Arpita Mukherjee Ramneet Goswami January 2009 - icrier
Arpita Mukherjee Ramneet Goswami January 2009 - icrier
Arpita Mukherjee Ramneet Goswami January 2009 - icrier
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(UNCPC) for the purpose of negotiations. The WTO Services Sectoral Classification List<br />
(known as “W/120”) covered 12 service sectors and over 150 sub-sectors. However, it does<br />
not have a separate comprehensive category for energy services. Important energy services<br />
(transport, distribution, construction, consulting, engineering, etc.) are covered by the<br />
respective horizontal categories, while some energy-related services are listed as separate<br />
sub-sectors. For instance, services incidental to mining and services incidental to energy<br />
distribution are classified under ‘Other Business Services’, and pipeline transportation is<br />
covered under ‘Transport services’. One of the reasons for the poor coverage of energy<br />
services in the W/120 is that the UNCPC, from which it is drawn, also does not list energy<br />
services as a separate category. However, under each broad category, there is a corresponding<br />
CPC number for energy services. For instance, CPC 632 relates to non-food retailing services<br />
under which CPC 63297 covers retail sales of fuel oil, bottled gas, coal and wood. Given the<br />
complexities of classification, countries have to be careful in scheduling commitments. It is<br />
also important to note that after the Uruguay Round, the coverage of energy services in the<br />
UNCPC has undergone changes in line with developments in this sector. For instance, in<br />
CPC Version 1.0, new services, such as electricity distribution services (69110) and gas<br />
distribution services through mains (69120), have been included.<br />
Given the evolutionary nature of this sector and its inadequate coverage in the W/120,<br />
classification of this sector has been widely debated since the beginning of the Doha Round.<br />
The debate largely centered around two issues: (a) whether energy services should be<br />
classified as one sector or should different parts of it be classified under relevant sectors<br />
(transport, distribution, etc.), and (b) what constitutes a comprehensive coverage of this<br />
sector. A number of negotiating proposals submitted to the WTO (for instance, by the United<br />
States of America 4 , European Community 5 , Japan 6 , Cuba 7 and Venezuela 8 ) have raised the<br />
classification issue. Some proposals, for instance, that of the EC, USA and Venezuela,<br />
provided various alternative classifications of energy services for the purpose of discussion<br />
and consultation in the WTO.<br />
In the initial and revised offers, while making commitments, countries have not<br />
classified energy as a separate sector. In the plurilateral request, the requesting countries<br />
provided a comprehensive coverage of the sector. Based on this and W/120, the coverage of<br />
energy services is shown in Table 1.1.<br />
Table 1.1: Coverage of Energy Services<br />
W/120 CPC No. Description<br />
1.A.e 8672 Engineering services<br />
1.A.f 8673 Integrated engineering services<br />
1.C.a 85103 Research and experimental development services on natural<br />
sciences and engineering and technology for casting, metal,<br />
machinery, electricity, communications, vessels, aircraft,<br />
civil engineering, construction, information, etc.<br />
1.F.c 86509 Management consulting services<br />
1.F.d 86601 Services related to management consulting<br />
1.F.e 8676 (partial) Technical testing and analysis services<br />
4 WTO (18 December 2000).<br />
5 WTO (23 March 2001).<br />
6 WTO (4 October 2001).<br />
7 WTO (22 March 2002).<br />
8 WTO (29 March 2001), (15 October 2001), and (4 June 2003).<br />
3