Himachal Pradesh) now have laws mandat<strong>in</strong>g a two-child norm <strong>for</strong> members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Panchayat. Aswe can see <strong>in</strong> Table 6, women and men Pradhans have <strong>the</strong> same number <strong>of</strong> children on average(around 2.5 <strong>in</strong> West Bengal). S<strong>in</strong>ce women do not necessarily control <strong>the</strong>ir fertility choices, andare unlikely to f<strong>in</strong>d it worthwhile to fight <strong>the</strong>ir family <strong>in</strong> order to be eligible <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Panchayat,this policy is likely to discourage women, or members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SCs and STs, from be<strong>in</strong>g candidates,even when <strong>the</strong>re is reservation, thus encourag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> situations that critics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reservation policydescribe, where “puppet candidates” will take <strong>the</strong> place <strong>of</strong> real candidates. De facto, it will thusreduce women’s agency and, if anyth<strong>in</strong>g, may result <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> fertility, ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong>opposite. 16This would be an un<strong>for</strong>tunate outcome, given <strong>the</strong> evidence that Panchayat leaders make adifference and that br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g women and SCs <strong>in</strong>to politics may help <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir welfare.Reduced fertility may be achieved by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g women’s barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g power <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> family, and aneffective democracy with adequate women’s representation may be more effective at achiev<strong>in</strong>g itthan regulation that takes away from women and SCs what <strong>the</strong> 73rd Amendment guarantees <strong>the</strong>m.ReferencesBesley, Timothy, Roh<strong>in</strong>i Pande Lup<strong>in</strong> Rahman, and Vijayendra Rao (2003) ‘<strong>The</strong> politics <strong>of</strong> publicgoods provision: Evidence from Indian local government.’ Mimeo, LSE, <strong>for</strong>thcom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Journal<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Economic AssociationChattopadhyay, Raghabendra, and Es<strong>the</strong>r Duflo (2003a) ‘Efficiency and rent seek<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> local governments:Evidence from randomized policy experiments <strong>in</strong> India.’ Mimeo, MIT(2003b) ‘Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment <strong>in</strong> India.’Mimeo, MIT; <strong>for</strong>thcom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> EconometricaGhatak, Maitreya, and Maitreesh Ghatak (1999) ‘Grassroots democracy: A study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> panchayatsystem <strong>in</strong> West Bengal.’ Mimeo, Development Research Group Calcutta and University <strong>of</strong>ChicagoGovernment <strong>of</strong> West Bengal (1998) <strong>The</strong> West Bengal Panchayat (Constitution) Rules, 1975 Department<strong>of</strong> Panchayats & Rural DevlelopmentKanango, Sukla Deb (1998) ‘<strong>Panchayati</strong> raj and emerg<strong>in</strong>g women leadership: An overview.’ In People’sPower and <strong>Panchayati</strong> <strong>Raj</strong>: <strong>The</strong>ory and Practice, ed. Bansaku (Indian Social Institute)chapter 5, pp. 77—95Norris, Pippa (2001) ‘Break<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> barriers: Positive discrim<strong>in</strong>ation policies <strong>for</strong> women.’ In HasLiberalism Failed Women: Parity, Quotas and Political Representation, ed. Jyette Klausenand Charles Maier (St Mart<strong>in</strong>s Press) chapter 1016 <strong>The</strong>re is considerable evidence that higher barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g power leads to a reduction <strong>in</strong> women’s fertility.12
Pande, Roh<strong>in</strong>i (2003) ‘Can mandated political representation <strong>in</strong>crease policy <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>for</strong> disadvantagedm<strong>in</strong>orities? <strong>the</strong>ory and evidence from India.’ American Economic Review 93(4), 1132—1151Probe Team (1999) ‘<strong>The</strong> school environment.’ In ‘Public Report on Basic Education <strong>in</strong> India’(Delhi: Ox<strong>for</strong>d University Press) chapter 4Sen, Amartya (1999) Development as Freedom, 1 ed. (Random House)Topalova, Petia (2003) ‘Women are chang<strong>in</strong>g governance <strong>in</strong> India? <strong>The</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> female leadershipon household satisfaction, quality <strong>of</strong> public goods and governance.’ Mimeo, MITWorld Bank (2001) Engender<strong>in</strong>g Development: Through Gender Equality <strong>in</strong> Rights, Resources, andVoice (Ox<strong>for</strong>dUniversityPressandWorldBank)13