01.12.2012 Views

NRC An Assessment of SBIR Program - National Defense Industrial ...

NRC An Assessment of SBIR Program - National Defense Industrial ...

NRC An Assessment of SBIR Program - National Defense Industrial ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>An</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Small Business Innovation Research <strong>Program</strong><br />

http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11989.html<br />

PREPUBLICATION COPY<br />

This contribution is noteworthy because government awards address segments <strong>of</strong> the<br />

innovation cycle that private investors <strong>of</strong>ten do not fund because they find it too risky or too<br />

small.<br />

“It does seem that early-stage help by the government in developing platform technologies<br />

and financing scientific discoveries is directed exactly at the areas where institutional venture<br />

capitalists cannot and will not go.” 70<br />

UNEDITED PROOFS<br />

Copyright © <strong>National</strong> Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences. All rights reserved.<br />

31<br />

David Morgenthaler,<br />

Founding Partner <strong>of</strong> Morgenthaler Ventures<br />

<strong>SBIR</strong> is the main source <strong>of</strong> federal funding for early-stage technology development in the<br />

United States. Based on Banscomb and Auerswald’s lower estimate <strong>of</strong> the distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

funding sources, <strong>SBIR</strong> provides over 20 percent <strong>of</strong> funding for early-stage development<br />

from all sources and over 85 percent <strong>of</strong> federal financial support for direct early-stage<br />

development. Moreover, <strong>SBIR</strong> has no public or private substitutes. (See Box D.) Funding<br />

opportunities under <strong>SBIR</strong> can thus provide early stage finance for technologies that are not<br />

readily supported by venture capitalists, angel investors, or other sources <strong>of</strong> early-stage<br />

funding in the United States.<br />

Box D: The Federal Role in Comparative Perspective<br />

“Small technology firms with 500 or less employees now employ 54.8 percent <strong>of</strong> all scientists<br />

and engineers in US industrial R&D. However, these nearly 6 million scientists and engineers<br />

are able to obtain only 4.3 percent <strong>of</strong> extramural government R&D dollars. In contrast, large<br />

and medium firms with more than 500 employees combined employ only 45.2 percent but<br />

receive 50.3 percent <strong>of</strong> government R&D funds. Universities receive 35.3 percent, nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

research institutions 10.0 percent, and states and foreign countries 1.0 percent. Of the<br />

4.3 2 percent that goes to small firms 2.5 percent is from <strong>SBIR</strong> and the related Small<br />

Business Technology Transfer (STTR) program. Together they receive less than 10 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the funding that large firms receive.” 71<br />

Roland Tibbetts, “<strong>SBIR</strong> Renewal and U.S. Economic Security” 72<br />

1.3 <strong>SBIR</strong>: STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS<br />

<strong>SBIR</strong> leverages small business innovation to address government and societal needs in such<br />

areas as health, security, environment, and energy. The strength <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SBIR</strong> concept lies in<br />

aligning the interests <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the participants in the program with the goals <strong>of</strong> the<br />

program. <strong>SBIR</strong> proposals are industry-initiated based on broad solicitations posted by<br />

federal agencies. This bottom-up design promotes a positive interest by small businesses in<br />

the outcome <strong>of</strong> their research. Similarly, the federal agencies can each use the program to<br />

70 David Morgenthaler, “Assessing Technical Risk,” in L. M. Branscomb, Kenneth P. Morse, and Michael J.<br />

Roberts, eds., Managing Technical Risk: Understanding Private Sector Decision Making on Early Stage Technology-Based<br />

Project, 2000, p. 107-108.<br />

71 <strong>National</strong> Science Foundation, “Science and Engineering Indicators 2006.” Figures are for 2005<br />

72 http://www.nsba.biz/docs/tibbetts_sbir_reauthorization.pdf

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!