bringing together recognised and highly qualified planners aswell as other stakeholders involved in the development and maintenance <strong>of</strong> the built environment.ISOCARP has members from over 70 countries and is a non-governmental organisation, recognisedby the United Nations and the Council <strong>of</strong> Europe and with a consultative status with UNESCO.The aims <strong>of</strong> ISOCARP are to improve cities and territories through planning practice, training,education and research. ISOCARP promotes the planning pr<strong>of</strong>ession in all its aspects. ISOCARPkeeps its focus on being a politically and commercially independent network <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional planners.It has grown into a worldwide organisation but has also kept a strong European emphasis. TheSociety aims at becoming a more global organisation and is particularly looking for a stronger base inAsia, Latin America and Africa, but also strengthening the traditional European base. The main tools<strong>of</strong> ISOCARP are the yearly congresses, symposia, workshops and publications.The Objectives <strong>of</strong> ISOCARP: improvement <strong>of</strong> planning practice through the creation <strong>of</strong> a platform forthe exchange between planners from different countries, promotion <strong>of</strong> the planning pr<strong>of</strong>ession in all itsaspects, notably from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> its identity, the services it can render and the conditionsrequired for it to function, promotion <strong>of</strong> planning research, improvement <strong>of</strong> planning education andtraining, provision <strong>of</strong> information and advice on major planning issues.ISOCARP Munich Liaison Office will be responsible in HLANDATA for the dissemination andnetworking <strong>of</strong> the project, will work in the identification <strong>of</strong> leading administration and on thevalidation <strong>of</strong> the methodology.Key staff CVs:Didier Vancutsem is Programme Manager, Head <strong>of</strong> the ISOCARP Brussels Liaison Office.International Consultant in Urban and Regional Planning, Landscape Planning, Infrastructure andEnvironmental Management, based in Brussels and Munich. Lead Expert in the EU-Program23/03/10 v11 44


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAURBACTII, responsible for the URBACT Project LUMASEC (Land Use Management forSustainable European Cities).Past-Vice-President and Treasurer <strong>of</strong> ISOCARP, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Rural and Urban Landscape Planning,Urban Planning at the Higher Institute <strong>of</strong> Town Planning Brussels (from 1998), Lecturer at theUniversity <strong>of</strong> Applied Sciences Munich-Weihenstephan (from 2003) and Lecturer at the University <strong>of</strong>Lille – Master Eurostudies (from 2007).23/03/10 v11 45


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAB3.2a. Chosen approachThe chosen approach has already been explained in section B1.1. (Project Concept).B3.2b. Work planThe project has been organized into the following Work Packages:WP1DIAGNOSTICLeader: IGN/CNIGWP6COORDINATIONLeader: GNWP2HARMONIZATION OF LU/LC DATA AND DEVELOPMENT OF THEBASELINE LU/LC DATA SHARING INFRASTRUCTURELeader: TRACASAWP3PILOT PROJECTS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATIONLeader: GISATWP3a PILOT 1WP3b PILOT 2WP3c PILOT 3Leader: GNLeader: GISATLeader: SEAWP5COMMUNICATION & DISSEMINATIONLeader: ISOCARPWP4RESULTS ASSESSMENTLeader: AGIWP1: DIAGNOSTIC: Assessment <strong>of</strong> the current European situation regarding the harmonization <strong>of</strong>the Land Cover and Land Use geographic information, taking into account the categorization and datamodel initiatives already ongoing in that field. Being HLANDATA a project aimed at providing somerelevant value-added services, the Land Cover and Land Use will make a thorough assessment <strong>of</strong> theend users and their needs from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> data harmonization: kinds <strong>of</strong> users, user purposesand required functionalities for the high-level services to be developed in the projectWP2: HARMONIZATION OF LU/LC DATA AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE BASELINELU/LC DATA SHARING INFRASTRUCTURE: Based on the results <strong>of</strong> WP1, a harmonizationproposal for the Land Cover / Land Use geographic information will be provided, both from theperspective <strong>of</strong> the data categorization and the data model. This will include a methodology for theharmonization <strong>of</strong> the data and metadata models <strong>of</strong> the Land Use and Land Cover topics. Moving fromsequential nomenclature towards object oriented one will be the base for such development. Als<strong>of</strong>lexibility to produce national, regional or specific-user driven pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> general nomenclature will beessential.23/03/10 v11 46


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAThe second part <strong>of</strong> the WP will deal with the development <strong>of</strong> web services based on the harmonizationproposal, aimed at allowing some basic functionalities for the data exploitation.WP3: PILOT PROJECTS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION: WP3 will address the design anddevelopment <strong>of</strong> the three pilot projects described in Chapter 1. The starting point will be theadaptation and optimization <strong>of</strong> the generic web services developed in WP2 to the concrete value-addedservices <strong>of</strong>fered by the pilot projects. In each one <strong>of</strong> the pilot projects, these will be extended with newweb services and functionalities, allowing the validation <strong>of</strong> the proposed harmonization at a Europeanlevel.WP4: RESULTS ASSESSMENT: Assessment <strong>of</strong> the results obtained and collection <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong>applicability experiences <strong>of</strong> the Land Use and Land Cover information within the Member States andin the European Union as a whole: energy, climate change, biodiversity loss, desertification, GMESservices, etc. Elaboration <strong>of</strong> best practice guidelines in order to facilitate the creation <strong>of</strong> such kind <strong>of</strong>databases in Europe.WP5: COMMUNICATION AND DISSEMINATION: General dissemination <strong>of</strong> results andpromotion <strong>of</strong> an experts’ network composed <strong>of</strong> producers and users <strong>of</strong> this topic’s information.WP6: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION: Coordination <strong>of</strong> the project in bothadministrative and technical terms. Management <strong>of</strong> the relations and the communication with theparticipants and the European Commission.The following Gantt chart shows the planned timing <strong>of</strong> the Work Packages and their components:23/03/10 v11 47


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3 Pilot BHLANDATAYEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3WORK PACKAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36WP1. DIAGNOSTICTask 1.1. Analysis on the currentEuropean situation in the field <strong>of</strong>Land Cover and Land Use DataharmonizationTask 1.2 End users’ assessmentTask 1.3: Analysis <strong>of</strong> existingmethodologies for harmonizationTask 1.4: Diagnostic <strong>of</strong> thecurrent state <strong>of</strong> dataharmonization according tocategorized user requirementsWP2. HARMONIZATION OFLU/LC DATA ANDDEVELOPMENT OF THEBASELINE LU/LC DATASHARING INFRASTRUCTURE'Task 2.1. HarmonizationTask 2.2. Development <strong>of</strong> theCommon Data SharingInfrastructureWP3. PILOT PROJECTSDESIGN ANDIMPLEMENTATIONTask 3.1. Design <strong>of</strong> the pilotprojectsTask 3.2. Development &running <strong>of</strong> the pilot projectsTask 3.3. Validation <strong>of</strong> the pilotprojectsWP4. RESULTS ASSESSMENTTask 4.1. Results assessmentTask 4.2. Potential applications23/03/10 v11 48


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3 Pilot BHLANDATAYEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3WORK PACKAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36Task 4.3 Exploitation plansWP5. COMMUNICATION ANDDISSEMINATIONTask 5.1. Elaboration <strong>of</strong> aProject web siteTask 5.2. Elaboration <strong>of</strong> thedissemination planTask 5.3. Elaboration <strong>of</strong> leafletsTask 5.4. Attendance toEuropean/International GISeventsTask 5.5. Publication <strong>of</strong> articlesin magazines and newspapersTask 5.6. Organization <strong>of</strong>seminars with local stakeholdersand one press conference withthe final project outputs per PilotWP6. PROJECTMANAGEMENT ANDCOORDINATIONTask 6.1. Consortium operatingprocedures definitionTask 6.2. Administrative andfinancial managementTask 6.3. Technical coordinationTask 6.4. Consortium meetings23/03/10 v11 49


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATASuccess IndicatorsThe table below provides some indicators which have been considered to be representative enough soas to assess the state <strong>of</strong> achievement <strong>of</strong> the expected results <strong>of</strong> the project, as well as the quantitativeaccomplishment degree <strong>of</strong> the intended targets:IndicatorNo.1234567891011Objective/expectedresultDevelopment andoptimization <strong>of</strong> acommon data sharinginfrastructurePilot projectsdevelopmentAssessment <strong>of</strong> therelevance, consistenceand reliability <strong>of</strong> thepilot projects validationprocessValidation andassessment <strong>of</strong> the pilotprojects as a wholeValidation andassessment <strong>of</strong> Pilot 1Validation andassessment <strong>of</strong> Pilot 2Validation andassessment <strong>of</strong> Pilot 3Dissemination andvisibilityDissemination andvisibilityDissemination andvisibilityCreation <strong>of</strong> an experts’networkIndicator nameGiving access toharmonized datacoming fromseveral dataprovidersNumber <strong>of</strong>implementedservicesAmount <strong>of</strong> pilotprojects validatorsNumber <strong>of</strong> accessesto the pilot webservicesNumber <strong>of</strong> accessesto the pilot webservicesNumber <strong>of</strong> accessesto the pilot webservicesNumber <strong>of</strong> accessesto the pilot webservicesNumber <strong>of</strong>publications,articles and papersNumber <strong>of</strong> EUglobalwideconferences andevents in whichHLANDATA willbe visibleNumber <strong>of</strong>accumulated visitsat the HLANDATAproject web siteNumber <strong>of</strong>participants in theexperts’ networkExpected ProgressYear 1 Year 2 Year 3Access tothe data <strong>of</strong>6 dataprovidersAccess to thedata <strong>of</strong> 6 dataprovidersAccess tothe data <strong>of</strong> 6dataprovidersNone 3 4- 3 6- 2000 5000- 800 2000- 600 1500- 600 15005 10 155 10 101500 3000 600010 20 30Technical risks and risk management plan23/03/10 v11 50


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATARegarding the technical implementation <strong>of</strong> the HLANDATA Project, there exist some risks to betaken into account, which will have to be contemplated in the frame <strong>of</strong> a risk management plan. Forinstance, the proposed harmonization model may be difficult to implement as related to the availableinformation for the development <strong>of</strong> the 3 pilot projects. This issue may be solved by adapting thestructure <strong>of</strong> the pilot project available data to the already defined model. This may imply an increase<strong>of</strong> the foreseen costs which would have to be compensated through an adjustment <strong>of</strong> the overallproject budget.Other hypothetical setbacks to be overcome could be the withdrawal <strong>of</strong> a key expert from a member <strong>of</strong>the Consortium, or even the justified withdrawal <strong>of</strong> a partner. In the first case, the missing expertwould have to be substituted by another person from the same organization, whereas in the secondcase, the necessity <strong>of</strong> searching for another partner (depending on the punctual situation <strong>of</strong> the projectand on the particular role <strong>of</strong> the missing partner within the Consortium) would have to be analyzed.Moreover, some <strong>of</strong> the partners could fail to fulfil their expected tasks within the correspondingdeadlines. In such case, the mechanisms described at the Consortium Agreement would have to beaccordingly launched.It is especially important to ensure an adequate participation <strong>of</strong> the final users from the beginning <strong>of</strong>the project. Communication failures, lack <strong>of</strong> involvement from the partners’ side, changingrequirements, among others, could lead to unjustified delivery delays. The inclusion <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> veryheterogeneous (or very numerous) final users within the Consortium could also entail greaterdifficulties when trying to harmonize their respective necessities. In addition, a validation plan for thefinal products, involving a wide enough amount <strong>of</strong> well-capable validators should be set out.As for the expertise and experience <strong>of</strong> the appointed work team <strong>of</strong> the project, main risks would berelated to the amount <strong>of</strong> personnel dedicated to the project, as well as their degree <strong>of</strong> involvement,their degree <strong>of</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong> the common and homogeneous objectives for the project, and also thehypothetical unexpected effect <strong>of</strong> the personnel rotation within the different work teams.From a technological point <strong>of</strong> view, different databases, whose functionalities and results have neverbeen proved yet, have been foreseen to interact together, which constitutes an added risk for thetechnological success <strong>of</strong> the project. A specific user interface will be required, new harmonizedutilities will have to be developed, new development tools will have to be integrated, and usersinteraction issues will also have to be contemplated, resulting in many possible causes for the rise <strong>of</strong>technological contingencies.During the mass production process, the main risks for the project will be associated to the clearnessand strictness <strong>of</strong> the defined development plan, as well as <strong>of</strong> the normalization and follow-up policiesapproved. The degree <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> the standards and the methodology <strong>of</strong> the required technicalreviews will also turn out to be crucial in order to avoid risks and face any incidence at this point.Another incidental possibility to be considered could be the lack <strong>of</strong> continuity <strong>of</strong> the project once ithad been completed. However, this is not a realistic situation to be contemplated, since the existence<strong>of</strong> a consistent Viability and Exploitation plan for the project flatly disables such a possiblecontingency.In addition, the risk management plan for the project must also contemplate the possible risksassociated to the foreseen implementation <strong>of</strong> the pilot projects. For pilot project 1, the harmonizationmodel elaborated at WP2 may not adjust properly to the content <strong>of</strong> the data to be included within suchpilot project. As already considered, this contingency could be solved by modifying the structure <strong>of</strong>the original data and by adapting it to the proposed model.Another risk to be taken into account would be the fact that some functionalities included within pilotproject 1 could show themselves to be more difficult to implement than expected, giving rise to delaysand increases <strong>of</strong> the foreseen expenses. A possible solution for this would be to try to make use <strong>of</strong>23/03/10 v11 51


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAanother different technology for the implementation <strong>of</strong> the affected functionalities, or, in the worst <strong>of</strong>the cases, to discard the development planned if the successful achievement <strong>of</strong> the whole pilot projectwere at risk.Finally, the risk that the validation enterprises for pilot project 1 do not accomplish with their acquiredcommitment face to the project should also be considered, which would imply to search for newavailable validators either within the organizations involved in pilot project 1 (Government <strong>of</strong>Navarre, IGN, TDF), within the HLANDATA project as a whole, or even outside the Consortium.23/03/10 v11 52


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAThe set <strong>of</strong> Work Packages in which the whole project has been divided is shown in the next table:WT1: Work package listWorkpackageNo.(i)Work PackageTitleLeadParticipantNo. (ii)LeadParticipantShortname (iii)Total personmonthsper WP (iv)StartMonth(v)WP 1 Diagnostic 3 IGN/CNIG 56 1 6EndMonth(vi)WP 2WP 3WP 4WP 5WP 6Harmonization <strong>of</strong>LU/LC data anddevelopment <strong>of</strong>the basic LU/LCdata sharinginfrastructure2 TRACASA 109 6 16Pilot projects 5 GISAT 188 10 36design andimplementationResults4 AGI 81 27 36AssessmentCommunication 9 ISOCARP 50 1 36and disseminationProject1 GN 46 1 36management andcoordinationTOTAL 53023/03/10 v11 53


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAThe HLANDATA project work and tasks will be carried out in a logical and organized way. This factmakes a set <strong>of</strong> deliverables that can be clearly identified, in order to facilitate the project progressfollow up, as shown in the next table:WT2: Deliverables listDeliverableNo (i)Deliverable nameWPNo.Nature(ii)Disseminationlevel (iii)D 1.1 Diagnostic report 1 R PU 6D 1.2 End users assessment report 1 R PU 6D 2.1 HLANDATA Harmonization 2 SP PU 11ProposalD 2.2 Methodology specification for 2 SP PU 11the harmonization <strong>of</strong> theavailable datasetsD 2.3 Preliminary design and 2 SP RE 12specifications <strong>of</strong> theharmonized data sharinginfrastructure to beimplementedD 2.4 Validated harmonized data 2 P PU 16sharing infrastructure from alldata providersD 3.1 Detailed design <strong>of</strong> each pilot 3 SP RE 15projectD 3.2 First partial version <strong>of</strong> the 3 D RE 18implemented pilotsD 3.3 Final version <strong>of</strong> the3 D PU 24implemented pilots includingall value-added services andfunctionalitiesD 3.4 Individual pilot results 3 R RE 36assessment reportD 4.1 Results assessment report 4 R PU 36D 4.2 Guidelines & recommendations 4 R PU 36for the harmonization <strong>of</strong> theLU/LC Data and thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> the LU/LCData sharing InfrastructuresD 4.3 Analysis and forecast <strong>of</strong> 4 R PU 36potential applicationsD 4.4 Exploitation plan 4 R RE 36Deliverydate (proj.month) (iv)D 5.1 Dissemination plan 5 R PU 3, 9, 15, 21,27, 33D 5.2 Project web site 5 D PU 3D 5.3 Leaflets and dissemination 5 O PU 12, 24, 36material with the project resultsD 5.4 Promotional video 5 O PU 36D 5.5Communication anddissemination final report5 R PU 3623/03/10 v11 54


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAD 6.1 Consortium operating6 SP CO 3proceduresD 6.2 First technical and financial 6 R CO 12reportD 6.3 Second technical and financial 6 R CO 24reportD 6.4 Final technical and financial 6 R CO 36reportD 6.5 Periodic progress reports 6 R PU 6, 12, 18, 24,30, 3623/03/10 v11 55


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAThe description <strong>of</strong> the different Work Packages defined for the HLANDATA project comes next:WT3: Work Package DescriptionsWork package number : 1 Start date or starting event: Month 1Work package title:DIAGNOSTICParticipant number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Participant short namePerson-months perparticipant:GNTRACASAIGN/CNIGAGI GISAT TDF SEA CEIT6 6 15 6 6 5 4 4 4ISOCARPObjectives (i)The main objectives for this Work Package are shown next:O 1.1 – To explore and assess all Land Use and Land Cover initiatives and projects carried out up to themoment and being carried out at present moment in the EU territory and related international programs (byUNEP, GEOS, etc), and to get an updated inventory <strong>of</strong> existing initiatives to harmonize Land Use / LandCover Databases at Sub-national, National, European and Global levels.O 1.2 – To assess the different potential users <strong>of</strong> the Land Data and Land Use geographic information,obtaining a categorized user requirement inventory.O 1.3 – To analyze the existing harmonizing methodologies (hierarchical nomenclatures, feature datamodels, ontologies, etc.) in order to understand their current and potential use, advantages anddisadvantages.O 1.4 – To evaluate the benefits / disadvantages <strong>of</strong> using each analyzed methodology for land management.Description <strong>of</strong> work (ii)Task 1.1: Analysis on the current European situation in the field <strong>of</strong> Land Cover and Land Use dataharmonizationAs explained in the introductory part <strong>of</strong> this proposal, several important initiatives have been carried out inthe field <strong>of</strong> Land Use and Land Cover harmonization, although none <strong>of</strong> these has provided (or is expectedto provide) normalized procedures which are valid for the harmonization <strong>of</strong> these data at a European leveland for the current needs.This task will assess all these initiatives, making a thorough analysis and assessment <strong>of</strong> them and takingadvantage <strong>of</strong> those results which might be valid for the objectives <strong>of</strong> this project. Those results which mightbe usable for the harmonization objectives <strong>of</strong> this project will be selected.The running projects which are to a greater <strong>of</strong> lesser extend related to HLANDATA (such as Plan4All) willbe contacted and inquired to make the selection <strong>of</strong> the usable results and the analysis <strong>of</strong> the gaps notaddressed by them.The INSPIRE framework is another perspective to take into account within this task. It has to be taken intoaccount the fact that although at present moment there is no clear INSPIRE activities roadmap for the workwith Land Use and Land Cover datasets, by the time this project starts the roadmap will be clear and willhave to be taken into account for the development <strong>of</strong> the project activities, as these are intended tocontribute to INSPIRE as the most representative harmonization initiative related exclusively to LandCover and Land Use data from the different perspectives addressed up to the moment.23/03/10 v11 56


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAThe CEN and ISO standards for geographic information will be considered, too, as well as the EC’s GMESand SEIS programs for Land Use / Land Cover data production and sharing.Task 1.2: End users’ assessmentAny data harmonization initiative has to take into account the end users and their needs. HLANDATA isdevoted to provide value-added high-level services addressed for different kinds <strong>of</strong> users based on webservices which will provide access to harmonized data. The main issues to be addressed within this taskwill be:- Kinds <strong>of</strong> users- Different user purposes- Required functionalities for the high-level services to be developed in the projectThis will be done by obtaining a categorized user requirement inventory, with 3 user categories, (accordingto the definitions in Pilot 1 description).- Low-level users- Intermediate-level users- High-level usersThis inventory will be done using standardized user analysis techniques, such as use case description,interviews, etc.Task 1.3: Analysis <strong>of</strong> existing methodologies for Land Use / Land Cover data harmonizationIt is also necessary to review all the existing and past initiatives for harmonizing Land Use / Land Coverdata. Several projects have been carried out by Sub-national, National, European and Global authorities inorder to get this goal, most <strong>of</strong> them using hierarchical classifications and nomenclatures, withunsatisfactory results for the Land Use / Land Cover users’ community. This means in practice having toanalyze the existing harmonizing methodologies (hierarchical nomenclatures, feature data models,ontologies, etc.) in order to understand their current and potential use, advantages and disadvantages, aswell as percentage <strong>of</strong> success for this initiatives.INSPIRE compliance is also an issue to be considered and carefully described for these methodologies, aswell as ISO TC 211 and OGC standards.Task 1.4: Diagnostic <strong>of</strong> the current state <strong>of</strong> Land Use / Land Cover data harmonization according tocategorized user requirementsFinally, a diagnostic report will be produced considering the results <strong>of</strong> the three previous tasks,summarizing the analysis <strong>of</strong> the present situation and the state <strong>of</strong> the art for Land Use / Land Coverinformation, including a set <strong>of</strong> recommended procedures to follow to achieve the harmonization <strong>of</strong> thisdata. The diagnostic report will identify the categorized list <strong>of</strong> user requirements to be complied by eachprocedure.Participants:WP1 is a very important Work Package within the HLANDATA project as a whole, as it will set theknowledge basis for the rest <strong>of</strong> WPs and activities. It needs the contributions <strong>of</strong> all the partners providingthe perspective <strong>of</strong> their different national or regional situation and the perspective from their different enduser category. This is why all HLANDATA partners will contribute to and participate in all the activitiesincluded within WP1.Deliverables (iii)23/03/10 v11 57


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAD 1.1 – Diagnostic report, including an evaluation report <strong>of</strong> existing methodologies for harmonization(month 6).D 1.2 – End users assessment report, including a catalogue <strong>of</strong> user requirements, ordered by user categories(month 6).23/03/10 v11 58


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAWork package number : 2 Start date or starting event: Month 6Work package title:HARMONIZATION OF LU/LC DATA AND DEVELOPMENT OF THEBASELINE LU/LC DATA SHARING INFRASTRUCTUREParticipant number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Participant short namePerson-months perparticipant:GNTRACASAIGN/CNIGAGI GISAT TDF SEA CEIT ISOCARP20 21 10 20 13 8 7 8 2Objectives (i)The main objectives for this Work Package are shown next:O 2.1 – To make the HLANDATA proposal for the harmonization <strong>of</strong> the Land Use and Land Datageographic information.O 2.3 – To provide a methodology for the harmonization <strong>of</strong> the data.O 2.2 – Design, implementation and validation <strong>of</strong> the harmonized data sharing infrastructure to be used bythe pilots as the base for providing the basic data interoperability.Description <strong>of</strong> work (ii)Task 2.1: Harmonization proposalThe main objective <strong>of</strong> this task is to make the proposal for the harmonization <strong>of</strong> the Land Use and LandCover data from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the data categorization and the data modelling. The basis for the taskwill be the results <strong>of</strong> WP1, in which all the previous and ongoing initiatives related to the harmonization <strong>of</strong>Land Use and Land Cover will have been assessed. Taking this information into account, task 2.1 willdecide on what results will be valid for this initiative, which ones will have to be adapted and in whichfields work will have to be carried out in order to reach the final harmonization proposal.After the analysis <strong>of</strong> the WP1 results, this task will make the proposal for the HLANDATA Land Use LandCover data harmonization and will agree and set out a common methodology to be applied by all partnerswithin the project, in order to carry out the harmonization <strong>of</strong> the available geographic information. Thisincludes the required methodology for the implementation <strong>of</strong> the generic web services which are to bedeveloped in task 2.2 and further implemented in the Pilots in WP3. The agreement on the data formats andmultilingual concepts to be applied by all partners and common methodology for the harmonization willalso be established here.All project participants will contribute to this task.Task 2.1: Design, development and validation <strong>of</strong> the harmonized data sharing infrastructureThe main objective <strong>of</strong> this task is to carry out the design and development <strong>of</strong> common harmonized datasharing infrastructure (based on web services) that will be the base for the pilot projects basic visualizationand information overlay functionalities. The design and implementation <strong>of</strong> this infrastructure will be basedon the harmonization methodology defined previously.The implemented web services will be systematically tested, assessed and validated along this task, both at23/03/10 v11 59


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAeach partner level and also at interoperability level.At the end <strong>of</strong> this task, the data provided by the data providers present in HLANDATA project will have tobe accessible in a harmonized way for any interested party through internet services.This task implies a common development phase among the partners making the implementation <strong>of</strong> thisinfrastructure, together with some specific developments to be carried out by each <strong>of</strong> the data providers.Participants:Based on the results <strong>of</strong> WP1, WP2 will make the proposal for the data harmonization and will specify,design and implement the data sharing infrastructure for LU/LC data.It is clear that all partners’ contributions will be needed in the 2 activities comprised within this WP, first <strong>of</strong>all to agree on the harmonization proposal with as much support as possible (support from the partnersthemselves and support coming from their networks <strong>of</strong> collaborators), and second to implement andvalidate the baseline data sharing infrastructure which has to be implemented by all data providers withinthe project. This is why the contributions to the activities will be as follows:Task 2.1: Participation <strong>of</strong> all partners.Task 2.2: Participation <strong>of</strong> all partners with special dedication <strong>of</strong> the data providers and technologyproviders within the project.Deliverables (iii)D 2.1 – HLANDATA Harmonization Proposal (month 11).D 2.2 – Methodology specification for the harmonization <strong>of</strong> the available datasets (month 11).D 2.3 – Preliminary design and specifications <strong>of</strong> the harmonized data sharing infrastructure to beimplemented (month 12).D 2.4 – Validated harmonized data sharing infrastructure from all data providers (month 16).23/03/10 v11 60


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAWork package number : 3 Start date or starting event: Month 10Work package title:PILOT PROJECTS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATIONParticipant number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Participant short namePerson-months perparticipant:GNTRACASAIGN/CNIGAGI GISAT TDF SEA CEIT30 19 10 50 40 15 12 6 6ISOCARPObjectives (i)The main objective for this Work Package is shown next:O 3.1 – Development and validation <strong>of</strong> the value-added service associated to the project.Description <strong>of</strong> work (ii)This WP will be the responsible for the design, development and validation <strong>of</strong> the pilot projects providingthe value-added services described in Chapter 1. Preliminary assessment <strong>of</strong> the obtained results, evaluation<strong>of</strong> the implemented web services and <strong>of</strong> the harmonized geographic information database and analysis onthe potential applications will also be carried out within this WP but at a pilot level, without putting theresults in common (which will be made in WP4).PILOT COUNTRIES CONTENT PROVIDERWP3a PILOT 1: Land Use / Land CoverData Analysis SystemSpain, LatviaGN, IGN, TDFWP3b PILOT 2: Land InformationSystemsCzech Rep., Lithuania GISAT, AGIWP3c PILOT 3: Stratification <strong>of</strong> WasteDumpsSlovakiaSEAThe WP organization corresponds to the organization <strong>of</strong> the pilots, and as such the activities pointed nextare applicable to each <strong>of</strong> the pilot projects and will be carried out for each <strong>of</strong> the pilot projects, by thepartners participating in each <strong>of</strong> the pilot projects.Task 3.1: Design <strong>of</strong> the pilot projectsThe main objective <strong>of</strong> this task is to carry out the preliminary design <strong>of</strong> each pilot project to beimplemented, as described in Chapter 1. Each Pilot design will be carried out based on the results <strong>of</strong> WP2,so all <strong>of</strong> them will be based on the harmonized data sharing infrastructure implemented in WP2.Task 3.2: Development and running <strong>of</strong> the pilot projectsThis task comprises the development phase <strong>of</strong> the pilot projects to be implemented according to theprevious design.The development <strong>of</strong> the pilot projects in each <strong>of</strong> the cases implies different tasks and activities, being some<strong>of</strong> them the following:- Pre-processing <strong>of</strong> the existing base-map data layers and ancillary data (all pilots).- If necessary, acquisition and pre-processing <strong>of</strong> other data (all pilots).- Development <strong>of</strong> downstream LU/LC information layers (all pilots).23/03/10 v11 61


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATA- Development and implementation <strong>of</strong> LU/LC statistical analysis framework (all pilots).- Production <strong>of</strong> reports on land statistics according to the requirements defined by end users andstakeholders (all pilots).- Production <strong>of</strong> Statistical Land Accounting System statistical products within multi-level statisticalsampling framework (Pilot 2).- Production <strong>of</strong> cartographic products on LU/LC and land statistics (Pilot 2).- Development and implementation <strong>of</strong> a technological framework for the integration <strong>of</strong> StatisticalLand Accounting System products into the national Information Systems (Pilot 2).- Analysis <strong>of</strong> the emerging GIS technologies and introduction <strong>of</strong> new downstream thematic elementsfor the extension <strong>of</strong> Statistical Land Accounting System content for further development <strong>of</strong> thesystem (Pilot 2).Once developed, the pilot projects will be running for at least 18 months, providing freely the services forwhich they have been implemented.Task 3.3: Validation <strong>of</strong> the pilot projectsThe implemented pilot projects will be systematically tested, assessed and validated along this task. Overallassessment <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> all projects together will be carried out in WP4.The validation <strong>of</strong> the pilot projects will be carried out by the partners on the basis <strong>of</strong> the registered dataregarding the behaviour <strong>of</strong> the end users <strong>of</strong> the value-added services implemented by such pilot projects.End users involvement is necessary in this task to provide an adequate feedback on the results <strong>of</strong> theproject. In most <strong>of</strong> the cases, the content providers themselves also correspond to the end users <strong>of</strong> theinformation (the public administrations usually will play a double role, being at the same time dataproviders and main users <strong>of</strong> the data, too). However, in other cases (such as the Spanish and Czech pilots),other external target users will be considered during the validation phase. Concretely, in Pilot 2, ISOCARPwill act as validator due to its nature <strong>of</strong> association <strong>of</strong> territorial planners.Participants:The degree <strong>of</strong> participation in WP3 is dependant on the participation <strong>of</strong> the partners in the several pilotprojects. Those partners providing a pilot project will dedicate much more effort to this task than thepartners which do not provide a pilot but support the development <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> them. However, all projectpartners will be involved in one or more pilots as shown next:PILOTCONTENTPROVIDEROTHER CONTRIBUTORPARTNERSLand Use / Land Cover Data AnalysisGN, IGN, TDFSystemTRACASA, CEIT ALANOVALand Information Systems GISAT, AGI CEIT ALANOVA, ISOCARPStratification <strong>of</strong> Waste Dumps SEA CEIT ALANOVA, ISOCARPDeliverables (iii)D 3.1 – Detailed design <strong>of</strong> each pilot project (month 15).D 3.2 – First partial version <strong>of</strong> the implemented pilots (month 18).D 3.3 – Final version <strong>of</strong> the implemented pilots including all value-added services and functionalities(month 24).D 3.4 – Individual pilot results assessment report (month 36).23/03/10 v11 62


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAWork package number : 4Work package title:RESULTS ASSESSMENTStart date or startingevent:Month 27Participant number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Participant short namePerson-months perparticipant:GNTRACASAIGN/CNIGAGIGISATTDF SEA CEIT12 10 10 20 10 6 3 5 5ISOCARPObjectives (i)The main objectives for this Work Package are shown next:O 4.1 – Assessment <strong>of</strong> the obtained results, evaluation <strong>of</strong> the implemented web services and <strong>of</strong> theharmonized geographic information database, analysis on the potential applications <strong>of</strong> the provided solutionfor both public and private sectors, exploitation plan <strong>of</strong> the project.Description <strong>of</strong> work (ii)Task 4.1: Results assessmentEvaluation <strong>of</strong> the achieved objectives <strong>of</strong> the project and <strong>of</strong> the performance <strong>of</strong> the different Pilots involvedincluding:- Analysis on the compliance degree with the expected goals <strong>of</strong> the project.- Technical and functional assessment <strong>of</strong> the end solution.- Discussion on the balance among different Pilots.- Quality estimation.- Analysis on the impact <strong>of</strong> the project on the field <strong>of</strong> European Geographic Information Systemsand compliance to the expectations <strong>of</strong> the CIP ICT PSP Call.Within this task, the HLANDATA project will also deliver guidelines and recommendations for theEuropean countries aimed at the harmonization <strong>of</strong> their Land Use / Land Cover data and the development<strong>of</strong> their Land Use / Land Cover data sharing infrastructures.Task 4.2: Potential applicationsForecast and approach to the potential applications to be exploited for the developed Pilots. Strengths andweaknesses <strong>of</strong> the achieved results.Task 4.3: Exploitation plansThis task will provide the foreseen exploitation plan for each pilot. As it has already been described inprevious chapters, due to the public nature <strong>of</strong> the partners developing the pilots, these plans will not be ledby the objective <strong>of</strong> getting a financial benefit from the exploitation <strong>of</strong> the pilots, but they will assess andexplain the way the pilots will be adapted to an operational version aimed at giving stable and continuousservice to the end users <strong>of</strong> these pilot projects.Participants:23/03/10 v11 63


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAWP4 will put in common the results <strong>of</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> WPs, constituting the conclusion <strong>of</strong> the whole project.This is why the contributions <strong>of</strong> all the partners are needed, providing their own experiences, and thereforeall HLANDATA partners will contribute to and participate in all the activities within WP4.Deliverables (iii)D4.1 – Results assessment report (month 36).D4.2 – Guidelines and recommendations for the harmonization <strong>of</strong> the LU/LC data and the development <strong>of</strong>the LU/LC data sharing infrastructures (month 36).D4.3 – Analysis and forecast <strong>of</strong> potential applications (month 36).D4.4 – Exploitation plan (month 36).23/03/10 v11 64


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAWork package number : 5Work package title:Start date or startingevent:COMMUNICATION AND DISSEMINATIONMonth 1Participant number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Participant short namePerson-months perparticipant:GNTRACASAIGN/CNIGAGIGISATTDFSEACEIT8 6 6 6 6 4 2 3 9ISOCARPObjectives (i)The objectives <strong>of</strong> this WP consist <strong>of</strong>:O 5.1 – Transferring the knowledge and experience obtained in the project to other local and Europeanstakeholders.O 5.2 – Promoting the scalability <strong>of</strong> the project results.O 5.3 – Promoting the use and applications <strong>of</strong> the developed harmonized services in both the public andprivate sectors.In order to achieve these objectives, a dissemination plan will be elaborated.Description <strong>of</strong> work (ii)Given the importance <strong>of</strong> this WP in the project, all partners will participate to a greater or lesser extent.Task 5.1: Elaboration <strong>of</strong> a project web siteA project web site will be elaborated within the first three months <strong>of</strong> the project, and will be updated everytwo months. The main elements <strong>of</strong> this project web site will be:- Public area: project overview, public deliverables, dissemination documents, links to partners’ websites, links to events, networks, and related projects and to the CIP-PSP programme.- Private area: project information exchange.Task 5.2: Elaboration <strong>of</strong> the dissemination planDuring the first three months <strong>of</strong> the project, ISOCARP as WP leader will elaborate a dissemination plan incollaboration with the rest <strong>of</strong> the partners, where dissemination activities at local and European level willbe defined in detail. The main elements <strong>of</strong> this dissemination plan will include: tasks, responsible partnerfor each task, addressed public and timing. Such dissemination plan will be updated every six months.The main dissemination tasks that will be included in the dissemination plan will be divided in two levels:At European level, there will be a results transference to institutions related with the INSPIRE initiative inone hand and with Land Cover and Land Use management (public administrations, ICT technologyproviders and end users) on the other hand. In the dissemination plan a list for the next six monthsactivities and the partner responsible will be defined. The results dissemination will start in the second year.At local level, the dissemination will be directed to the pilot application users, from the beginning <strong>of</strong> the23/03/10 v11 65


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAproject. This is a very important step in the project development, for the end users implication in the projectand in order to obtain a real validation.All the next tasks will be included in the dissemination plan as basic tools.Task 5.3: Elaboration <strong>of</strong> leafletsAt the end <strong>of</strong> each project phase, a leaflet with the project results will be elaborated in order to be sent tothe identified stakeholders at local and European level: policy makers, public organizations, private sectorand technological experts.Task 5.4: Attendance to European/International Geographic Information Systems eventsAn analysis <strong>of</strong> the main events on this field and the possibility <strong>of</strong> presenting project results will beevaluated by the Consortium in order to select the most adapted to the HLANDATA features. The objectiveis to attend at least three events.Task 5.5: Publication <strong>of</strong> articles in magazines and newspapersAn analysis <strong>of</strong> the magazines and newspapers interested in HLANDATA results will be elaborated.Task 5.6: Organization <strong>of</strong> seminars with local stakeholders and one press conference with the finalproject outputs per Pilot.Participants:All project partners will contribute to this WP to a greater or lesser extent.Deliverables (iii)D 5.1 – Dissemination plan (updated every six months) (months 3, 9, 15, 21, 27, 33).D 5.2 – Project web site (updated every two months) (month 3).D 5.3 – Leaflets, articles and dissemination material with the project results (months 12, 24, 36).D 5.4 – Promotional video (month 36).D 5.5 – Communication and dissemination final report (month 36).23/03/10 v11 66


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAWork package number : 6Work package title:Start date or startingevent:Month 1PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATIONParticipant number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Participant short namePerson-months perparticipant:GNTRACASAIGN/CNIGAGI GISAT TDFSEACEIT20 4 4 4 3 3 2 3 3ISOCARPObjectives (i)This Work Package aims at the coordination <strong>of</strong> the project in both administrative and technical terms. Theobjective is to manage and to ensure coordination <strong>of</strong> efforts among all partners in order to guaranteeeffective operation <strong>of</strong> the project, timely delivery <strong>of</strong> the expected deliverables, as well as the adequatedissemination <strong>of</strong> results. Furthermore, the management <strong>of</strong> the relations and the communication with theparticipants and the European Commission will also be covered by this WP.Description <strong>of</strong> work (ii)The Project Coordinator, GN, will be supported by the supporting coordinator, the Project ManagementBoard, the Project Technical Committee and the Technical Coordinator.Task 6.1: Consortium operating procedures definitionThe main objective <strong>of</strong> this task is to prepare a project management handbook summarizing the requiredknowledge for the good management <strong>of</strong> the project (in terms <strong>of</strong> administrative forms, financial aspects,quality processes, etc.).A specific chapter will be defined for the pilots monitoring.Task 6.2: Administrative and financial managementThe following subtasks are comprised within this task:• Coordination and management <strong>of</strong> administrative matters and administrative support to all partners.• Preparation <strong>of</strong> administrative reports for the European Commission.• Ensuring <strong>of</strong> financial management (cost monitoring, accounting, cost statement preparation,distribution <strong>of</strong> subsidy).• Ensuring <strong>of</strong> compilation <strong>of</strong> project deliverables.• Ensuring <strong>of</strong> periodic reporting and communication with the EC services and the Project Officer(s)for purposes <strong>of</strong> coordination, progress monitoring, reporting, etc.Task 6.3: Technical coordinationThis task will assume the overall technical coordination, project monitoring and will ensure that the projectis carried out as planned; a specific subtask will be in charge <strong>of</strong> the Project Technical Committee, leaded bythe Project Technical Coordinator (TRACASA), which will include:• Corrective actions needed to meet the plan.• Coordination <strong>of</strong> internal project communication, meetings and workshops.• Identification and management <strong>of</strong> technical risks.23/03/10 v11 67


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATA• Pre-check <strong>of</strong> results (against project requirements and objectives) and ensuring <strong>of</strong> their internaldistribution.The Project Technical Committee, with the participation <strong>of</strong> all the Pilot Leaders and Work PackageLeaders, will take the required technical decisions to achieve the implantation <strong>of</strong> the three pilot projects insix geographic areas.If a problem cannot achieve a solution in the Project Technical Committee, the Project Management Boardwill take the responsibility in all final decisions.An Advisory Board composed by the project partners and external invited experts from the EuropeanCommission and other European Projects will be created and consulted at the end <strong>of</strong> each project WP inorder to elaborate its final conclusions.Task 6.4: Consortium meetingsProject Management Board meetings will be scheduled once a year.The Project Technical Committee meetings will be held at least twice a year. The work planning will beupdated continuously during the project. Monitoring <strong>of</strong> project activities will occur on a finer basis withsix-monthly internal reporting.The tasks <strong>of</strong> the Work Package Leaders as participants in the Project Technical Committee include theorganization <strong>of</strong> the necessary WP meetings for a common technical direction within the WP, thesupervising <strong>of</strong> the technical work <strong>of</strong> the WP and the surveillance <strong>of</strong> the progress and quality <strong>of</strong> the differenttasks. They will take care <strong>of</strong> transmitting the WP advances to the Project Technical Committee.GISAT, leader <strong>of</strong> WP3, will be responsible for the monitoring <strong>of</strong> the pilots implementation. Each pilot willbe managed by a Pilot Leader.The tasks <strong>of</strong> the Pilot Leaders include the organization <strong>of</strong> the necessary Pilot meetings for a suitablecoordination within each pilot project, the supervising <strong>of</strong> the technical work <strong>of</strong> the Pilot and thesurveillance <strong>of</strong> the progress and quality <strong>of</strong> the different tasks. They will report their corresponding advancesto the Leader <strong>of</strong> Work Package 3 (GISAT).Pilot meetings will be scheduled at least twice a year, and also whenever it be considered necessary for anadequate development <strong>of</strong> the planned tasks within each Pilot.Participants:All project partners will contribute to this WP.Deliverables (iii)D 6.1 – Consortium operating procedures (month 3).D 6.2 – First technical and financial report (month 12).D 6.3 – Second technical and financial report (month 24).D 6.4 – Final technical and financial report (month 36).D 6.5 – Periodic progress reports (months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36).23/03/10 v11 68


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAWT4: List <strong>of</strong> MilestonesMilestone Milestone Name WP Lead Beneficiary Delivery DateNumberMilestone 1.1 Diagnostic made 1 IGN/CNIG Month 6Milestone 2.1 Data harmonized 2 TRACASA Month 16Milestone 3.1 Pilots designed 3 GISAT Month 15Milestone 3.2 Pilots running 3 GISAT Month 36Milestone 4.1 Results assessed 4 AGI Month 36WT5: List <strong>of</strong> Tentative ReviewsReview Number Tentative Timing Planned venue <strong>of</strong> Comments, if anyreview1 Month 18 To be determined Mid-term review2 Month 36 To be determined Final reviewWT6: Summary effort tableThe following table includes the information about the staff effort within the HLANDATA project:number <strong>of</strong> person months over the whole duration <strong>of</strong> the planned work per Work Package and partner.The Work Package leader is identified in each case by showing its person months figure in bold.ParticipantNo.Participant ShortnameWP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 Total personmonths1 GN 6 20 30 12 8 20 962 TRACASA 6 21 19 10 6 4 663 IGN/CNIG 15 10 10 10 6 4 554 AGI 6 20 50 20 6 4 1065 GISAT 6 13 40 10 6 3 786 TDF 5 8 15 6 4 3 417 SEA 4 7 12 3 2 2 308 CEIT 4 8 6 5 3 3 299 ISOCARP 4 2 6 5 9 3 29Total 56 109 188 81 50 46 53023/03/10 v11 69


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAB3.3. Project managementBased on the involvement <strong>of</strong> the participants in several European Projects (see the description <strong>of</strong> thepartners), in some <strong>of</strong> which the partners have been Project Coordinators; the consortium has built upextensive experiences and practices related to European Projects.Some <strong>of</strong> the public partners have developed different experiences in the area <strong>of</strong> geodesy and territorialinformation systems and would be willing to keep on working on this area, being able to providevalue-added services which have still never been <strong>of</strong>fered in such way on a European level. In addition,some <strong>of</strong> the involved partners (Government <strong>of</strong> Navarre, TRACASA, National Geographic Institute <strong>of</strong>Spain, GISAT, AGI, TDF, CEIT ALANOVA) have already been participating in other eContentplusand FP7 European projects, which ensures their experience at coordinating themselves for thesuccessful management <strong>of</strong> a European cooperation project.Being this a complex proposal, the consortium has put great care in defining the most appropriatemanagement structures for the project. All partners assume full technical and financial responsibilityfor the management <strong>of</strong> the project. This involves the appointment <strong>of</strong> a Project Coordinator and theManagement Structure shown next:Project CoordinatorDelia Delia Sola Sola - - Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> NavarreSupporting CoordinatorMaría María Cabello - - TRACASAPROJECT TECHNICAL COMMITTEEChair: Chair: Technical CoordinatorIsabel Isabel Goñi Goñi - - TRACASAPROJECT MANAGEMENT BOARDChair: Chair: Project CoordinatorDelia Delia Sola Sola - - Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> Navarre1 representative <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> each each involved organizationADVISORY BOARDInvited experts from from other other relatedongoing projectsWP1 WP1 LEADERLEADERIGNIGNDiagnosticWP2 WP2 LEADERTRACASAHarmonization &Data Data SharingSharingInfrastructurePILOT PILOT 1 1 LEADER:LEADER:GNGNLU/LC LU/LC DataDataAnalysis Analysis SystemSystemSpainSpainLatviaLatviaWP3 WP3 LEADERLEADERGISATGISATPilot Pilot ProjectsProjectsPILOT PILOT 2 2 LEADER:GISATGISATLand Land InformationSystemSystemCzech Czech RepublicRepublicLithuaniaLithuaniaPILOT PILOT 3 3 LEADER:LEADER:SEASEAStratification <strong>of</strong><strong>of</strong>Waste Waste DumpsDumpsSlovakiaSlovakiaWP4 WP4 LEADERLEADERAGIAGIAssessmentWP5 WP5 LEADERLEADERISOCARPCommunication&DisseminationThe management structure has been structured in two main boards:• The Project Management Board, composed <strong>of</strong> one representative <strong>of</strong> each partner <strong>of</strong> theconsortium, which is chaired by the Project Coordinator;• The Project Technical Committee, composed <strong>of</strong> the leaders <strong>of</strong> the pilots and <strong>of</strong> the WPs,which is chaired by the Technical Coordinator <strong>of</strong> the Project.Apart from these 2 main bodies, other smaller bodies have also been defined in the project:• The Local Pilot Teams, composed <strong>of</strong> representatives <strong>of</strong> the organizations participating ineach one <strong>of</strong> the pilots.• The Work Package Teams, one per WP, composed <strong>of</strong> representatives <strong>of</strong> the partnersparticipating in the Work Packages. These WP teams are leaded by the WP Leaders.23/03/10 v11 70


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATASpecific attention will be focused on all integration activities. In order to handle the complexity <strong>of</strong>management tasks arising from this project, both the organizational and administrative structures needto be carefully implemented.Project CoordinatorThe project will be coordinated by the Government <strong>of</strong> Navarre (GN), with vast experience incoordination <strong>of</strong> European Projects. The Government <strong>of</strong> Navarre has been involved in several EuropeanProjects with other partners <strong>of</strong> the consortium, having an established relationship with them. Theperson assigned to be the Project Coordinator by the Government <strong>of</strong> Navarre will be supported bythe Supporting Coordinator, appointed by TRACASA.The Government <strong>of</strong> Navarre will be the project coordinating agent and the main contact with theCommission. The Coordinator will be responsible for:• Organizing project management meetings; administration, preparation <strong>of</strong> minutes;• Follow-up and adaptation <strong>of</strong> the project planning;• Organizing, steering, checking and assuring the reporting in time towards the Commission;• The overall monitoring <strong>of</strong> progress on all work packages and setting in place procedures forensuring more detailed progress monitoring in consultation with the subgroups;• Monitoring <strong>of</strong> the expenses and allocation <strong>of</strong> the budget; assistance towards the participantsconcerning administrative aspects <strong>of</strong> the project;• Communicating with the Commission;• Preparing and communicating the yearly project progress reporting to the General Assemblyand Technical Board;• Coordinating the payments to the partners;• Providing assistance towards the participants concerning: the rules <strong>of</strong> the project, the projectplanning and individual partner planning, giving advice on all kind <strong>of</strong> matters, e.g. how to fillin cost statements, full cost system, rights, ...Project Management BoardA Project Management Board as steering and management committee will be composed <strong>of</strong> theProject Coordinator and representatives <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the partners taking part in the project. One mainaim <strong>of</strong> this Board is to advise and support the decisions <strong>of</strong> the Project Coordinator on operational andmanagement issues. Furthermore, the Project Management Board will be an effective and efficientmanagement board. This board will be responsible for all decisions <strong>of</strong> general nature within the frame<strong>of</strong> the EC Contract and the Consortium Agreement. Especially the detailed budget allocation, any redefinition<strong>of</strong> the overall work plan, the coordination <strong>of</strong> the activities and communication between thesubgroups, and the overall project progress assessment will be performed by this committee.The Project Management Board is responsible for all decisions affecting more than one partner, suchas contractual matters, planning, financial matters, major technical decisions, preparation <strong>of</strong> reporting.The detailed responsibilities and tasks are described in the project’s Consortium Agreement. TheProject Management Board is chaired by the Project Coordinator and his Assistant.The Project Management Board will be convened every 12 months in face to face consortiummeetings (kick <strong>of</strong>f meeting in month 1 and months 12, 24 and 36). The meetings will be called by theCoordinator. The meetings will take place regularly, scheduled once a year (face to face) andwhenever needed (audioconferences). A tentative meeting agenda will be prepared in advance <strong>of</strong> everymeeting and will be distributed to all attendees by email or fax well before the meeting. The meetingswill take place in the locations <strong>of</strong> the different core partners in rotation. The meetings will besupported by approved minutes. They will include a list <strong>of</strong> actions and due dates for each <strong>of</strong> thepartners. Decisions will be taken by consensus or in case by majority vote. The project plan will beupdated at the meetings.23/03/10 v11 71


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAProject Technical CommitteeThe Project Technical Committee will be chaired by TRACASA and will be responsible for the dayto-daytechnical work. It will be convened every 6 months (kick <strong>of</strong>f meeting in month 1 and months 6,12, 18, 24, 30, and the final meeting in month 36). The Technical Committee will exchange the workcarried out in the pilots together with the results in order to support the implementation and running <strong>of</strong>the pilots and the replication <strong>of</strong> the pilots. It will also propose the changes <strong>of</strong> the technical workprogramme <strong>of</strong> the project, evaluate the technical reports and participate in the update <strong>of</strong> theimplementation plan. It will ensure the integration and spill-over <strong>of</strong> the knowledge created in each <strong>of</strong>the subgroups, and thus monitor and assess the scientific progress <strong>of</strong> the project in line with theobjectives and even beyond. The Project Technical Committee will play a crucial coordination roleamong partners for the implementation <strong>of</strong> the different pilot projects in a coherent way, and will alsobe the main forum for the information exchange between Pilot Leaders and Work Package Leaders.Pilot Teams and LeadersThe project will implement 3 pilots in a total <strong>of</strong> 6 geographical areas. Additionally to the three PilotLeaders, each pilot will be locally implemented and each implementation will have a partnerresponsible:• PILOT 1: Land Use / Land Cover Data Analysis System for intermediate-level userso Leader: GNo Participants: GN, TRACASA, IGN/CNIG, TDF, CEIT• PILOT 2: Harmonized and Interoperable Land Information Systemso PILOT 2.1: Harmonized interoperable national land information systemo Leader: GISATo Participants: GISAT, CEIToooPILOT 2.2:Establishment <strong>of</strong> a national land statistical accounting system based onGMES core mapping service productsLeader: AGIParticipants: AGI, CEIT• PILOT 3: Stratification <strong>of</strong> waste dumpso Leader: SEAo Participants: SEA, CEITRegular meetings will take place in order to share the experiences and learn from them, to receive andprovide support in between pilots, to plan different measures, to jointly review objectives, and tocollect and deliver good practices.In addition, the leaders <strong>of</strong> the different pilot projects will have to report their respective progress totheir corresponding Work Package Leader, GISAT (Leader <strong>of</strong> Work Package 3), who will play a veryrelevant coordination role among the different partners and the different activities carried out withinthe pilots.Work Packages Teams and LeadersThe Work Package Leaders will assure the coordination between the different project teams thatcollaborate with the aim <strong>of</strong> exchanging intermediate results. They will assure the timely execution <strong>of</strong>tasks included in each Work Package, stimulating the interaction between the various partnersinvolved. They are also responsible for the consolidation <strong>of</strong> the specification reports and execution <strong>of</strong>the tasks that integrate each WP. Each organization involved will appoint a WP Manager, who is23/03/10 v11 72


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAresponsible for operational decisions, sending quarterly a short progress report to the ProjectCoordinator, guaranteeing that the partial and total objectives <strong>of</strong> the WP are accomplished, elaboratingthe reports <strong>of</strong> the WP and organising the presentation or results.The appointed WP Leaders will be the following:• WP1: Diagnostic: National Geographic Institute <strong>of</strong> Spain (IGN/CNIG)• WP2: Harmonization <strong>of</strong> LU/LC data and development <strong>of</strong> the baseline LU/LC data sharinginfrastructure: Trabajos Catastrales (TRACASA)• WP3: Pilots: GISAT• WP4: Results assessment and potential applications: AGI• WP5: Communication and Dissemination: ISOCARP• WP6: Project Management and Coordination: Government <strong>of</strong> Navarre (GN)Advisory BoardThe Advisory Board will be the organ through which external expert people recruited from otherrelated projects in the field <strong>of</strong> Land Cover and Land Use will give their advice and feedback on themain arising issues <strong>of</strong> the HLANDATA project. The Advisory Board will play a key advisory andconsultative role in the project. The main goals <strong>of</strong> this board will be the following:- Providing requirements and feedback to the project objectives.- Monitoring the main milestones <strong>of</strong> the project, updating their feedback, and providing thenecessary inputs for guiding the project research and activities towards the achievement <strong>of</strong> theproject main objectives.- Providing a final feedback on results evaluation and expectations for future evolution.Conflict ResolutionConflicts will be solved at the lowest level possible, and preferably amicably. If an agreement cannotbe reached at a task or WP level, then the Project Coordinator will mediate. If that is not satisfactory,then the Project Board will make a decision and, if necessary, will ask for the authorisation <strong>of</strong> the EC.More detailed procedures will be provided in the Consortium Agreement to be signed by the partnersbefore the start <strong>of</strong> the project. This document will formalize the rights, obligations, relationships andprocedures within the consortium, as well as any other relevant issue.General Management ProceduresPartners are responsible for:- Effective economic management and conduct <strong>of</strong> the operational work in accordance with theprogram guidelines and with ethical and legal standards.- Complying with the general terms and conditions governing grants and any terms andconditions specific to each grant or granting programme established by the EuropeanCommission.- Managing and supervising operational personnel.- Meeting reporting requirements specific to the CIP ICT PSP.- Acknowledging, whenever possible, the Coordinator's financial support for the operationalwork.Strategy <strong>of</strong> communicationHLANDATA is a project implementing 3 pilots that must interact between them, and therefore, inorder to ensure collaboration, fulfilment <strong>of</strong> goals and good general functioning <strong>of</strong> the consortium,23/03/10 v11 73


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAthere will be six monthly meetings (Project Technical Committee) including representatives from thePilot Leaders and Work Package Leaders. This will guarantee the synchronization <strong>of</strong> all the tasks,define control procedures to follow the evolution <strong>of</strong> work, solve potential conflicts between partners,define dissemination policies for results and plan the presentation <strong>of</strong> common communications. Apartfrom these meetings, teleconferences, email, ftp and web exchange will also be used as the primaryforms <strong>of</strong> communication and exchange <strong>of</strong> documents among the partners.The Consortium will hold annual full partner meetings to disseminate technical progress throughpresentation <strong>of</strong> results and peer review, co-ordinate and cohere project planning, and allow thediscovery <strong>of</strong> new perspectives and ways <strong>of</strong> making progress through interdisciplinary interaction.Consensus in decision-making is highly desirable, both for quality assurance and to ensure that thegoals and interests <strong>of</strong> the partners are respected throughout the project. Peer review will be the mainmechanism for providing quality assurance. In case <strong>of</strong> conflicting views, the Project ManagementBoard will consider the facts and decide which type <strong>of</strong> action is the best for the project.Project reporting mechanisms will specifically include an internal six monthly control report (detailingperson-months expended, achievements made in terms <strong>of</strong> results and progress, meetings attended,plans for the following period and issues arising).Project Management Board members will also contribute to the annual review report, annual costclaim and delivery <strong>of</strong> the final reports. Much <strong>of</strong> this information will be used for preparing the reportfor the Project Officer and the European Commission. Asking the partners to report in advance theirplans for the following period will allow the Project Management Board or Work Package Leaders tomake corrections to the work plan in a pre-emptive way and to ensure efficient use <strong>of</strong> resources.In addition to reporting to the Commission, the Project Coordinator will also manage other externalliaisons, including any contributions to any horizontal actions, project clusters and programmemeetings.23/03/10 v11 74


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATAB3.4. Security, privacy, inclusiveness, interoperability, standards and open-sourceInteroperability is at the core <strong>of</strong> the HLANDATA project: The harmonization proposal to be deliveredby the project, as well as the data sharing infrastructure are aimed at giving access and allowing to useand exploit geographic data which are distributed all around Europe and stored in a different way. Theharmonization proposal to be made and the data sharing infrastructure to be built according to thisproposal will allow users to access these data no matter the place where it is stored and no matter theway it is stored through network services provided by the different data providers.The project is devoted to achieving the interoperability <strong>of</strong> the Land Use/Land Cover existing data, andthis is why interoperability issues have to be considered from the very beginning <strong>of</strong> the project.Multilingual issues are closely connected to this; mainly to the data harmonization proposal to beprovided by the project.The project will not use proprietary solutions in the developments to be carried out. These will bebased on open solutions and open standards, and in own s<strong>of</strong>tware in some cases. The services to bedeveloped, freely accessible through the web, will guarantee the use <strong>of</strong> standard services (Web MapServices – WMS, Web Processing Services – WCS, Web Features Services – WFS).It is important to remark that the set <strong>of</strong> GIS contents to be utilized and harmonized along this projectare going to be public contents freely provided by the data providers. Although, for statisticalpurposes, and also in order to control the access to the developed web services, the requirement for a(costless) licence might be introduced in the future, the nature <strong>of</strong> the harmonized datasets will remainpublic and freely available for the end users.B3.5. Resources to be committedThe approach taken by the HLANDATA project involves 6 WPs with well-defined objectives andresults that will allow the achievement <strong>of</strong> all project objectives. The project consortium considers thatan adequate mass <strong>of</strong> resources is mobilized to ensure the success <strong>of</strong> the project. In this sense, abalanced project component organization has been designed so that the resources are integrated in acoherent way within the project.The consortium believes that the HLANDATA financial plan is adequate to the planned activities andobjectives <strong>of</strong> the project. Effort distribution, equipment acquisitions and other investments havealready been planned for the full project duration during the preparation <strong>of</strong> the proposal.The financial plan for the project is shown in the next two graphs:1. GN 2. TRACASA 3. IGN 4. AGI 5. GISAT 6. TDF 7. SEA 8. CEIT 9. ISOCARPEUROS/PERSON-MONTH 4.500 4.500 4.000 2.930 5.100 4.900 5.000 5.000 5.000ACTIVITY TYPE IND IND IND IND IND IND IND IND INDRTD FUNDING RATE 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%INDIRECT COSTS MODEL Flat Rate Flat Rate Flat Rate Flat Rate Flat Rate Flat Rate Flat Rate Flat Rate Flat RateINDIRECT COST PERCENT. 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30%23/03/10 v11 75


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATACOST CATEGORIES 1. GN 2. TRACASA 3. IGN 4. AGI 5. GISAT 6. TDF 7. SEA 8. CEIT 9. ISOCARP TOTALPERSONNEL COSTS 430.000 299.000 220.000 310.580 397.800 200.900 150.000 145.000 145.000 2.298.280SUBCONTRACTING 60.000 0 0 10.000 65.000 72.400 0 0 0 207.400OTHER SPECIFIC COSTS 30.000 20.000 20.000 42.837 20.000 27.600 20.000 15.000 15.000 210.437OVERHEAD COSTS 129.000 89.700 66.000 93.174 119.340 60.270 45.000 43.500 43.500 689.484TOTAL COSTS 649.000 408.700 306.000 456.591 602.140 361.170 215.000 203.500 203.500 3.405.601Requested Grant 324.500 204.350 153.000 228.295 301.070 180.585 107.500 101.750 101.750 1.702.800Next, an explanation is given about the costs to be charged to some <strong>of</strong> the cost categories above:Other specific Costs:There are several types <strong>of</strong> costs included under this category.In the case <strong>of</strong> GN (10.000 €) and TDF (5.500 €), the costs for the organization <strong>of</strong> workshops orseminars at local or national levels with selected target-audience, translation expenses, renting <strong>of</strong>meeting rooms, printing <strong>of</strong> leaflets and so on have been included here.Travel and Subsistence CostsThis cost category includes: travel and subsistence costs for the whole project, travel costsrelated to Project Management Board and Project Technical Committee meetings, travel costsassociated to meetings with the EC, and so on.The following amounts per partner have been foreseen:o GN: 20.000 €o TRACASA: 20.000 €o IGN: 20.000 €o AGI: 20.000 €o TDF: 20.000 €o GISAT: 20.000 €o SEA: 20.000 €o CEIT: 15.000 €o ISOCARP: 15.000 €Equipment CostsAs for the equipment budget lines, TDF would like to include such expenses (a total <strong>of</strong> 2.100€) in the budget for the purchasing <strong>of</strong> some required s<strong>of</strong>tware licences.Consumables CostsAGI has included some costs under this category for the purchase <strong>of</strong> some satellite images andlayers (22.837 €).Subcontracting:In the procurement <strong>of</strong> external services described in the project as subcontracting, both the regulation<strong>of</strong> the European Commission and those national regulations that might be more restrictive regardingthe different partners will be considered and respected.Some <strong>of</strong> the partners (GN and AGI) have included subcontracting budgetary lines (60.000 and 10.000€ respectively) aimed at the assumption <strong>of</strong> some dissemination tasks which could not be otherwiseundertaken by such kind <strong>of</strong> partners. These dissemination subcontracting lines include the design andissue <strong>of</strong> promotional materials (from project websites to promotional videos). In the case <strong>of</strong> GN(Project Coordinator), their subcontracting amount also comprises some support tasks related to theadministrative management <strong>of</strong> the project.23/03/10 v11 76


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATALatvian TDF has allocated a subcontracting item <strong>of</strong> 72.400 € which is essential for the development <strong>of</strong>an internet-based learning tool associated to their participation in the pilot project led by GN.The Czech partner GISAT has foreseen a 65.000 € subcontracting with CENIA (Czech EnvironmentalInformation Agency). It is intended that CENIA will support GISAT by federating the actorsinvolvement based on its leading role in the INSPIRE process in the Czech Republic. They will alsosupport the design and implementation <strong>of</strong> the Czech pilot project in organizational aspects, takingadvantage <strong>of</strong> their experience from the FP6 NESIS project.B3.6. Dissemination / Use <strong>of</strong> ResultsAmong the principal project objectives we find the following:• To make the assessment and disseminate the obtained pilot results within their respectivefields <strong>of</strong> action.• To promote the creation <strong>of</strong> an experts’ network composed <strong>of</strong> producers and users <strong>of</strong> thisinformation.In order to achieve these objectives, a comprehensive dissemination plan will be implemented. Suchcommunication and dissemination plan will ensure the deployment <strong>of</strong> the experience gained by thedifferent pilot projects, as well as the exchange <strong>of</strong> information, and will also make easier the extension<strong>of</strong> the realized harmonization tasks to other possibly interested partners throughout Europe, since theforeseen deliverables might always be replicated by other entities from the Geographic InformationSystems sector. This plan will also provide the promotion strategy as well other details as for examplenational and European dissemination workshops, publication <strong>of</strong> the results, etc. There will be anappropriate budget for dissemination activities foreseen. The dissemination plan will be discussed andupdated each six months.Strategies: Usual communication strategies will be used in the dissemination activities: joint projectweb site, joint e-newsletters and leaflets (translated to the necessary languages), press/media releases,organization <strong>of</strong> events, participation in events and collaboration in its organization.The different strategies to be implemented will be:• Collaboration with other related European Projects that are working in related areas.• Expert panel as the source <strong>of</strong> expert network, with high relevance in the entire project.• Real demonstrators. The implemented pilots will be used in the dissemination activities,sowing the indicators obtained in the assessment WP.All partners are committed to maximize the potential impact <strong>of</strong> the knowledge to be created in terms<strong>of</strong> its dissemination to relevant stakeholders that can take advantage <strong>of</strong> the project results forharmonization and standardization <strong>of</strong> Land Cover and Land Use information at various levels and newapplications. The support <strong>of</strong> the EU will be recognised in all the publication and disseminationactivities resulting from the project.Audience: The user groups cover a wide spectrum <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iles and have distinct needs. Therefore thedissemination activities will be different according to the specific needs <strong>of</strong> each group. To achievethese objectives the Consortium will undertake different types <strong>of</strong> activities.ISOCARP, as Leader <strong>of</strong> the Dissemination Work Package, will be responsible for coordinating thedissemination activities. However, all partners will contribute and carry out specific disseminationactivities especially at their own country for diffusion in the different sectors. In this sense, everypartner is committed to disseminate the project in their own networks and associations. Information <strong>of</strong>this project will also be made available in conferences and meetings from other eContentplus and CIPICT PSP projects in order to create synergies between projects.23/03/10 v11 77


CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3Pilot BHLANDATASome specific dissemination actions will be the following:• Each partner will use their own web page to present the projects results.• TRACASA will elaborate a booklet with the applications and technologies used, directed totechnological companies.• IGN/CNIG, together with the public partners within the Consortium, will collaborate in thediffusion to Land Use and Land Cover data owners preparing technical documents forharmonization.• ISOCARP, as Leader <strong>of</strong> the Dissemination Work Package, will manage the contacts withEuropean institutions related to INSPIRE.Some <strong>of</strong> the dissemination tools to be used in the project are:• Project website: This task is devoted to the design, development and continuous update <strong>of</strong> thepublic part <strong>of</strong> the project website that will contain general information such as: background,objectives, structure, consortium, agenda, public deliverables, etc. The task will becoordinated by ISOCARP, who will act as the webmaster <strong>of</strong> the project. Each partner willprovide information to the webmaster and will be required for feeding the website.• Project Identity: A Project Logo will be designed, as well as communication templates thatwill include the Project Logo and the CIP PSP Logo. Besides, an informative brochure(including a presentation <strong>of</strong> the project, objectives, partners, etc.) will be elaborated,electronically distributed and made available at the Project website.• Attendance to congresses, industrial fairs, exhibitions and commercial meetings.• Participation in scientific and industrial publications.• Presentation <strong>of</strong> the Project in European Events where the partners participate.• Press release in local and national media, presenting the project.• Elaboration <strong>of</strong> a Post-project dissemination plan. In order to guarantee the continuity <strong>of</strong> theproject, the consortium will design a dissemination strategy to be carried out once the projectis finished. This plan will include the analysis <strong>of</strong> the possibilities <strong>of</strong> setting up an experts’network composed <strong>of</strong> producers and users <strong>of</strong> Land Use and Land Cover information.B3.7. Conditions for the pre-financingThe pre-financing is to be forwarded by the coordinator to TDF and ISOCARP in two equalinstalments, the first <strong>of</strong> which in connection with the payment <strong>of</strong> the pre-finance to the consortium.The second instalment should cover the remaining part <strong>of</strong> the pre-finance and should be paid aftermonth 6. It is the duty <strong>of</strong> the coordinator to monitor the costs <strong>of</strong> the partners and adjust the instalmentsaccordingly.23/03/10 v11 78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!